1. Mr. Mike Mosley Learning Standards Branch Head 04 Feb 2014
NETC N74 Update to AIM FRB
Mr. Mike Mosley
Learning Standards Branch Head
04 Feb 2014

2. Overview Opening Comments
NETC Course Development and Revision Process (E2E) / HPRR Process Linkage
NETC Governance
NETC N7 policy for conversion from AIM I and AIM II
OCCSTDS Integration into CPM
NJA Working Group with NAVMAC

3. Naval Education and Training Command
Version: 11 December 2013_V1_NETC N74
External Training
Requirement Sources
Develop
Business Case
Analysis
(BCA)
Training
Project Plan
(TPP)
Perform
Job Duty
Task Analysis
(JDTA)
NAVEDTRA 137 (series)
Job Duty Task Analysis
Management Manual
NAVEDTRA 138 (series)
Front End Analysis
NETCINST (series)
Analysis Policy
Internal Trigger Initiating Process
Fleet Performance
Assessment
Direct Fleet
Input
Operational Risk
Management Assessment
NAVEDTRA 130 (series)
Task Based Curriculum
Development Manual
NAVEDTRA 136 (series)
ILE Course
Development & Life-Cycle
Maintenance Manual
NAVEDTRA 132 (series)
Navy School
Testing Program
NAVEDTRA 131 (series)
PPP Based Curriculum
NAVEDTRA 135 (series)
External Trigger Initiating Process
OPNAV N1 Training
Course Development and
Revision Process
OPNAV N1 Training
NETC Course Development &
Revision E2E Process Color Key:
Requirement Sponsor & Resource Sponsor Actions
Course Development, Revision,
Delivery, & Sustainment Process
NAVEDTRA Manuals and
NETC Directives
Front End
(FEA)
New Course
or Revise
Existing Course
and Pilot
Deliver
Course of
Instruction
NAVEDTRA 133 (series)
Human Performance
Requirements Review
NAVEDTRA 130, 131
132, 133, 134, 135,
and 136 (series)
Naval Education and Training Command
Course Development and Revision
End-to-End (E2E) Process
Course Development, Revision, Delivery, and Sustainment Process
Rating Merger
Establishment or
Revision of a NEC
Requirements Review (HPRR)
- Existing NETC/CCA Course -
Revision to Enlisted
Occupational Standard
Training Requirement Identification & Resource Sponsor Commitment
NETCINST (series)
Training Requirement
Identification & Resource
Sponsor Commitment
Resource Sponsor
Validates Training Requirement
& Submits to NETC/LC;
Final Determination to Fund
Requirement is Made at
Output of “Develop BCA” Step
of the Course Development,
Revision, Delivery, &
Sustainment Process
Requirement Sponsor
Provides:
Training Requirement,
Justification Statement,
Impact Statement if
is Not Funded, and
Request for
Funding Consideration
Per OPNAVINST (series), Training Support Agency course development & course revision projects (i.e. ACAT I through IV programs, non-ACAT programs of record, etc...) for the NETC domain are to be compliant with NAVEDTRA series manuals.
End
Process
NAVEDTRA 134 (series)
Navy Instructor
Manual
NAVEDTRA 140 (series)
Training Support
Navy Training Systems Plan
(NTSP) Revision
Deactivate
Course
Maintenance
Naval Education and Training Command
Course Development and Revision End - to - End (E2E) Process
The NETC Course Development and Revision End-to-End (E2E) Process is a standardized, repeatable, and defendable process. The process was created to instill the programmatics and governance required to standardize the process of developing and revising courses as effectively and as efficiently as possible, to include course delivery and sustainment within the NETC domain. Training Support Activity (TSA) {NAVSEA, NAVAIR, NAVSUP, SPAWAR...etc} Acquisition Category (ACAT) I through IV course development and course revision projects are supported by OPNAVINST (series), a Navy Training System Plan (NTSP), and the Integrated Defense Acquisition, Technology, & Logistics Life-Cycle Management Framework. Per OPNAVINST (series) TSA and Program Office course development and course revision projects for the NETC domain will be compliant with NAVEDTRA 130 through Within the NETC Course Development and Revision E2E Process is the seven (7) step Course Development, Revision, Delivery, and Sustainment Process that ensures the Re-use, Re-purpose, and Reference (R3) of existing content development data, during the “Perform Front End Analysis (FEA)” step; thus eliminating the premium that has been paid in the past to build required artifacts or make revisions to courseware that already existed within the domain. Additionally, the process ensures that content being developed adheres to the same standardized, repeatable, and defendable processes. The following is a brief description of the various components that collectively comprise NETC’s Course Development and Revision E2E Process:
Submitting Training Requirements to NETC.
