Methods for Developing Baseline Scenario and Estimating Carbon Stocks Indu K. Murthy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Carbon sequestration: Forest and soil objective of the presentation is to give a general picture on possibilities to achieve standard for accounts for.
Advertisements

Ispra, 2 2 – 2 3 September Recommendations for the content of the NIRs and CRFs by Zoltan Somogyi, Sandro Federici and Günther Seufert.
On-line resource materials for policy making Ex-Ante Carbon-balance Tool Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Learning how using.
On-line resource materials for policy making Ex-Ante Carbon-balance Tool Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Learning how using.
Module 2: Project appraisal M2. M2. Project appraisal Time lines -10:45 -12:30: Content: Elements of the project appraisal (SSN) –Blunt tools blunt data.
Carbon sequestration potential assessment in India by A/R activities and implementation of pilot studies Indo-Italian Business Seminar on Renewable Energy.
National Assessment of Ecological C Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes – the USGS LandCarbon Project Zhiliang Zhu, Project Chief, What.
Technical Support Unit, National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Programme, IPCC GHG Inventory AFOLU Agriculture, Forests and Other Land Use.
Bioenergy: GHG balances ‘Carbon lean’, not ‘carbon neutral’
The status of science to support REDD+ based mitigation policies of Mexico Bernardus de Jong, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur Fernando Paz, Colegio de Postgraduados.
Forest Project Protocol v3.1 Use of FIA Data John Nickerson FIA Conference February 2010.
Basic Considerations  outlines the process by which the Government of Kenya will develop its national strategy for participating in an evolving international.
Application of PROCOMAP – Case Study of Mancherial Forest Division, Adilabad Indu K. Murthy.
Environmental Plantings This presentation is an overview of Environmental Plantings and the Reforestation Modelling Tool Source: Department of Industry,
The main tools and functions of the system can be accessed via this side bar Allometric equations editor can be accessed under utilities, and user.
The Carbon Benefits Project: Modelling, Measurement and Monitoring Approximately 30% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions come from land use and land use.
Module 2.5 Estimation of carbon emissions from deforestation and forest degradation REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World.
VM0017 Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Land Management VCS Association 18 January 2012 Introduction to an approved methodology.
On-line resource materials for policy making Ex-Ante Carbon-balance Tool Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Learning how using.
Carbon Trading: The Challenges and Risks John Drexhage Director, Climate Change and Energy International Institute for Sustainable Development Agriculture.
6.1 Module 6 Reporting of Mitigation Assessments in National Communications Ms. Emily Ojoo-Massawa CGE Chair.
Module 2.3 Estimating emission factors for forest cover change (deforestation and forest degradation) REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen.
Biomass Carbon Neutrality in the Context of Forest-based Fuels and Products Al Lucier, NCASI Reid Miner, NCASI
An introduction to the monitoring of forestry carbon sequestration projects Developing Forestry and Bioenergy Projects within CDM Ecuador March, 2004 Igino.
A. N. Gichu Kenya Forest Service REDD+ and REDD Readiness.
Baseline Methodology ARNMB0010 Xiaoquan Zhang and Bernhard Schlamadinger.
UNFCCC and IPCC guidance on measuring and monitoring forest degradation “Moving on From Experimental Approaches to Advancing National Systems for Measuring.
Challenges and options John Couwenberg Hans Joosten Greifswald University Are emission reductions from peatlands MRV-able.
Global Emissions from the Agriculture and Forest Sectors: Status and Trends Indu K Murthy Indian Institute of Science.
Degradation Accounting Methods Katie Goslee Program Officer, Ecosystem Services Unit Winrock International Measuring.
1 Methodologies of Carbon Estimation By Zahabu, E & Malimbwi, R.E Department of Forest Mensuration and Management (SUA)
LULUCF Concepts Training Seminar for BioCarbon Fund Projects February 8 th 2008 Timothy Pearson and Sarah Walker Winrock International.
