Management of Structural Funds The Austrian Approach Belgrade, June 23, 2011 Markus Gruber.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme
Advertisements

The Management of European Structural Funds in Western Scotland ISPA Partners Meeting April 2003 Laurie Russell Strathclyde European Partnership.
Financial Management and Control Annual Meeting of ISPA PARTNERS 2003 Preparation for post-accession Management of Community Funds : Nicholas Martyn Regional.
Planning and Timely Implementation of Structural Funds Interventions Katarína Mathernová Director, DG Regional Policy European Commission 24 November 2005.
The Cohesion Fund: Programming and link to the Structural Funds Annual Meeting of ISPA Partners 2003: From ISPA to Cohesion Fund and Structural Funds Angela.
Social Economy Partnership under EQUAL Czech best practice case study Petra Francová Open Days 2008 Brussels 8th October 2008.
Arrangements regarding ECP 2014–2020 implementation 1.Implementation of the Republic of Slovenia Budget Act Specific section for the period:
S3 Project aim The main goal, thus expected result, of the S3 project would be to strengthen tools used for Structural Fund policies (SF), through the.
Expert Group / Brussels October 13 th 2006 This project has received funding from the european community JA AT - JOINT CALL -
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Event – date, place About INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG IVC Joint Technical Secretariat Iruma Kravale, The.
Implementation of Leader Axis measures by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
Managing authorities working with cities Regions for Economic Change 17 th February 2009 Peter Ramsden Pole Manager.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
Planning Evaluation 1 Planning evaluation An example - ERDF Berlin Dr. Oliver Schwab IfS Institut für Stadtforschung und Strukturpolitik.
Preparation of Bulgaria for future use of EU Structural Instruments Lyubomir Datzov Deputy Minister of Finance.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The EU Recovery Plan and the proposal amending the European Regional Development Fund Regulation.
OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME Information Society 3rd Community Support Framework for Greece June 2001.
SME Enterprise Networks in the framework of the At-Hu Border Region Csaba Horváth, JTS SME Enterprise Networks in the framework of the At-Hu Border Region.
Workshop on the Legal Framework of EU Structural Funds’ Management for the Period Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006 Head of Division, Preben.
Implementation Section Romania-Bulgaria Cross-Border Cooperation Operational Programme Joint Approval Committee, Bucharest, 3 April 2007.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Innovation and the Structural Funds, Antwerp, 16 January 2007 Veronica Gaffey Innovative Actions Unit.
European Cooperation in the EU RTD Framework Programme: Experiences in FP6 and perspectives for FP7 Manfred Horvat bm:bwk and ASO Bratislava Kosice 2 nd.
OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE BULGARIAN ECONOMY” Republic of Bulgaria Ministry of Economy and Energy April 2006.
The Future of Transnational Cooperation in Central Europe ( ) Claudia Pamperl JTS INTERRREG IIIC East.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENS SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP CONSUMER
South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme Bologna, 15° June 2009 Kick-off meeting of project SARMa SEE Joint Technical Secretariat.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden A Community Initiative concerning Transnational co-operation on spatial.
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE MANAGING AUTHORITY CSF Promoting Regional Partnership, Networking and Cooperation between Greece & Czech Republic.
Audit Authority and Auditors Group of “European Territorial Cooperation” Programmes for Lessons to be learnt from the INTERREG IIIB NWE Auditors.
STEPS FOR FUNDING ELI-NP March 11 st 2011 Dan Cutoiu.
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
Regional Development OP in Hungary , June 2008, Zagrab.
1 LIFE+ COUNCIL WORKING GROUP 4 OCTOBER Discussion Points 1. LIFE+ in Context: Environment funding under the Financial Perspectives.
Part-financed by the European Union Baltic Sea Region 2007– Profile Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant Seminar, Riga, 9-11 April 2008.
Struktūrfondu vadošā iestāde – Finanšu ministrija 1 1 Communication Strategy of EU Funds Sanda Rieksta Head of Information Division, Deputy Head.
Partnership in the SF Programmes. GRDP For IRT 2 Influencing the future programmes” 3 main topics were identified –SEA –Greening projects –Partnership.
1 Cohesion Policy Brussels, 9 June 2009 “ Cohesion policy: response to the economic crisis” European Commission seminar for managing and certifying.
1 December, 2004 Agency for Vocational Education Development Riga Support of ESF in Education and Continuing Training.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT meeting, 12 December 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
STRAT.AT Report 2012 Second Strategic Report for Austria on the implementation of EU Cohesion Policy some selected results Alexandra Deimel Federal.
Experience of Accessing EU Financial Support in Lithuania 4th PG Funding Meeting , Paris.
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
European Union Funds European Union Funds for growth and development Andžs Ūbelis Deputy State Secretary Ministry of Finance EU Structural Funds.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Dagmar Schmalzbauer ATMOS - Austrian Monitoring System.
Ministry of Finance Compliance assessment of the management and control systems of the managing authorities under the Operational programmes. Conclusions.
Leader Axis Rural Development Policy by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
Energy Fund The Hague Alternative use of ERDF to support energy efficiency measures Making financial instruments work for cities Ton Overmeire, Holding.
Norwegian Cooperation Programme – Roles, responsibilities and procedures 15 November 2007, Radisson SAS Grand Hotel Sofia, Bulgaria Anne Lise Rognlidalen,
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity in programming period
SLOVENE EXPERIENCES New Territorial Cooperation : new scenarios and opportunities International Conference Venice, Italy Bojan Suvorov,
Joint Seminar Brussels 2017.
NSRF and National Development Planning in Greece
INTERREG VB Danube Transnational Programme
Bulgarian NSRF and OPs: Evaluation Arrangements
ESF ASSISTANCE TO LITHUANIA’S OBJECTIVE 1 AND EQUAL PROGRAMS
Supporting Cities and Regions through Projects and Programmes
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN EUPAN
MULTILEVEL GOVERNANCE UNDER ESF IN SPAIN
Constituent Bodies Reform (CBR)
National Cluster Platform Austria Dr
Art. 17 EGTC Indicators 13th Meeting of the Expert Group on Delegated and Implementing Acts for the ESI Funds 4th July 2013.
An overview The EU Strategy for the Danube Region -
Presentation transcript:

Management of Structural Funds The Austrian Approach Belgrade, June 23, 2011 Markus Gruber

S. 2 Convelop Research, Development and Consultancy Innovation & Regional Policy Organisational Development Focus: Structural Funds First Strategic Report for Austria on the Implementation of EU-Cohesion Policy Drawing a balance: Structural Funds in AUT

S. 3 Institutional Framework in Austria Federal State – Planning at 3 levels: Federal level Bundesländer (9) Communities (2.357) 8.2 Mio. Inhabitants Structural Funds National Strategic Reference Framework – STRAT.AT 25 Operational Programs: Bill. Euro SF A fairly good reputation & g ood absorption rates, good organised

S. 4 Four points to be highlighted 1.Division between strategic and operativ tasks -- > Agencification 2.Balance between formalization and informal coordination 3.Active management of project pipeline / implementation 4.Focus on communication (horizontal, vertical) -- > ÖROK, STRAT.ATplus

S. 5 Four points to be highlighted 1.Division between strategic and operativ tasks -- > Agencification

S. 6 Political evel: Objectives, Strategies Managing authorities (governmental departement) Public Agencies (intermediate bodies) Project selection based on support schemes & selection criteria Political level is responsible for Objectives, overall strategy and financial framework Approval of OP at national/regional level Political level is responsible for Objectives, overall strategy and financial framework Approval of OP at national/regional level MA: Overall responsibility for programme preparation and implementation (governmental departements) Managing authorities enter into a contract with Public Agencies for implementation of OP at measure level MA: Overall responsibility for programme preparation and implementation (governmental departements) Managing authorities enter into a contract with Public Agencies for implementation of OP at measure level

