1 UOS Application Dialog Introduction Dagobert Soergel College of Information Studies, University of Maryland.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Natural, Semi-formal, and Formal Ontologies: Bridging the Layers, Limits, and Lacunas Protégé International Conference Sunday, Ontolog Forum F2F 9:00.
Advertisements

© 2009 IBM Corporation John Carter and Karthick Rajamani Welcome To The Second Workshop on Energy Efficient Design Saint Malo, France.
1 Using Ontologies in Clinical Decision Support Applications Samson W. Tu Stanford Medical Informatics Stanford University.
Copyright: SIPC From Ontology to Data Model: Choices and Design Decisions Matthew West Reference Data Architecture and Standards Manager Shell International.
Upper Ontology Summit Tuesday March 14 The BFO perspective Barry Smith Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo National Center.
1 © 2006 Adam Pease, Articulate Software - apease [at] articulatesoftware [dot] com Formal Upper Ontology for Interoperability Adam Pease Articulate Software.
OMII-UK +OMII-Europe: Using Open Specifications to deliver project Achievements Neil Chue Hong + Steve Brewer © 2006 Open Grid Forum.
Re-learning Ontology Management for the Web Chris Welty IBM Research.
Joint WGISS-WGCV Session John Faundeen WGCV-23 & WGISS-19 9 March 2005 Cordoba, Argentina.
How many hours have passed from 6:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M.? C. 3 hours B. 6 hoursA. 9 hours.
1Copyright © 2009 Printer Working Group. All rights reserved. 1 IPP Working Group Session 24 June 2009 Rochester, NY - PWG F2F Meeting.
1Copyright © 2008, Printer Working Group. All rights reserved. Imaging Device Security (IDS) Working Group Camas, WA - PWG F2F Meeting August 13, 2008.
Welcome to W3C RIF F2F4 4-5 November 06 – Athens, GA.
Future Seekers: Career Awareness Project for At-Risk Eighth-Graders (Students of Promise)
West Virginia Department of Education. Overview State Board Mandate Parent and Community (PAC) Focus Areas How Can We Partner Together? Partnering.
March 18 th, 2008 Data Systems – Data Warehouse. Data-Driven Decisions.
1 Working together to strengthen research in Europe Open access and preservation: how can knowledge sharing be improved in ERA? (session 1.5) Alma Swan.
Towards a European repository ecology: conceptualising interactions between networks of repositories and services ECDL 2007, Budapest R. John Robertson,
Design Project (Last updated: Nov. 22/2010) Change since August 31: added the notes to the presentation in the next slide.
Winter 2013 Operations Workshop February 20, 2013.
INTERNET SHIELD COURSE F-SECURE ® ANTI-VIRUS CLIENT SECURITY 6.
Using Several Ontologies for Describing Audio-Visual Documents: A Case Study in the Medical Domain Sunday 29 th of May, 2005 Antoine Isaac 1 & Raphaël.
KR-2002 Panel/Debate Are Upper-Level Ontologies worth the effort? Chris Welty, IBM Research.
Go to View > Header & Footer to edit August 25, 2014 | slide 1 RSCs – Stimulating and supporting innovation in learning Gordon Millner.
1 Knowledge Management Workshop All Hands 2005 Sponsored by The Knowledge Management Roadmap & Cooperate Ontology Development Environment (CO-ODE) Contacts:
Development of the Smart Grid Implementation of the Board’s Policies Smart Grid Working Group November 29, 2012.
The 20th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE2008) Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Upper Ontology Summit Wednesday March 15 The BFO perspective Barry Smith Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo National.
Network Security Workshop Dhaka, Bangladesh 09 – 11 November 2013 Proudly Supported by:
2011 PI Conference Overview Assessment/Evaluation 2. Collaboration 3. Dissemination 4. Faculty Development 5. Key Challenges 6. Materials Development.
PA Geospatial Town Meeting Mapping Our Future Welcome Introductions Name Organization Geospatial area of expertise.
The Future of the Vermont Technology Grade Expectations January 30, 2009.
The Power of Collaboration Models of Collective Impact
Enablement kick off with Segme... 1 © 2014 IBM Corporation 1Q14 IBM SWG Sales Academy – ECM and ILG Sessions.
Introduction A Major Career Decision Format: Lunch & Learn (Panel discussion) Purpose: To assist college students answer two age-old questions, “What.
CE Transportation Team Page 1 Motorola Confidential CE LOGISTICS Motorola Communications Enterprise CE Global Transportation RFP Semi- Finalists Agenda.
Law Department Management Track Wednesday, 9:00–10:30am
MALACH Multilingual Access to Large spoken ArCHives Survivors of the Shoah Visual History Foundation Human Language Technologies IBM T. J. Watson Research.
Opportunities & Implications for Turkish Organisations & Projects
Group Members S. Lyon V. Garcia L. Mitra-Gast. What is Organizational Culture Unique to that company; built and changed over time Beliefs, assumptions,
Top Level Ontologies Ontologies and Ontology Engineering Ekhiotz Vergara and Maria Vasilevskaya Dept. of Computer & Information Science Linköping University.
1 Adam Pease Articulate Software apease at articulatesoftware dot com
1 Spatial Ontology Community of Practice Overview Workshop October 17, 2008 John Moeller SOCoP Co-Chair Maps and map visualization Features and feature.
Development of Domain Ontology, Targeted at the Creation of Learning Materials from Digital Archives Kamenka Staykova, Danail Dochev, Desislava Paneva,
1 © 2006 Adam Pease, Articulate Software - apease [at] articulatesoftware [dot] com Perspectives on UOS Adam Pease Articulate Software
The Agricultural Ontology Service (AOS) A Tool for Facilitating Access to Knowledge AGRIS/CARIS and Documentation Group Library and Documentation Systems.
® IBM Software Group © 2006 IBM Corporation Writing Good Use Cases Module 1: Introduction to Use-Case Modeling.
Using Several Ontologies for Describing Audio-Visual Documents: A Case Study in the Medical Domain Sunday 29 th of May, 2005 Antoine Isaac 1 & Raphaël.
SOCoP 2013 Workshop: Vision and Strategy Gary Berg-Cross SOCoP Executive Secretary Nov NSF Stafford II facility Wilson Blvd, Ballston VA.
Ontology – the benefits trail Matthew West. Why bother with Ontology? 2 Reduced Risk Identify Business Opportunities Responsive to change Increased effectiveness.
Ontology and Databases 1. We'll go around with a self-introduction of participants (10~15 minutes) - we'll skip this if we have more than 20 participants.
1 6 th Semi-Annual Service- Oriented Architecture (SOA) e-Gov Conference Special Session: Spatial Ontology Community of Practice.
WSMO in Knowledge Web 2nd SDK cluster f2f meeting Rubén Lara Digital Enterprise.
CS344 Artificial Intelligence Prof. Pushpak Bhattacharya Class on 26 Mar 2007.
Ppy/Ontolog_Collaborative_Work_Environment--PeterYim_ /Apr The Ontolog Collaborative Work Environment - the CoP’s Knowledge Repository by.
General Chairs: Nicola Guarino, Leo Obrst Ontology Summit 2012 Ontology for Big Systems Postmortem April 26, 2012.
1 Spatial Ontology Community of Practice Workshop November 12, 2009 Maps and map visualization Features and feature geometries Geographic and spatial-temporal.
Copy right 2004 Adam Pease permission to copy granted so long as slides and this notice are not altered Ontology Overview Introduction.
Leo Obrst, Fabian Neuhaus MITRE, NIST An Open Ontology Repository: Rationale, Expectations & Requirements Session.
LE:NOTRE Spring Workshop The Role of Ontologies for Mapping the Domain of Landscape Architecture An introduction.
Merge Domain ontologies below Upper ontology Advisor: P-J, LEE Student: Y-C, LIN Date: April
1 Collaborative Expedition Workshop #51: Open Collaboration: Networking Geospatial Information Technology for Interoperability and Spatial Ontology June.
CCSAS V2 Impacts on Business and Legal Processes October 4, 2006.
Ontology Summit 2016: Launch Framing the Conversation: Ontologies within Semantic Interoperability Ecosystems Donna Fritzsche and Michael Grüninger February.
Ontology for Big Data: Claims and Evidence
The Role of Ontologies for Mapping the Domain of Landscape Architecture An introduction.
Ontology Reuse In MBSE Henson Graves Abstract January 2011
Undertaking Real Assessment: The Software Made Us Do It
Bird of Feather Session
Entry Guideline Template
Presentation transcript:

