Writing for Scholarship in Science Education: Conceptual and Methodological Issues Dana L. Zeidler Writing for Scholarship in Science Education: Conceptual.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Constructing Hypotheses
WRITING RESEARCH PAPERS Puvaneswary Murugaiah. INTRODUCTION TO WRITING PAPERS Conducting research is academic activity Research must be original work.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by law: any public.
Publishing qualitative studies H Maisonneuve April 2015 Edinburgh, Scotland.
Educational Research by John W. Creswell. Copyright © 2002 by Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Slide 1 Chapter 10 Reporting and Evaluating Research.
Topics - Reading a Research Article Brief Overview: Purpose and Process of Empirical Research Standard Format of Research Articles Evaluating/Critiquing.
Reporting and Evaluating Research
Introduction to Communication Research
WRITING A RESEARCH PROPORSAL
Chapter One of Your Thesis
WRITING A RESEARCH PROPOSAL
The phases of research Dimitra Hartas. The phases of research Identify a research topic Formulate the research questions (rationale) Review relevant studies.
Writing a Research Proposal
Copyright © 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. John W. Creswell Educational Research: Planning,
Planning an Applied Research Project Chapter 1 – Reading and Analyzing Research © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reporting & Ethical Standards EPSY 5245 Michael C. Rodriguez.
Evidence-Based Practice Current knowledge and practice must be based on evidence of efficacy rather than intuition, tradition, or past practice. The importance.
Formulating a Research Proposal
Literature Review Evaluating Existing Research
Please check, just in case…. Announcements: Office hour appointments filling up – get yours today! Don’t delay on getting started on next TWO assignments.
Requirements for the Course
How to Write a Critical Review of Research Articles
Chapter 21 Preparing a Research Report Gay, Mills, and Airasian
Writing research proposal/synopsis
Evaluating a Research Report
Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning Chapter 16 Experimental Research Proposals.
The Literature Search and Background of the Problem.
Is research in education important?. What is the difference between Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods?
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Evaluating Research Articles Approach With Skepticism Rebecca L. Fiedler January 16, 2002.
FOR 500 PRINCIPLES OF RESEARCH: PROPOSAL WRITING PROCESS
URBDP 591 I Lecture 3: Research Process Objectives What are the major steps in the research process? What is an operational definition of variables? What.
Writing about Methods in Dissertations and Doctoral Studies
Literature Review. Outline of the lesson Learning objective Definition Components of literature review Elements of LR Citation in the text Learning Activity.
Critique and Utilization of Research Presentation and Discussion of Study Findings.
L1 Chapter 10 Reporting and Evaluating Research EDUC 640 Dr. William Bauer.
Preparing a Research Plan. Purpose of plan Detailed description. Written plan helps illustrate aspects. Anticipate potential problems.
W RITING Q UALITATIVE R ESEARCH. How should we organize publishable qualitative research? 1. Consider the format and structure of the paper (layout, APAi.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Intelligent Consumer Chapter 14 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
Anatomy of a Research Article Five (or six) major sections Abstract Introduction (without a heading!) Method (and procedures) Results Discussion and conclusions.
Evidence-Based Practice Evidence-Based Practice Current knowledge and practice must be based on evidence of efficacy rather than intuition, tradition,
Criteria for selection of a data collection instrument. 1.Practicality of the instrument: -Concerns its cost and appropriateness for the study population.
Writing A Review Sources Preliminary Primary Secondary.
Writing an Academic Paper/ Journal Article: An Overview of the Sections of Research-Focused Text Taken from Cantor A Guide to Academic Writing and Huff.
CHAPTER 2 LITERATION REVIEW 1-1. LEARNING OUTCOMES 1.The reasons for a literature review being an essential part of every project. 2.The purpose of a.
© International Training Centre of the ILO Training Centre of the ILO 1 Research Process for Trade Unions.
Critiquing Quantitative Research.  A critical appraisal is careful evaluation of all aspects of a research study in order to assess the merits, limitations,
Guidelines to Critiquing Qualitative Research Reports.
Dr. Aidah Abu Elsoud Alkaissi An-Najah National University Employ evidence-based practice: key elements.
Dr.V.Jaiganesh Professor
Requirements for the Course
Writing a sound proposal
Chapter 9: Reporting and Evaluating Research
The Literature Search and Background of the Problem
Parts of an Academic Paper
Research Paper Writing
Analyzing Qualitative Data
How to write a literature review
RES 723 Enthusiastic Study/snaptutorial.com
IB Environmental Systems and Societies
Discussions and Conclusions
WHAT EXAMINERS SAY: EXPECTATIONS AND SURPRISES
Research Proposal and Report
Managerial Decision Making and Evaluating Research
Tips for Creating and Delivering an Effective Presentation
Understanding Scholarly Journal Articles
Critiquing Qualitative Research
Presentation transcript:

Writing for Scholarship in Science Education: Conceptual and Methodological Issues Dana L. Zeidler Writing for Scholarship in Science Education: Conceptual and Methodological Issues Dana L. Zeidler

President Isaac Sharpless, Haverford College Commencement, 1888 “I suggest that you preach truth and do righteousness as you have been taught, whereinsoever that teaching may commend itself to your consciences and your judgments. For your consciences and your judgments we have not sought to bind; and see you to it that no other institution, no political party, no social circle, no religious organization, no pet ambitions put such chains on you as would tempt you to sacrifice one iota of the moral freedom of your consciences or the intellectual freedom of your judgments.”

