W ORK P ACKAGE 2 C ONCEPTUAL MODEL Richard Walker 13 January, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COBECOS SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME PRIORITY 8.1 WP 4 – DATA HARMONISATION London, 5 – 7 September.
Advertisements

Appraisal of Literature. Task 4 The task requires that you:  Obtain a piece of literature from a journal, book or internet source. The literature should.
D EEMED M EASURE R EVIEW P ROJECT Final Report December 7, 2010 Regional Technical Forum Presented by: Michael Baker.
Regional Trajectories to the Knowledge Economy: A Dynamic Model IKINET-EURODITE Joint Conference Warsaw, May 2006.
Theory Deduction Hypothesis Researchdesign Findings Datagathering Operationalization Measurement Analysis Induction.
Mapping Studies – Why and How Andy Burn. Resources The idea of employing evidence-based practices in software engineering was proposed in (Kitchenham.
Writing the Research Report The purpose of the written report is to present the results of your research, but more importantly to provide a persuasive.
The Literature Review Literature search and review from the perspective of citations.
Listening to the Learner - Week 1- Program for Educational Transformation Through Technology.
Social networks as a potential source of bias in peer review Sándor Soós Zsófia Viktória Vida Beatriz Barros Ricardo Conejo Richard Walker Sándor Soós.
Online Communities Academic Publishing Perspective.
Research Methods Nanda Ganesan, Ph.D. Professor of Information Systems California State University, Los Angeles.
Conducting the IT Audit
Advanced Research Methodology
School of Psychology, HMNBS Deakin University An evaluation of the Deakin University – Department of Human Services (Barwon-South Western Region) Partnership.
OIR C OMMITTEE S TATUS R EPORT 2 nd face-to-face meeting Oct , 2014 Beckman Center of the National Academies Irvine, CA.
An Observatorium for Science in Society based in Social Models Kick-off meeting SISOB Kick-off Meeting.
New York State K-12 Social Studies Update Dr. John B. King, Jr. New York State Commissioner of Education President of the University of the State of New.
Consultative meeting Gender in Value Chains Addis Ababa, May 9.
I NTRODUCING FRONTIERS Richard Walker 13 January, 2011.
2 nd Steering Committee Meeting October 2008, Athens and Aegina.
Donatella Fazio BLUE-ETS project coordinator Maria Grazia Calza BLUE-ETS senior researcher ISTAT BLUE-ETS BLUE – Enterprise and Trade Statistics 2012 ESSnet.
Suggested Guidelines for Thesis/Dissertation Chapters Chapter 1: Introduction  Problem Statement: Why is this research important?  What are the objectives.
1 KEY PERSONNEL SUGGESTING FORMAT FELIX E.O OPATA MBA (STRATEGIC PLANNING & MGT.) BSC.HONS.(BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES) DIPLOMA MANAGEMENT (CAMB).
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
WP8: Knowledge Sharing Lead: UDE Partners: UMA, CICE, MTA KSZI, FR, RICYT Month 1 - Month 36.
Writing the Introduction to the Study Dissertation Editors Writing Center.
TG Projects status Nikos Houssos euroCRIS Board meeting Prague, 06 June 2012.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education InternationalChapter Writing Reports and Proposals.
WP4/T4.1 D4.1 Detailed Report on Indicators. Overall stragtegy Case studies Types of networks Types of impact indicators (Network) Model definition Algorithm.
Careers in Computer Science What is computer science? Who should major in computer science? What do computer scientists really do? Research Paper Alice.
I NTRODUCING FRONTIERS Richard Walker 13 January, 2011.
RESEARCH PROPOSAL Statement of problem Objectives of the study Scope of the study Review of Literature Methodology and theoretical back- ground Benefits.
Researching & Writing a Literature Review Karen Ciccone NCSU Libraries.
Mining fuzzy domain ontology based on concept Vector from wikipedia category network.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice HallChapter Writing Reports and Proposals.
LITERATURE REVIEW  A GENERAL GUIDE  MAIN SOURCE  HART, C. (1998), DOING A LITERATURE REVIEW: RELEASING THE SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH IMAGINATION.
Research Group – ResRA RRA Network Review Workshop - 9 May 2013.
21st Century Research Scholarship & Certificate Program Workshop 1 Spring 2011.
Project Thesis 2006 Adapted from Flor Siperstein Lecture 2004 Class CLASS Project Thesis (Fundamental Research Tools)
What is a research proposal? What is research?. University research is scholars working on problems that are  collective  systematic  global.
From description to analysis
IDARI Workshop, Tartu, June 2005 NUI Galway Work Package 4 Administration Lorna Ryan The IDARI project is financed under the FP5 Quality of Life and Management.
Developing your Research Plan for FemNorthNet Community Case Studies 1.
Three basic areas for consideration: 1.Searching, reading and critically evaluating your literature. 2.Managing your literature – organizing and documenting.
Network of Excellence in Internet Science Network of Excellence in Internet Science (EINS) 1 st REVIEW Brussels, 12th April 2013 FP7-ICT
Reviewing the literature András István Kun. An 8 step model of research processes 0. Identify broad area of research discipline, school 1.Formulating.
April 29, Overview History of planning Schedule for Recovery Strategy Issues of Concern to Operations.
How to Write Literature Review ww.ePowerPoint.com
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
Writing and presenting a dissertation proposal requires high self-discipline and commitment. Three essential pre-writing actions:  Complete preliminary.
CERN openlab Phase 5 Preparation (Technical) Alberto Di Meglio CERN openlab CTO office.
BIS 9213: MIS Research Seminar Professor Merrill Warkentin Mississippi State University Spring 2005.
Implementation plan for Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda for Traditional Food Prof. Đuro Kutlača, PhD Institute “Mihajlo Pupin”, University of.
Communicating Science using Social Media John Cook Date: 24/11/2011.
WP7Joint and sustainable transport in health and care Action plan for the period July-December Dr Snežana Manić AdriHealthMob, Steering Committee.
TEMPUS project Fostering University Support Services and Procedures for Full Participation in the European Higher Education Area - FUSE Workpackage 1 Activity.
Writing a sound proposal
Reviewing the literature
WP4 Measurements & social indicators.
Dissertation Proposal
Empirical Project.
The Starting Point: Asking Questions
WP and Pillar leader meeting
Title Author name1, Author name2 and Author name3 Department of
Student Name: Student Id: Supervisor’s Name:
Style You need to demonstrate knowledge and understanding beyond undergraduate level and should also reach a level of scope and depth beyond that taught.
Reviewing the literature
Tentative Title: XXXXXX
Structural Funds: Investing in Roma
Presentation transcript:

W ORK P ACKAGE 2 C ONCEPTUAL MODEL Richard Walker 13 January, 2011

WP2: Basic Data Start date – January 1, 2011 End date – December 31, 2011 Coordinator – Frontiers Other Partners – UMA – CICE – UDE – RICY

WP2: Objectives Identify key actors, communities and social networks involved in “social appropriation of knowledge” Develop hypotheses on impact – of -  impact Operationalize hypotheses in terms of – Data sources – Network indicators – Measurements of impacts Identify data sources/indices/representations/tools to verify hypotheses

WP2: methods Review literature (D2.1: Month 3) – Review based on template from Frontiers – Theoretical literature on social networks – Empirical Social Network Analysis outside science – Social Network Analysis applied to science – Social Network Analysis applied to specific SISOB themes Conceptual model (D2.2 Month 6) – Model based on template from Frontiers – Identify actors, communities and social networks Science in general SISOB cases (take account of data availability) – Identify impact measures Science in general SISOB cases (take account of data availability) – Formalize hypotheses on relationship between social networks and impact Science in general SISOB cases (take account of data availability) Detailed specification of data sources, indices, representations and tools (D2.3 Month 12)

Literature survey: methods Selection of sources (Google Scholar etc.) Definition of search terms for each theme Systematic search Selection of top ranking review papers Selection of other top ranking papers Summary of content

Literature Review – preliminary TOC Objectives and structure of this document (Frontiers) Methodology (Frontiers) Social Networks and Social Network Analysis – What is a social network – What is social network analysis – Social network indicators – Tools and technologies Empirical applications of Social Network Analysis – Social Network Analysis and Science – General – Social Network Analysis and Researcher Mobility – Social Network Analysis and Knowledge Sharing – Social Network Analysis and Author/Reviewer Networks Conclusions

Action Points ItemPartner ResponsibleDeadline Proposals for changes to TOCAll20/01/2011 Proposals for data sources and search termsAll20/01/2011 Finalization of TOCFrontiers23/01/2011 Finalization of data sources and search termsFrontiers27/01/2011 Social networks and Social Network Analysis??28/02/2011 Empirical applications of Social Network Analysis??28/02/2011 Social Network Analysis and Science (general)Frontiers28/02/2011 Social Network Analysis and MobilityFR28/02/2011 Social Network Analysis and Knowledge SharingUDE28/02/2011 Social Network Analysis and Author/Reviewer NetworksFrontiers28/02/2011 Release of draft 1 deliverableFrontiers15/03/2011 Collaborative revision and editingAll22/03/2011 Release of deliverableFrontiers31/03/2011