NETC course development and revision initiatives are initiated by triggered events, as illustrated in the process map. There are external training requirement triggers (outside OPNAV N1) and there are internal training requirement triggers (within OPNAV N1) that drive NETC to take action to either develop a new course or revise an existing course. Both types of triggers are drivers for the Course Development, Revision, Delivery, and Sustainment Process. All course development and revision initiatives submitted to NETC are governed by NETCINST (series). The instruction establishes the policy that once a Requirement Sponsor(s) identifies a training requirement that they will submit it to the Resource Sponsor, if the Resource Sponsor is a separate entity, for funding consideration. The Requirement Sponsor will provide a description of the training requirement, a justification statement, and an impact statement if the training requirement is not funded to the Resource Sponsor, when requesting funding consideration. If the Resource Sponsor validates the training requirement, (equates to providing an intention to fund the development, delivery, and sustainment of the new course or revision to an existing course; final determination to be made at the output of the “Develop Business Case Analysis (BCA) step), they will submit a letter to NETC/Learning Center requesting implementation of the Course Development, Revision, Delivery, and Sustainment Process.
Additionally, NETC/LC will provide a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) for the development and sustainment of a new course or course revision project, to the Requirement Sponsor so that they can include it with the funding request to the Resource Sponsor. A ROM is developed at the early stages of a project to provide Requirement & Resource Sponsors an estimate (based upon available information) of the projected cost to develop, deliver, and sustain training to satisfy the training requirement. A much more accurate cost estimate will be provided at the output of the “Develop Business Case Analysis” step of the Course Development, Revision, Delivery, and Sustainment Process. True cost will not be known until completion of a successful pilot.
If the training requirement is for a new course or is a revision to an existing course that contains new work, NETC/LC will perform a Job Duty Task Analysis (JDTA) , to understand the scope of the training requirement before providing the ROM.
At the conclusion of the “Develop Business Case Analysis” step of the Course Development, Revision, Delivery, and Sustainment Process, NETC will present to the Requirement and Resources Sponsors training solution alternatives based upon the output of the FEA, each containing terms of impact, risk, and cost and benefit. Following their selection of a training solution alternative, a Training Project Plan will be developed to capture all resources required to develop, deliver, and sustain the training through the Future Years Defense Program (FYDP). Following adjudication of resource shortfalls by the Resource Sponsor, NETC will coordinate either the development of a new course or the revision to an existing course, pilot the course, deliver the course of instruction, and perform course maintenance to ensure currency of the course.
Course Development, Revision, Delivery, and Sustainment Process, consists of seven (7) steps:
JDTA is a process that structures and decomposes work and assigns attributes at the task level (the attributes will determine the performance outcomes required of training). Duty and task data is used to build the Course Training Task List (CTTL) and ultimately the course’s learning objectives. Data generated during a JDTA is captured in the Authoring Instructional Material (AIM) Content Planning Module (CPM); a web-enabled tool that also provides NETC learning centers the ability to share content development data across the domain. JDTAs are facilitated by NETC/LC personnel. Requirement Sponsor(s), stakeholders, and Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) provide the work data. Following the collection of data, Requirement Sponsor(s) select which tasks they desire to be formally trained to, included in a Personnel Qualification Standard (PQS), a Non-Resident Training Course (NRTC), On-The-Job (OJT) training, or in some combination of formal training, PQS, NRTC, and/or OJT. The JDTA policy document is NAVEDTRA 137 (series), Job Duty Task Analysis Management Manual. The output of the JDTA is the input to the “Perform Front End Analysis (FEA)” step.
Step 1: Perform Job Duty Task Analysis (JDTA).
Step 2: Perform Front End Analysis (FEA).