S. 7 Political evel: Objectives, Strategies Managing authorities (governmental departement) Public Agencies (intermediate bodies) Project selection based on support schemes & selection criteria Public Agencies are responsible for OP implementation at measure level Federal (selection): Austrian Agency for Research Promotion Austrian economic promotiona agency Communal Public Consulting Länder: e.g. Styrian economic promotion agency Public Agencies are responsible for OP implementation at measure level Federal (selection): Austrian Agency for Research Promotion Austrian economic promotiona agency Communal Public Consulting Länder: e.g. Styrian economic promotion agency Agency are autonomous & independent in project decisions Project selection is based on committed support schemes and criteria (national + SF) Agencies are supervised by Committees/Boards Agencies are working for national policy implementation (federal & regional level) and Structural Funds Agency are autonomous & independent in project decisions Project selection is based on committed support schemes and criteria (national + SF) Agencies are supervised by Committees/Boards Agencies are working for national policy implementation (federal & regional level) and Structural Funds

S. 8 Agencification Reduces political influence on operative level / project decisions etc. Funding decisions are based on aggreed support schemes and criteria which are linked to the OP Final approval of projects decisions  boards of the Agencies (often economic and social partners are included) Agencies are controlled internally, by boards and by courts of Auditors + evaluated Important: Agencies are responsible for implementation of both: national policy instruments and Structural Funds measures – No parallel SF-Structure is established

S. 9 Four points to be highlighted 1.Division between strategic and operativ tasks -- > Agencification 2.Balance between formalization and informal coordination

S. 10 Balance between formalization and informal coordination Contracts between MA & Public Agencies Certifying and Audit authority (Federal Chancellery) Rules on eligible costs Common ERDF data monitoring system (ATMOS) Monitoring committees ÖROK coordination platform & joint secretariat for MCs

S. 11 ÖROK coordination platform & joint secretariat for MCs ÖROK: coordination platform

S. 12 Formal and informal structures – not only for SF implementation ÖROK Informal cooperation network: crucial for success Source: BKA, ÖROK European Commission Managing Authorities Certifying and (federal or Länder) Audit Authorities (federal level) Joint Monitoring Intermediate Bodies (Agencies federal or Länder) Intermediate Bodies (Agendcies federal or Länder) Intermediate Bodies (Agencies federal or Länder) Formal responsibilities

S. 13 Four points to be highlighted 1.Division between strategic and operativ tasks -- > Agencification 2.Balance between formalization and informal coordination 3.Active management of project pipeline/ implementation

S. 14 companies R&D organisations municipalities Pro-active Project development Pro-active Project development Regional Management: Project development and co-ordination at „sub- regional“ level Active management of project pipeline at the ground Political level: Objectives, Strategies Managing authorities Public Agencies Project selection

S. 15 Four points to be highlighted 1.Division between strategic and operativ tasks -- > Agencification 2.Balance between formalization and informal coordination 3.Active management of project pipeline/ implementation 4.Focus on communication (horizontal, vertical) -- > ÖROK, STRAT.ATplus

S. 16 “STRAT.ATplus Monitoring Process”

S. 17 Four points to be highlighted 1.Division of tasks between strategic and operativ tasks -- > Agencification 2.balanced system between formal rules and informal coordination 3.Active management of project pipeline at the ground Pro active project development Regional level: Organisations for project stimulation & development 4.Focus on communication -- > ÖROK, STRAT.ATplus

S. 18 Coordination strategic programme measure project Programmes Monitoring & financial control Monitoring & financial control Political level: Objectives, Strategies Managing Authorities Agencies (intermediate bodies) Project selection based on support schemes & selection criteria companies R&D organisations municipalities ÖROK Joint Secretariat For MCs Incl. economic and social partners Monitoring committee incl. NGO, economic and social partners Certifying and Audit authority (Federal Chancellery) NGO, economic and social partners National: court of auditors EC DG Regio Level Task Joint ERDF- Monitoring

S. 19 Coordination strategic programme measure project Programmes Monitoring & financial control Monitoring & financial control Political level: Objectives, Strategies Managing Authorities Agencies (intermediate bodies) Project selection based on support schemes & selection criteria companies R&D organisations municipalities ÖROK Joint Secretariat For MCs Incl. economic and social partners Monitoring committee incl. NGO, economic and social partners Certifying and Audit authority (Federal Chancellery) NGO, economic and social partners National: court of auditors EC DG Regio Level Task Joint ERDF- Monitoring

Markus Gruber convelop cooperative knowledge design gmbh A-8010 Graz, Bürgergasse 8-10/I Telefon +43 (0) Fax +43 (0)