R. Tschirhart Fermilab Oct 15 th 2012 PX Stage 1 Physics Case: Preparations for Snowmass / Minnesota.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The US 5 Year Muon Acceleration R&D Program To Boldly Go… MICE Collaboration Meeting Harbin January, 2009.
Advertisements

U.S. Department of Energy Brookhaven Science Associates BNL’s Role in High Energy Physics Thomas B.W. Kirk Associate Director for High Energy and Nuclear.
CERN First Considerations to implement nuSTORM on the CERN site “North Area Neutrino Hub” E.Wildner, CERN Wednesday, March 27, 2013Elena Wildner,
European Strategy for Particle Physics 2013 Preparatory group->Strategy group Individual town meetings Town meeting in Krakow: september 2012 Drafting.
DOE Neutrino Program Plans
Beyond the ALCPG David B. MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Director for PPA.
Experimental Facilities DivisionORNL - SNS June 22, 2004 SNS Update – Team Building Steve Miller June 22, 2004 DANSE Meeting at Caltech.
F Future of Neutrino Program at FNAL NuMI Off-Axis Meeting Hugh Montgomery January 12, 2004.
February 19, 2008 FACET Review 1 Lab Overview and Future Onsite Facilities Persis S. Drell DirectorSLAC.
Nufact09-IIT 107/24/2009 Project X and a Muon Facility at Fermilab Milorad Popovic FNAL.
Jefferson Lab Status Hall A collaboration Dec. 16, 2013 R. D. McKeown Deputy Director For Science.
Project X Update Steve Holmes SPAFOA Meeting November 13, 2012
MUON COLLIDER: R&D Status & Opportunities for Participation FNAL, February 24, 2011   1.Motivation & OverviewSteve Geer 2.Accelerator R&DVladimir.
The NOvA Experiment At Fermilab Mark Messier Indiana University 34th International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP’08) Philadelphia, PA July 30,
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
Project X: Project Status Steve Holmes Project X Working Group Meeting December 15, 2011.
Experimental Facilities DivisionOak Ridge SNS INSTRUMENTS OVERVIEW R. K. Crawford Instrument Systems Senior Team Leader September 10, 2004 HYSPEC IDT Meeting.
Greetings to Veljko from Fermilab December 9, 2010.
American Neutrino Strategy: Consequences of P5 Report Jim Strait, LBNE Project Director NuFact August 2014.
P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.
Contractor Assurance System Peer Review April Page 1 NSTAR 2011 May 16, 2011 Jefferson Lab Hugh Montgomery.
Fermilab Neutrino Program Jim Strait Neutrino Discussion at CERN 26 November 2013.
Steve Holmes and Brendan Casey DPF Project X Forum August 10, 2011 Project X: A 5 MW Proton Accelerator Accelerator and Particle Physics.
An Integrated Intensity Frontier Strategy Steve Holmes & Bob Tschirhart LBNE Reconfiguration Workshop April 25, 2012.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 International Linear Collider In August 2004 ICFA announced their technology selection for an ILC: 1.The.
Project-X Physics Opportunities R. Tschirhart Fermilab March 18 th, 2010.
1 Status of FNPB Geoff Greene / Nadia Fomin University of Tennessee.
Mu2e, August 15, 2007 E Prebys 1 The Steering Group and mu2e Eric Prebys.
PIP-II: Why a new accelerator? Paul Derwent Fermilab Community Advisory Board 23 July 2015.
1 How Can We Get More Neutrons? Upgrade Paths for the EDM Geoff Greene University of Tennessee /Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oct 2006.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
The 12 GeV Physics Program at Jefferson Lab R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab College of William and Mary PTSP 2013 – Charlottesville, VA September 9, 2013.