The purpose of the FEA is to compare the “as-is” training to the “to-be” training state, resulting in a delta, or gap. During the FEA, the most effective and cost efficient training solutions (instructor led, computer based training {CBT} and or labs, a blended solution, etc...) will be determined to satisfy the desired outcome of the training requirement. Additionally, the FEA will ensure that existing content is explored for possible Re-use, Re-purpose, and/or Reference, (R3) to reduce the overall cost of a content build. If existing content is identified for Re-use or Re-purpose, instructional developers can assess the quality (value) of the existing instructional products using the NAWCTSD Orlando “Quality Evaluation Tool.” The tool is supported by NAWCTSD Technical Report of June The tool provides a set of rating criteria that evaluates the instructional product’s: instructional content, instructional activities, performance assessment, performance feedback, navigation and operation, content presentation, and installation and registration. The FEA policy document is NAVEDTRA 138 (series), Front End Analysis Management Manual. The output of the FEA is costed out in the Business Case Analysis step.
The BCA is the process followed to determine the cost of each training solution derived during the FEA. The BCA also identifies the risk(s) associated with each training solution. The Requirement Sponsor(s) and Resource Sponsor(s) will select the best training intervention at the best cost, given their requirements and constraints. The BCA policy document is NETCINST (series).
Step 3: Develop Business Case Analysis (BCA).
A TPP provides a blueprint of the course development or revision initiative that includes the resources (best estimate) and milestones to course implementation. A TPP provides a description of the course; training location(s); planned student throughput; course justification; safety risks and hazardous materials, if applicable; and a list of manpower, facility, and items required to deliver the training through the Future Years Defense Program (FYDP). The final page of a TPP contains a milestone chart that leadership can use to track the build, implementation sequence, and timeline of a new or revised course. The TPP has been adopted by NETC and OPNAV as the vehicle to broker training requirements that require additional resources. Resource Sponsor OPNAV Codes consist of: N1 (Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Manpower, Personnel, Training, and Education), N2/N6 (Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Information Dominance), N4 (Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Fleet Readiness and Logistics), and N9 (Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Systems). N9 is further identified as: N95 (Director of Expeditionary Warfare), N96 (Director of Surface Warfare), N97 (Director of Undersea Warfare), and N98 (Director of Air Warfare). Resource shortfalls must be adjudicated by the resource sponsor with either funds committed, an offset, or successful Program Objective Memorandum (POM) submission. TPP policy documents include: NAVEDTRA 130(series), NAVEDTRA 131(series), and NAVEDTRA 136(series).
Step 4: Develop Training Project Plan (TPP).
Step 5: Develop New Course or Revise Existing Course and Pilot.
This step consists of managing and completing the processes to develop the curriculum to support a new course or a revision to an existing course, acquire the resources (manpower, facilities, equipment, and funding) required to prepare the course for implementation, and develop a testing and remediation program. This step also includes piloting the course and making adjustments as required, to finalize the course or course revision to achieve the desired training outcome. The following NAVEDTRA Manuals support this step:
NAVEDTRA 130 (series) - Task Based Curriculum Development Manual. Document consists of three (3) volumes: (1) Developer’s Guide; (2) Sample Products; and (3) Manager’s Guide. The majority of NETC content was created using the 130 approach. The document contains guidelines for the development of training programs. It is designed for use by individuals actually revising or developing training materials. It provides guidance and illustrations for use in planning, analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation of curricula.
NAVEDTRA 131 (series) - Personnel Performance Profile (PPP) Based Curriculum Development Manual. Document consists of three (3) volumes: (1) Developer’s Guide; (2) Sample Products; and (3) Manager’s Guide. Typically addresses equipment or system content development.
 NAVEDTRA 132 (series) - Navy School Testing Program Management Manual. Provides policy and guidance for developing testing programs designed to measure the attainment of desired learning outcomes. A quality testing program ensures that successful course graduates have achieved at least the minimum level of skill and knowledge necessary to perform the job for which they were trained. Additionally, a good testing program identifies students who have not achieved the desired level of skill and knowledge and need further training assistance (remediation).
NAVEDTRA 136 (series) - Integrated Learning Environment Course Development and Life-Cycle Maintenance Manual. Normalizes terms; applies additional programmatics to the Computer Based Training (CBT) content builds that include standardized display (all content looks and feels the same); creates technical artifacts to sustain the content; and standardizes Statements of Work (SOW) for contracting content development.
