The Decline of the UUP?: an electoral analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Revenge of the Grassroots: the Transformation of the Orange Order since 1950.
Advertisements

Voter Behavior Chapter 6 section 4.
Influences on Voting behaviour
Voters and Voter Behavior
American Government and Politics Today
Review What is a random sample? What is saliency?
VOTING BEHAVIOR. FAMILY  Tremendous influence upon the way one votes.  80% of the populace votes the same way as their parents do.
Nationalism & Unionism in Ireland Do Economic Forces Matter? 1.
The Orange Order in the Twentieth Century: A Comparative Perspective from Northern Ireland, Scotland, Newfoundland and Ontario.
Comparing Political Activism Worldwide Democratic Phoenix.
PPA 419 – Aging Services Administration Lecture 3a – The Political and Policy Context of Aging Services.
“Local Political Parties and Young Voters.” Daniel Shea, 2009.
“Local Political Parties and Young Voters.” Daniel Shea, 2009.
“Local Political Parties and Young Voters.” Daniel Shea, 2009.
The Culture War?. Questions for today Are we a polarized electorate? Arguments for the existence of polarization? Arguments against the existence of polarization?
Geography of Religion In USA Chap 6 Religion Envs
Department of Politics
Religion and Politics. In some parts of the world, religion and politics are inseparable. Notable examples of countries where there is a solid connection.
Youth Priorities and Electoral Participation: Canada and the Third World -A comparative framework Youth priorities and political participation in Canada.
How Newspapers Differ: Devolution in Northern Ireland How far down the path to devolution is Northern Ireland?
 starter activity How would you describe the political differences between these two presidents?
American Political Culture American Federal Government.
Lesson Objectives: By the end of this lesson you will be able to: 1.Examine the problem of nonvoting in America. 2.Identify those people who typically.
POLITICAL PARTIES. How do U.S. political parties differ from European parties? European voters are more loyal Federal system decentralizes power Parties.
5.1 Parties and What They Do
Political Parties. What is a Political Party? Definition- – A group of people who seek to control the government through winning elections.
Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.
Chapter Six: Public Opinion and Political Socialization 1.
Chapter 6 Public Opinion, Political Socialization and Media.
Public Opinion and Political Action Chapter 6. Introduction Some Basics: Demography The science of population changes. Census A valuable tool for understanding.
AP GOVERNMENT PUBLIC OPINION Chapter 5 PUBLIC OPINION The aggregate of individual attitudes or beliefs by some portion of the adult population No ONE.
Structure, Conventions, and the Two Party System Linkage Institutions #2.
Chapters 6 – Participation I. Public Opinion – aggregate of attitudes and opinions of individuals on a significant issue. A. Survey research. Is public.
Introduction Public Opinion Demography Census
From Deference to Defiance: the Transformation of the Orange Order since 1950.
Unit 2 Ch 6-11 Inputs to US Government. Quiz 1.Briefly explain the 3 “waves” of immigration. 2.What is the #1 source of a citizen’s political socialization?
FROM THIS…….. AND THIS……. Marty …….TO THIS!! WELCOME TO THE WELCOME TO THE WEIRD AND WEIRD AND WONDERFUL WORLD OF NORTHERN IRELAND POLITICS! WONDERFUL.
Public Opinion Listening to Citizens. Understanding Public Opinion in the Context of American Politics Focus groups – Small gatherings of individuals.
The Orange Order in the Twentieth Century: A Comparative Perspective.
Why People vote Suffering through Suffrage. Clearly Stated Learning Objectives Examine the 2008 Election in the broader context of American electoral.
Are you a Democrat or Republican? Find GoogleGoogle Put 3 rd Party w.s. in basket.
Why People vote Suffering through Suffrage. Clearly Stated Learning Objectives Examine the 2008 Election in the broader context of American electoral.
Political Parties in Canada D Brown D Brown St Francis Xavier University St Francis Xavier University Winter term 2007 Winter term 2007.
PUBLIC OPINION AND POLITICAL ACTION Chapter 6. Introduction Some Basics: Demography: The science of population changes. Census The most valuable method.
Orange Traditionalists or Orange Skeptics?: the complex social base of Pro-Agreement Unionism.
Polling Public Opinion v. political culture Unbiased Random Sample Stratified Sample Sampling Error/Margin of Error.
From Respectability to Violence?: the Transformation of the Orange Order since 1950.
PUBLIC OPINION AND POLITICAL SOCIALIZATION. Public opinion – the aggregate of individual attitudes or beliefs shared by some portion of the adult population.
Political Parties – Structure: Three major components of Political Parties (3-headed Political Giant): 1.Party in the Electorate 2.Party Organization 3.Party.
The Intra-Party Dynamics of the Ulster Unionist Party: an ecological approach.
Democracy and Public Opinion  Core beliefs are shared  Political attitudes differ  What is public opinion?  Public opinion is critical to democracy.
Unit 2 Peer Lecture By Andrew Sickenger, Sush Kudari, and Aaron Ramsay.
PUBLIC OPINION Chapter 6. The Power of Public Opinion  The Power of Presidential Approval  What Is Public Opinion?  Expressed through voting  The.
Chapter 7 Public Opinion. Forms of Public Opinion Public Opinion – the aggregate of individual attitudes or beliefs shared by some portion of the adult.
Glenn Verbauwhede Wouter Vandewaetere Tanguy Soubry Matthieu Demeyer.
Political Beliefs and Behaviors
Political Parties.
Lesson 6: Long-Term Factors Affecting Voting Behaviour
“Vasil Aprilov” Primary School Burgas
Chapter 6 Public Opinion and Political Participation
Chapter 6-Section 4 Voter Behavior
Chapter 6: Voters and Voter Behavior
Demographics Belief & Behaviors.
Political Socialization
“Local Political Parties and Young Voters.”
Nationalism & Unionism in Ireland
2-5: Voter Turnout and Voter Choice
ALLIANCE PARTY Lesson Objectives:
(10.3/10.4) Voting Trends / Voting Process
Chapter 6-Section 4 Voter Behavior
Presentation transcript:

The Decline of the UUP?: an electoral analysis

Main Research Questions What individual characteristics (background, attitudinal) best predict support for the UUP in the Assembly Elections of 2001 [NI Election Study] What aggregate characteristics (census, electoral, Orange) best predict support for the UUP in District Council elections, 1993-2001 [Ecological Regression] Is there an 'Orange vote' and which party benefits [Ecological Regression]

Attitudes to Integration

The Importance of Ideology over Class

Moderate Republicans

Anti-UK Govt/Anti-Labour

Anti-Establishment

Respectful Young Integrationists

Influential Male Cynics

Dissatisfied Social Services

2001 Election Study Findings (Protestants) Self-Identified Protestants participate at same level as Catholics Age by far the strongest predictor of UUP vote, esp. 18-24 vs. 55-65 cohorts Education level more important than income or class for a pro-UUP vote Anti-Establishment feeling very important for anti-UUP vote

Survey Summary Factors associated with a deferential, traditional political culture play a central role in UUP support De-traditionalisation and cohort replacement will make UUP resurgence more difficult Liberal ('civic unionist') support is important, but this cannot compensate for loss of traditional UUP base

Age and the Ulster Unionist Council: the Orange Order Leadership vs Age and the Ulster Unionist Council: the Orange Order Leadership vs. UUC Orange members 48% of Orange officebearers are under 40 while just a quarter of Orange UUC members are under 45 29% of Orange officebearers over 50, while 66% of UUC Orange members were over 55 UUC is far more elite in terms of social status (wealth, education) than the Order or the Unionist Community

UUP share of Protestant vote at District Council level

Church of Ireland % of Protestants, 1991 (by DC)

Orange Order Lodges & Density 1991

Orange Order Density 1991

Determinants of UUP Constituencies, 1993-2001 (by z score)

Predictors of UUP vote, 1993-2001 (with Orange density), N = 165

The Role of Context Areas of High Protestant Unemployment are likely to be young and anti-Elite in attitude Church of Ireland and Orange counties and councils may be more deferential for historical reasons (these forces may once have shaped local political cultures) Less clear that they do so today.

