Mapping the Big Picture Curriculum Mapping for Integrating Curriculum and Assessment in K – 12 By Cristiana A. Baggio www.edutech.org.br.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
When Students Can’t Read…
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Curriculum Mapping by Kendra Jensen & Laura Nelson.
Curriculum Mapping Boyer Valley.
CCSS in a year long context
Understanding by Design Planning Instruction Stage Three Prepared for Mercer University EDUC621 by Sherah B. Carr, Ph.D Information adapted from training.
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
Consistency of Assessment
Curriculum Mapping Overview
Atlas Curriculum Mapping Moving Toward an Integrated Curriculum.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
Session Materials  Wiki
CURRICULUM ALIGNMENT Debbi Hardy Curriculum Director Olympia School District.
Unwrapping Standards.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
“Developing Quality Maps: Nuts, Bolts, and Staff Development” Dr. Ann Johnson
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
The Common Core Curriculum By Dean Berry, Ed. D. Gregg Berry, B.A.
Collaborative Instructional Leader Becoming a collaborative instructional leader.
Professional Development through the Authentic Academic Achievement Project.
Curriculum Mapping 101 Teaching Matters, Inc
BASED ON THE WORK OF HEIDI HAYES JACOBS, PH.D AND SUSAN UDELHOFEN, PH.D CURRICULUM MAPPING OVERVIEW Revised by Lisa Cohen June 2014.
Work Session: Mapping Template for Higher Education ICIU facilitated by Dr. Heidi Hayes Jacobs - March 5, 2015.
Curriculum Mapping Overview Based on the work of Heidi Hayes Jacobs, Ph.D and Susan Udelhofen, Ph.D Compiled and Presented to IUP undergraduate students.
Susan Agre-Kippenhan, Portland State University Professor, Art Department Evaluating the Effectiveness of Service Learning.
Preparing Global Thinkers, Workers, Leaders: A 21 st Century Education Plan ASCD Annual Conference March 6, 2010 Janis Jensen, Director, Office of Academic.
Curriculum Mapping Leadership Team Planning Based on the work of Heidi Hayes Jacobs, Ph.D. and Susan Udelhofen, Ph.D.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
2012 Regional Assessment Workshops Session 2 Dr. Maryellen Cosgrove, Dean School of Business, Education, Health and Wellness Gainesville State University.
A process to collect information about content, assessment and thinking processes currently in place with a school. What concepts, skills, knowledge and.
The Curriculum Mapping Review Process Twice and thrice over, as they say, good is it to repeat and review what is good. --Plato.
Curriculum Mapping November Types of Curriculum Recommended – Standards as defined by experts in their field. Written – State standards, local goals.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
CCSS IN A YEAR LONG CONTEXT MARIE ALCOCK PHD & SUSAN VON FELTEN Slide show at lsalearning.com/workshops.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
A Successful Curriculum Mapping Initiative An Administrative Perspective Debra J. Sheard, Ed.D.
Big6 Overview Big6™ Trainers Program McDowell County Schools.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
Using Understanding by Design
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
6 th Grade and Global Social Studies Curriculum Mapping Depew Middle School December 4 th, 2008 Jill Drake, Erie 1 BOCES.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Senior Capstone Experience Framework A Guide for South Dakota Schools.
“Developing an Implementation Map: Mapping / Mapping ” Dr. Ann Johnson
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
How Much Do We know about Our Textbook? Zhang Lu.
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
Blueprint for GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS. The Minister’s reform agenda is based on the following belief: “All students are entitled to an excellent education.
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume III Curriculum Prioritization and Mapping.
Prepared by Joseph D. Cantara- Counsultant 1 Curriculum Mapping: A Road Map for The Common Core Standards: Session #2 The work of Heidi Hayes Jacobs: Presented.
FINDING THE PATH AND STAYING ON IT Sue Howell August 12 & 13, 2010.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
Curriculum Mapping. What is curriculum mapping? A procedure to present an overview of the learning experiences in the classroom Not what ‘ought’ to be.
Action Research Purpose and Benefits Technology as a Learning Tool to Improve Student Achievement.
PE Day 2 Welcome Back!!! Welcome Back!!! Agenda Agenda Agenda Updates/Q’s/Comments Updates/Q’s/Comments.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
6 Technology, Digital Media, and Curriculum Integration
Project-Based Learning
Purpose for Curriculum Mapping
Presentation transcript:

Mapping the Big Picture Curriculum Mapping for Integrating Curriculum and Assessment in K – 12 By Cristiana A. Baggio

Essential Questions How can curriculum mapping improve student performance? What are initial mapping tasks?