This step of the Course Development, Revision, Delivery, and Sustainment Process begins when the new course or revised course is approved for implementation by the Curriculum Control Authority (CCA), following a successful pilot. This step includes delivery of the course, testing programs, remediation programs, and school house management. The NAVEDTRAs that provide the policy and business rules, processes, and the roles and responsibilities for all aspects of “Delivering Course of Instruction,” are NAVEDTRA 135 and NAVEDTRA NAVEDTRA 132 (described in step 5 above) describes the testing plan and remediation processes to support the delivery of a course and should be considered a resource document for this step. The following is a brief description of NAVEDTRAs 135 and 134:
Step 6: Deliver Course of Instruction.
NAVEDTRA 135 (series) - Navy School Management Manual. The manual provides information about Defines the roles and responsibilities for Staff and Student Management to include: Curriculum Control Authority (CCA), Course Curriculum Model Manager (C2M2), Director of Training (DoT), Learning Standards Officer (LSO) and many others. Provides information about Academic Review Boards (ARBs) and Remediation Programs. Additionally, course surveillance and Formal Course Reviews (FCR) are described. The document also describes Curriculum Management, Assessment Strategies, and Support Functions (i.e. Corporate enterprise Training Activity Resource System [CeTARS], Council on Occupational Education [COE], Contract Management, Information Assurance Systems, Security Requirements, and Safety Requirements).
NAVEDTRA 134 (series) - Navy Instructor Manual. Used as a reference within the Navy Instructor Training Course (NITC), formally: Journeyman Instructor Training Course. NEC: 9502 awarded upon course completion. The manual serves as a field manual for instructors at a school house. Additionally, the manual supports instructors in qualifying as a Master Training Specialist.
NAVEDTRA 140 (series) - Training Support Management Manual. Provides information and guidance for establishing, aligning, and executing training support functions throughout
the NETC domain. The manual outlines the NETC requirement for infrastructure, training, and student management support for all NETC training activities. Although the mission may vary in breadth and scope depending upon geography and student populations, the primary facilitator for training support are NETC’s Training Support Centers (TSCs).
The final step in the Course Development, Revision, Delivery, and Sustainment Process is comprised of two (2) discrete processes.
Step 7: Perform Course Maintenance/Deactivate Course.
Process 1: Perform Course Maintenance is focused on maintaining currency of the course, often time referred to as surveillance. In this step instructors, course supervisors, Course Curriculum Model Managers (C2M2’s), maintain constant surveillance of assigned courses to ensure the course reflects the latest changes to directives, such as safety messages, bulletins, and technical publication changes. They also monitor fleet feedback, and perform Formal Course Reviews (FCRs) periodically. Additionally, NETC established the Human Performance Requirements Review (HPRR) Process to provide a periodic and trigger driven review and revalidation of existing courses, that a NETC Learning Center (LC) is the Curriculum Control Authority (CCA), by all stakeholders (Type Commanders, Community Managers, Technical Warrant Holders, Fleet Subject Matter Experts [SMEs], etc..). Course reviews are planned no greater than every 36 months to ensure that a course remains aligned to current training requirements, unless a different review cycle is directed by the Requirement Sponsor(s). The HPRR Process is illustrated in the NETC Course Development and Revision E2E Process within “External Training Requirement Sources” and “OPNAV N1 Training Requirement Sources” blocks, as HPRRs are conducted on courses that belong to both sources of requirements. Training issues identified during a HPRR are captured using HPRR Action Chits. Each HPRR Action Chit is assigned a Training Requirement Category of 1, 2, or 3. Training Requirement Categories are used to identify the level of effort and resources that are required to adjudicate each HPRR Action Chit. The following is a description of the three (3) Training Requirement Categories:
Training Requirement Category 1: A training requirement that will result in:
a revision to a training course that changes the instructional strategy or delivery method.
addition of a new training course.
the deletion of a training course.
a revision to a training course which changes resource requirements.
a revision to a training course that changes course length.
the addition or deletion of a training course (Course Data Processing [CDP]).
the transfer of a training course between Curriculum Control Authorities (CCAs).
