Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City 220-2515 June.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Findings from Recent Illinois Voter Survey Survey Conducted: May 12-14, 2009 Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy.
Advertisements

Key Findings from a Countywide Voter Survey Conducted November 21-25, 2013.
About the Poll The Washington Poll is a non-partisan, academic survey research project sponsored by the Washington Institute for the Study of Ethnicity.
1 Measure M Investment Plan Update. 2 Measure M: A Contract With the Voters Approved by 55 percent of voters in November 1990 after two failures One-half.
A Public Opinion Research Project Exploring Attitudes About Government Emily Ekins | Polling Director at Reason Foundation reason.com/poll.
Survey Conducted May 6-8, Project Objectives & Results  A recently commissioned project of The Lew Edwards Group--with survey research.
Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan Randell Iwasaki California Department of Transportation.
0 RBC contracted with Public Opinion Strategies to conduct a telephone survey in Douglas County School District, Colorado. The survey was completed April.
HART Community Survey Ilium Associates Inc. July–August 2009.
Key Findings from Mail Survey Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison,
Municipal Water District of Orange County SURVEY OF CUSTOMERS REGARDING KEY WATER ISSUES Survey of 500 Orange County residents in MWDOC service area October.
1 PROPOSITION 63 The Mental Health Services Act Community Mental Health Providers, Consumers and Families, and Other Supporters of Increased Funding for.
Contra Costa County Survey of Likely November 2014 Voters Presentation to Board of Supervisors June 24, 2014.
Texas Transportation Poll Testimony of Ginger Goodin Transportation Policy Research Center Texas A&M Transportation Institute before the Senate Select.
VOTE An Overview of Transit Referendum Campaigns and the Communities That Have Conducted Them Alan C. Wulkan Senior Vice President Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Summary of Survey Results Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison,
Getting on the Ballot: Counting the Votes Shall transportation improvements throughout Hillsborough County, Tampa, Temple Terrace and Plant City be.
Rural Counties Task Force Meeting – October 2005 Martin Wachs University of California, Berkeley.
Are Your Polls Effective? Yes, No, Maybe St. Louis, Missouri June 22, 2011 Richard Bernard, Ph.D. Transit Initiatives and Communities Conference Understanding.
1 Colorado Transportation Issues July 10, These unique polling results are based on 1,001 live telephone surveys among likely 2014 voters statewide.
Presentation on Polling Results and Direction to Staff on November 2008 Ballot Measure July 7, 2008.
About the Poll The Washington Poll is a non-partisan, academic survey research project sponsored by the Washington Institute for the Study of Ethnicity.
March 2010 Telephone Survey EMC Research, Inc. 811 First Avenue – Suite 451 Seattle, WA (206)
Southern Maryland Association of REALTORS® Charles County Issues Survey American Strategies Incorporated and Myers Research | Strategic Services, LLC designed.
A Survey of Voter Attitudes in Douglas County, Colorado #12459 May 25-26, 2010.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM A SURVEY OF LIKELY VOTERS IN DENVER What Is the Public Telling Us? Ben Kelly.
Fresno County Library Revenue Measure Survey Survey Conducted March 9-14, 2012.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ACEC-LA Luncheon February 12, 2014 Frank Quon, P.E. Executive Officer, Highway Program.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City City of Palo.
PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES Senior Project Director PID# Sarah Simmons On Behalf of.
1 Senate Transportation & Housing Committee December 13, 2005 Orange County Transportation Authority.
