Enhancing Transfer Enhancing Transfer Student Success George D. Kuh Indiana University January 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NSSE:RetrospectiveandProspective George Kuh AAC&U General Education and Assessment Conference March 2, 2007.
Advertisements

George D. Kuh THECB 2005 Governing Board Conference Austin TX October 11, 2005 Building an Excellent Undergraduate Experience: Taking Student Success Seriously.
The Role of Academic Leadership in Student Success August 21, 2012 Deans and Department Chairs` Dialogue Southern Utah University Charles Schroeder, Consultant.
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
George D. Kuh Oklahoma Enrollment Management Conference February 20, 2007 What Really Matters to Student Success: Lessons from High Performing Colleges.
2008 National Survey of Student Engagement – SUNY Oneonta Patty Francis Steve Perry Fall 2008.
Maximizing Your NSSE & CCSSE Results
1 NSSE Results Indiana University Kokomo Sharon K. Calhoon Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Presentation to Clerical.
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
Academic Vision, Whitworth College. Five Strategic Objectives Improve on excellence in teaching, learning, and scholarship. Advance the intercultural.
Intro Tour of the Male Student Mind In American Higher Education European Access Network National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland June 28, 2007 Tom.
What Matters to Student Success George D. Kuh University of British Columbia May 7, 2009.
Students who are… …engaged in the classroom – pass; …engaged in their academic program - return; …engaged in deep learning – graduate. What constitutes.
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
National Survey of Student Engagement Department of Institutional Research and Planning December 2006.
Lessons from the National Survey of Student Engagement Dan BureauMahauganee Shaw Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
What Matters to Student Success: The Promise of High- Impact Practices George D. Kuh RIT Faculty Institute Rochester, NY May 26, 2010.
DEEP Lessons about Student Success in College Jillian Kinzie NSSE User Workshop October, 2005.
DEEP Lessons about Student Success in College Jillian Kinzie NSSE User Workshop October, 2005.
1 Student Learning Assessment Assessment is an ongoing process aimed at understanding & improving student learning Formative Assessment – Ongoing feedback.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
Student Engagement: Promoting Better Learning Rick Vaz Associate Dean Interdisciplinary and Global Studies Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester, Massachusetts,
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
National Research Agenda to Support Transformation National Learning Infrastructure Initiative Focus Session June, 2003 Copyright Jillian Kinzie, 2003.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Visioning and Fostering Quality Teaching and Learning in Higher Education in Ontario Council of Ontario Educational Developers: Judy Britnell (Ryerson)
Using the National Survey of Student Engagement to Enhance Student Academic Success: Best Practices on Canadian Campuses Debra Dawson Ryerson University.
What Matters to Student Success in the First Year of University? George D. Kuh Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference QUT Gardens Point,
George D. Kuh U of Maine System March 20, 2007 Strengthening Institutional Responsibility for Student Success: Lessons from NSSE.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Presentation of Results NSSE 2003 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
1 N ational S urvey & F aculty S urvey of S tudent E ngagement (NSSE) & (FSSE) 2006 Wayne State University.
1 NSSE Columbus State University Program Overview  What do you know about college student engagement?  Why is student engagement important?
Student Engagement at Towson: NSSE 2005 Telling and Selling the Story Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 11, 2006.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
What Matters to Student Success? Lessons for ANAC Institutions George D. Kuh Elon University June 13, 2007.
An Introduction: NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement.
Student Clark Atlanta University Opening Session Thursday, August 13, 2009 Division of Enrollment Services & Student Affairs Randy Gunter,
George D. Kuh NACADA National Conference October 18, 2006 Thinking DEEPly about Academic Advising and Student Engagement.
Establishing a Campus Connection for Transfers Janet Marling & Susan Bullinger University of North Texas Fourth Annual Institute for the Study of Transfer.
Student engagement varies more within than between institutions.
Camille Kandiko, Indiana University Bloomington Jon Acker and William Fendley, The University of Alabama Lawrence Redlinger, The University of Texas at.
Improving Undergraduate Success Through Student Engagement George D. Kuh Council on Higher Education Council on Higher Education Pretoria SA May 22, 2009.
Fostering Student Success at SCSU Melanie Guentzel Peg Furshong Matt Trombley Victoria Williams Work cited: Kuh, G.D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J.H., Whitt,
Student/Faculty Interaction Presenter: Dr. Steady Moono Dean of Student Success Montgomery County Community College.
NSSE and the College of Letters and Sciences Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis November 7, 2008.
ENHANCING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IWU DR. MARY ANN SEARLE VICE PRESIDENT FOR ENROLLMENT & STUDENT AFFAIRS.
Results of the 2003 NSSE and FSSE: Implications for Student Affairs Bowling Green State University.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
Using National Studies of Student Engagement to Support Institutional Change Nathan Marti, CCSSE Todd Chamberlain, NSSE FAIR Conference June 23, 2004.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
Highlights of NSSE 2001: University of Kentucky December 10, 2001.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
Why Learning Communities Work: A DEEPer Look at Effective Educational Practice George D. Kuh Center for Postsecondary Research Indiana University Bloomington.
George D. Kuh CAUCUS/ASEUCCSaskatoon June 11, 2007 What Matters to Student Success in College and University.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Stargazing 2019: What Will Matter to Student Success George D. Kuh TACUSPA October 5, 2009.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
Closing the Experience Gap March 30, 2017
Student Engagement at Orange Coast College
NSSE Results for Faculty
What’s Your Evidence? Using Data to Support Student Success
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Jeanne Butler, Director Office of Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Enhancing Transfer Enhancing Transfer Student Success George D. Kuh Indiana University January 2004