Category 1 training requirements shall be formally submitted to NETC/Learning Center (LC) by a Resource Sponsor per NETCINST (series). A Training Project Plan (TPP) is required and must be approved by NETC N7 for implementation, prior to a LC performing the "Develop New Course or Revise Existing Course and Pilot" step of NETC’s Course Development, Revision, Delivery, and Sustainment Process .
Training Requirement Category 2: A training requirement that requires a change to an existing course that will not change course length or require a change in resources to incorporate. A Training Project Plan (TPP) is required and is approved for implementation by the course’s Center Curriculum Control Authority (CCA).
Training Requirement Category 3: A training requirement that can be incorporated into an existing course without the need to generate a Training Project Plan (TPP).
HPRR Action Chits that receive a Training Requirement Category of two (2) or three (3) require no additional resources to implement and are adjudicated by the LC/training site. HPRR Action Chits that receive a Training Requirement Category of one (1) require additional resources to implement and are forwarded to the appropriate Requirement Sponsor(s) and Resource Sponsor(s) for resourcing. Appropriate OPNAV Codes provide resource adjudication of HPRR Action Chits that receive a Training Requirement Category of one (1). OPNAV Codes consist of: N1 (Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Manpower, Personnel, Training, and Education), N2/N6 (Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Information Dominance), N4 (Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Fleet Readiness and Logistics), N8 (Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Integration of Capabilities and Resources), and N9 (Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Systems). N9 is further identified as: N95 (Director of Expeditionary Warfare), N96 (Director of Surface Warfare), N97 (Director of Undersea Warfare), and N98 (Director of Air Warfare). The appropriate OPNAV Code will submit a letter to the learning center and NETC N7, in accordance with NETCINST (series), for incorporation of the training requirement, identified in the HPRR Action Chit, into the existing course. NAVEDTRA 133 is the Human Performance Requirements Review Management Manual. The manual provides policy and guidance for scheduling, planning, and conducting HPRRs, and for adjudicating the training requirements identified in the HPRR Action Chits.
Process 2: Deactivate Course is the process of standing down a course (often times referred to as “sun-setting”). This process is ONLY initiated when a course’s Requirement Sponsor(s) directs it. The process involves dispensing or re-aligning all resources assigned to deliver and sustain a course (e.g. instructors, facilities, Technical Training Equipment (TTE), etc...). Course deactivation begins once an “approved for implementation” Training Project Plan (TPP) is received by the course’s CCA from NETC Headquarter’s N7 Division. Additionally, data sources such as Corporate enterpriese Training Activity Resource System (CeTARS) and Catalog of Navy Training Courses (CANTRAC) will need to be updated to reflect the course deactivation. Course deactivation is a shared effort between NETC, Fleet Forces Command N1T, the course’s Requirement and Resource Sponsors, and BUPERS. Also, if the course is supported by a Navy Training System Plan (NTSP), the course’s Program Office and respective acquisition community will be involved in the process. Guidance for course deactivation will be contained in NAVEDTRA 135.

4. Naval Education and Training Command
NETC
Learning Center
Naval Education and Training Command
Human Performance Requirements Review (HPRR) &
Course Development and Revision End-to-End (E2E) Process
Version: 15 Oct 2013_NETC N74
Version: 11 December 2013 _V1_NETC N74
Trigger Initiating HPRR Process:
Example of
HPRR Outcomes
Request by
Requirement Sponsor
Training Requirement Identification &
Resource Sponsor Commitment
Fleet Feedback
Change in Resource
Requirement
Requirement Sponsor
Provides:
Training Requirement,
Justification Statement,
Impact Statement if
Training Requirement
is Not Funded, and
Request for
Funding Consideration
New or Revised
Occupational Standards
Resource Sponsor
Validates Training Requirement
& Submits to NETC/LC;
Final Determination to Fund
Requirement is Made at
Output of “Develop BCA” Step
of the Course Development,
Revision, Delivery, &
Sustainment Process
NETC/LC CCA
Existing Course
HPRR
Action Chits
Training
Requirement
Category 1
CDP
Addition or Deletion
Course Surveillance
Perform
Human Performance
Requirements Review
(HPRR) Process
Change in
Delivery Method or
Performance Standard
