Deconstructing and Reconstructing a Repository – Strategies for Nimble Rebuilding Linda Newman Head of Digital Collections and Repositories University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is HathiTrust and How Can it Make a Difference? Sourcing and Scaling brought to the collective collection.
Advertisements

1 st DSpace User Group Meeting March 10-11, 2004 William J Nixon, Project Manager (Service Development) DAEDALUS Putting Eprints Software into the User.
Moving Forward With Digital Preservation at the Library of Congress Laura Campbell Associate Librarian for Strategic Initiatives Library of Congress.
Creative Re-Use of geographic and historical data and documents Linda Newman Head of Digital Collections and Repositories University of Cincinnati Libraries.
" OPEN ACCESS INITIATIVE IN ONE OF THE PALESTINIAN UNIVERSITIES: BIRZEIT UNIVERSITY" Prepared by Mrs. Diana Sayej-Naser Library Director Birzeit University.
Digital Collections: Storage and Access Jon Dunn Assistant Director for Technology IU Digital Library Program
Bringing an Institutional Repository to the Ball State University Community Cardinal Scholar (CS) Bradley Faust, Assistant Dean LITS University Libraries.
Andrea Eastman-Mullins Information & Technology Coordinator University of North Carolina, Office of the President Teaching and Learning with Technology.
Information Without Borders: Perspectives from the Federal Government: A Canadian Digital Information Strategy Ingrid Parent Library and Archives Canada.
ARROW Progress Report to CAUL September 2004 Geoff Payne, ARROW Project Manager.
Yale VITAL/FEDORA Repository IAC Update 30 Oct 2006 Audrey Novak, Head IS&P, ILTS.
RIAS PHASE II Oracle General Ledger, Financial Reporting and Data Warehouse 6/27/2015.
Institutional Repositories Tools for scholarship Mary Westell University of Calgary AMTEC Conference May 26, 2005.
Student Information system
© 2004 University of Rochester LibrariesSlide 1 Enhancing DSpace Based on a Work-Practice Study DSpace Federation User Group Meeting March 10, 2004 Dave.
OU Digital Library development project Liz Mallett – Project Manager James Alexander – Project Developer 25 January 2012.
 an easy-to-use interface for deposit and update  access via persistent URLs  tools for long-term management  permanent storage Merritt is a new cost-effective.
©2011 Quest Software, Inc. All rights reserved. Steve Walch, Senior Product Manager Blog: November, 2011 Partner Training Webcast.
Anthony Atkins Digital Library and Archives VirginiaTech ETD Technology for Implementers Presented March 22, 2001 at the 4th International.
DAMS: An Overview July 13, 2011 Karen Estlund Head, Digital Library Services.
University Library Senior Design Theses: Moving to an electronic collection by collaborating with the School of Engineering Susan Boyd Special Libraries.
Open Source Software Sustainability: A Case Study of Indiana University's Variations Software Jon W. Dunn, Phil Ponella, and Robert H. McDonald Indiana.
Annual Membership Meeting 2012 A Community of Libraries since 1985.
High Water Raises All Boats Leveraging Partnerships on Campus to Build a Repository Mary Molinaro University of Kentucky Libraries.
Hydra: future development A Hydra roadmap… Hydra Europe Symposium – Dublin – 7/8 April 2014 Richard Green.
DuraCloud A service provided by Sandy Payette and Michele Kimpton.
DuraCloud Managing durable data in the cloud Michele Kimpton, Director DuraSpace.
“Filling the digital preservation gap” an update from the Jisc Research Data Spring project at York and Hull Jenny Mitcham Digital Archivist Borthwick.
Jenny Jopling Texas Computer-based Testing Collaborative.
City of Seattle Office of the City Clerk Open Government = Access Challenges and Opportunities with Digital Records.
Creating metadata out of thin air and managing large batch imports Linda Newman Digital Projects Coordinator University of Cincinnati Libraries.