2012 Community Survey Results Water Issues Conducted by.
Transportation 2035: Investment Trade Offs Metropolitan Transportation Commission Transportation 2035 Public Involvement Program June 13, 2008.
Communicating about Active Transportation Developing your story & communications strategy Lessons learned from polling & focus groups Effective messages.
Survey conducted: May 14-19, Key Findings Two-thirds of respondents perceive that the City is headed in the right direction. Six out.
A Survey of Voter Attitudes in the United States Conducted September 7-10, 2003.
National Survey of Likely Voters April AHUA National Survey of Likely Voters - April Methodology Universe: Likely Voters Sample Size: 1,000.
Transportation 2035 Survey Results Presented to: MTC Planning Committee November 9, 2007.
Initiated the discussions that led to Measure R on the November 2008 ballot:  a ½ cent sales tax increase to raise $40 billion for LA County transportation.
Regional Transportation Issues Infrastructure Maintenance New Facilities Air Quality Pollution Congestion Freeway System Surface Streets Income.
Marketing Resource Group for The Michigan Chamber of Commerce A survey of 600 likely voters was conducted by live interview April 2-6, A random sample.
December 15, 2015 Del Mar Village Specific Plan Voter Survey – Preliminary Results Conducted for the City of Del Mar Presented by Timothy McLarney, Ph.D.,
Agenda Methodology Major Findings –Perceptions of Congestion –Ease of Travel –Transportation Planning Issues –Interest in Using Public Transportation.
Survey Conducted: May 6-14, 2009 Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland,
Transportation 2035: S.F. Bay Area Targeting Health through Environment Metropolitan Transportation Commission Therese W. McMillan, Deputy Executive Director,
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Metro Update 2014 NGFCU Planning Conference.
Survey Conducted: April 6-10, & May 4, 2014 City of Sausalito Community Survey Summary of Results May 27, 2014.
City of Indio Community Survey SUMMARY PRESENTATION TO CITY COUNCIL June 16, 2010 Presented by: Rick Sklarz, Senior Researcher.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis Transportation Funding Updated March 10, 2014.
Transportation Authority of Marin SB83/VRF Feasibility Survey June 2010.
Voter Attitudes Toward Energy Issues in Iowa Key Findings from a Statewide Voter Survey August 2014.
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Statewide Transportation Survey Arizona Transportation Summit May 29, 2008.
MARICOPA COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SURVEY TOPLINE FINDINGS.
About the Poll The Washington Poll is a non-partisan, academic survey research project sponsored by the Washington Institute for the Study of Ethnicity.
Regional Transportation Plan Draft Hybrid Scenario Transportation Policy Committee 7/22/03.
1 MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN SURVEY TOPLINE FINDINGS.
OUR CHALLENGE, OUR CHOICE RECOMMENDATIONS AND NEXT STEPS Policy Leadership Group July 16, 2015.
Summary Results of Survey Conducted on March 3-5, 2008 Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa.
Survey Conducted May 11-22, Methodology Telephone survey (landline and cell phones) of a random sample of 295 voters registered to vote.
NORTH & SOUTH FULTON TRANSPORTATION VOTE November 8, 2016.
Future Of Transportation National Survey
Methodology Survey of 402 randomly-selected Larkspur residents
Fall Community Survey Summary Conducted for the City of Port Hueneme
Transportation Funding Update
Efforts to Pass Prop 69 & Protect SB 1
Methodology 1172 online and telephone interviews with voters likely to cast ballots in November 2018 in Petaluma This sample included a sub-sample of 949.
Efforts to Pass Prop 69 & Protect SB 1
Los Angeles County Public Opinion Landscape
Presentation transcript:

Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City June 5-15, 2008 Los Angeles County Transportation Survey 2007

Los Angeles County Transportation Survey 2008 Slide 2 Methodology Survey conducted June 5th-June 15th, 2008  Interviews with 1,400 likely November 08 voters in Los Angeles County.  Margin of error for the full sample is of +/- 2.7%  Margin of error for half the sample is +/-3.7%  Margin of error for each Planning Area is +/-6.9%

Los Angeles County Transportation Survey 2008 Slide 3 Ballot Language Tested LOS ANGELES COUNTY TRAFFIC RELIEF, LIGHT RAIL EXTENSION AND ROAD SAFETY MEASURE To relieve traffic congestion by Immediately synchronizing traffic signals, repairing thousands of potholes, and adding left turn lanes; Extending light rail and connecting it to airports; Improving traffic flow on the 5, 10, 60, 101, 110, 210, 405, 605 and 710 freeways; Earthquake retrofitting bridges; Expanding subway, Metrolink and express bus service; shall the Los Angeles County sales tax be increased by one-half cent for 30 years, with local control, independent audits and public review of expenditures?

Los Angeles County Transportation Survey 2008 Slide 4 Initial Ballot Vote and Vote After General and Specific Area Projects/Services TOTAL NO 30% TOTAL YES 63% Definitely yes Probably yes Lean yes Lean no Probably no Definitely no Undecided 5/9 (Split Sample C). If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it? Initial Ballot Vote TOTAL NO 26% TOTAL YES 70% Vote After Projects/Services (Traffic Relief, Light Rail, Road Safety Measure)

Los Angeles County Transportation Survey 2008 Slide 5 Initial Ballot Vote and Vote After General and Specific Area Projects/Services and Vote after Supportive Statements TOTAL NO 30% TOTAL YES 63% Definitely yes Probably yes Lean yes Lean no Probably no Definitely no Undecided 5/9 (Split Sample C)/11 (Split Sample C). If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it? Initial Ballot Vote TOTAL NO 26% TOTAL YES 73% Vote After Projects/Services Vote After Supportive Statements TOTAL NO 26% TOTAL YES 70% (Traffic Relief, Light Rail, Road Safety Measure)

Los Angeles County Transportation Survey 2008 Slide 6 Oppositional Statement Those people who oppose the measure say that this regressive tax comes at a bad time because hard working families and individuals are getting squeezed in their pocket books from higher food costs, rising gas prices and increased home foreclosures. Opponents also say that the plan calls for only 30 percent of the funds raised to be used for mass transit projects, while 25 percent will go to pay the salaries of already highly paid bus drivers and mechanics, who have gone on strike nine times in the last 35 years. Finally, opponents say Los Angeles County residents have been paying a one-cent sales tax dedicated for local street, freeway and mass transit improvements for the last 20 years, and we still have traffic gridlock. Why should we trust the government now to follow through on their promises. 12. If the election were held today, would you vote yes in favor or no to oppose it?

Los Angeles County Transportation Survey 2008 Slide 7 Initial Ballot Vote, Vote After Projects/ Services and Vote after Supportive and Oppositional Statements TOTAL NO 30% TOTAL YES 63% Definitely yes Probably yes Lean yes Lean no Probably no Definitely no Undecided 5/9 (Split Sample C) /11 (Split Sample C)/12 (Split Sample C). If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it? Initial Ballot Vote Vote After Projects/Services Vote After Supportive Statements Vote After Oppositional Statements TOTAL NO 26% TOTAL YES 70% TOTAL NO 26% TOTAL YES 73% TOTAL NO 30% TOTAL YES 66% (Traffic Relief, Light Rail, Road Safety Measure)

Los Angeles County Transportation Survey 2008 Slide 8 Support for LA County’s Transportation Measure if a Statewide One Cent Sales Tax Increase is on the Same Ballot TOTAL LA County Transportation Measure/Both 63% 13. As you may know, California is experiencing a 17 point two billion dollar budget deficit. The Governor is considering placing a proposition on this November’s ballot asking voters to approve a one-cent sales tax increase statewide to help balance the budget. If this statewide one-cent sales tax measure was on the same ballot as the one-half cent sales tax we have been discussing; do you think you would vote Yes on both of these ballot measures, vote No on both, or would you vote Yes on the L-A County transportation one-half cent sales tax measure but No on the statewide one cent sales tax measure, or would you vote No on the L-A County transportation measure but Yes on the statewide measure? TOTAL Statewide Measure/Both 36% LA County transportation one-half cent sales tax measure only Both measures Statewide one cent sales tax measure only Neither Undecided

Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City June 5-15, 2008 Los Angeles County Transportation Survey 2007 Alternate Language

Los Angeles County Transportation Survey 2008 Slide 10 Ballot Language Tested LOS ANGELES COUNTY TRAFFIC RELIEF, MASS TRANSIT EXTENSION, AIR POLLUTION PREVENTION AND REDUCTION OF FOREIGN OIL DEPENDENCE MEASURE To relieve traffic congestion in every community by Synchronizing traffic signals, repairing potholes, and adding left turn lanes; Extending mass transit and connecting it to airports; Improving freeway traffic flow; Replacing current diesel buses with cleaner burning buses; Adding carpool lanes; Expanding the number and use of hybrid vehicles to reduce carbon emissions; shall the Los Angeles County sales tax be increased by one-half cent for 30 years, with local control, independent audits and public review of expenditures?

