EUROPEAN COMMISSION Territorial Co-operation in 2007-2013 Territorial Co-operation in 2007-2013 Territorial Co-operation Unit DG Regional Policy West Sussex,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 FROM INTERREG III TO EUROPEAN TERRITORIAL CO- OPERATION State of Play January 2007.
Advertisements

Seminar on European Territorial Co-operation – Brussels - 21 February 2005 Cross border co- operation at the EU external borders Seminar on Territorial.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Objective 3 Territorial Co-operation Workshop 1: Cross-border co-operation DG Regional Policy Brussels, 21 February 2005.
Cyprus Project Management Society
„South East Europe Programme” as a financing opportunity for projects in the Danube region and complementarity to other instruments COMPLEMENTARITY OF.
EUROPEAN TERRITORIAL CO-OPERATION Brussels, 1 September 2008 Nathalie Verschelde Unit REGIO E1 «Territorial Cooperation »
The URBACT II Programme General Presentation Vilnius, 20 January 2011.
Territorial Cooperation – adding value to the Danube Region Ivana Lazic, INTERACT Point Vienna 9 July 2010 | Novi Sad.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
Opportunities for interregional cooperation in Regional Operational Programmes: Article 96.3.d) of the Common Provisions Regulation INTERACT Future Pilot.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
04/2007 European Funds in Bulgaria Supported by the European Commission (DG ENV)
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
Part-financed by the European Union The new Baltic Sea Region Programme Susanne Scherrer, Director of the Joint Secretariat Rostock/Riga.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The EU Recovery Plan and the proposal amending the European Regional Development Fund Regulation.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – Regional Policy Why change? Cohesion Policy has been changing already for a long time! ✦ EU has been changing:
Alpine Space Summit Stresa, 20 June 2006 Claudio CARUSO European Commission DG REGIO A new approach for European Transnational Co-operation
EU Cohesion Policy Focus on European Territorial Cooperation Manuela Passos DG Regional Policy European Commission Bari 29 November.
INTERREG IVC 1 EUROPEAN INTERREGIONAL COOPERATION 2007/13 Interreg IVC General overview 21 March 2007.
Napoli, Procida May 2007 Henrik Lauridsen EuropeAid The ENPI CBC programmes and their content.
European Union | European Regional Development Fund From INTERREG IVC to Interreg Europe Info day in Tullamore Akos Szabo| Project Officer Interreg Europe.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Innovation and the Structural Funds, Antwerp, 16 January 2007 Veronica Gaffey Innovative Actions Unit.
EU Cohesion Policy Developments Sophie Purdey Title Slides Your audience needs to know who you are and what you are going to talk about. Give your presentation.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 Interregional Cooperation and the Lisbon and Gothenburg Agendas “GROW” Brussels, 18 October 2007 Territorial Co-operation.
The Future of Transnational Cooperation in Central Europe ( ) Claudia Pamperl JTS INTERRREG IIIC East.
South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme Bologna, 15° June 2009 Kick-off meeting of project SARMa SEE Joint Technical Secretariat.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
European Territorial Cooperation SAWP meeting, 9 July
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
European Territorial Cooperation Programmes European Territorial Cooperation Programmes Greece-Italy A case study in cross-border cooperation.
EU Structural Funds Presentation to Chief Executives 9 May 2006 Hillgrove Hotel Monaghan.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Community-led local development Articles of the Common Provisions Regulation.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
EU European Territorial Cooperation Legal Package - State of play Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head.
1 European Territorial Cooperation in legislative proposals Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward studies, impact assessment, DG Regional Policy.
1 LIFE+ COUNCIL WORKING GROUP 4 OCTOBER Discussion Points 1. LIFE+ in Context: Environment funding under the Financial Perspectives.
Part-financed by the European Union Baltic Sea Region 2007– Profile Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant Seminar, Riga, 9-11 April 2008.
The European Structural and Investment Funds & the defence sector Paul Anciaux, Helsinki, 25 March 2014.
Preparation of future ENI CBC programmes - State of Play Vanessa De Bruyn (DG DEVCO) 3 December 2012.
March 2007, Smolyan Angelos SANOPOULOS, Euroconsultants SA CROSS BORDER COOPERATION Bulgaria-Greece Experiences, Framework and New Operational.
Black Sea Cross Border Cooperation in the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy Black Sea International Day Black Sea Joint Operational Programme.
The European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument DG RELEX UNIT ER-D-1 European Neighbourhood Policy Coordination – General Coordination.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Akos Szabo Joint Technical Secretariat 26 June 2014, Brussels.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
EU A new configuration of European Territorial Cooperation Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head of Unit.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
Welcomeurope © RUSE Project Krakow, 2005 November 29 “The European Structural Funds” RUSE Project coordinated by Energie-Cités Seminar hosted by Polish.
Future outlook and next steps for ESPON The ESPON 2013 Programme OPEN DAYS Bruxelles, 10 October 2007.
AlpCity AlpCity Final Conference Prà Catinat, 16 October 2006 Ivan Curzolo - JTS Alpine Space Programme.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
GROW Conference 20 June 2007 Silke Brocks Project Officer JTS INTERREG IIIC West, Lille (F) Main achievements of the INTERREG IIIC programme Insight into.
European Commission Directorate General Environment Page 1 Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning monitoring.
1 Second call for proposals – National Information Day EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Benoît Dalbert, Project Officer, Joint Technical Secretariat.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
1 Cohesion policy post 2013 Jiri Svarc Head of Unit for Finland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Operative Programmes Anita Gulam Ana Kovačević Ministry of Environmental and Nature Protection, Republic of.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity in programming period
Please note this information is subject to change.
South-East European Space
Informal Water Directors Meeting Dublin, 22nd June 2004
Petri Haapalainen Jyväskylä 7 April 2006
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Territorial Co-operation
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Art. 17 EGTC Indicators 13th Meeting of the Expert Group on Delegated and Implementing Acts for the ESI Funds 4th July 2013.
Ex ante conditionalities in cohesion policy:
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Objective 3 Territorial Co-operation Workshop 4:Trans-national co-operation DG Regional Policy Brussels, 22.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Objective 3 Territorial Co-operation Workshop 5: Interregional co-operation and network programmes DG Regional.
Presentation transcript:

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Territorial Co-operation in Territorial Co-operation in Territorial Co-operation Unit DG Regional Policy West Sussex, 17 October 2006

Main points l Legal Framework and Financing l Programme areas and structure l Content and topics l Programme management l Next Steps

Regulations mCouncil common position agreed on 12/6 and approved by Parliament on 4/7 m3 Council Regulations approved on 5 July ERDF – (EC) No 1080/ ESF – (EC) No 1081/ EGTC (EC) No 1082/2006 mand 2 on 11 July General Regulation – (EC) No 1083/ Cohesion Fund – (EC) No 1084/2006 mEntry into force on 1/8/2006

Regulations mLetter sent by EC on revised allocations per MS mCOM will ask MS whether they want to make use of flexibility (up to 15%) and how much they will allocate to each programme mList of eligible cross-border areas to follow in the autumn [Community Strategic Guidelines adopted on 6 October by the Council]

European Territorial Co-operation Financing l l From a Community Initiative to an Objective in its own right l l Somewhat higher financing € 5.8 billion → € 8.8 billion € 5.8 billion → € 8.8 billion

l l Cross-border co-operation 74% * l l Transnational co-operation 21%* l l Interregional co-operation 5% In addition, interregional co-operation with regions in other Member State will be encouraged in Convergence and Competitiveness programmes Co-financing rate: up to 75% (even 85% for certain programmes) 900 mio € to be transferred from Objective 3 ERDF- allocation from the Member States concerned to the external instruments (ENPI or IPA) *) Flexibility at Member State level: +/- 15% European Territorial Co-operation Financing

Present programmes Commission Proposal ( July 2004 ) Final Agreement (July 06 ) (Current prices) Cross-border co- operation 3998 mio € 6,8 bn € ~6,5 bn € (inc 0,9 bn € ENPI/IPA) Transnational co- operation 1394 mio € 6,8 bn € ~1,8 bn € Interregional co- operation (INTERREG IIIC, URBACT, ESPON, INTERACT) 406 mio € 406 mio € 0,65 bn € ~0,4 bn € Total 5799 mio € 14,25 bn € ~8,8 bn € European Territorial Co-operation Financing

Today 62 cross-border programmes

Regions eligible for cross-border co- operation More than 50 programmes on internal borders + 12 IPA programmes More than 50 programmes on internal borders + 12 IPA programmes

Co-operation programmes l Strand A Cross-border co-operation - for solving local problems - include strategic projects, especially along maritime borders l Strand B Transnational co-operation - no longer studies and plans but concrete, strategic projects important for the whole area l Strand C Interregional co-operation - exchange of experiences and best practices to improve regional policy design

l l The addition of many maritime borders will change the eligible programme areas considerably l l Larger co-operation areas may bring in new innovative projects l l As some topics of cross-border and transnational programmes may overlap, especially after the inclusion of many maritime borders, coherence between cross- border and transnational programmes should be ensured already at the programming stage l l General approach: reduce the number of programmes whenever possible, as a high number of small programmes and excessive administration costs would not seem sensible Cross-border co-operation: Programme structure