Baseline Methodologies for LULUCF: Overview B. Schlamadinger * Joanneum Research, Austria Training Seminar for BioCarbon.
Fire Prevention as a GHG Mitigation Strategy Presented by Robert Beach, RTI International Brent Sohngen, The Ohio State University Presented at Forestry.
Relationship between the EU ETS and the Kyoto Protocol Flexible Mechanisms, from the Perspective of Bioenergy and C Sequestration Relationship between.
CDM Project Developers Workshop.  Boundaries & Leakage  Calculating emissions reductions  Any other issues Session II.
FINANCING REDD – A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE REDD MECHANISM Patricia Blazey and Hope Ashiabor Patricia Blazey and Hope Ashiabor 1.
InVEST Tier 1 Carbon Model. In the Tier 1 model we estimate carbon stock as a function of land use / land cover. Storage indicates the mass of carbon.
Harnessing the carbon market to sustain ecosystems and alleviate poverty Project Cycle and Project Design Document Project Cycle and Project Design Document.
Guidance on Measurement Elaboration and Examples.
Regional Modeling and Linking Sector Models with CGE Models Presented by Martin T. Ross Environmental and Natural Resource Economics Program RTI International.
CDM A/R Investors' and Developers' Workshop, Beijing 2010 CDM Afforestation/Reforestation Projects: International workshop for developers and investors.
METHODS AND GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSING AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECTS UNDER CDM Indu K. Murthy Indian Institute of Science.
Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for bioenergy and C sequestration? Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for.
Harnessing the carbon market to sustain ecosystems and alleviate poverty Monitoring of AR Projects Monitoring of AR Projects BioCarbon Fund Training Seminar,
Methodologies for Moldova Soil Conservation project ARNM0007 Rama Chandra Reddy July 12, 2005.
CDM and Forestry Sector in India Carbon Pool of Forestry Sector in India The growing stock of the country has been estimated to be 4,740 million m³.
Case Study2: Reforestation Project Using Native Species Around AES-Tiete Reservoirs ARNM0002 Comments on Baseline Methodology Fourth Regional Workshop.
AIT Case Study 2: Afforestation & Reforestation Project Sudhir Sharma, AIT.
Module 2.3 Estimating emission factors for forest cover change (deforestation and forest degradation) REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen.
Chapter 4: Supplementary methods and good practice guidance arising from the Kyoto Protocol Section 4.3LULUCF Projects.
EMMER INTERNATIONAAL ARWG tools and consolidation of methodologies Igino Emmer.
FOREST SECTOR MITIGATION IN INDIA Ravindranath, Sudha & Sandhya Indian Institute of Science Bangalore.
Forestry Projects: Measurement and Monitoring Werner A. Kurz Natural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Service Victoria, BC, Canada Biological Sequestration.
A Grand Plan for FIA’s role in a FS National Carbon Accounting System Linda S. Heath USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, FIA Forest Carbon Accounting.
Alternative Approaches to Address Leakage in Carbon Sinks in Indonesia: Methods and Case Study in Sumatra Rizaldi Boer and Team Geomet FMIPA-IPB
Opportunities for Research and Collaboration Relevant to Climate Change and Forests Overview of Opportunities for Research and Collaboration Relevant to.
Tatsushi HEMMI Institute for Global Environmental Strategies COP 9 Decisions related to CDM in forestry sector – An update on implications for Asia IGES-URC.
Item #11 Alternative Approaches for Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
The Value of Your Urban Forest:
FORESTRY MITIGATION PROJECTS & SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Prof. N. H. Ravindranath Indian Institute of Science.
India project not used. Summary: Areas of Potential Cooperation to Realize Sinks Potential Perform pilot project analyses: issues. Stimulate development.
Forest Carbon Calculator Forest Carbon Reporting Initiative of USAID’s Global Climate Change Program.
Carbon sequestration by Forest and soil
REDD+ Project Area Juniperus-Podocarpus Acacia-Comiphora woodland.
Indu K. Murthy Indian Institute of Science
Science-Policy Interface
West Virginia University
DEVELOPMENT OF MRV-SYSTEM & REL/RL IN TANZANIA
Regional Modeling and Linking Sector Models with CGE Models
Presentation transcript:

Methods for Developing Baseline Scenario and Estimating Carbon Stocks Indu K. Murthy

What is Baseline?  “The scenario that reasonably represents the anthropogenic emissions by sources of greenhouse gases or removal by sinks that would occur in the absence of the proposed project activity.” – time projection of C-stocks in project area in the absence of project activities and is the “Reference scenario” against which change is measured – C-stock changes need to be estimated for the period selected; year-0 to year-12 for demonstrating that estimated GHG emission avoided or carbon sink enhanced is real and additional benefits are not merely incidental or due to non-project factors

Baseline Definition Options  SBSTA has presented five options – Option 1: Emission by sources replaced by removal by sinks – Option 2: Includes tracking of natural emissions & removals in the absence of project activity, and non-CO 2 fluxes and emissions linked to A&R included – Option 3: Same as Option 1, but a variable or adjustable baseline suggested – Option 4: Scenario that represents net change in C-stocks & GHG emissions – Option 5: Scenario that represents the most likely prospective land use at the time of initiation of the project

Types of Baseline  Global, regional or national  Project-specific Vs. Generic  Fixed Vs. Adjustable

Baseline Activities Compared to Project Activity

Establishment of C-Stocks Under Baseline - Steps  Define land use systems and area  Stratify the land use systems  Define the project boundary and prepare a map  Select C-pools & methods for measurement & monitoring; parameters for monitoring  Develop sampling design and strategy for biomass and soil carbon estimation  Lay plots in different land use systems  Measure in the field  Analyze data for biomass/C-stock & soil carbon  Report C-stocks for different pools  Report incremental carbon benefits

Decision Matrix on Methods

Approach-1: Based on Default Values  Estimate the current land use pattern and area under each land use system  Obtain data on past or historical land use changes in the area proposed for the project  Based on current land use, historical data and proposed programs;project future land use for different periods say 5, 10, 15 and 20 years  Based on current extraction of fuelwood or timber assess any implications for land use change or biomass stock, say percent reduction in biomass stock

Contd..  Use default values from published studies / reports for projecting future C-stocks in various land use systems Estimate total C-stock in year ‘0’ for all land use systems and current areas Use future land use pattern for a given year say 5, 10 or 15 years Using default values, estimate C-stock for the projected land use pattern for a selected period, say 5 or 10 or 15 years  Difference between C-stocks considering all land use systems and area, for year ‘n’ (projected period) and year ’0’ is; Change in C-stock in the baseline or without-project scenario The value could be positive or negative, most often likely to be negative, indicating reduction in C-stocks

Approach-2: Based on Cross-Section Field Studies  Involves steps described for Approach-1, except that the C-stock values for current land use and projected land use systems are obtained from field measurements  Step 1: Select all current land use systems along with area estimates  Step 2: Estimate total C-stock for year ‘0’ for each land use system in the project area, based on measurements using plot method  Step 3: Derive future land use systems and areas based on historical data and government programs, particularly land conversion

Contd…  Step 4: Obtain future C-stock data for each projected land use system using one of the following approaches; – i) Field measurement – ii) Estimate future C-stocks using data from field measurements during year ‘0’ (starting date) and default ‘emission or sequestration factors’ and the project period (10 or 20 years)  Step 5: Using one or a combination of methods given in Step 4, estimate change in C-stock in baseline scenario. estimate total C-stock for base-year (year ‘0’) estimate total C-stock for a future project-year (say 5th or 10th or 15th year)

Approach 3: Based on Model Outputs  C-stocks for future years estimated – Using simulation models such as CO 2 -FIX and COMAP – particularly at the project development phase.

Baseline Carbon Stock Monitoring During Project Implementation Phase  Estimate area under different land use systems pre-project stage  Based on historical records of LU change and current land use pattern, project land use pattern for the project area under BSL  Establish the project boundary for each land use system, for the current and projected years  Establish ‘control plots’ (permanent plots) for each of the land use systems in project area, which will not be subjected to project activities but are likely to be subjected to conditions similar to ‘without-project scenario’, for monitoring C-stock changes [OR]

Contd…  In land use systems, which are likely to be subjected to conditions (grazing, extraction etc.) identical to without-project scenario  Monitor and estimate area under different LU systems - subjected to conversion and/or biomass extraction  Measure and estimate C-stock changes in the ‘control plots’ for the C-pools identified using ‘permanent plot’ technique  Using per hectare data on changes in C-stocks and area involved, estimate the cumulative baseline C-stock change for the selected period

Illustration of Land Use Change Under Baseline Scenario; Historical & Projected Through PRA Column (3): Area in 1997 is obtained by group discussion with local community and validated by past land use change data from records Column (5): Using area converted annually during 1997 and 2002 area is projected to 2012

Method for Estimating Net Change in C-stock under BSL Scenario  Estimate C-stock in base-year  Estimate C-stock for projected year (say year-12)  Estimation of net change in C-stock under BSL scenario = [C-stock in base-year] - [C-stock in project-year]

Estimation of AGB, BGB & Woody Litter under BSL Column (2): Area in 2002 estimated based on measurement or land survey Column (3): AGB estimated using plot method, DBH and height data and biomass equations Column (4) & (9): BGB = AGB (t/ha) * 0.26 (Conversion factor for AGB to BGB). Column (7): Area in 2012 obtained through PRA (group discussion) based on past record for 1997 to Refer to Appendix A11. Column (6) & (11): Total Biomass = (AGB + BGB + WL): area during 2002 (and 2012) Column (12): Net change in biomass including all biomass pools = [Total biomass stock in 2002] – [Total biomass stock in 2012]