K E M A, I N C. TCA/KEMA ERCOT Cost Benefit Analysis Implementation Impacts Assessment KEMA Assumptions ERCOT CBCG June 2, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Healthy Schools-Successful Students Coordinated School Health in Washington.
Advertisements

June 26, 2008 TAC Texas Nodal Market Implementation: Program Update Jerry Sullivan.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 3.1.
Project Management.
1 April 2010 TX SET Timeline Project Conceptualization 11 weeks Market Requirements 12 weeks ERCOT Requirements 12 weeks Conceptual Design 6 weeks Detail.
Business Consulting Services Agenda Discussion: Management Reports Discussion: Project Reports Discussion: Engagement Proposal Upcoming Events Review Project.
Project Management Phases Class 6. Initiation & Planning – Agenda Overview of the project management phases Midterm paper details.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT Market Engagement and Readiness (MER) Training Update TPTF Meeting October 27, 2008 Market Education.
1 Our Expertise and Commitment – Driving your Success An Introduction to Transformation Offering November 18, 2013 Offices in Boston, New York and Northern.
Enterprise Product Implementation Process. Components of a Successful Implementation  A detailed Scope Document for customer review and signoff  Creation.
Texas Nodal Transition ACCOUNTABLE EXECUTIVE DESIGNATION Electric Reliability Council of Texas March 30, 2007.
Texas Regional Entity Update Sam Jones Interim CEO and President Board of Directors July 18, 2006.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR Update to RMS Karen Farley June 3, 2014.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee April 8, 2010.
SacProNet An Overview of Project Management Techniques.
K E M A, I N C. TCA/KEMA ERCOT Cost Benefit Analysis Implementation Impacts Assessment ERCOT CBCG May 4, 2004.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 4, 2009.
1 RMS Task Force on Retail Market Customer/ESI Transition October 16, 2003.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy Management System Requirement Documents December 5, 2006 Jay Dondeti EMS Project.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
TEXAS NODAL Board of Directors Austin, Texas July 15, 2003.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott July 16,
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Introductions, Roles and Responsibilities.
RMS Update to TAC January 8, Voting Items From RMS meeting on 12/10/2008  RMGRR069: Texas SET Retail Market Guide Clean-up – Section 7: Historical.
A Strawman for Discussion by Dottie Stockstill & Greg Ramon Special ERCOT Board Meeting June 24, 2003.
©2010 Micron Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. Products are warranted only to meet Micron’s production data sheet specifications. Information, products,
Nodal Education Initial Staff Concepts 11/30/05. Agenda Integrated Approach Roadmap and Processes Curriculum Development ERCOT Education Advisory Council.
Market Coordination Team Update Retail Market Subcommittee November 8, 2006 Susan Munson Retail Market Liaison.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Registration Kick-off Meeting Matt Mereness June 6 th, 2007.
1 Texas Nodal Presentation Board of Director’s Meeting September 20, 2005.
ERCOT Nodal Readiness Plan Trip Doggett TAC Special Meeting September 7, 2005.
SPP Presentation Stakeholder Meeting April 16, 2008 Austin, Texas UPDATE: Retail Open Access for ETI within SPP.
Page 1 of 13 Texas Regional Entity ROS Presentation April 16, 2009 T EXAS RE ROS P RESENTATION A PRIL 2009.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Legal Disclaimers and Admonitions PROTOCOL DISCLAIMER This presentation provides a general overview of the Texas Nodal.
01/17/ CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.
TDTWG Update to RMS Wednesday January 14. TDTWG Update to RMS Scope Texas Data Transport Working Group (TDTWG) is responsible for creating and maintaining.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board February 16, 2005.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Implementation ERCOT Board Of Directors – August 15, 2006 TPTF Meeting August.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Introductions, Roles and Responsibilities.
SPP.org 1. Status Update: Retail Open Access for ETI within SPP Stakeholder Meeting June 20 th, 2008 Austin, TX.
1 TDTWG March 4, 2009 Performance Measures Overview.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee October 1, 2009.
Nodal Readiness Plan Update Ron Hinsley Update for TAC November 3, 2005.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Implementation Integration Update October 24, 2006 Daryl Shing, Enterprise.
COMET Working Group Progress Report. Purpose of Report Provide Team Updates Potential Future Voting Items Draft Competitive Meter Ownership Timeline.
Team-Based Development ISYS321 Managing the Information Systems Project.
July 7, 2008 TPTF Texas Nodal Market Implementation: Metrics Revisions Jerry Sullivan.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Market Rules Overview Topics in this lesson...  Introduction to Market Rules Public Utility Regulatory Act PUCT Substantive.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness Update TPTF May 5, 2008.
1 SCR756 – Enhancements to the MarkeTrak application –Fondly called - MarkeTrak Phase 3 –ERCOT CEO determined that SCR756 is not necessary prior to the.
CEO Report Thomas F. Schrader ERCOT Board of Directors July 19, 2005.
1 TX SET Update to RMS August 13, Issues Under Review I075 – CSA-By Pass flag is being used by CRs when they do not have a CSA established I075.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Implementation Program MIS Web Portal Business Requirements Review Current.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee May 7, 2009.
ME 3.0 to ME 5.0 ME3.0 review scheduled during the Joint NDSWG/NATF meeting in July. There were approximately 180 comments on the ME3.0 paper. Deadline.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
TEXAS NODAL (ERCOT REVISIONS)
NMMS Nodal Network Mgmt and Monitoring System Update
Protocol Revision Subcommittee
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC
Ken Shoquist VP, CIO Information Technology Board Meeting October 2003
The New Texas Wholesale/Retail Market
CEO Report Thomas F. Schrader ERCOT Board of Directors May 17, 2005
PM 584 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
SQL Server BI on Windows Azure Virtual Machines
SQL Server OLTP with Microsoft Azure Virtual Machines
Texas Energy Market About ERCOT ERCOT market participants
Chapter 3 Managing the Information Systems Project
Texas Energy Market About ERCOT ERCOT market participants
Chapter 3 Managing the Information Systems Project
Presentation transcript:

K E M A, I N C. TCA/KEMA ERCOT Cost Benefit Analysis Implementation Impacts Assessment KEMA Assumptions ERCOT CBCG June 2, 2004

K E M A, I N C. 2 Agenda n Progress Update n Scope Review n KEMA Assumptions Review

K E M A, I N C. 3 Progress Update n ERCOT contacts for Inventory and Impacts review identified by CBCG n KEMA started to ask these contacts for possible date for meetings over the next 3- 4 weeks n Impacts assessment at the process level in progress n Market Participant Surveys ready for distribution later this week

K E M A, I N C. 4 Implementation Impacts Assessment Scope n Quantitative and qualitative treatment of:  Systems Costs  Staffing  Risk Transition  Training  On-going Maintenance & Support

K E M A, I N C. 5 KEMA Assumptions Review n Assumptions:  Classification of Market Participants  Change Case Description/Definition  Confidentiality  Data Gathering  Impacts Assessment

K E M A, I N C. 6 Classification of Market Participants n Market Entities:  ERCOT  Qualified Scheduling Entity (QSE)  Resource Owners (PGCs)  Load Serving Entity (LSE)  Transmission and/or Distribution Service Provider (TDSP) n Why not the 9-segments?  An IOU or Municipal can play multiple Market Entity roles  No simple way to separate by segment and avoid “double counting” n The Implementation Impacts Analysis will provide detailed cost estimates

K E M A, I N C. 7 Market Participant Relationships

K E M A, I N C. 8 Study Market Segments n Nine Market Segments  Investor Owned Utilities (IOU)  Municipally Owned Utilities (MOU)  Electric Cooperatives (EC)  Independent Power Producers (IPP)  Power Marketer (PM)  Retail Electric Provider (REP)  Retail Customer  ERCOT ISO  Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) n Market Segments Costs based on Entity costs

K E M A, I N C. 9 Change Case Description / Definition n Three Change Cases Considered:  1) Texas Nodal Team (TNT)  Defined in Concept (White) Papers  Detailed in Draft TNT Protocols  CBCG to identify SMEs and Contact Information  2) Nodal Light  Defined in Change Case Summary  Additional information may be needed  CBCG to identify SMEs and Contact Information  3) NE-ISO Replication  Defined in Change Case Summary  Additional information may be needed  CBCG to identify SMEs and Contact Information

K E M A, I N C. 10 Confidentially n Information may be available in the public domain n KEMA will:  Maintain strict confidentiality of any identified competitive information  Remove identity for use in the corresponding generic Entities results n Review and Sharing of Information with:  Cost Benefit Concept Group (CBCG)  Texas Nodal Team (TNT)

K E M A, I N C. 11 Data Gathering n Data Collection for:  Existing and planned (~1yr) Hardware expansions  Existing and planned (~1yr) Applications expansions  Staffing, Training, and Support Cost Data n KEMA will use other sources of data such as:  Historical organization experience  Current costs from surveys and inventories  Vendor estimates  Market research and publications  Analyst judgement

K E M A, I N C. 12 Data Gathering n Market Participant Survey (See handout) n Market Segment Representative Roles/Responsibilities:  Act as key liaison/contact for other Market Participants  Assist KEMA in monitoring progress of responses n Individual Market Participants  Separate survey completed for each “Role”  Questions on Survey through KEMA/CBCG  TWO weeks allotted for responses – due by June 18

K E M A, I N C. 13 Data Gathering n ERCOT Information  Existing Systems, Applications, and Staffing  Planned expansions or changes prior to Nodal Market 2007  Clearly identify Nodal Drivers for Nodal Market 2007 n KEMA will analyze, sort and compile the surveys  Generic Market Entities systems  No substitutes or proxies for missing data responses

K E M A, I N C. 14 Data Gathering – Process Summary

K E M A, I N C. 15 Impacts Assessment n Implementation Impacts Assessment  By Market Process Timeline n New Nodal Business Process Derived from Change Change Cases description:  Pre-Day Ahead Activities  Day-Ahead Activities  Adjustment Period and Operating Period Activities  Real Time  Post-Operating Day Activities

K E M A, I N C. 16 Impacts Assessment - Process Summary

K E M A, I N C. 17 Deliverables – Implementation Impacts n Preliminary outline and results (~summer) n Summary of Impacts  Summary of costs  Major cost drivers and cost risks  Treatment of other major risks  Qualitative impacts n Detailed cost spread sheets (Excel workbook format)  For ERCOT  For Market Participants, based on reasonable categorization of market participants

K E M A, I N C. 18 Questions?