Fermilab Perspective: Where are We Going with Project-X, and How Can it Benefit Nuclear Energy? Stuart Henderson PASI Meeting April 5, 2013.
September 10, 2004 Experimental Facilities Division SING Project Status HYSPEC IDT Meeting John Haines SING Project Manager September 10, 2004.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
News Y2K June 25, Summary of June 12 Face-to-Face Meeting.
Plan to go forward Peter Wilson SBN Program Coordinator 27 September 2014.
Fermilab: Present and Future Young-Kee Kim Data Preservation Workshop May 16, 2011.
Snowmass Summary Session: Introduction D. MacFarlane August 23, 2013.
Status of Project X Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Winter Meeting - March 1, 2011.
EU accelerator contributions to the IDS … R. Garoby ISS meeting RAL 28/04/2006.
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
Protons for Neutrinos: Mid-Term and Project-X Bob Zwaska Fermilab Intensity Frontier Neutrino Working Group Meeting October 24, 2011.
March 2012 R. Tschirhart PX Kaon Targetry Design Study March 2012 R. Tschirhart Fermilab PX Kaon Targetry Design Study March.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
Project-X Research Program R. Tschirhart Project X Research Program Scientist Fermilab Junne 20 th 2012.
Project X: Accelerators Sergei Nagaitsev September 2, 2011.
Project X: Technology, Perspectives, and Applications Steve Holmes on behalf of the Project X Team IEEE-Nuclear Science Symposium Anaheim, CA November.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Fermilab SRF Linac Development Steve Holmes Workshop on High Intensity Proton Accelerators October 19, 2009.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
Project X Research Program R. Tschirhart Project X Machine Advisory Committee March 18-19, 2013.
Intensity Frontier Physics with a Mega-Watt Proton Source R. Tschirhart Fermilab Science & Technology Review November
Fermilab: Introduction Young-Kee Kim DOE KA12 (Electron Research)Review June 22-23, 2010.
Muon Accelerator Program: Overview & Directions Mark Palmer June 19, 2013.
Science Requirements and Instrumentation for Future Neutrino Experiments Gina Rameika, Fermilab Instrumentation Frontier Community Planning January 9 –
CPM 2012, Fermilab D. MacFarlane & N. Holtkamp The Snowmass process and SLAC plans for HEP.
Opportunities from the Intensity Frontier to the Energy Frontier J.P.Delahaye/SLAC.
The High Intensity Horizon at Fermilab R. Tschirhart Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory IPAC 2012, New Orleans, USA. May 23 rd, 2012.
Project X as a Muon Facility Platform Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee November 7-9, 2011.
Fermilab Budget Briefing FY 2014 Intensity Frontier Proton Research KA Breakout February 28, 2013 Office of High Energy Physics Germantown, MD.
The High Intensity Horizon at Fermilab R. Tschirhart Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory IPAC 2012, New Orleans, USA. May 23 rd, 2012.
R. Tschirhart Fermilab NuFact Meeting William & Mary July 25 th 2012 The Project X Research Program: Muons.
Particle Physics Sector Young-Kee Kim / Greg Bock Leadership Team Strategic Planning Winter Workshop January 29, 2013.
Steve Holmes DNP Meeting/Santa Fe November 6, 2010 Project X: A Multi-MW Proton Source at Fermilab.
UK Neutrino Factory Conceptual Design
A Muon-based Accelerator Staging Scenario (MASS)
Short-Baseline Plans at Fermilab Steve Geer European Strategy for Neutrino Oscillation Physics – II May 14-16, 2012.
Charge for APS Neutrino Study
Feedback from the Temple Town Meeting MEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
Presentation transcript:

R. Tschirhart Fermilab Oct 15 th 2012 PX Stage 1 Physics Case: Preparations for Snowmass / Minnesota

SNOWMASS WORKING GROUPS Energy Frontier Intensity Frontier Cosmic Frontier Frontier Capabilities Instrumentation Frontier Computing Frontier Education and Outreach R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

Intensity Frontier group charge: Conveners: JoAnne Hewett (SLAC), Harry Weerts (Argonne) The Intensity Frontier working group is charged with summarizing the current state of knowledge and identifying the most promising future opportunities at the intensity frontier. Topics are described under the working groups. R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

Frontier Capabilities Group Conveners: William Barletta (MIT), Murdock Gilchriese (LBNL) Frontier Facilities will assess the existing and proposed capabilities of two distinct classes of experimental capabilities for high energy physics broadly understood, namely, those provided by accelerator-based facilities and those provided by detector facilities distinct from accelerators. We expect the evaluations to be performed with two principal groups that will operate independently: Accelerator Facilities and Non-accelerator Facilities. R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

Instrumentation frontier charge: Conveners: Marcel Demarteau (ANL), Howard Nicholson (Mt. Holyoke), Ron Lipton (Fermilab) The task of this group is to provide an evaluation of the Detector R&D program being carried out in support of the High Energy Physics science mission, to determine if the existing program meets the science needs of the Energy, Intensity, and Cosmic Frontiers, and to suggest a program to strengthen the field. This group supports the other frontier groups and at the same time identifies and advocates new technologies that have the potential for significant breakthrough in science reach. R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

Education and Outreach charge: Conveners: Marge Bardeen (Fermilab), Dan Cronin-Hennessy (U of M) How can we build support for and develop understanding of particle physics? The questions we want to answer Our history and record of accomplishment The impact of our research, our tools and our people on society The nature of discovery science in general R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

The Project-X Research Program Neutrino experiments A high-power proton source with proton energies between 1 and 120 GeV would produce intense neutrino sources and beams illuminating near detectors on the Fermilab site and massive detectors at distant underground laboratories. Kaon, muon, nuclei & neutron precision experiments These could include world leading experiments searching for muon-to-electron conversion, nuclear and neutron electron dipole moments (edms), precision measurement of neutron properties and world-leading precision measurements of ultra-rare kaon decays. Platform for evolution to a Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Neutrino Factory and Muon-Collider concepts depend critically on developing high intensity proton source technologies. Material Science and Nuclear Energy Applications Accelerator, spallation, target and transmutation technology demonstrations which could investigate and develop accelerator technologies important to the design of future nuclear waste transmutation systems and future thorium fuel-cycle power systems. Possible applications of muon Spin Resonance techniques (muSR). as a sensitive probes of the magnetic structure of materials. 4 R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October Detailed discussion on Project X websiteProject X website

Example Research Program, definitive space of accelerator parameters on PXPS Indico site * Operating point in range depends on MI energy for neutrinos. ** Operating point in range depends on MI injector slow-spill duty factor (df) for kaon program. 11 Project X Campaign R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October Program: Onset of NOvA operations in 2013 Stage-1: 1 GeV CW Linac driving Booster & Muon, n/edm programs Stage-2: Upgrade to 3 GeV CW Linac Stage-3: Project X RDR Stage-4: Beyond RDR: 8 GeV power upgrade to 4MW MI neutrinos kW** kW** 1200 kW2450 kW kW 8 GeV Neutrinos15 kW +0-50kW**0-42 kW* kW**0-84 kW*0-172 kW*3000 kW 8 GeV Muon program e.g, (g-2), Mu2e-1 20 kW0-20 kW* kW* 1000 kW 1-3 GeV Muon program, e.g. Mu2e kW1000 kW Kaon Program 0-30 kW** (<30% df from MI) 0-75 kW** (<45% df from MI) 1100 kW1870 kW Nuclear edm ISOL program none0-900 kW kW Ultra-cold neutron program none kW kW Nuclear technology applications none0-900 kW kW # Programs: Total max power: 735 kW 2222 kW 4284 kW 6492 kW 11870kW

R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October PX Physics Study Conveners for Experimental Concepts and Sensitivities Neutrinos: Andre de Gouvea (Northwestern University), Patrick Huber (Virginia Tech), Geoff Mills (LANL) Ko Nishikawa (University of Chicago/FNAL), Steve Geer (FNAL) Muon Experiments: Bob Bernstein (Fermilab), Graham Kribs, (University of Oregon) Kaon Experiments: Kevin Pitts (University of Illinois UC), Vincenzo Cirigliano (LANL) EDMs: Tim Chupp (University of Michigan), Susan Gardner (University of Kentucky), Zheng-Tian Lu (ANL) n-nbar oscillations: Chris Quigg (FNAL), Albert Young (North Carolina State University) Hadron physics: Stephen Godfrey (Carleton University), Paul Reimer (ANL) 2

