Argument Stephen Toulmin, originally a British logician. He became frustrated with the inability of formal logic to explain everyday arguments, which prompted.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments
Advertisements

Claim, Data, Warrant A model for analyzing arguments adapted from the work of Stephen Toulmin.
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible Global Introductions.
Toulmin Analysis and Rogerian Argument. The Toulmin Model of Argumentation.
English 100 Tuesday, and Wednesday, Tuesday: On a sheet of paper, write about the following prompt… you will keep this in your notebook:
Toulmin Argument Model Model Three: The Final Model.
Causal Arguments. The Problem of Causation What caused the eraser to hit the floor? What caused the eraser to hit the floor? Gravity? Gravity? Nerve impulses?
A Tool for Understanding Argument
Art of Qualifying Claims Prasad M. Jayaweera
Bias, Persuasion, and Propaganda From:
Pragmatic Argument Supports or rejects course of action based on its consequences. Tests: Are the predicted consequences likely? Is the action better than.
Key Terms: Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
A Tool for Diagramming “Informal” Arguments
The Logical Structure of Arguments (WA Chapter 4)
Argument and Persuasion
A Visual Explanation By Frank Clarke. STEPS TO AN EFFECTIVE ARGUMENT CLARKE’S EXPLANATION OF.
Basics of Argumentation Victoria Nelson, Ph.D.. What is an argument? An interpersonal dispute.
By definition: (verb)  to urge someone to do something  to induce to believe by appealing to reason or understanding; to convince.
Toulmin model of argument
Building on the Classical Argument P.A. McCabe-Remmell Department of English University of South Florida.
The Toulmin Model A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments.
Engl 212 Propaganda Fall 2015 G. Thompson Argument.
The Art of Argument: Exploring Toulmin Logic By Patrick, Daniel and Rodney.
The story of Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation.
READING PERSUASIVE TEXTS What is persuasion? What is persuasion? Persuasion is the act of influencing someone to believe or consider a certain point.
The Common Core and Argument Writing. Persuasion vs. Argument Ethos (author credibility) Pathos (emotional appeals) Persuasion Logos (logical appeals)
Thinkin’ about Logic Using the Toulmin system to evaluate arguments.
Persuasive Text convincing a reader to do something, buy something, believe in something.
1 Reasoning Chapter 8. 2 Forms of Proof Logos = Logical evidence Logos = Logical evidence Ethos = Ethics/Credibility Ethos = Ethics/Credibility Pathos.
Argumentative Appeals/ Methods of Persuasion Speech Unit English 10A.
LOGICAL FALLACIES By Jennifer Lynn Abernethy. Part I: AVOIDING THE QUESTION.
Argument Language is a form of motivated action. Argument as Discourse It’s important to understand that for the purposes of this class, Argument means.
Reasoning by Analogy What is an analogy? juQGk juQGk.
Persuasive Strategies Questions/Main Ideas What is Persuasion? What is a “claim?”
The Argument Essay English Learners’ Fridays Workshop October 9, 2015.
The Toulmin Model A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments.
Persuasive  To convince someone to believe in something or do something.  Writers may use language that appeals to the reader’s senses.
Everything’s An Argument Chapter 8 The Toulmin Model
Introduction to Proposal Arguments Scott Hale English 1213.
Examples of Persuasive Techniques in Advertising
What do we mean by the “logical structure” of an argument? PART ONE.
What is a persuasive essay? The purpose of a persuasive essay is to convince people to agree with you.
Elements of an Argument. How can I change the ways that other people think?
Digging Deeper into The Toulmin Model Introduction I found the Wood (2012) article inspiring, so I though I would delve into the Toulmin Model further,
The Toulmin Argument The everyday argument.  The most basic components are:  Evidence  Warrants  A claim Components.
Do Now: Take out your character information sheet.Take out your character information sheet. Complete a VOTE analysis.Complete a VOTE analysis. –Victory—what.
Argument.
Introduction to Argument Chapter 2 (Pgs ) AP Language Demi Greiner | Arlyn Rodriguez Period 4.
The Open Prompt: Timing 1-3 minutes reading and working the prompt. 3 minutes deciding on a position minutes planning the support of your position.
Writing Test September 27, 2011 All Juniors must take and pass in order to receive a diploma.
The Toulmin Model A tool for diagramming arguments.
Argumentative Essay Terminology.
The Structure of Persuasion
The Basics of Argumentation and the Toulmin Model
Logic Lines and Toulmin Model
according to Stephen Toulmin
A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments
A tool for diagramming arguments
A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments
A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments
Toulmin’s Argument Model
A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments
A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments
A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments
Build a Foundation for Your Argument
The Toulmin Model A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments.
Argument Moves from what is know to what is unknown
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Toulmin Model
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Toulmin Model
Rhetoric Notes.
Presentation transcript:

Argument Stephen Toulmin, originally a British logician. He became frustrated with the inability of formal logic to explain everyday arguments, which prompted him to develop his own model of practical reasoning.

Example of Argument Toulmin, S. E., Rieke, R. D., & Janik, A. (1984). An Introduction to reasoning. New York [etc.]: Macmillan. A: I should choose the ice cream today! Q: Why do you say that? A: Jack chose yesterday, and Jill the day before. Q: So? A: Everyone should have a turn at choosing.

Example of Argument Claim Grounds (because) Grounds (because) Warrant (since) Warrant (since) Toulmin, S. E., Rieke, R. D., & Janik, A. (1984). An Introduction to reasoning. New York [etc.]: Macmillan. I should choose the ice cream today! Jack chose yesterday, and Jill the day before. Everyone should have a turn at choosing.

Principle or Category Claim Grounds (because) Grounds (because) Warrant (since) Warrant (since) Toulmin, S. E., Rieke, R. D., & Janik, A. (1984). An Introduction to reasoning. New York [etc.]: Macmillan. We should support genetically modified foods. Doing so values scientific reason over emotion. Reason is superior to emotion.

Show how your proposed action follows a principle valued by your audience or belongs to a category valued by your audience. “Because doing this action is ________” What might be the objection of someone who doesn’t hold this value? (be very specific!) How might you anticipate/address the argument of that stakeholder?

Consequences Claim Grounds (because) Grounds (because) Warrant (since) Warrant (since) Toulmin, S. E., Rieke, R. D., & Janik, A. (1984). An Introduction to reasoning. New York [etc.]: Macmillan. We should support genetically modified foods. Biotech crops can reduce world hunger. Hunger is something humans shouldn’t have to experience (i.e., everyone agrees about “goodness” of reason/grounds).

Show how your proposed action will lead to consequences valued by your audience. What might be the objection of someone who doesn’t agree that your proposed action will result in the consequences you predict? (be very specific!) How might you anticipate/address the argument of that stakeholder?

Resemblance Claim Grounds (because) Grounds (because) Warrant (since) Warrant (since) Toulmin, S. E., Rieke, R. D., & Janik, A. (1984). An Introduction to reasoning. New York [etc.]: Macmillan. We should support genetically modified foods. Genetic modification is like natural crossbreeding that has been accelerated. Faster is better. Analogies generally hold.

Show how your proposed action has been done successfully elsewhere or is like another action valued by your audience. What might be the objection of someone who doesn’t buy your analogy? (be very specific!) How might you anticipate/address the argument of that stakeholder?