We all want the same thing— an undergraduate experience that results in high levels of learning and personal development for all students.

The Challenge There’s too much at stake to assume students are doing the things that lead to high levels of learning and personal development.

We can’t leave serendipity to chance

Advance Organizers 1.What can we do individually and collectively to enhance transfer student success? 2.How do we get transfer students to take greater advantage of their school’s resources for learning?

Overview  What the Research Says About Student Success  Effective Educational Practice  Selected NSSE Findings  Transfer Friendly Schools

What Matters to Student Success Lessons from the research

Lessons From the Research  What matters more to desired outcomes is what students do, not who they are  A key factor for student learning is the quality of effort students devote to educationally purposeful activities

What Really Matters in College: Student Engagement “The research is unequivocal: students who are actively involved in both academic and out-of-class activities gain more from the college experience than those who are not so involved.” Ernest T. Pascarella & Patrick T. Terenzini, How College Affects Students

Engagement, grades, and persistence go hand in hand

Lessons From the Research  What matters most is what students do, not who they are  A key factor is the quality of effort students expend  Educationally effective institutions channel student energy toward the right activities

Two Components of Student Engagement What students do -- time and energy devoted to educationally purposeful activities What students do -- time and energy devoted to educationally purposeful activities What institutions do -- using effective educational practices to induce students to do the right things What institutions do -- using effective educational practices to induce students to do the right things

Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education (Chickering & Gamson, 1987) Student-faculty contact Student-faculty contact Active learning Active learning Prompt feedback Prompt feedback Time on task Time on task High expectations High expectations Respect for diverse learning styles Respect for diverse learning styles Cooperation among students Cooperation among students

Student Engagement Quiz What percent of full-time senior transfer students study two hours or more for every hour in class? (a) 13% (b) 20% (c) 31% (d) 39% (e) 49% a. 13% a. 13% (Starters – 13%)

Student Engagement Quiz What percent of senior transfer students never did community service or volunteer work during college? (a) 14% (b) 19% (c) 30% (d) 37% (e) 45% e.45% (starters – 29%) e. 45% (starters – 29%)

Student Engagement Quiz What percent of senior transfer students never worked with a faculty member on activities other than coursework? (a) 14% (b) 29% (c) 39% (d) 46% (e) 59% e.%(starters – 39%) e. 59% (starters – 39%)

Student Engagement Quiz True or false? Senior transfers are more likely to come to class unprepared than starters. False (only 17% vs 24% of starters are “frequently” unprepared)

Evidence of Student Engagement To what extent do transfer students engage in effective educational practices? To what extent do transfer students engage in effective educational practices?

