ODU Summer Leadership Institute June 19, 2014 John A. Caggiano, Ed.D. Executive Director of School Leadership Hampton City Schools

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collegial Coaching Rebecca Derenge Title I, Reading Coordinator Teamwork Collegial.doc.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Session 4: Classroom MBI Team Training Presented by the MBI Consultants.
Years 1 to 3 Teacher Professional Development Program An Overview.
The Role of the Information Technology Coordinator Moving the programme forward at your school.
Teacher Evaluation Model
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
MICHAEL DiPAOLA, EdD DLST PROJECT February 13, 2012.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Linda Bragg Office of Title II, III and System Support Division of Educator Quality and System Support.
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Catalyst High School May 11,12,13, 2014.
Laurell Parris Summer 2005 Can Self-Study and Peer Collaboration Improve the Content Knowledge and Instructional Practices of Selected Elementary School.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Coaching Framework Improving Teaching and Learning Literacy District More than Literacy.
Copyright © Tulsa Public Schools 2011 Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2014 Overview of Final Evaluation Report Administrator.
Observations A Mirror of the Classroom. Objectives  Gain specific strategies for communicating with teachers to promote successful teaching and learning.
SURN ACTION RESEARCH WENONAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REBECCA J. WALTERS, PRINCIPAL
NEW TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS CONNECTING TEACHER PERFORMANCE to ACADEMIC PROGRESS.
Clinical Teaching/Student Teaching
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
Leading the Learning and Creating High Expectations for Student Achievement- Make AYP Now! Theresa West NAESP Convention April 11, 2010.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
SAM Administrative Institute Supported by the International Center for Leadership in Education SAM Administrative Institute Supported by the International.
PROVIDENCE PUBLIC SCHOOLS Office of Performance Management Strategic Planning, Continuous Learning & Improvement & Accountability.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING (FFT) SUMMER INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DR. MICHAEL BROOKS JUNE 18, 2012.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Collaboration for Professional Learning SCCSD Leadership Academy 2010.
Teacher Evaluation System Administrator Training June 5 & 6, 2012.
STUDENT ENGAGEMENT SURN Principal’s Academy Clarksville Elementary School Ann Dalton, Principal
Welcome to todays session!  Please take a moment to check your connection and audio settings.  If this is your first time using LYNC please see the resources.
Demonstration School LAWRENCE. Explanation of Support Assigned Executive Coach – Retired Administrator Forty Days of Coaching over 18 Months Unlimited.
Visible Learning at John B. Cary Elementary School Heidi Brezinski Principal
Warilla Public School Journey of Literacy Development with Primary Students.
PEER COACHING INTRODUCTION Lisa Bruno Tanza Shuy.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
SURN PRINCIPALS’ ACADEMY W.W.ROBINSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MELISSA L FOLTZ, PRINCIPAL APRIL 22, 2015.
Student Perception Survey: Survey Coordinator Training Office of Policy and Evaluation April 2016.
Using the CLASS tool to Improve Instructional Practices in Early Childhood Tracie Dow and Felicia Owo.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Jackie Wilson Gary Bloom Jill Baker Kelly An Damaries Blondonville
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Coaching for Progress Creating and Sustaining a Quality
SCHOOL and DISTRICT ACCREDITATION
Angela Byrd-Wright, Principal
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
School Redesign and SRCL Implementation
Ed 11: Beginning Field Experience
A Tool To Support Implementation of the Oregon K-12 Diploma
Leaders of Teachers (external to classroom)
Chapter Eight Co-teaching Models © 2016 Taylor & Francis.
Learning Intentions We are learning to (W.A.L.T.):
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE Board of Education May 2018
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Introductions Introduction
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

ODU Summer Leadership Institute June 19, 2014 John A. Caggiano, Ed.D. Executive Director of School Leadership Hampton City Schools Using Formative Observation Tools to Support the Teacher Evaluation Process

Agenda Purpose of Teacher Evaluation Working Together to Improve Teaching and Learning Data Collection Tools onlineobservationtools.com

Purpose of Teacher Evaluation The role of a teacher requires a performance evaluation system that acknowledges the complexities of the job. Teachers have a challenging task in meeting the educational needs of an educationally diverse student population, and good evaluation is necessary to provide teachers with support, recognition, and guidance they need to sustain and improve their efforts. Tucker, P. D., Stronge, J. H., & Garies, C. R. (2002)

Observations Teacher Evaluation in Virginia Data Collection Tools

Data collection tools

Working together to improve teaching and learning

“We don’t believe that teaching and learning will improve unless principals and teachers work together as a team. Principals have the responsibility of helping teachers become more effective, and by that we mean improving student learning. Increased teacher effectiveness occurs through professional development of teachers, which is embedded in the informal process of supervision and the formal process of evaluation.” DiPaola, M. F. & Hoy, W. K. (2012)

Roles change when conducting formative observations Administrator’s role changes from evaluator to facilitator Job in this process is not to form judgments but to help teachers reflect on their practice and reveal areas for their professional growth Teacher’s role changes from recipient to participant Job in this process is to analyze the data with the administrator and to become a more reflective practitioner…with the goal of improving instruction

Data collection tools available via onlineobservationtools.com Cognitive Levels of Questions and Wait Time Teacher/Student Behavior Observation Student Engagement Data Collection Student-Teacher Verbal Interactions Engagement Data Collection Effective Teacher Pedagogy High-Yield Teacher Behaviors Student Indicators of Engagement Developed by DiPaola & HoyDeveloped by SURN

Data collection tools

Onlineobservationtools.com Various privilege sets for different levels of users Central Office staff can view all observations conducted as well as conduct observations in any school Building administrators can access each other’s observations Teachers can conduct peer observations Intuitive database a copy of the observation form prior to leaving a teacher’s classroom Works well with iPads, tablets, and smartphones

onlineobservationtools.com Cost (annual license) $150 – per user $350 – up to six users per school/site $500 – up to 25 users per school/site Registration code for a free trial - 30daytrial

Data collection tools