Professor Barry J Rodger, University of Strathclyde Glasgow ACLE- To Enforce and Comply: Incentives Inside Corporations and Agencies, March 5-6, 2009
Tackles a range of key issues in the debate on compliance and incentives Corporate Governance Internal Managerial incentives Corporate and individual Crime Whistleblowing, compliance and Law Enforcement 3 issues- Leslie and ‘faithless agents’; the Australian compliance study and my UK follow-up study
‘Cartels, Agency Costs and Finding Virtue in Faithless Agents’ C R Leslie [2008] William and Mary Law Review Vol Fascinating- Christie’s and Sotheby’s- Christopher Davidge, CEO of former- (see the Art of the Steal) Lysine- Mark Whitacre, division manager of ADM (see the Informant, and forthcoming film- Matt Damon!)
Leslie- destabilise cartels from within… Encourage faithless agents, by decoupling the interests of principal and agent by:- Increasing severity of individual punishment for price-fixing; Reward individuals for exposing cartel activity- immunity and bounties; and Structure law so employees will not trust employers to protect them should the cartel be exposed
The Australian compliance study- work of Parker and Nielsen “Do Businesses Take Compliance Systems Seriously?: An Empirical Study of the Implementation of Trade Practices Compliance Systems in Australia”, Melbourne University Law Review, Volume 30, 2006 p 441; ‘How Much Does it Hurt? How Australian Businesses Think about the Costs and Gains of Compliance with the Trade Practices Act’ (2008) Melbourne Uni Law Review perceptual deterrence
Nielsen/Parker- To what extent do Third parties Influence Business Compliance? (2008) Law and Society 3 rd party pressure/influence on compliance management- plural compliance motivations? Considerable worry but little evidence of impact in driving business compliance behaviour, except for risks of complaints But suggests enforcement agencies can facilitate role of third parties..
Earlier empirical work re compliance (2000 CLLR, 2005 World Competition) (forthcoming European Competition Journal) Study following Australian study-Database of all OFT infringement decisions from March to end 2005 Questionnaires to all organisations which infringed either Competition Act prohibition Your organisation, the Competition Act 1998 and the OFT; Your knowledge of the 1998 Act; The impact of the Act on your Organisation; Costs and Benefits of Complying with the Act 20 questionnaires returned (33%)- all Chap 1 prohibitions
33% response rate satisfactory, but limited number- 20 in total Disappointing levels of compliance implementation- note focus of study Communication and training weak OFT education strategy post enhanced carrot and stick approach Further resources dedicated to information and education re compliance
Business perceptions re compliance important- pluralistic motivations Support for three key theories- deterrence, moral citizenship, managerial (in)competence Increase sanctions> greater concern but clearly insufficient Greater task for OFT including promotion of compliance professionalism Future research re top 100 UK companies..??