National Survey of Student Engagement (pronounced “nessie”) Community College Survey of Student Engagement (pronounced “sessie”) College student surveys that assess the extent to which students engage in educational practices associated with high levels of learning and development

NSSE Project Scope  435,000 students from 730 different schools  58% of 4-yr undergraduate FTE  50 states, Puerto Rico  50+ consortia

The College Student Report Student Behaviors Institutional Actions & Requirements Reactions to College Student Background Information Student Learning & Development

NSSE

NSSE

NSSE

NSSE

NSSE Benchmarks Level of Academic Challenge Active & Collaborative Learning Enriching Educational Experiences SupportiveCampusEnvironment Student Faculty Interaction

Academic Challenge  Temple University undergraduates complete five writing-intensive courses, including a capstone writing experience in the major.

Active & Collaborative Learning University of Texas at El Paso uses learning communities and course- based service learning and volunteerism to actively engage its mostly commuter, first-generation students. University of Texas at El Paso uses learning communities and course- based service learning and volunteerism to actively engage its mostly commuter, first-generation students.

Student-Faculty Interaction University of Kansas mandates that students constitute 20% of campus policy-making committees and sponsors “Meet-a- Professor” nights in the residence halls. Most classes (79%) have fewer than 30 students. University of Kansas mandates that students constitute 20% of campus policy-making committees and sponsors “Meet-a- Professor” nights in the residence halls. Most classes (79%) have fewer than 30 students.

Enriching Experiences  Diversity at George Mason University is deeply rooted, and intentionally woven into the curriculum, especially at New Century College. Through the STAR Center and other venues students are encouraged to use technology to enrich learning.

Supportive Environment At Fayetteville State University all first- and second-year students are assigned to University College, which is designed as a transitional bridge. “Failure is not an option here…”

Respondents  56,000 senior “starters”  33,500 senior transfers  year institutions

Key Question Are senior transfer students generally more or less engaged compared with starter students? Less engaged

Transfer tremor?!? Transfer tremor?!?

Lessons From NSSE  Transfers engage in required, class-related effective educational practices to same degree as starters.  Transfers are less engaged in out- of-class “discretionary” activities.  Life exigencies (work, family) may preclude taking advantage of opportunities for learning

Institutional Reflection Areas of EffectiveEducationalPractice Question or Improvement

What Can We Do? Administrators Students Faculty Members

Tau Sigma  Academic honor society to recognize and promote the academic excellence and involvement of transfer students.  Founded in 1999 by Prof. Lee Colquitt at Auburn U.

De aqui no se puede Can’t get there from here

Transfer-friendly colleges and universities

Project DEEP Project DEEP To discover, document and describe what high performing institutions do and how they achieved this level of effectiveness.

Project DEEP Partners

DEEP Selection Criteria A.Higher-than-predicted graduation rates B.Higher-than-predicted student engagement scores

Project DEEP Doctoral Extensives University of Kansas University of Kansas University of Michigan University of Michigan Doctoral Intensives George Mason University Miami University (Ohio) University of Texas El Paso Master’s Granting Fayetteville State University Fayetteville State University Gonzaga University Gonzaga University Longwood University Longwood University Liberal Arts California State, Monterey Bay California State, Monterey Bay Macalester College Macalester College Sweet Briar College Sweet Briar College The Evergreen State College The Evergreen State College University of the South University of the South Ursinus College Ursinus College Wabash College Wabash College Wheaton College (MA) Wheaton College (MA) Wofford College Wofford College Baccalaureate General Baccalaureate General Alverno College Alverno College University of Maine at Farmington University of Maine at Farmington Winston-Salem State University Winston-Salem State University

Longwood University  Transfers are valued (e.g., 10 scholarships annually)  Phi Theta Kappa honor society for transfers  Systematic evaluation of programmatic initiatives  dent/evaluationgoals.html

Hay muchas maneras de matar pulgas There are many ways to kill fleas

Key Characteristic  Many roads to a transfer- friendly institution  No one best model  Different combinations of complementary, interactive, synergistic conditions

Key Characteristic  Learning centered  “Cool passion” for talent development of all students  Bent toward engaging pedagogies  Labor-intensive enterprise

It Takes a Whole Campus to Promote Student Success

Principles For Promoting Student Engagement Collaboration (pull many levers) Collaboration (pull many levers) Intentionality Intentionality Alignment (mission, curriculum, student experiences) Alignment (mission, curriculum, student experiences) Assessment and feedback to guide/document improvement Assessment and feedback to guide/document improvement

Points to Ponder 1.What can we do individually and collectively to enhance transfer student success? 2.How do we get transfer students to take greater advantage of their school’s resources for learning?

Questions & Discussion