AIM Virtual FRB Meetings Sep, & 1400 Both Days

Agenda Introductions Feedback on AIM User Community Survey Software Status Software Plans – Modernization Functional Enhancements Review of Draft November FRB Agenda

AIM-based Learning Content* Big “3” Example Others include: NSWC SPAWAR NMPT&E NSTC CNL CNE CID CEODD *Data captured in 4 th Quarter of FY07

AIM User Community Survey Findings 414 Contacts –36% reached 60% of those Government, 40% Contractors –10 individuals have promised but not submitted data Content Hours Developed- 148,198 hrs –Aviation: 25,313 hrs –Sub: 28,064 hrs –Surface: 6,840 hrs –Other: 87,981 hrs Training –618 users self-identified as trained –896 users need/requested training in FY09 AIM Usage –Most now using AIM 3.3 (AIM I & AIM II)

Software Status AIM I/II Rel – Superseded by Rel 3.3 AIM I/II Rel 3.3 – NMCI certified in May 08 – Pushed to NMCI end users in Jun-Jul 08 – Includes first version of Learning Object (LO) Module – Central site Citrix Metaframe enhancements – CMS Web service interface to CeTARS Content Planning Module (CPM) 3.0 – GAT conducted May 08 – Operational s/w posted Jun 08

Software Plans - Modernization AIM I/II Rel 4.0 – LO Module  Initial GAT conducted Jun 08  Significant additional functionality being coded now; in work for Mar 09 delivery for testing  Anticipated NMCI push Jun 09 – CPM  Significant additional functionality being coded now; in work for Mar 09 delivery for testing  Anticipated operational Jun 09 – Interim builds available to support ongoing ILE projects – FRB-prioritized ACRs incorporated in LP/TG modules

Software Plans – Modernization (contd) AIM I/II Rel 4.1 – LO Module  requirements define by FRB feedback on FRM  planned delivery for GAT and NMCI testing in Mar ‘10  anticipated NMCI push in Jun ‘10 – CPM  requirements defined by FRB feedback on Functional Reqts Matrix  planned delivery for GAT testing in Mar ‘10  Operational in Jun ‘10 – Interim builds available to support ongoing ILE projects – FRB-prioritized ACRs incorporated in LP/TG modules

AIM Functional Enhancements Governance Process –Voting, Priorities, Funding, etc. AIM I/II Change Request –Summary –Distribution for Review and Prioritization AIM Modernized Functional Requirements Matrix –Summary –Distribution for Review and Prioritization

FRB Governance Process Software requirements –All FRB attendees encouraged to review and comment on AIM Change Request (ACR) and Modernization Functional Requirements Matrix (FRM) Enhancement priorities –ACR and FRM lists will be discussed by whole group, based on pre-meeting inputs –Each participating Center and SYSCOM will have one vote in determining final priorities for upcoming releases

Review of Draft November FRB Agenda Comments? Proposed Additions/Deletions? Other?

Jake Aplanalp - AIM/CPM Program Manager NAWCTSD Orlando (407) Ron Zinnato – AIM SSO (System Support Office) NAWCTSD Orlando (407) Jim Ferrall - Program Manager Columbus Technologies (703) Paul Graf - Technical, Functional and ISD Support (443) AIM Website – Contacts Questions?