Promoting Open Source Software Through Cloud Deployment: Library à la Carte, Heroku, and OSU Michael B. Klein Digital Applications Librarian
The DSpace Course Module – An introduction to DSpace.
1. 2 introductions Nicholas Fischio Development Manager Kelvin Smith Library of Case Western Reserve University Benjamin Bykowski Tech Lead and Senior.
Natick Public Schools Technology Update January 26, 2009 Dennis Roche, CISA Director of Technology.
APARSEN WP22 Identifiers and Citability APARSEN WP22 Identifiers and Citability Some key results Fondazione Rinascimento Digitale Emanuele Bellini, Chiara.
PROJECT HYDRA SNEAK PEAK – ADVANCE SHOWING Brought to you by the Digital Repository Task Force Steve Marine (chair), Ted Baldwin, Dan Gottlieb, Kevin Grace,
J. WILLARD MARRIOTT LIBRARY Preserving, Promoting and Presenting Research Posters: USpace’s New Poster Archiving Service Lisa Chaufty Western CONTENTdm.
Research Data Management Victoria University Context Lyle Winton Adrian Gallagher Julie Gardner.
The Global Video Grid: DigitalWell Update & Plan For SRB Integration Myke Smith, Manager Streaming Media Technologies University of Washington / ResearchChannel.
Dermot Frost Digital Repository of Ireland Trinity College Dublin.
DuraCloud Enabling services for managing data in the cloud Michele Kimpton, CBO DuraSpace Bill Branan, Senior Developer DuraSpace.
: Strategies for a Successful IR Michael Boock Head of Technical Services Oregon State University Libraries.
T HE M ETA A RCHIVE M ODEL : D ISTRIBUTED D IGITAL P RESERVATION N ETWORKS Dr. Martin Halbert VIVA/SCHEV LAC Meeting Christopher Newport University Trible.
February, 2006 Open Repositories, Sydney, Australia Transition to a Broader Participation: Experience from the DSpace Project MacKenzie Smith MIT Libraries.
The OhioLINK Library System Ohio Library and Information Network.
Producción de Sistemas de Información Agosto-Diciembre 2007 Sesión # 7.
Ensuring Equal Access, Collaborating on Accessibility #dlbb Digital Library Brown Bag Series Humbert Joe Humbert, UITS Assistive Technology.
DuraCloud Open technologies and services for managing durable data in the cloud Michele Kimpton, CBO DuraSpace.
Development of the West Virginia University Electronic Theses & Dissertations System Presented By Haritha Garapati at ETD the 7 th International.
DAEDALUS - An ePrints Case Study William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
LOCKSS at Georgia Tech Patricia E. Kenly April 2007.
Transforming Catalogers (and Others) into Digital Library Specialists : The Evolution of the University of Oregon’s Metadata and Digital Library Services.
Leveraging the Expertise of our Staff and the Information Resources We Manage MIT Libraries Visiting Committee April 13, 2005.
Managing live digital content with DuraSpace services Bill Branan PASIG Spring 2015.
Migration Collection from Dspace to Digital Commons Jane Wildermuth & Andrew Harris.
Just in Time Digital Southern Offers a Suite of Services for the Entire Campus Zach S. Henderson Library.
Go Big or Go Home: Securing University-wide Adoption of OrgSync Ben Jager, Associate Director of Student Life University of Nebraska Omaha Get at
DAEDALUS Project William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
The Future of ScholarWorks WHERE WE’RE GOING AND WHERE WE’VE BEEN.
Digital Asset Management at Michigan Tech
Creating metadata out of thin air and managing large batch imports
Digital Library Development in Australia
Digital Libraries: Planning, Creating, Collaborating, & Reality
Access  Discovery  Compliance  Identification  Preservation
The MetaArchive Model: Distributed Digital Preservation Networks
Digital Library and Plan for Institutional Repository
BUT DIGITAL LIBRARY OPEN ACCESS AT CZECH REPUBLIC
Digital Library and Plan for Institutional Repository
IT Next – Transformation Program
Presentation transcript:

Deconstructing and Reconstructing a Repository – Strategies for Nimble Rebuilding Linda Newman Head of Digital Collections and Repositories University of Cincinnati Libraries

The University of Cincinnati Libraries has been relying for five years on a DSpace institutional repository ( now at over 560,000 records, and maintained by OH-Tech and OhioLINK. While in the OhioLINK environment we experienced 4 migrations: staying in the same DSpace version but migrating to the Amazon Cloud migrating to OH-Tech shared infrastructure and an upgraded version of DSpace migrating from PostGreSQL and DSpace 1.6 to Oracle and DSpace 1.7 merging two DSpace instances into one DSpace 1.8 installation.

The OhioLINK community determined in January of 2013 that maintaining over thirty institutional instances of DSpace was not sustainable for its future. At the same time the University of Cincinnati Libraries determined that we had larger goals for data management and e-science, for the digital humanities and for our university born-digital records, all of which we hoped a broader repository service could encompass. OhioLINK asked its member libraries to migrate content away from the existing DRCs by December So in February and March of 2013 the University of Cincinnati Libraries began to put together a development team and a plan, and began to evaluate our choices for a next generation open source repository.

We started asking ourselves these questions: Can we build, while assembling a new development team, within the OhioLINK requested timeline, a production Fedora instance with a Hydra (projecthydra.org) front end, capable of supporting all our existing use cases (images, text, audio, video, small data, dissertations, direct faculty submission, cultural heritage and institutional repository content) and sustaining the size of our repository? Can we build a DSpace instance that has the potential to develop to meet our broader repository service goals? Should we even settle on one platform? Can we maintain our domain name and handle server prefix (now registered with handle.net and doi.org), with record identifiers maintained, so that the persistent URLs which now point to content are really persistent? Can we build a system to replace a successful large instance of DSpace, minimizing service disruptions for our users by maintaining most existing functionality, but at the same time design a system that is does offer a path to new functionality and service models?

What we have done in the intervening 4 months: Formed a Digital Repository Task Force, with a platform subcommittee. Developed a questionnaire (!) and attempted contact with repository managers or developers at all of the Hydra Partner and AP Trust sites, as well as other ARL libraries in Ohio. Most responded! Started intensive talks with our campus computing center about a partnership; contributing not only the physical infrastructure (production servers, backup) but developer hours. Moved a staff person into a developer position; advertised for an additional developer. Made some decisions…

The Hydra community really impressed us – the community and the platform. But – We concluded there was no easy entry to stand up the repository without at least a years worth of development. We decided to: 1.Adopt Hydra as our local digital repository solution. 2.Install DSpace and clone the UC DRC locally – provide our users with a system with the same URL, same functionality but now on our campus. 3.Begin a direct conversation with the AP Trust, to understand more fully the prospects, benefits, and obligations of membership.

DRC move Begin discussions with OhioLINK about a DRC cloning, and to establish a service agreement with OhioLINK clarifying the level of support they would be providing throughout this process. (June/July 2013 – talks productive) Work with Library IT to establish resources and a plan for the local installation of DSpace for the UC DRC. (May-July 2013 – campus IT has agreed to increate bandwidth to library server room and to provide an Oracle database server, Library IT is bringing up 2 servers for DSpace test and production, OhioLINK will provide custom DSpace code and record/digital object migration) Work with Library IT to make critical improvements in current backup solutions, to adequately secure repository content. (July 2013, discussion with Library IT initiated) Repository Capacity development: Work with Library IT to provide a sandbox server where the digital repository development team can begin to work with Hydra. (May/June 2013 – sandbox server in place; additional disk capacity in progress, we have built 4 hydra heads - with 3 Fedora installs – all breaking at different points.) Schedule training for developers with Media Shelf, a Hydra Camp -- maybe partnering with other institutions in Ohio interested in Hydra development? (Fall 2013) Fill the open Digital Repository Developer position (June-August 2013) Working with campus IT and other interested parties at the University of Cincinnati, establish agreements concerning server resources, backup, and development time. (Summer 2013) Whats now underway – Two Tracks:

It doesnt stop: We are still actively adding content to our DSpace repository and our LUNA repository. Our Art and Architecture library may be installing Omeka. We may be installing Open Journal Systems. Librarians are discovering more digital content than ever in senior design reports, open access journals that need better support, datasets, university born-digital but official records, the twitter archive of our university president… We are talking to our campus IT department and the clinical and translational research folks about big data. We hope to join the AP Trust (and are paying attention to how that may alter our repository development, to have long term preservation built in from the ground up. We are paying attention to SHARE – and how that in turn will affect our repository development.

Deconstructing and Reconstructing a Repository – Strategies for Nimble Rebuilding Linda Newman Head of Digital Collections and Repositories University of Cincinnati Libraries