R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October PX Physics Study Conveners for Enabling Technologies and Techniques High rate Precision Photon Calorimetry: David Hitlin (Caltech), Milind Diwan (BNL) Very Low-Mass High-Rate Charged Particle Tracking: Ron Lipton (FNAL), Jack Ritchie (University of Texas, Austin) Time-of-Flight System Performance below 10 psec: Mike Albrow (FNAL), Bob Wagner (ANL) High Precision Measurement of Neutrino Interactions: Kevin McFarland (Rochester University), Jonghee Yoo (FNAL), Rex Tayloe (University of Indiana) Large Area Cost Effective (LACE) Detector Technologies: Mayly Sanchez (Iowa State University), Yury Kamyshkov (University of Tennessee) Lattice QCD: Ruth Van de Water (BNL), Tom Blum (University of Connecticut) 3

participants Summaries for experimental concepts and required detector R&D. Will serve as basis for research program white papers. Staging introduced, Stage-1 program clarified. Scope increments discussed: proton-edm, decay-at-rest neutrino sources. Project X detector R&D proposals submitted to OHEP as part of the comparative review process. Summary of the The Project X Physics Study June 14 th -22 nd R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October 2012

Stage 1: CW Linac (1 GeV, 1 mA) feeds Booster allowing 60-70% more beam at 8 and 120 GeV. 900 kW of CW beam remains at 1 GeV, and can be used in combination with existing AP0, former anti-proton rings, and new Muon Campus Kaducak & Polly concept studies at PXPS R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

Stage 1a: A compressor ring allows non-CW experiments to be mounted in the existing 1 GeV experimental areas. R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October 2012 Kaducak & Polly concept studies at PXPS 13

Stage 2: CW linac for 1 to 3 GeV constructed to feed new 3 MW experimental campus. Reuses first 180˚ of 1 GeV bunching ring for transport. R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October 2012 Kaducak & Polly concept studies at PXPS 14

R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October 2012 Kaducak & Polly concept studies at PXPS Stage 2a: A compressor ring allows non-CW experiments to be mounted in the 3 GeV experimental areas. 15

R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October 2012 Kaducak & Polly concept studies at PXPS 16 Stage 3: Pulsed linac constructed to feed Recycler. Reuses first 180˚ of 3 GeV bunching ring for transport.

Stage-1 Accelerator Resources: Promotes the Main Injector (MI) to a Mega-Watt class machine for neutrinos, and increases the potential beam power for other medium power MI experiments (e.g. ORKA, nu-STORM). Unshackles the   e (Mu2e) experiment from the Booster complex: Potentially increases sensitivity of Mu2e by x10 - x100 with 1-GeV CW drive beam. High power spallation target optimized for ultra-cold neutron and atomic-edm particle physics experiments and neutron anti-neutron oscillation experiments. Capability to drive polarized protons to a proton-edm experiment. Increases the available integrated 8 GeV power for other experiments (e.g. short-baseline neutrinos) from the Booster complex by liberating Mu2e. R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

CP violation research opportunities with Stage-1: Neutrinos: 70% increase in LBNE statistics. Proton-EDM, x10 6 reach, new capability Muon-EDM, x10 4 reach, new capability Neutron EDM, x reach Atomic EDMs. x reach, goal of surpassing Hg! R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October Stage-1 LBNE

19 5 Courtesy Klaus Kirch CIPANP 2012 R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October 2012 EDM Research Worldwide…

Neutrino research opportunities with Stage-1: 70% increase in LBNE statistics for hierarchy, precision oscillation measurements. 70% increase in statistics for short baseline experiments driven be the Main Injector (e.g. nuSTORM). x3 increase in 8 GeV beam power for short baseline experiments. R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

Baryon number violation research opportunities with Stage-1 n-nbar oscillations with free neutron techniques, sensitivity reach beyond Super-K which is background limited. R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

Rare Processes Research Probing far Beyond the TeV scale with Stage-1 x10 improvement in mu2e sensitivity. Platform for next generation rare muon decay experiments such as   3e. x100 improvement in K +   + sensitivity, many other rare K + modes. R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