Formal Course Review (FCR)
Course HPRR Cycle
HPRR
Action Chits
Training
Requirement
Category 2 & 3;
Adjudicated at
Learning Center
Change in
Work Requirement
End
Process
NAVEDTRA 133 (series)
Human Performance
Requirements Review
Management Manual
NETCINST (series)
Training Requirement
Identification & Resource
Sponsor Commitment
Request by Curriculum
Control Authority (CCA)
Deactivate
Course
Perform
Maintenance
End
Process
Perform
Job Duty
Task Analysis
(JDTA)
Perform
Front End
Analysis
(FEA)
Develop
Business Case
Analysis
(BCA)
Develop
Training
Project Plan
(TPP)
Develop
New Course
or Revise
Existing Course
and Pilot
Deliver
Course of
Instruction
Naval Education and Training Command
Human Performance Requirements Review (HPRR)
&
Course Development and Revision End-to-End (E2E) Process
This diagram provides a focus on NETC’s Human Performance and Requirements Review (HPRR) Process, with an illustration of how it is incorporated within NETC’s Course Development and Revision End-to-End (E2E) Process. NETC established the Human Performance Requirements Review (HPRR) Process to provide a periodic and trigger driven review and revalidation of each course that a NETC Learning Center (LC) is the Curriculum Control Authority (CCA), by all course stakeholders (Type Commanders, Community Managers, Technical Warrant Holders, Fleet Subject Matter Experts (SMEs), etc..). HPRRs are planned no greater than every 36 months to ensure that a course remains aligned to current training requirements, unless the course’s Requirement Sponsor(s) direct a different review cycle. A HPRR can be organized to review a single course or a number of courses that support a policy, a directive, a grade, a rate, a platform, a system, a sub-system, or equipment. The HPRR Process provides stakeholders an opportunity to review and address existing training issues, identify redundant or unnecessary training, and ensure proper alignment of training based upon new or revised training requirements. Training gaps to the existing course that are identified during a HPRR are captured using HPRR Action Chits. NETC’s governance directive for HPRRs is NAVEDTRA 133 (series), Human Performance Requirements Review Management Manual.
The HPRR Process can be triggered by one or more triggers that maybe generated as part of the “Perform Course Maintenance” step of the Course Development, Revision, Delivery, and Sustainment Process, as illustrated in the diagram above. The following is a description of the seven (7) triggers that may initiate a review of one or more courses:
(1) Request by Requirement Sponsor: A Requirement Sponsor may request that a Learning Center (LC) conduct a HPRR to address a Fleet performance issue suspected to rooted in a current training course. Performance issues may be based upon (not an all-inclusive list): Top Management Attention (TMA)/Top Management Issue (TMI), Afloat Training Group (ATG) evaluations, Board of Inspection and Survey (INSURV) results, Navy Safety Center reports, changes in Technical training Equipment (TTE), or a change in policy or directive. To prepare for a HPRR, a Requirement Sponsor may provide HPRR agenda items to the LC HPRR Coordinator, these may include HPRR Action Chits not adjudicated from a previous HPRR.
(2) Fleet Feedback: Fleet feedback can come in many forms (i.e., lessons learned, hot wash or after action reports, exercise reports, onsite evaluation or inspection teams etc...), and may trigger a HPRR in order to address performance issues suspected to be rooted in a current training course.
(3) New or Revised Occupational Standards: New or revised Occupational Standards (OCCSTDs) may trigger a HPRR for “A” School courses.
(4) Course Surveillance: Continuous surveillance of a course is performed by a course’s Course Curriculum Model Manager (CCMM), course supervisors and instructors to detect changes in documentation, equipment, materials, or procedures associated that course. Changes identified during surveillance may result in the need to conduct a HPRR, to consider incorporation of changes to the course’s content to maintain currency.
(5) Formal Course Review: A Formal Course Review (FCR) is designed to provide a check of different elements contained in a course and serves as an excellent source of feedback. During a FCR, various programs and policies associated with the course are evaluated for effectiveness, such as: Academic Review Boards, Drop from Training, Attrition, Set-Backs, Remediation Program, Instructor Certification Programs, and conformance to developmental standards established in the NAVEDTRA 130 (series) manuals. Outputs from a FCR may trigger the need to conduct a HPRR to acquire justification, and resources if required, to make adjustments to a course.
