January, 20011 Please join us in the Tech Tower Auditorium on Tuesday, January 30th for a WFC3 Post-CDR Celebration 4:30 to 7:30 pm Dinner and adult beverages.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MODELING THE TESTING PROCESS Formal Testing (1.0) Requirements Software Design Risk Data Approved, Debugged, Eng. Tested Code Automated Test Tools Tested.
Advertisements

11/08/2001 FSW/GS Splinter Meeting 3 rd FSW/GS Splinter November 8, Ball COS WFC3 (morning session, auditorium) O. Lupie, WFC3 STScI Review of Goals.
Page 1 9/4/01 SMS Test Phase 2 & 3 WFC3 FSW and STScI Development Flow through SMGT 4/1/02-6/30/02 FSW 2.1 C&UT 7/8/01-8/15/01 FSW 2.2 C&UT - WFC3 Software.
Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.
Team MADD Michael Davies Andrew Mountain Dan Hoang Daniel Brink Team MADD Michael Davies Andrew Mountain Dan Hoang Daniel Brink Power Distribution Control.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 3.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
Home: Phones OFF Please Unix Kernel Parminder Singh Kang Home:
1 Software Testing and Quality Assurance Lecture 15 - Planning for Testing (Chapter 3, A Practical Guide to Testing Object- Oriented Software)
From Concept to Silicon How an idea becomes a part of a new chip at ATI Richard Huddy ATI Research.
Other Planning Processes: Final Planning Touches
Introduction to Computer Technology
Chapter 2: Overview of Essentials ISE 443 / ETM 543 Fall 2013.
November 7, Transition Planning 1.Purpose & Scope 2.Phase List 3.Key Assumptions 4.Transition – Phase by Phase.
Flight-like Flight Software Testing Methods Celina A Garcia Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology ©2009 California Institute of.
SwRR 4/28/ Telecon MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Requirements Review SwRR Peter R. Harvey April 28, 2010.
© 2012 IBM Corporation Rational Insight | Back to Basis Series Chao Zhang Unit Testing.
Engineering Telemetry Hubble Space Telescope Tom Wheeler Chris Long
SPP Spacecraft Emulator (SCE) Introduction
Protecting the Public, Astronauts and Pilots, the NASA Workforce, and High-Value Equipment and Property Mission Success Starts With Safety Believe it or.
September 10, TaskLeadDue Dates COS FSW Build 3.1 (Preparation for MEB Functional) HW needs: fully functional Mechanism Simulator 1.Complete unit.
SECCHI Consortium Meeting, July 2001 SECCHI Ground Data Systems and Data Processing Nathan Rich NRL/Interferometrics
1 Project Risk Management Project Risk Management Dr. Said Abu Jalala.
LoadRunner SE Guide 김범수 한국비지네스써비스 ( 주 )
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
Final Version Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mission Operations Tim Rykowski Jeffrey Hosler May 13-17, 2002.
GLAST LAT ProjectEGSE Peer Design Review, August 17, S. WilliamsEGSE Overview Electrical Ground Support Equipment Overview Scott Williams Stanford.
M. Frize, Winter 2003 Reliability and Medical Devices Prof. Monique Frize, P. Eng., O.C. ELG5123/ February 2003.
Software Engineering 2 Software Testing Claire Lohr pp 413 Presented By: Feras Batarseh.
May 21, 2009John MacKenty, STScI1 WFC3 SM4 Events and Current Status.
University of Southern California Center for Systems and Software Engineering Barry Boehm, USC CS 510 Software Planning Guidelines.
CE Operating Systems Lecture 3 Overview of OS functions and structure.
ECE445: The Design Review Sept 2, Documentation Roadmap Request for Approval Proposal Design Review Final Paper &Presentation Sept 10Sept 16Sept.
ECE398: The Design Review Fall What the Design Review is  Board meeting with engineers- (faculty, TA, classmates)  Structured discussion of your.
Jan 15, 2004WFC3 TIPS – John W. MacKenty1 WFC3 TIPS Presentation January 15, 2004 Optical Stimulus.
COS PIPELINE CDR Jim Rose July 23, 2001OPUS Science Data Processing Space Telescope Science Institute 1 of 12 Science Data Processing
October 1, TaskLeadDue Dates COS FSW Build 3.1 (Preparation for MEB Functional) HW needs: fully functional Mechanism Simulator 1.Complete unit level.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
Final Version Kequan Luu May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Flight Software.
Science Operation Readiness Review ICESat SIPS (I-SIPS) Status N0v 30, 2001 David Hancock ICESat Science Ground System Manager
Test Plan: Introduction o Primary focus: developer testing –Implementation phase –Release testing –Maintenance and enhancement o Secondary focus: formal.
WFC3 SMOV Report for TIPS 16 July 2009 John MacKenty This presentation contains material that is embargoed until after the SM4 ERO press conference. Images/spectra.
Pre-PDR Peer Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Peer Review Requirements Definition Peter R. Harvey May 12, 2010.
HarveyFIELDS iCDR – Flight Software Solar Probe Plus FIELDS DCB FSW Requirements Peter Harvey University of California 1.
Time Management.  Time management is concerned with OS facilities and services which measure real time.  These services include:  Keeping track of.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA TIPS / COS 17 January 2002.
NICMOS Suspend Event STB 632 “MECH_2_MAX_RETRIES_EXCEEDED” 2008/069.
GLAST LAT ProjectFace to Face, 14 April 2004 LAT System Engineering 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: EGSE and Interface Verification Pat Hascall SLAC System.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
Business Continuity Disaster Planning
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory Payload Operations and Integration Function Overview Payload Operations.
IS&T Project Reviews September 9, Project Review Overview Facilitative approach that actively engages a number of key project staff and senior IS&T.
Dr. Gerry Firmansyah CID Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Planning for IT (W-XI)
Benefits of a Virtual SIL
Simulink Interface Layer (SIL)
I&T&C Organization Chart
Chapter 6: Database Project Management
Testing Process Roman Yagodka ISS Test Leader.
Software Planning Guidelines
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
THE PROCESS OF EMBEDDED SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
Session 5b Dr. Dan C. Surber, ESEP
IS&T Project Reviews September 9, 2004.
CubeSat vs. Science Instrument Complexity
Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak
PSS verification and validation
Instrument Overview Larry Springer HMI Program Manager
Command and Data Handling
STScI Ground System Development Status:
Integration & Test Instrument Operations Coordination
Information system analysis and design
Presentation transcript:

January, Please join us in the Tech Tower Auditorium on Tuesday, January 30th for a WFC3 Post-CDR Celebration 4:30 to 7:30 pm Dinner and adult beverages will be provided WFC3 CDR Party !!!

January, WFC3 and COS Flight and Ground Test Software Agenda: –Ball SI Development Team Organization –what are we doing and how we do it? –where are we and what is left to do? –when will it be done and what are the risks?

January, On-site Contractor Off-site Contractor Ball

January, RIU NSSC-1 MEB Cmds ED Cmds Response SDF Science Data UVIS State Machine Digitized Pixel Data (4x) UVIS Det Clock Drivers Clocks Analog Pixel Data A/D Conv IR Det Clocks Analog Pixel Data IR DEB IR State Machine Clock Drivers 4 FIFOs Digitized Pixel Data (4x) CS Buffer Memory MEB = Main Electronics Box CEB = CCD Electronics Box IR DEB = IR Detector Electronics Box A/D Conv CS FSW WFC3 AP FSW CEB WFC3SI C&DH HST

January, RIU NSSC-1 COS AP FSW MEB CS FSW Cmds ED Cmds Hskp Response NUV DET MCE FSW MCE DCE FSW FUV DET DCE DIB DIB FSW Raw NUV SD Raw FUV SD Processed SD SDF Science Data CS Cmds Response COSSI C&DH HST

January, SW/Ops Test Bench: Non-flight Main Electronics Box CPU, Memory (2) Comm, SES (4) Low Voltage Power Supply Box power relays: hold & operate Facility power (not PDU) Mechanism Simulator Detector (CEB/DEB) Simulator Science Data Simulator In Circuit Emulator sw unit test & debug tool WFC3 SW/Ops Test Bench Bench 1 of 2 in development The test bench shall support 100% path testing of FSW at the unit test level. No manual intervention shall be required during the execution of a full function SMS The executable flight software shall not be modified for operation on the test bench.