Broader Impacts Research with Stage-1 Energy applications: Material studies, transmutation science, accelerator reliability. DOE SC/NE workshop early Materials science with muon Spin Rotation (muSR): very-low energy (<4 MeV) stopping  + that are sensitive probes of the magnetic properties of materials. Several facilities world- wide, no US facilities. Project X muSR forum October 17 th -19 th. R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

Since PXPS: Interaction with the NP/NSAC Fundamental Symmetries and Neutrinos working group August 10 th & 11 th Investment in Fermilab muon program highlighted. Project X Stage-1 capability document submitted to workshop. Recognition of Project X opportunities. Recognized value of cooperation with OHEP on selected projects. R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October Brad Plaster, Fun-Sym August 11th

DOE NP view of fundamental symmetries R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October T. Hallman, NP Associate Director Sept 21 st, NSAC.

Since PXPS: Interaction with the LBNE Reconfiguration enterprise* * R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

Since PXPS: Interaction with the European Strategy for Particle Physics* “Opportunities for Collaboration at Fermilab: Input to the European Strategy for Particle Physics, 2012” Submitted by P. Oddone “Opportunities for Collaboration in the Design and Development of the Project-X Accelerator Complex and Research Program.“ Submitted by S. Holmes & R. T. “Americas: Vision, Status &Strategy” Presented by A. Lankford. *( R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

CSS 2013 Engagement Plan: Accelerator Reference Design Report Accelerator Reference Design Report (RDR) will be prepared for distribution to the community in June The RDR will include: -Staging plan, capability of each stage. -Some information on cost drivers and scaling. R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

CSS 2013 Engagement Plan: Research Program Report R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October Research program opportunities report will be prepared for distribution to the community in June This report will include: - Experimental concepts and physics reach opportunities of each stage. - Will evolve from existing white papers, work at the Project X Physics Study, and and a URA funded theory study group.

CSS 2013 Engagement Plan: Necessary Detector R&D Report R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October A report on Detector R&D required to develop the research program opportunities will be prepared for distribution to the community in June This report will include: - R&D necessary for each stage. - Coordination with the DPF Coordination Panel for Advanced Detectors (CPAD) and connections to other scientific and technical disciplines.

CSS 2013 Engagement Plan: Broader Impacts Report R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October A report on the broader impacts of Project X including: - Energy and material irradiation applications working closely with our DOE NE colleagues at ANL, LANL and PNNL and our Indian collaborators. - Possibly muon Spin Rotation applications, pending discussions later this week.

Schedule Broader applications forums and workshops Oct 2012 (muSR) January 2013 (Energy & Materials). May/June 2013: Meeting at Fermilab to review Project X draft materials for Snowmass. This meeting will be coordinated with an Intensity Frontier CSS 2013 preparatory meeting. June 2013: Post and distribute Project X Snowmass materials. R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

Summary Project X staging and the stage-1 research program is now fairly clear, and community engagement is growing. Coordination and interaction with DOE NP is important and should continue through Snowmass. We will deliver Project X materials that define the research and broader impacts landscape for Snowmass. R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October Brad Plaster, Fun-Sym August 11th

1B - Disordered Mat’ls Commission Backscattering Spectrometer Commission High Pressure Diffractometer Commission A - Magnetism Reflectometer Commission B - Liquids Reflectometer Commission Cold Neutron Chopper Spectrometer Commission Wide Angle Chopper Spectrometer Commission High Resolution Chopper Spectrometer Commission Fundamental Physics Beamline Commission A - Powder Diffractometer Commission Single Crystal Diffractometer Commission Engineering Diffractometer IDT CFI Funded Commission SANS Commission B - Hybrid Spectrometer Commission – Spin Echo 9 – VISION Beamline 13 Has Been Allocated for Nuclear Physics at SNS Courtesy Geoff Greene R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

Target Moderators Proton Beam ORNL SNS Spallation target 37 Courtesy Geoff Greene R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October

R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October A. Lankford, ESPP Sept 2012

R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October A. Lankford, ESPP Sept 2012

R. Tschirhart, Fermilab PAC October A. Lankford, ESPP Sept 2012