1 UOS Application Dialog Introduction Dagobert Soergel College of Information Studies, University of Maryland

2 Purpose of this session Identify benefits of upper ontologies Identify benefits of aligning existing upper ontologies Identify requirements for upper ontologies Identify research issues

3 Purpose of this session Identify benefits of upper ontologies Identify applications where the use of an upper ontology gives –improved efficiency in system creation and/or –better system performance in terms of better reasoning or retrieval etc. Identify benefits of aligning existing upper ontologies for improving interoperability among applications Identify requirements for upper ontologies from the perspective of (potential) adopters Identify research issues on the path towards meeting application requirements and interoperability

4 Agenda 9:00 AM - Introduction – Dagobert Soergel 9:10 AM - Upper Ontologists: Application examples 10:10 AM - Stakeholders and potential funders 10:30 AM - Break 11:00 AM - Open dialog: Potential of upper ontologies –Upper ontologists –Stakeholders –Application builders 12:00 NOON - ADJOURN

5 Agenda 9:10 AM - Upper Ontologists: Application examples Cyc applications – Doug Lenat, Cycorp SUMO applications – Adam Pease, Articulate Software ISO applications – Matthew West, Shell DOLCE applications – Nicola Guarino Charge Present an example where the use of an upper ontology made a real difference in practice; Help those not steeped in logic understand the need for formalization and axioms; Illustrate the importance of aligning existing upper ontologies to achieve interoperability among practical applications.

6 Agenda 10:10 AM - Stakeholders and potential funders John Walker, NSA TBA, NSF Charge Comments and reactions to the presentations with a view to next steps towards implementation

7 Agenda 11:00 AM - Open dialog: Potential of upper ontologies –Upper ontologists –Stakeholders –Application builders Chris Welty, IBM Mike Uschold, Boeing Conor Shankey, Visual Knowledge Miles Davis (on Digital Harbor & Metatomix applications) Tom Beckman, Beckman Associates Dave McComb, Semantic Arts Charge Give more examples so we can start to build guidelines Identify requirements to make the use of upper ontologies easier. 12:00 NOON - ADJOURN