Our roles… Researchers Designers Writers Editors Systems analysts Sociologists

What is Mapping? Calendar based curriculum mapping is a procedure for collecting a data base of the operational curriculum in a school or district. It provides the basis for authentic examination of that data base. It replaces curriculum committees with a site based cabinet.

All discussion, debate, and decisions will be based on: What is in the best interest of our specific clients… the students in our setting: Their age Their stage of development Their learning characteristics Their communities Their aspirations Their needs

Who are YOUR learners?

What information do we collect on the Map? Content Assessment Skills/Thinking Processes

Your design elements: Choice of CONTENT: the type of format and the nature of the subject matter. Choice of THINKING PROCESSES: the precise technical and thinking skills. Choice of ASSESSMENT: the product or performance to demonstrate learning.

Content can be designed in different formats: Discipline Field: with integrity; focus on the knowledge and specific problem solving tools.

Content can be shaped in different formats: Interdisciplinary: combination of two or more disciplines to examine a common focus. Student Centered: content is focused on investigation of student generated interests derived from their personal interests and needs.

Skills and Thinking Processes are displayed on the map: Note the difference between broad based thinking processes: analysis, synthesis, decision making, creative, critical, etc… and Specific techniques: comparing, contrasting, using sentence variety, etc.

Assessments are the Major Products and Performances: Assessment is a demonstration of learning Assessment is observable evidence They must be nouns Tangible products Observable performances

Some questions to think about: What is possible with these data? What would you be able to do if you had these data? How would your school be different if you had these data available now?

Editing, auditing, updating and creative development tasks: Gain information Avoid repetition Identify gaps Identify potential areas for integration Match with learner standards Examine for timeliness Edit for coherence

Gain Information Underline every place in the map where you learned something new about the operational curriculum. This expands the teacher’s understanding of his/her students’ experience.

Edit for Repetitions Recognize the difference between repetitions and redundancy. Spiraling as a goal.

Edit for Gaps Examine maps for gaps in: Content Thinking processes and skills Assessments

Locate potential areas for integration Peruse the map and circle areas for integration of content, skills, and assessment. These can serve as the springboard for curriculum planning.

Validate standards Search the maps for places where students are completing performance tasks that match your standards. Identify gaps.

Applying your standards National State District Site

Edit for timeliness Review the maps for timely issues, breakthroughs, methods, materials, and new types of assessment. Be vigilant about technology.

Edit for Coherence Scrutinize maps for a solid match between the choice of content, the featured skills and processes, and the type of assessment.

Procedures PHASE 1: collecting the data PHASE 2: first read-through PHASE 3: small mixed group review PHASE 4: large group comparisons PHASE 5: determine immediate revision points PHASE 6: determine points requiring some research and planning PHASE 7: plan for next review cycle

PHASE 1: Collecting the Data Each teacher in the building completes a map The format is consistent for each teacher, but reflects the individual nature of each classroom Technology simplifies data collection

Collecting Content Data Types of focus: Topics Issues Works Problems Themes Configuration: Discipline field based Interdisciplinary Student centered

Collecting Skill and Assessment Enter the skills and assessments FOREGROUNDED for each unit of study or course. Precision is the key. Enter skills and assessments that are ongoing through the course of a year. Portfolio checks Early Childhood assessments.

PHASE 2: First Read-Through Each teacher reads the entire school map as an editor and carries out the “tasks”. Places where new information was gained are underlined. Places requiring potential revision are circled. (repetitions, gaps, etc.)

PHASE 3: Mixed Small Group Groups of 5 to 8 faculty members are formed. Groups should be from diverse configurations (I.e. different grade levels and departments) The goal is to simply share individual findings. No revisions are suggested.

PHASE 4: Large Group Review All faculty members come together and examine the compilation of findings from the smaller groups. Session is facilitated by principal and/or teacher leader.

PHASE 5: Determine areas for immediate revision The faculty identifies those areas that can be handled by the site with relative ease. The specific faculty members involved in those revisions determine a timetable for action.

PHASE 6: Determining those areas requiring long term planning Faculty members identify those areas that have implications beyond the site with other sites. Faculty members identify those areas where research is needed.

PHASE 7: The Cycle Continues The district cabinet meets 3 times annually for review. Task forces report on their timetables. The site based council continues its review of the maps through the course of the year and into the next.

Why Mapping?

Mapping is a Communication Tool Between teachers in a building. Between teachers in feeding and receiving sites. For parents. For students.

Mapping is a Planning Tool For curriculum reform. For meeting date standards. For ordering materials, software… For coordinating events. For assessment reform.

Mapping is a Pedagogical Tool For the new teacher. For the special education teacher. For the new student. For seeing the operational program. For designing staff development.

Mapping needs to be tailored to your locale The school and district culture. The decision making process. A deliberate timetable. Available time. Leadership at each site.