Don’t put the cart before the horse! Conceptual Clarity of Research Questions Comprehensive and Deep Knowledge of the Research Literature: Emic/Proximal: Science Education Etic/Distal: Other Disciplines Conceptual Clarity of Research Questions Comprehensive and Deep Knowledge of the Research Literature: Emic/Proximal: Science Education Etic/Distal: Other Disciplines

Scholarship Comes in Many Forms Empirical (Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods) Analytic Reviews / Synthesis Theoretical Philosophy – Conceptual Analyses Have you hit the mark? Caveat: Combining methodological approaches may not give deeper insight or understanding without attention to cumulative assumptions, inferences, threats. Empirical (Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods) Analytic Reviews / Synthesis Theoretical Philosophy – Conceptual Analyses Have you hit the mark? Caveat: Combining methodological approaches may not give deeper insight or understanding without attention to cumulative assumptions, inferences, threats.

Evaluation Criteria for Research “The devil is in the details!”

Title Specificity of Topic: Does the title provide the reader with a valid label of its content? Specificity of Purpose: Does the title reflect the purpose of the investigation / article? Congruence with Central Is there consistency with with research questions: the main research questions? Specificity of Topic: Does the title provide the reader with a valid label of its content? Specificity of Purpose: Does the title reflect the purpose of the investigation / article? Congruence with Central Is there consistency with with research questions: the main research questions?

Purpose / Statement of the Problem Cogency: Does the purpose make clear the intent/focus of the investigation? Control of Design: Does the purpose provide for linkage with procedures and methods? Amenability to testing, Does the purpose eventuate in the exploration, verification: formation of question to be tested? Relevance of Knowledge: Does the central problem have relevance to a larger body of theory? Cogency: Does the purpose make clear the intent/focus of the investigation? Control of Design: Does the purpose provide for linkage with procedures and methods? Amenability to testing, Does the purpose eventuate in the exploration, verification: formation of question to be tested? Relevance of Knowledge: Does the central problem have relevance to a larger body of theory?

Significance of Study Conceptual Clarity: Is there justification for the study? Is there evidence of need? Genesis of the Problem: Have the factors that have given rise to the problem been examined? Contribution to Theory: Does the promise to extend / refine existing knowledge? Contribution to Practice: What pedagogical impact is suggested by the study? Conceptual Clarity: Is there justification for the study? Is there evidence of need? Genesis of the Problem: Have the factors that have given rise to the problem been examined? Contribution to Theory: Does the promise to extend / refine existing knowledge? Contribution to Practice: What pedagogical impact is suggested by the study?

Review of the Literature / Theoretical Framework Introduction: Does the intro provide the purpose of the review and its topical organization? Criteria for selectingDoes the review illustrate the literature:historical nature of the problem and provide a context for your study? Delimitations? Congruence of design/ Does the review indicate how study methodology: will modify, improve, extend past research and inform related methods? Organization/Summary Is review organized around major and minor headings to provide form and shape discussion? Concluding section present? Introduction: Does the intro provide the purpose of the review and its topical organization? Criteria for selectingDoes the review illustrate the literature:historical nature of the problem and provide a context for your study? Delimitations? Congruence of design/ Does the review indicate how study methodology: will modify, improve, extend past research and inform related methods? Organization/Summary Is review organized around major and minor headings to provide form and shape discussion? Concluding section present?

Design and Methodology Population / Do the data sources show promise Sample selection:yielding the data required? Adequacy of sample size: Is sample size adequate to minimize inferential error? Instrumentation:Are instruments to be used described in detail? Have considerations been given to validity and reliability? Rationale for conceptual clarity? Population / Do the data sources show promise Sample selection:yielding the data required? Adequacy of sample size: Is sample size adequate to minimize inferential error? Instrumentation:Are instruments to be used described in detail? Have considerations been given to validity and reliability? Rationale for conceptual clarity?

Design and Methodology (cont’d.) Clarity of Methods:Are procedures fully articulated? Are treatments adequately described? Is collection of data adequate? Is training of individuals (data collectors and those implementing a treatment) appropriate? Analysis of Data:Is choice of statistical techniques described? Are taxonomical constructions described. Clarity of Methods:Are procedures fully articulated? Are treatments adequately described? Is collection of data adequate? Is training of individuals (data collectors and those implementing a treatment) appropriate? Analysis of Data:Is choice of statistical techniques described? Are taxonomical constructions described.

Design and Methodology (cont’d.) Additional Concerns (where appropriate): How do you know the treatment is what it is supposed to be? Experimenter versus Investigator roles and issues. Quantitative Investigations Qualitative Investigations Mixed Methods Conceptual Papers Model Cases Contrary (counter) Cases Borderline Cases Invented Cases Additional Concerns (where appropriate): How do you know the treatment is what it is supposed to be? Experimenter versus Investigator roles and issues. Quantitative Investigations Qualitative Investigations Mixed Methods Conceptual Papers Model Cases Contrary (counter) Cases Borderline Cases Invented Cases

Findings, Conclusions, Discussion, Implications Additional Concerns (where appropriate): Do data tables/figures add to understanding? Is appropriate data reported? Do empirical assertions or categories, interpretive commentary have backing by the data? Are outliers or discrepant cases discussed? Is there a high degree of instantiation (e.g., validity, reliability, credibility, trustworthiness)? Is the discussion congruent with the theoretical framework discussed earlier? Support? Deviations? Challenges? Anomalies? Do the findings connect to research, practice, policy, etc.? Additional Concerns (where appropriate): Do data tables/figures add to understanding? Is appropriate data reported? Do empirical assertions or categories, interpretive commentary have backing by the data? Are outliers or discrepant cases discussed? Is there a high degree of instantiation (e.g., validity, reliability, credibility, trustworthiness)? Is the discussion congruent with the theoretical framework discussed earlier? Support? Deviations? Challenges? Anomalies? Do the findings connect to research, practice, policy, etc.?

Questions ?