1. High Water Raises All Boats Leveraging Partnerships on Campus to Build a Repository Mary Molinaro University of Kentucky Libraries

2. http://www.flickr.com/photos/gnuckx/5040689842/

3. More Than a “Library” Issue  Worked on IR issues since 2003  Opening Doors to Open Scholarship (white paper)  http: http://uknowledge.uky.edu/libraries_reports/1/ http://uknowledge.uky.edu/libraries_reports/1/  2007  Advocated for campus-wide support

4. Repository Model (2007)

5. We have to do something!

6. Digital Commons and Be Press  Hosted solution  Indexed by Google and Google Scholar  OAI compliant  Persistent URL  Creation of peer reviewed journals  Content can be delivered back to us

8. What we are putting into UKnowledge?  Electronic Theses and Dissertations  Articles  Books  Presentations  University press materials

9. Concurrently…

10. Kentucky Digital Library Migration  DLXS to what?  Has to accommodate multiple kinds of data  Not simply a CMS  Use all open source tools  Blacklight as the discovery layer  Settled on a Micro-Services based repository

11. Why Micro-Services?  Nimble  Flexible  Modular  Easily replaced  Supports our overall strategy https://confluence.ucop.edu/display/Curation/Home

14. At the same time a storm is brewing…  New data management requirements from federal granting agencies (NSF, NIH, etc)  Various solutions popping up around campus

15. http://www.flickr.com/photos/torek/3675252198/

16. Partners: Specialized Expertise  Library  Digital preservation  Metadata  Information Technology  Hardware Infrastructure  Cloud Storage solutions  Research  Proposal development  Agency requirements

17. Educating partners  Working from a position of strength  Leverage our expertise and experience  Confidence in the approach

18. Benchmark Survey/Comparison  University of Maryland - College Park  University of Michigan - Ann Arbor  University of Minnesota - Twin Cities  University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill  University of Pittsburgh - Pittsburgh Campus  University of Virginia  University of Washington - Seattle Campus  University of Wisconsin – Madison  University of Florida  North Texas University  Georgia Institute of Technology  Ohio State University  Pennsylvania State University  Rutgers University - New Brunswick  Texas A & M University  The University of Texas at Austin  University of California - Berkeley  University of California - Davis  University of California - Los Angeles  University of California – San Diego  University of Illinois at Urbana – Champaign  University of Illinois

19. Options  Contract with a vendor  Leverage D-Space  Bring up a Fedora repository  Look for a new approach

20. Enter Micro-Services! Again.  Nimble  Flexible  Modular  Easily replaced  Support our overall strategy http://www.cdlib.org/services/uc3/curation/

21. Timing is Everything

22. NSF & NIH Research Grant Associated Data Electronic Records E-Print UKnowledge Digital Media Digital Library Content Other Research Data Micro-Services to address back-end repository functions Hydra to address front-end repository functions Common Metadata Store Hybrid Cloud Storage – File & Object Based

23. Our basic strategy  Hydra Front-End – Think front-end website  Archivematica – workflow engine  CDL Micro-Services for the back-end services  Ingestion  Storage  Fixity  Identity  Preservation  Indexing

24. NSF & NIH Research Grant Associated Data Electronic Records E-Print UKnowledge Digital Media Digital Library Content Other Research Data Micro-Services to address back-end repository functions Hydra to address front-end repository functions Common Metadata Store Hybrid Cloud Storage – File & Object Based

25. Scope - Initially  Service Research data management needs providing meaningful & robust services to researchers – specifically, NSF & NIH requirements  Workflow  Metadata Management  Federation – Security & Identity  Curation  Storage – Lowest Cost

26. Scope - Future  Provide Enterprise Repository Services for much of UK from a data management & research perspective

27. Infrastructure Considerations  Overlap with High Performance Computing & Cloud storage space  Virtualized Infrastructure

28. Partner Roles  Library  Technical lead  Metadata schema  Data management plans  Information Technology  Storage solutions – spinning disc, tape, cloud  Virtualized infrastructure  Security and authorization  Research  Policies  Governance  Proposal development with researchers

29. Next steps  Policies and governance  Meetings with research stakeholders  Funding models  Data management tool

31. Personnel (Tech Leads)  Eric Weig – eweig@email.uky.edueweig@email.uky.edu  Jason Conley – jason.conley@uky.edujason.conley@uky.edu

32. Resources  Hydra https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/hydra/The+Hydra+Projecthttps://wiki.duraspace.org/display/hydra/The+Hydra+Project  Microservices - https://confluence.ucop.edu/display/Curation/Homehttps://confluence.ucop.edu/display/Curation/Home  Blacklight http://www.lib.virginia.edu/digital/resndev/blacklight.htmlhttp://www.lib.virginia.edu/digital/resndev/blacklight.html  Archivematica -http://archivematica.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Pagehttp://archivematica.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page  DMPTool -https://dmp.cdlib.org/https://dmp.cdlib.org/

33. Sustainable preservation strategies are not built all at once, nor are they static. Sustainable preservation is a series of timely actions taken to anticipate the dynamic nature of digital information. - Sustainable Economics for a Digital Planet: Ensuring Long-Term Access to Digital Information. Blue Ribbon Task Force on Sustainable Preservation and Access. February 2010. http://brtf.sdsc.edu/