A Review of Recent Changes to NIH Forms & Instructions Jane Tolbert ORPA December 15, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Sponsored Programs VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY The Office of Sponsored Programs has upgraded COEUS to accommodate the new Grants.gov C-Forms About.
Advertisements

B IOMEDICAL E NGINEERING Significance & Innovation Dawn M Elliott, PhD.
Website: where you can find all necessary forms! NIH Grant Writing 101 ASCEND March 2015.
Environment - Facilities/Equipment Randall Duncan Biological Sciences COBRE Grant Writing Workshop January 21, 2015.
Significance and Innovation Significance- The positive effect something is likely to have on other things Innovation- A new and substantially different.
FEBRUARY 7, 2012 SERIES 2, SESSION 3 OF AAPLS – PART 2: POLICY & APPLICATION COMPONENTS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module E:
NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PRE-AWARD TOPICS MODULE SESSION 8 OF SERIES III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PRE-AWARD LUNCHEON SERIES) How to Use eRA Commons.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
Preparing Grant Applications
Decoding RFAs and PAs Charlotte FlippDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health (EpiCH) Anne EverettDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health (EpiCH)
November 13, 2009 NIH PROPOSAL SUBMISSIONS: 2010 REVISONS.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 4
Grant Writing1 Grant Writing Lecture What are the major types of grants available in mental health research? What is the process of grant preparation and.
HRB Webinar Health Research Awards Content Objective of the call Scope and Panels Principal Investigator Response to peer-reviewers (rebuttal) Some.
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW Changes to Application Forms and Instructions December 2009
Roger Sorensen, Ph.D., MPA Program Official National Institute on Drug Abuse 1 Update on “New” Investigator Activities.
4/17/2017 Maximizing Investigators’ Research Award for New and Early Stage Investigators (R35) Jon Lorsch, Director, NIGMS Peter Preusch, Program Director,
11 1 Enhancing Peer Review Frequently Asked Questions on Application Changes.
Creating a Research Plan for a Career Development Award Jill Harkavy-Friedman, Ph.D.
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Policy WG NIH policy proposal. Goal: Incorporating global access licensing as one of the additional review criteria Question 1: Should we propose this.
International Environmental Health Conference Presented by: John S. Petterson, Ph.D. Director, Sequoia Foundation Sponsored by: Shanghai Health Bureau.
SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 SESSION 8 OF AAPLS – OVERVIEW OF THE APPLICATION FORMS AND MOST COMMON ERRORS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module.
Writing Successful Research Grant Proposals
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions EFFECTIVE JANUARY 25, 2010.
Avrom Caplan, PhD Associate University Dean for Research
NIH Implementation and Guidance Syracuse University Office of Sponsored Programs Stuart Taub.
1 Introduction to Grant Writing Beth Virnig, PhD Haitao Chu, MD, PhD University of Minnesota, School of Public Health December 11, 2013.
COMPONENTS OF A GOOD GRANT PROPOSAL Philip T. LoVerde.
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW Changes to Application Forms and Instructions October 6, 2009.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
K-Award Seminar Research Plan October 9, 2013 Jill Harkavy Friedman, Ph.D.
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat K-Series March 2012 Bioengineering Classroom.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
NIH Challenge Grants in Health and Science Research RFA OD
The NIH Grant Review Process Hiram Gilbert, Ph.D. Dept. of Biochemistry, Baylor College of Medicine Xander Wehrens, M.D. Ph.D. Dept. of Molecular Physiology.
Office of Sponsored Projects & Industry Partnerships 1 New Scientific and Grants Management Policies Cynthia Ernest Office of Sponsored Projects & Industry.
NIH UPDATE Reference: NOT-OD Error correction window REDUCED from 5 to 2 business days Proposal “on time” if ALL of the following are met Registrations.
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH CHALLENGE GRANT APPLICATIONS Dan Hoyt Survey, Statistics, and Psychometrics(SSP) Core Facility March 11, 2009.
1 Preparing an NIH Institutional Training Grant Application Rod Ulane, Ph.D. NIH Research Training Officer Office of Extramural Research, NIH.
Grant writing 101 The Art of Flawless Packaging Scott K. Powers Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology Scott K. Powers Department of Applied.
J.P. Hornak, , 2004 Research Practices http://
Clinical Research Training Center Office of Training Grants RPPR: Training Grant Focus Training Grant Administrators Working Group July 8, 2015.
GCO INFORMATION SESSION: YOU ASK, WE ANSWER NIH R01 A PPLICATION B ASICS P RESENTED BY : M ICHELLE H UMPHREYS G RANTS A NALYST II G RANTS AND C ONTRACTS.
G RANTSMANSHIP $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
Restructured NIH Applications One Year Later:
OCTOBER 18, 2011 SESSION 9 OF AAPLS – SELECTED SUPPORTING COMPONENTS OF SF424 (R&R) APPLICATION APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module.
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW: GUIDE FOR REVIEW OF RESTRUCTURED GRANT APPLICATIONS.
Pilot Grant Program EGAD Study OCCUPATIONAL & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.
UNM CTSC Mentored Career Development Scholar’s Program Presentation Template Name Title Department or College Mentors.
NIH Fellowships – Tips and Tricks for the Forms and Application Process Jenny Dahlberg, School of Veterinary Medicine
Research Strategy: Approach Frank Sellke, MD Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery Brown Medical School Providence RI AATS Grant Course 2011.
1 Lifespan Office of Research Administration, Grants & Contracts NIH PEER REVIEW CRITERIA AND RESTRUCTURED PHS 398 & SF 424 APPLICATION FORMS Presenters:
NIH R03 Program Review Ning Jackie Zhang, MD, PhD, MPH College of Health and Public Affairs 04/17/2013.
Anatomy of a Biosketch: Updated
NIH Fellowships Overview
Research and Grant Writing
Grant Writing Information Session
Grant Title PI Name Intended Institute List of Proposed Key Personnel
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat R-series
Writing that First Research Grant
Preparing Research Proposals for NSF and NIH April 20, 2018
Dr. Lani (Chi Chi) Zimmerman, UNMC Dr. Bill Mahoney, IS&T
How to Succeed with NIH: September 28, 2018
K R Investigator Research Question
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Biosketches and Other Attachments
Presentation transcript:

A Review of Recent Changes to NIH Forms & Instructions Jane Tolbert ORPA December 15, 2009

Today’s Topics Important Dates Important Dates Changes common to all applications Changes common to all applications Changes specific to the SF424 Forms (electronic submissions) Changes specific to the SF424 Forms (electronic submissions) Changes Specific to the PHS 398 forms (paper submissions) Changes Specific to the PHS 398 forms (paper submissions) Reminder of PHS 2590 changes Reminder of PHS 2590 changes Available Resources Available Resources

Important Dates Effective January 25, 2010 all grant applications must use the new forms and instructions Effective January 25, 2010 all grant applications must use the new forms and instructions The grant deadline determines which forms should be used The grant deadline determines which forms should be used Deadlines prior to 1/25/10 – old forms Deadlines prior to 1/25/10 – old forms Deadlines on or after 1/25/10 – new forms Deadlines on or after 1/25/10 – new forms

Changes Common to All Applications (paper or electronic) Shortened Page Limits Shortened Page Limits Restructured Research Plan Restructured Research Plan Bios tailored to each application Bios tailored to each application Resources tailored to each application Resources tailored to each application

New Page Limits Introduction – 1 page Introduction – 1 page 3 pages for certain mechanisms (see FOA for details) 3 pages for certain mechanisms (see FOA for details) Specific Aims – 1 page Specific Aims – 1 page Research Strategy Research Strategy For R03, R21, R36, SC2, SC3, F awards – 6 pages For R03, R21, R36, SC2, SC3, F awards – 6 pages For R01, R10, R15, R21/R33, R24, R33, R34, DP3, G08, G11, G13, SC1, X01, single project U01 – 12 pages For R01, R10, R15, R21/R33, R24, R33, R34, DP3, G08, G11, G13, SC1, X01, single project U01 – 12 pages For R25 – 25 pages For R25 – 25 pages For P grants - for each project and core of multi-component applications – 6 or 12 pages For P grants - for each project and core of multi-component applications – 6 or 12 pages For individual K awards – 12 pages For individual K awards – 12 pages For institutional K awards and institutional training awards – 25 pages For institutional K awards and institutional training awards – 25 pages Everything else – follow FOA instructions Everything else – follow FOA instructions See for further details

Restructured Research Plan Specific Aims Specific Aims Should also include the impact of the results of the proposed research on the research field Research Strategy Research Strategy Significance Significance Innovation Innovation Approach Approach Preliminary Studies for New Applications Preliminary Studies for New Applications For new applications, include information on Preliminary Studies as part of the Approach section. For new applications, include information on Preliminary Studies as part of the Approach section. Progress Report for Renewal and Revision Applications Progress Report for Renewal and Revision Applications For renewal/revision applications, provide a Progress Report as part of the Approach section. For renewal/revision applications, provide a Progress Report as part of the Approach section.

Significance Explain the importance of the problem or critical barrier to progress in the field that the proposed project addresses. Explain the importance of the problem or critical barrier to progress in the field that the proposed project addresses. Explain how the proposed project will improve scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice in one or more broad fields. Explain how the proposed project will improve scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice in one or more broad fields. Describe how the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field will be changed if the proposed aims are achieved. Describe how the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field will be changed if the proposed aims are achieved.

