Nancy, 5-6 December 2005 – GL7 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature Uniform Requirements for grey literature: proposal for the adoption.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Investing in Information for Development
Advertisements

1 TITLE OF THE ARTICLE Author (Institution) Co-Author (Institution) .
1 EFSA policy on Declarations of Interests Management Board Meeting, September 2007 Bucharest.
Evidence-based Dental Practice Developing guidelines or clinical recommendations Slide #1 This lecture follows the previous online lecture on evidence.
Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.
1 KHAZAR UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY Tatyana Zaytseva February 18, 2011.
1 of 16 Information Access The External Information Providers © FAO 2005 IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Access The External.
1 of 18 Information Access Introduction to Information Access © FAO 2005 IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Access Introduction.
1 of 14 Information Access Management Interventions © FAO 2005 IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Access Management Interventions.
GL5 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, Amsterdam 4-5 December QUALITY OF GREY LITERATURE IN THE OPEN ACCESS ERA: PRIVILEGE AND RESPONSIBILITY Paola De Castro,
New Orleans, 4-5 December 2006 – GL8 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature Awareness and empowerment in document production and distribution.
An innovative concept to disseminate scientific communications
1 Making Contract Opportunities and Awards More Transparent Ahmet Arif Sezgin Public Procurement Authority of Turkey Rabat 03 April 2008.
Choosing a Journal APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.
The formats of scientific articles
Google Scholar and Web of Science: Similarities and Differences in Citation Analysis of Scientific Publications Maurella DELLA SETA, Rosaria CAMMARANO.
Tutorial for leadership teams of ITU-T study groups, TSAG, tariff groups and focus groups Alternative approval process (AAP) for ITU-T Recommendations.
0 - 0.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
Addition Facts
Getting published in academic publications Tips to Help you Publish Successfully June 2004.
Module 2 Sessions 10 & 11 Report Writing.
? What is the correct order of working steps? 1.Methods 2.Results 3.Figures 4.Tables 5.Introduction 6.References 7.Discussion 8.Abstract.
Digital Futures International Forum - Tuesday 18th September 1 Digital Futures International Forum The Digitisation Standard: Back & Forth Stephen Clarke.
The Peer Review Process Adapted from a presentation by Richard Henderson, Elsevier Hong Kong.
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
Internal Control–Integrated Framework
Addition 1’s to 20.
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
25 de febrero de 2009 Coloquio de Investigación CICIA Marisela Santiago, PhD Myra Pérez, PhD.
1 Lesson 15 Evaluating Electronic Information Computer Concepts BASICS 4 th Edition Wells.
Revision of WIPO Standard ST.14 Committee on WIPO Standards, third session Geneva 15 – 19 April 2013 Anna Graschenkova Standards Section.
1 Permits and Certificates CITES Secretariat. 2 Overview Permits and certificates Normal procedures.
How the University Library can help you with your term paper
Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.
Writing an original research paper Part one: Important considerations
RESPONSIBLE AUTHORSHIP Office for Research Protections The Pennsylvania State University Adapted from Scientific Integrity: An Internet-based course in.
ROLE OF THE REVIEWER ESSA KAZIM. ROLE OF THE REVIEWER Refereeing or peer-review has the advantages of: –Identification of suitable scientific material.
Editing, Peer-Reviewing and Team-Writing Editing isn’t a cosmetic process. It’s a thinking process. Richard Rhodes, author Making of the Atomic Bomb.
Shelly Warwick, Ph.D – Permission is granted to reproduce and edit this work for non- commercial educational use as long as attribution is provided.
Grey Literature, E-Repositories and Evaluation of Academic & Research Institutes. The case study of BPI e-repository Maria V. Kitsiou - Head Librarian,
5. Presentation of experimental results 5.5. Original contribution (paper) - the main outcome of scientific activities - together with patents, they can.
 needs to be met  existing resources  content outline  contributor team  contract details  timeline.
GL14 - Fourteenth International Conference on Grey Literature National Research Council Rome, Italy November 2012 Rosa Di Cesare, Marianna Nobile.
Teaching and learning across national frontiers to improve dissemination of scientific research output 14th International Conference on Grey Literature,
How Do I Evaluate Electronic Information and Why Should I? Internet Skills Living Online Lesson 5 Mrs. Elzey.
How to Write a Critical Review of Research Articles
Ginny Smith Managing Editor: Planning and Urban Studies Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Setting Project Requirements. Step One The first step in creating a website is to define the Purpose.
INDEXATION CRITERIA Christian Kieling, MD Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
References Prof. Nikos Siafakas MD,PhD. University of Crete.
Ian White Publisher, Journals (Education) Routledge/Taylor & Francis
Evaluation of information. Introduction It is common for people to challenge things they learn It is known that not every information is true Medical.
5.5. Original contribution (paper) - the main outcome of scientific activities - together with patents, they can not be combined together at one time -
INANE Meeting –Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing Charon Pierson Geraldine Pearson August 5, 2015.
Authorship Criteria; Updated Version 2013 By: Behrooz Astaneh MD Founder and Head, Medical Journalism Department Visiting Editor, BMJ COPE Council Member.
Salha Jokhab, Msc 222 PHCL Pharmacy Literature. Objectives Brief description of the literature used in pharmacy, its structure and format. Tips for writing.
Manuscript Review Prepared by Noni MacDonald MD FRCPc Editor-in-Chief Paediatrics and Child Health Former Editor-in -Chief CMAJ
How to publish paper in journal. Step 1.Familiarize yourself with potential publications.
Chapter 19: “Writing Instructions and Manuals” Matthew Frase.
AuthorAID Workshop on Research Writing Nepal March 2011.
Prof. Dr. Saw Aik Chief editor Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Ethical Issues and Publication Misconducts.
Peer-Review Process – Part I
Role of peer review in journal evaluation
What the Editors want to see!
The Activities of COPE: Code, International Standards and Best Practices on the Ethics of Scientific Publications The 7th International Scientific and.
5. Presenting a scientific work
MANUSCRIPT WRITING TIPS, TRICKS, & INFORMATION Madison Hedrick, MA
Presentation transcript:

Nancy, 5-6 December 2005 – GL7 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature Uniform Requirements for grey literature: proposal for the adoption of a Nancy style Paola De Castro, Sandra Salinetti Istituto Superiore di Sanità Rome (Italy)

Nancy, 5-6 December 2005 – GL7 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature 2 Characteristics initially associated to GL have been upset. GL and the Internet sea change Information retrieval Document availability Increased responsibility Target no longer under control PROS CONS

Nancy, 5-6 December 2005 – GL7 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature 3 GL: from Cinderella to Princess Old virtues and new look to enter the realm of science! Unique content Original information Not for profit production Pleasant layout Online availability Easy retrieval (content) (form) OLD VIRTUES NEW LOOK

Nancy, 5-6 December 2005 – GL7 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature 4 A flick of magic wand… for Cinderella Taking off GREY ash-dress… Draft proposal to reach consensus on: NANCY STYLE… HOW? Creating and applying Uniform requirements for the production of institutional reports: how to write and distribute grey literature

Nancy, 5-6 December 2005 – GL7 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature 5 Nancy style: the secrets of the fairy Vancouver style Uniform requirements for manuscript submitted to biomedical journals ISO standard 5966/1982 Documentation – Presentation of scientific and technical reports Personal experience

Nancy, 5-6 December 2005 – GL7 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature 6 Why Nancy style? independent and correct production of institutional reports in the respect of the basic editorial principles Authors and issuing organizations GOAL TARGET

Nancy, 5-6 December 2005 – GL7 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature 7 Nancy style to be introduced at Court S EVEN mice magically transformed into six horses and a coachman led Cinderella to the castle…

Nancy, 5-6 December 2005 – GL7 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature 8 Nancy style to be introduced at Court 1.Ethical considerations 2.Publishing and editorial issues 3.Report structure 4.References 5.Non textual material 6.Revision editing 7.Instructions to authors Our mice to reach the Castle are:

Nancy, 5-6 December 2005 – GL7 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature 9 They regard responsibilities of the authors of reports and their issuing organizations. They also take into account the appropriateness of peer review and possible conflicts of interest, privacy and confidentiality. 1. Ethical considerations Burden of each mouse

Nancy, 5-6 December 2005 – GL7 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature 10 Considerations associated with intellectual property (copyright) New responsibilities arising from electronic publishing 2. Publishing and editorial issues Burden of each mouse

Nancy, 5-6 December 2005 – GL7 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature 11 The HEAVIEST burden allowing to reach the desired goal A well designed structure includes: FRONT MATTER BODY OF REPORT END MATTER 3. Report structure UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONTENT Burden of each mouse

Nancy, 5-6 December 2005 – GL7 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature 12 Sources of information used in the report 4. References They shall be corrected cited to permit retrieval. Burden of each mouse

Nancy, 5-6 December 2005 – GL7 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature 13 Tables and figures playing a significant part in the understanding of concepts explained in the text. 5. Non textual material ADDING VALUE to the information given Burden of each mouse

Nancy, 5-6 December 2005 – GL7 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature 14 It ensures that the technical content of a report is complete, accurate and understandable to the intended audience. Levels of revision depend on: speed in diffusion availability of editorial staff budget 6. Revision editing Burden of each mouse

Nancy, 5-6 December 2005 – GL7 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature 15 They are our coachman: it is up to him to drive the horses. All issuing organizations should provide guidelines for a correct production of reports 7. Instructions to authors Burden of each mouse

Nancy, 5-6 December 2005 – GL7 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature 16 And what about the pumpkin? It is the CONTENT of the document. All guests must follow a proper etiquette! A smart layout and well balanced structure is absolutely useless without any good substance! YETa good pumpkin can reach the castle to join the party of the noble (prestigious journal articles and monographs) only with a flick of the NANCY WAND FIRST RESPONSIBILITY of any author or issuing organization

Nancy, 5-6 December 2005 – GL7 Round Table: Quality Assessment of Grey Literature 17 Conclusions and the spell... will not end at midnight! Nancy style improves: quality usability availability It grants GL NOBILITY to join the party In one word