January, Ball Science Instrument Documentation

January, Ball Science Instrument Documentation (cont)

January, Software Development Methodology Qualification Test Iterate For Multiple Software Builds Tasks & Functions Tested Units Tested Components Tested Builds SW Requirements Peer Review CSCI Level Peer Review Code & Unit Test Component Test Build Test Software Documentation List: DM-03 SW Management Plan DM-03 FSW Requirements DM-03 FSW Design DM-06 Science Data Format DM-07 FSW Test Plan DM-08 FSW Test Procedure DM-03 FSW Users Manual Testable Requirements Components Component Level Peer Review Software Requirements Detailed Design System Requirements Review CEI OP-01 HW Design System Requirement Analysis System Requirement Analysis Preliminary Design

January, COS Build Plan

January, WFC3 Build Plan

January, UNIT TEST - tests every line of code and full range of conditions (full path testing) for all new software SW INTEGRATION & TEST - verifies functionality of SW in a flight like environment COMPONENT TEST - verifies SW I/F and functions using SITS & SW/Ops Test Bench - independent test team FORMAL QUALIFICATION TEST (FQT) - verifies SW requirements in a flight like environment CSU Unit Test CSC CSUs Component Test CSCI CSCs FQT Flight Image Code Review S/W I&T

January, PC Ground Simulation Flight Simulation DatabaseCCSSci Data PC SUN Flight Simulator Power Distribution Unit Science Instrument SW/Ops Test Bench: non-flight Main Electronics Box Mechanism Simulator Science Data Simulator Detector Simulator Internal power Remote User Workstations: tlm monitoring, and science data analysis & archive Science Instrument Test System (SITS): commanding (realtime & stored) tlm monitoring, eng data analysis & fault isolation

January,

January, Risk List Staffing Risks Concern Definition: –Reduced SW and Ops staff from previous HST programs and new personnel with less HST experience. Traditional support group involved in other work and new responsibilities. –COS: there is no SI/SE on-site support here at Ball –Impacts Schedule - performance achieved on past programs can not be counted on. Technical - over-site / review may miss a design mistake resulting in a costly fix later on, or no fix and degraded science Mitigation: –Provide diligent SW/Ops management to achieve maximum results for the current staff. –Make sure program / peer reviews are will attended by all cooperative groups

January, Risk List SITS GSE Concern Definition: –CCS is a new system. No science instrument has ever been completely developed using this system. There are over 900 documented CCS problems, and the SI development groups needs are second behind flight ops. –Impacts: Schedule - users are unfamiliar with how to use this new system. Performance achieved on past programs can not be counted on for WFC3. Flight HW safety - user I/F problems and commanding problems may lead to FSW anomalies not being caught in a timely manner, or unwanted commands being set to the flight hardware. Mitigation: –Schedule user training - done –Conduct weekly telecons with SITS developers to review problems - done –Maintain SITS users guide with problem workarounds - done –Review critical issues with users on a weekly basis - not done

January, Risk List Test Bench Availability Concern Definition: –Schedule problems: WFC3 the test benches do not arrive until most of the way through Build 2 COS - flight electronics testing needs boards from one of the SW/Ops test benches –Impacts: Schedule - unit and component level testing will have to be put off until later Schedule - resource shortages will occur during periods of high equipment usage Mitigation: –WFC3: Build table top MEB to support unit level testing - in work schedule new code development early - done –COS: work with electronics folks to minimize bench down time - in work work two shifts as required when only one bench is available