Cross-border programmes essentially local in nature, but include strategic projects at least along maritime borders l l Entrepreneurship and SMEs, cross-border trade, tourism and culture l l Protection and joint management of the environment l l Better access to transport, information and communication networks l l Water, waste management and energy management systems l l Urban-Rural links l l Joint use of health, culture and education infrastructure l l Legal and administrative co-operation Important issues in the programming process:   individual programmes should become more focussed   more focussed calls and commissioned projects

Transnational co-operation l 13 programme areas agreed l Allocation principle: national population l More strategic approach, well planned projects coordinated at national level Focus on - - Innovation: scientific and technological networks, technology transfer, R&TD and SMEs - - Environment: water and coastal management, Prevention of environmental and technological risks, maritime safety - - Accessibility: improve access to and quality of transport and telecommunication services - - Sustainable urban development

Transnational co-operation l Higher profile programmes l Concrete projects with some investments l Networking, plans and studies only to prepare concrete projects l Some strategic projects developed by the programme, involving both regional and national authorities - some of these projects may be written into the Programming document l Not only open calls for proposal but also focussed calls l Can spend 20% outside the eligible area l Can spend 10% outside the EU, if for benefit of the EU regions

Project ideas l l Maritime safety initiative (already initiated by the North Sea programme and now joint for 5 transnational programmes) l l Business co-operation and technology transfer between SMEs, research institutes, universities and regional development agencies to improve the competitiveness of the regions l l Protection against flooding l l Combating environmental threats l l Co-operation between coastal ports and towns to improve accessibility and transport interoperability

l l Interregional co-operation under Objective 3 (Territorial Co-operation) l l Interregional co-operation encouraged also within Objective 1 (Convergence) and Objective 2 (Competitiveness) programmes Two approaches to interregional co- operation

o oThematic interregional co-operation programme focusing on Lisbon and Gothenburg priorities (based on INTERREG IIIC) o oFramework programme for the exchange of experiences on urban renewal (developed on the basis of URBACT) o oStudies, data collection, observation and analysis of development trends in the Community (developed on the basis of ESPON) o oIdentification, transfer and dissemination of best practice in management of co-operation programmes (developed on the basis of INTERACT) Interregional co-operation programmes foreseen

l l Strong focus on European priorities :   Innovation and SMEs   Environment and risk prevention l l Simple, transparent and consistent programme framework for project applicants l l Thematically organised application and selection processes l l Systematic analysis of project results and dissemination ensuring easy access to best practice examples for regional policy makers Thematic interregional co-operation programme

l l Inclusion of a specific priority for interregional co-operation in Objective 2 (and Objective 1) programmes (optional) l l Will allow co-operation between programme regions l l Interregional co-operation can cover common topics of the programmes l l Each project partner funds own activities from respective programme Interregional co-operation in Competitiveness (Objective 2) programmes

Programme management structures: well working and cost-effective Managing Authority (MA) l Good management capacity Joint Technical Secretariat (JTS) l Support the MA (and PMC) effectively and therefore normally located nearby l Provide help and support to projects at all stages l P l Process applications and organise expert assessments Monitoring Committee l Normally also responsible for project selection

Programme structures to support true co-operation projects of high quality Cross-border and transnational co-operation : l l Partners from at least two countries l l Fulfill at least 2 of the following 4 co-operation criteria: mjoint project development mjoint implementation mjoint project staff mjoint financing

l l No pre-allocations to different regions nor Member States participating in the programme l l Projects should compete on the basis of quality and relevance l l True Lead Partner (LP) projects, where the LP is responsible for implementing the whole project and concludes agreement with MA and with the beneficiaries participating in the operation (project partners)   Mirror projects only exceptionally Programme structures to support true co-operation projects of high quality

Avoid potential conflicts of interest and apply transparent procedures: use external experts to make an initial assessments of projects, especially in those cases where the region managing the programme is also applying for a project use external experts to make an initial assessments of projects, especially in those cases where the region managing the programme is also applying for a project the Joint Technical Secretariat should never be involved in managing a project the Joint Technical Secretariat should never be involved in managing a project Programme structures to support true co-operation projects of high quality

 Article 20 of ERDF regulation No 1080/2006  Responsibility for the implementation of the whole project  Signs the contract with the Managing authority  Organises relations among the project partners  Ensures clear lines of responsibility in the event of irregularities  For the Commission, this principle offers clear added value for cross-border co-operation  Ensures genuine joint implementation and co-operation  Sufficient financial safety elements are included within the regulations Lead Partner Principle

NEXT STEPS

Next Steps l l Discuss programme and management structures with your potential partners l l Discuss programme and management structures with the Commission l l Think about strategic projects that should be included in the programming document l l Involve local, regional and national level as appropriate

Next Steps l Programme preparation must start now – if not already started l Commission has already seen advanced drafts of several programmes l Intention should be to submit formally before the end of the year – ideally in the autumn l Approval and programme launch in early 2007

Thank you for your attention