(6) Course HPRR Cycle: A Requirement Sponsor may change (decrease or increase) the periodicity of a course’s review cycle. The LC may request that the Requirement Sponsor approve a change in the periodicity (minimum review cycle of every 36 months) by submitting official correspondence. If the Requirement Sponsor approves the change in course review periodicity, the LC shall maintain the change in periodicity correspondence on file for the life of the course and ensure that NETC N74 is informed of the change.
(7) Request by Curriculum Control Authority (CCA): A CCA can initiate the HPRR Process for one or more courses, if it is deemed that a HPPR is required to adjudicate issues with one or more courses. Ultimately however, the decision to conduct a HPRR belongs to the stakeholders.
The HPRR Process and HPRR Action Chits:
NETC Learning Center staffs manage the HPRR Process and facilitate HPRRs. Additionally, they manage the adjudication of training issues identified during a HPRR that are captured using HPRR Action Chits. Each HPRR Action Chit is assigned a Training Requirement Category. Training Requirement Categories are used to identify the level of effort and resources that are required to adjudicate a training issue. The following is a description of each Training Requirement Category:
Training Requirement Category 1: A training requirement that will result in:
addition of a new training course.
a revision to a training course that changes the instructional strategy or delivery method.
a revision to a training course that changes course length.
a revision to a training course which changes resource requirements.
the deletion of a training course.
the transfer of a training course between Curriculum Control Authorities (CCAs).
the addition or deletion of a training course (Course Data Processing (CDP)).
Category 1 training requirements shall be formally submitted to NETC/Learning Center (LC) by a Resource Sponsor per NETCINST (series). A Training Project Plan (TPP) is required and must be approved by NETC N7 for implementation, prior to a LC performing the "Develop New Course or Revise Existing Course and Pilot" step of the Course Development, Revision, Delivery, and Sustainment Process.
Training Requirement Category 2: A training requirement that requires a change to an existing course that will not change course length or require a change in resources to incorporate. A Training Project Plan (TPP) is required and is approved for implementation by the course’s Center Curriculum Control Authority (CCA).
Training Requirement Category 3: A training requirement that can be incorporated into an existing course without the need to generate a Training Project Plan (TPP).
HPRR Action Chits that receive a Training Requirement Category of two (2) or three (3) require no additional resources to implement and are adjudicated by the LC/training site. HPRR Action Chits that receive a Training Requirement Category of one (1) require additional resources to implement and are forwarded to the appropriate Requirement Sponsor(s) and Resource Sponsor(s) for resourcing. Appropriate OPNAV Codes provide resource adjudication of HPRR Action Chits that receive a Training Requirement Category of one (1). OPNAV Codes consist of: N1 (Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Manpower, Personnel, Training, and Education), N2/N6 (Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Information Dominance, N4 (Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Fleet Readiness and Logistics), N8 (Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Integration of Capabilities and Resources), and N9 (Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Systems). N9 is further identified as: N95 (Director of Expeditionary Warfare), N96 (Director of Surface Warfare), N97 (Director of Undersea Warfare), and N98 (Director of Air Warfare). The appropriate OPNAV Code will submit a letter to the learning center and NETC N7, in accordance with NETCINST (series), for incorporation of the training requirement, identified in the HPRR Action Chit, into the existing course. NAVEDTRA 133 is the Human Performance Requirements Review Management Manual. The manual provides policy and guidance for scheduling, planning, and conducting HPRRs, and for adjudicating the training requirements identified in the HPRR Action Chits.
Additionally, the diagram provides 4 possible take-aways from a HPRR to demonstrate where in NETC’S Course Development, Revision, Delivery, and Sustainment Process work would begin to adjudicate the type of training requirement identified in a HPRR Action Chit assigned a training requirement category of one (1).:
(1) A “Change in Work Requirement” would begin with a JDTA, as the foundational work for the course would need to be updated to reflect the change in work, to at least the task level.
(2) A “Change in Delivery Method or Performance Standard” would begin with an FEA, as analysis would need to be performed prior to costing out the new training delivery method or what was required to achieve the change in performance standard.
(3) A “CDP Addition or Deletion” would begin with a BCA, to determine the cost adjustment required to add or delete a CDP (training location).
(4) A “Change in Resource Requirement” would begin with a BCA. In this context, a “change in resource requirement,” might be an increase in a course’s student throughput requirement. Some analysis would need to be performed to determine what additional resources would be required, if any, to support the throughput increase; and then cost analysis performed, as required.