Innovation Explain how the application challenges and seeks to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms. Explain how the application challenges and seeks to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms. Describe any novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation or interventions to be developed or used, and any advantage over existing methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions. Describe any novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation or interventions to be developed or used, and any advantage over existing methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions. Explain any refinements, improvements, or new applications of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions. Explain any refinements, improvements, or new applications of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions.

Approach Describe the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses to be used to accomplish the specific aims of the project. Unless addressed separately in Item 15 (Resource Sharing Plan), include how the data will be collected, analyzed, and interpreted as well as any resource sharing plans as appropriate. Describe the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses to be used to accomplish the specific aims of the project. Unless addressed separately in Item 15 (Resource Sharing Plan), include how the data will be collected, analyzed, and interpreted as well as any resource sharing plans as appropriate. Discuss potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success anticipated to achieve the aims. Discuss potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success anticipated to achieve the aims. If the project is in the early stages of development, describe any strategy to establish feasibility, and address the management of any high risk aspects of the proposed work. If the project is in the early stages of development, describe any strategy to establish feasibility, and address the management of any high risk aspects of the proposed work. Point any procedures, situations, or materials that may be hazardous to personnel and precautions to be exercised. A full discussion on the use of Select Agents should appear in Item 11, below. Point any procedures, situations, or materials that may be hazardous to personnel and precautions to be exercised. A full discussion on the use of Select Agents should appear in Item 11, below.

Biosketch New format: New format: A. Personal Statement B. Positions & Honors B. Positions & Honors C. Selected Peer-reviewed Publications D. Research Support Sample available at: e.pdf Sample available at: e.pdf e.pdf e.pdf

Biosketch Personal Statement Personal Statement Should describe why the individual’s experience and qualifications make him/her particularly well-suited for their role (e.g., PD/PI, mentor) in the project Should describe why the individual’s experience and qualifications make him/her particularly well-suited for their role (e.g., PD/PI, mentor) in the project Positions & Honors Positions & Honors As before As before Publications Publications NIH encourages applicants to limit the list of selected peer-reviewed publications or manuscripts in press to no more than 15. Publications may be selected on the basis of NIH encourages applicants to limit the list of selected peer-reviewed publications or manuscripts in press to no more than 15. Publications may be selected on the basis of recency, importance to the field, and/or relevance to the proposed research. Research Support Research Support As before - list both selected ongoing and completed (during the last three years) research projects As before - list both selected ongoing and completed (during the last three years) research projects

Resources Include the following information: Include the following information: As before, identify the facilities and resources available As before, identify the facilities and resources available How does the scientific environment contribute to the probability of success (e.g., institutional support, physical resources, and intellectual rapport)? How does the scientific environment contribute to the probability of success (e.g., institutional support, physical resources, and intellectual rapport)? How will the proposed studies benefit from unique features of the scientific environment or subject populations? Will the proposed studies employ useful collaborative arrangements? How will the proposed studies benefit from unique features of the scientific environment or subject populations? Will the proposed studies employ useful collaborative arrangements?

Resources for ESI Early Stage Investigators Early Stage Investigators Additional requirements for ESI applicants Additional requirements for ESI applicants describe institutional investment in the success of the investigator: describe institutional investment in the success of the investigator: resources for classes, travel, training; collegial support such as career enrichment programs, assistance and guidance in the supervision of trainees involved with the ESI’s project resources for classes, travel, training; collegial support such as career enrichment programs, assistance and guidance in the supervision of trainees involved with the ESI’s project availability of organized peer groups; logistical support such as administrative management and oversight and best practices training; availability of organized peer groups; logistical support such as administrative management and oversight and best practices training; financial support such as protected time for research with salary support. financial support such as protected time for research with salary support.

Changes to the SF424 Grant Application Face Page Grant Application Face Page The Competition ID field will read “Adobe Forms B” The Competition ID field will read “Adobe Forms B” SF424 Cover Component (Face Page) SF424 Cover Component (Face Page) New 4b – agency-assigned routing # (ignore for now) New 4b – agency-assigned routing # (ignore for now) Item 13 – now only requires congressional district of applicant (previously applicant and project) Item 13 – now only requires congressional district of applicant (previously applicant and project) Item 18 – new section (use only if indicated) Item 18 – new section (use only if indicated) Other items – complete as before Other items – complete as before

Changes to the SF424 Project/Performance Site Project/Performance Site New checkbox ( I am submitting an application as an individual … etc ) – do NOT check New checkbox ( I am submitting an application as an individual … etc ) – do NOT check The Congressional District is required for all performance sites The Congressional District is required for all performance sites Format for congressional district info Format for congressional district info For one district use NY-028 For one district use NY-028 For all districts in a given state use NY-all For all districts in a given state use NY-all For the whole US use US-all For the whole US use US-all Outside the US use Outside the US use