Conclusion Importance of 'traditional' vs 'modern' divide (i.e. Older Generation, Church of Ireland, Respect for Institutions and leaders) 'Civic Unionist' segment exists in metropolitan Belfast but does not counterbalance de-traditionalisation in UUP/DUP voting calculus

Traditionalists (Orange & Other), Co. Tyrone

Orange Skeptics & Liberal Civics (East Belfast)

Non-Orange Skeptics: Protestant Working-Class Area, Co. Armagh

http://www.kpdata.com/epk/index.html (Follow link 1) END http://www.kpdata.com/epk/index.html (Follow link 1)

Findings: Individual Orange and MLA status are the most important individual characteristics Rural, Gender, Title, Education and Status unimportant Age may be important

Findings: Contextual Contextual factors explain most of the variance (party section, geography of residence) Sectional splits and Geographic splits within the Orange Order are critical Big difference between UUC delegates who happen to be Orange and those who represent the Orange

Conclusion Implications of breaking UUC-Orange link 'Orange skeptics' vs. 'rational civics' idea needs to be contextualised to official Orangeism - esp. in Belfast & Antrim Importance of 'traditional' vs 'modern' divide (i.e. West Bann Orangemen, respectable working-class constituencies)

Differences in Stance within the Orange UUC

Orange Traditionalists or Orange Skeptics Orange Traditionalists or Orange Skeptics?: the complex social base of Pro-Agreement Unionism

Main Research Questions What is the social profile of the UUC and how does this differ from that of the Orange Order and the Unionist community as a whole Which factors best predict support for the Good Friday Agreement within the UUC? What are the characteristics of pro-UUP constituencies, 1993-2001[time permitting]

UUC Social Profile: Previous Survey Research Late 2000 Survey of UUC (Tonge & Evans 2001; 2002). 1/3 response rate Social Profile in terms of age, education, gender, income, occupation, county of residence Showed that roughly half the UUC were Orange members

Research Strategy We add contextual factors to the analysis Party List (gender, title, postcode, section) Strategists assign vote (pro/anti-GFA) MOSAIC classifications assigned to party members NI MOSAIC score 1-27 (status), 30-36 (rural) MOSAIC group and score used in multi-level and fixed-effects logistic regressions

The Social Profile of the UUC and Orange Order by MOSAIC Classification (99% sample)   % Top 12 Rural 8 Bottom 7 Nonrural Top 12 Nonrural Bottom 7 N Freemason officebearers 67.8% 15.5% 8.0% 80.2% 9.4% 766 Orange bloc UUC delegates 45.7% 36.2% 12.4% 71.6% 19.4% 105 UUC delegates total 44.3% 35.9% 8.4% 69.0% 13.1% 879 Grand Orange Lodge officebearers 34.7% 44.4% 9.7% 62.5% 17.5% 144 Northern Ireland population average 32.5% 18.1% 22.9% 39.6% 27.9% 1.6m Orange Order (lodge) officebearers 32.4% 43.9% 57.7% 22.1% 1429

Occupation: Orange Order versus Orange UUC Delegates

Age: Orange Order Leadership vs. the Orange UUC 48% of Orange officebearers are under 40 while just a quarter of Orange UUC members are under 45 29% of Orange officebearers over 50, while 66% of UUC Orange members were over 55

The Regional Base of the UUC

Findings: Social Profile Major status difference between Orange leadership/membership and Orange UUC delegates UUC profile is elderly and elite Explains why Protestant alienation from the UUP may be greater than from the Orange Explains why many Orange leaders and a majority of the membership wish to break the link with the UUC while Orange UUC delegates do not

GFA Voting Dynamics: Previous Survey Research Orange Order membership and age were clearly important (p < .001) Much unexplained: R2 = .1 predicting 1998 vote and .03 in predicting 'Vote Today' Concluded that division lay between 'Orange skeptics' and 'rational civics'

Support for the Agreement by UUP Constituency Association, c. 2002

UUC Constituency Profile: Rural

UUC Constituency Profile: Status

Table 2: UUC Social Profile (Party Section), by MOSAIC Classification (99% sample)   % Top 12 % Rural % Bottom 7 % Nonrural Top 12 % Nonrural Bottom 7 N East Belfast 81.6% 0.0 % 0.0% 38 North Down 74.3% 5.7% 11.4% 78.8% 12.1% 34 South Antrim 63.8% 23.4% 6.4% 83.3% 8.3% 47 MLAs 60.0% 28.0% 8.0% 11.1% 25 Strangford 59.6% 21.3% 10.6% 75.7% 13.5% UUC total 44.3% 35.9% 8.4% 69.0% 13.1% 879

Orange/Non-Orange Differential in Support for the Agreement

Orange/Non-Orange Differential in Support for the Agreement