Course Development / Revision End - to - End Process
Course Development, Revision, Delivery, and Sustainment Process
NAVEDTRA 137 (series)
Job Duty Task Analysis
Management Manual
NAVEDTRA 138 (series)
Front End Analysis
Management Manual
NETCINST (series)
Business Case
Analysis Policy
NAVEDTRA 130 (series)
Task Based Curriculum
Development Manual
NAVEDTRA 131 (series)
PPP Based Curriculum
Development Manual
NAVEDTRA 135 (series)
Navy School
Management Manual
NAVEDTRA 130, 131,
132, 133, 134, 135,
and 136 (series)
HPRR and Course Development & Revision E2E Process Color Key:
NAVEDTRA 136 (series)
ILE Course
Development & Life-Cycle
Maintenance Manual
NAVEDTRA 132 (series)
Navy School
Testing Program
Management Manual
NAVEDTRA 134 (series)
Navy Instructor
Manual
Triggers that can initiate
a HPRR
HPRR Action Chits, Training
Requirement Category 2 & 3
Course Development, Revision
Delivery, & Sustainment Process
Perform HPRR Process
Requirement Sponsor & Resource
Sponsor Actions
NAVEDTRA Manuals and
NETC Directives
HPRR Action Chits, Training Requirement Category 1
NAVEDTRA 140 (series)
Training Support
Management Manual
Possible Take-Aways from a HPRR

5. NETC Governance
NAVEDTRA Task Based Curriculum Development Manual
(Largest percent of NETC content built using Tasked Based approach)
NAVEDTRA 131- Personal Performance Profile Based Curriculum Development Manual
(Typically used for Systems/Equipment Training)
NAVEDTRA Navy School Testing Program Management Manual
(Provides guidance on test creation, analysis, min. grade requirements)
NAVEDTRA Human Performance Requirements Review Manual
(Provides guidance on HPRR policy and process)
NAVEDTRA Navy Instructor Manual
(Supplement to NIT course and aids in Master Training Specialist Qualification)
NAVEDTRA Navy School Management Manual
(Defines Learning Center roles and responsibilities, Formal Course Reviews and etc)
NAVEDTRA Integrated Learning Environment Course Development and Maintenance
(Provides guidance on Computer based training and Interactive courseware development)
NAVEDTRA Job Duty Task Analysis Manual
(Provides guidance on Structuring, Decomposing and ascribing Attributes to work)
NAVEDTRA 138- Front End Analysis Management Manual
(Establish a process that will identify a training requirement gap, appropriate media types, and media delivery modes to satisfy new training requirements or improve performance of existing training)
NAVEDTRA 140-Training Support Management Manual
(Outlines the NETC requirement for infrastructure, training, and student management support for all NETC training activities.)

6. NETC N7 Policy for Conversion
NETC N7 Policy for conversion from AIM I & AIM II into CPM/LOM
NETC INST A (19 Sep 13) policy: Any new content development, revision, or maintenance within the NETC domain shall be performed using AIM CPM and LO Module. Additionally, Learning Centers shall convert all course material into AIM CPM and LO Module no later than 1 October 2016
Continue to work on streamlining the process
A” School revisions and Common Core Modules are currently in development using AIM CPM and LO Module
OPNAV N1 Working with Acquisition Community to incorporate new policy for AIM LOM / CPM
OPNAVINST C Aug 2013
Future Statements of Work
NAVEDTRA Updates

7. OCCSTDS Support in CPM OCCSTDS integration into CPM Status
Import from NOID (sandbox database for NAVMAC) implemented and in final testing
NODCAM (Navy Occupational Data Collection and Management) - System designed on SharePoint Platform to enhance the OCCSTDS development process
OCCSTDS to JDTA tab design final design in review

8. Navy Job Analysis Cross Functional Team (NJA CFT)
NETC Co-Lead is Leslie Desenburg
NAVMAC Co-Lead is Tom Crain
WG Members from NETC, NAVMAC, NPRST, NETPDTC, and AIM team
NJA CFT Charter
Restore, streamline and improve Navy Job Analysis to support Navy OCCSTDS, manpower requirements determination, curricula development, and Navy advancement exam development
NEC/CeTARS reconciliation plan

9. NETC N74
Questions?