Changes to the SF424 Other Project Info Other Project Info New question under Human subjects section New question under Human subjects section Is the research exempt from Federal Regulations? Yes or No answer required if human subjects are involved Is the research exempt from Federal Regulations? Yes or No answer required if human subjects are involved New question 5 (Response REQUIRED) New question 5 (Response REQUIRED) Is the research performance site designated a historic place? Is the research performance site designated a historic place? Updated Resources section (refer back to changes common to all applications) Updated Resources section (refer back to changes common to all applications) All other sections as before All other sections as before

Changes to the SF424 Senior/Key Personnel Senior/Key Personnel Revamped bio (refer back to changes common to all applications) Revamped bio (refer back to changes common to all applications) New fields for degree type and degree year (optional; NOT mandatory) New fields for degree type and degree year (optional; NOT mandatory) Everything else as before Everything else as before Cover Page Supplement Cover Page Supplement New Investigator box is gone New Investigator box is gone Eligibility determined by data in NIH Commons Eligibility determined by data in NIH Commons

Changes to the SF424 Research Plan Component Research Plan Component Slots for Introduction, Specific Aims, Research Strategy Slots for Introduction, Specific Aims, Research Strategy Introduction – 1 page Introduction – 1 page Specific Aims – 1 page Specific Aims – 1 page Research Strategy – dependent on mechanism Research Strategy – dependent on mechanism Refer back to changes common to all applications for details on the content of the Research Strategy section Refer back to changes common to all applications for details on the content of the Research Strategy section

Changes to the PHS398 New forms are dated June 2009 (PHS 398 rev 06/09) New forms are dated June 2009 (PHS 398 rev 06/09) Face Page – no new investigator check box Face Page – no new investigator check box Table of contents – revised Table of contents – revised Bios – refer to changes common to all applications Bios – refer to changes common to all applications Resources – refer to changes common to all applications Resources – refer to changes common to all applications Research Plan – refer to changes common to all applications Research Plan – refer to changes common to all applications Personal Data form – no more Personal Data form – no more

Other Notable Items Reminder: all post-docs need an eRA Commons user name Reminder: all post-docs need an eRA Commons user name Institutional Training Grants will transition to electronic submission effective 1/25/2010 Institutional Training Grants will transition to electronic submission effective 1/25/2010 Revised Table 12A (part of the institutional training application) Revised Table 12A (part of the institutional training application) now requires data on the % of students who attain a doctoral degree and the average time to receive the doctoral degree now requires data on the % of students who attain a doctoral degree and the average time to receive the doctoral degree

Reminder: Changes to the PHS 2590 Current forms are dated PHS 2590 (rev. 06/09) Current forms are dated PHS 2590 (rev. 06/09) Use is mandatory after October 1, 2009 Use is mandatory after October 1, 2009 New All Personnel Report New All Personnel Report PD/PI(s) should be listed on the form PD/PI(s) should be listed on the form regardless of the source of compensation all personnel who participated in the project for at least one person month should be listed regardless of the source of compensation all personnel who participated in the project for at least one person month should be listed New Biosketch Format New Biosketch Format only required as part of the progress report for new senior/key personnel since the previous submission (uses new format and includes personal statement). only required as part of the progress report for new senior/key personnel since the previous submission (uses new format and includes personal statement).

NIH Resources Forms and instructions for the electronic SF 424 (R&R) applications are available at Forms and instructions for the electronic SF 424 (R&R) applications are available at Forms and instructions for paper-based PHS 398 applications are available at html Forms and instructions for paper-based PHS 398 applications are available at html html html

More NIH Resources NIH Enhancing Peer Review site ( review.nih.gov/index.html) NIH Enhancing Peer Review site ( review.nih.gov/index.html) review.nih.gov/index.htmlhttp://enhancing-peer- review.nih.gov/index.html Enhancing Peer Review Listserv at Enhancing Peer Review Listserv at A sample biosketch is available at f A sample biosketch is available at f f f Summary of changes review.nih.gov/docs/application_changes.pdf Summary of changes review.nih.gov/docs/application_changes.pdfhttp://enhancing-peer- review.nih.gov/docs/application_changes.pdfhttp://enhancing-peer- review.nih.gov/docs/application_changes.pdf

ORPA Resources Recent orpa-ls Recent orpa-ls The ORPA Guide to Assembling the SF424 (revisions in progress) The ORPA Guide to Assembling the SF424 (revisions in progress) Your ORPA RA Your ORPA RA

Happy Holidays!