Los Angeles County Transportation Survey 2008 Slide 11 Support for Traffic Relief/Light Rail and Road Safety Versus Traffic Relief/Mass Transit/Air Pollution Prevention/Foreign Oil Dependence Reduction TOTAL NO 30% TOTAL YES 63% Definitely yes Probably yes Lean yes Lean no Probably no Definitely no Undecided 5/6. If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it? Traffic Relief/Light Rail/ Road Safety Measure TOTAL NO 29% TOTAL YES 65% Traffic Relief/Mass Transit/Air Pollution Prevention/Foreign Oil Dependence Reduction Combined TOTAL NO 29% TOTAL YES 65%

Los Angeles County Transportation Survey 2008 Slide 12 Initial Ballot Vote and Vote After General and Specific Area Projects/Services TOTAL NO 29% TOTAL YES 65% Definitely yes Probably yes Lean yes Lean no Probably no Definitely no Undecided 6/9 (Split Sample D). If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it? Initial Ballot Vote TOTAL NO 28% TOTAL YES 67% Vote After Projects/Services (Traffic Relief, Mass Transit, Pollution, Reduction of Foreign Oil)

Los Angeles County Transportation Survey 2008 Slide 13 Initial Ballot Vote and Vote After General and Specific Area Projects/Services and Vote after Supportive Statements TOTAL NO 29% TOTAL YES 65% Definitely yes Probably yes Lean yes Lean no Probably no Definitely no Undecided 6/9 (Split Sample D)/11 (Split Sample D). If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it? Initial Ballot Vote TOTAL NO 27% TOTAL YES 70% Vote After Projects/Services Vote After Supportive Statements TOTAL NO 28% TOTAL YES 67% (Traffic Relief, Mass Transit, Pollution, Reduction of Foreign Oil Dependence)

Los Angeles County Transportation Survey 2008 Slide 14 Initial Ballot Vote, Vote After Projects/ Services and Vote after Supportive and Oppositional Statements TOTAL NO 29% TOTAL YES 65% Definitely yes Probably yes Lean yes Lean no Probably no Definitely no Undecided 6/9 (Split Sample D) /11 (Split Sample D)/12 (Split Sample D). If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it? Initial Ballot Vote Vote After Projects/Services Vote After Supportive Statements Vote After Oppositional Statements TOTAL NO 28% TOTAL YES 67% TOTAL NO 27% TOTAL YES 70% TOTAL NO 32% TOTAL YES 64% (Traffic Relief, Mass Transit, Pollution, Reduction of Foreign Oil Dependence)

Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City June 5-15, 2008 Los Angeles County Transportation Survey 2007 Combined

Los Angeles County Transportation Survey 2008 Slide 16 Initial Ballot Vote and Vote After General and Specific Area Projects/ Services by Planning Area TOTAL NO 29% TOTAL YES 65% Definitely yes Probably yes Lean yes Lean no Probably no Definitely no Undecided 5/6 combined/9. If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it? Initial Ballot Vote TOTAL NO 27% TOTAL YES 69% Vote After Projects/Services (Combined)

Los Angeles County Transportation Survey 2008 Slide 17 Initial Ballot Vote and Vote After General and Specific Area Projects/Services and Supportive Statements by Planning Area TOTAL NO 29% TOTAL YES 65% Definitely yes Probably yes Lean yes Lean no Probably no Definitely no Undecided 5/6 combined/9/11. If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it? Initial Ballot Vote TOTAL NO 26% TOTAL YES 71% Vote After Projects/Services Vote After Supportive Statements TOTAL NO 27% TOTAL YES 69% ( Combined )

Los Angeles County Transportation Survey 2008 Slide 18 Initial Ballot Vote, Vote After Projects/ Services and Vote after Supportive and Oppositional Statements TOTAL NO 29% TOTAL YES 65% Definitely yes Probably yes Lean yes Lean no Probably no Definitely no Undecided 5/6 combined/9 /11/12. If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it? Initial Ballot Vote Vote After Projects/Services Vote After Supportive Statements Vote After Oppositional Statements TOTAL NO 27% TOTAL YES 69% TOTAL NO 26% TOTAL YES 71% TOTAL NO 30% TOTAL YES 66% (Combined)