Current Trends in Smokeless Tobacco Use Among Wisconsin Adults Daphne Kuo, Karen Palmersheim, Mark Wegner, and Patrick Remington UW Carbone Cancer Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tobacco Module 4 Smokeless Tobacco Dental Health Intervention
Advertisements

Multiple Tobacco Product Use in WV What Do We Know? What Are We Missing? Presented by Richard Meckstroth, Chairman Dept. of Dental Practice and.
Income Inequality and Cigarette Smoking Behaviors in the United States Jun Yang 1, Frank J. Chaloupka 2, Cindy Tworek 1, Joseph Bauer 1, Mike Smith 3,
Results Introduction Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death in Wisconsin and the United States. Given the risk of smoking initiation during.
Shelley Mann-Lev & Janie Corinne 24/7 Technical Assistance Team Creating truly tobacco-free schools.
《 Promotion of Capability and Effectiveness for Tobacco Control Program among Rural Residents* 》 --Report On The Baseline Survey (Tobacco use status among.
Cross-sectional study. Definition in Dictionary of pharmaceutical medicine 2009 by G Nahler Dictionary of pharmaceutical medicine cross-sectional study.
Validation of the Social Climate Survey with Data from the Tobacco Use Supplement Robert McMillen SSRC Social Science Research Center Mississippi State.
Concurrent Tobacco Use: A Study of Socio-demographic Correlates Nasir Mushtaq, MPH Laura A Beebe, PhD University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center.
Australian secondary school students’ use of tobacco, alcohol, and over-the-counter and illicit substances in 2008 Cancer Council Victoria Graphs prepared.
Who tries how? Quit attempts among Swedish smokers Lars M. Ramström Institute for tobacco studies Stockholm, Sweden 6th Annual Conference of the SRNT Europe.
Tobacco 101:. Why are cigarettes bad for your health? Cigarettes have over 7,000 chemicals other than nicotine. Chemicals such as acetone (nail polish.
Example: Marketing to Cigar Smokers Smoking looks cool! Thompson Cigar Catalog Cigar Nexus Survey.
HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE CALIFORNIA TOBACCO SURVEYS Elizabeth A. Gilpin, MS Principal Investigator 1999 California Tobacco Surveys Cancer Prevention and Control.
TM Annette K. McClave Health Scientist, Epidemiology Branch Michael A. Tynan Public Health Analyst, Policy Unit CDC, Office on Smoking and Health Smokeless.
Poverty Rates in Indiana An very brief IBRC Economic Brief September 13, 2011.
© Copyright 2011, Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Nicotine and Tobacco Use.
Tobacco Use. Percentage of High School Students Who Ever Smoked Cigarettes,* by Type of Grades Earned (Mostly A’s, B’s, C’s or D’s/F’s), 2009** *Ever.
Taxation and New Products Gregory N Connolly DMD, MPH National Smokeless and Spit Tobacco Summit September 22,2009.
The Effect of Prices, Programs, and Smoke-free Homes on Smoking Behavior in the 1990s Evidence from Population Surveys John Pierce, UC San Diego Wael Al.
Quitting Cigarettes Completely or Switching to Smokeless Tobacco: Do U.S. Data Replicate the Swedish Results? Shu-Hong Zhu University of California, San.
Angela Trosclair, MS Statistician Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office on Smoking and Health Epidemiology Branch OSH/CDC Tobacco Use Supplement.
Data Analysis and Forecasting Project – Interim Report Delivered to the DJJ January 2008 Jennifer Lewis Priestley, Ph.D. Shan Muthersbaugh, MS Candidate.
Department of Medicine. The Harm Reduction Debate Current context of the debate - Snus enthusiasts vs. pessimists Switching from cigarettes to snus alone.
ITC India Pilot Survey Maansi Bansal-Travers, Ph.D. Department of Health Behavior Roswell Park Cancer Institute ITC-TTURC Project Annual Meeting Portland,
Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) Funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies.
Guiding Community Planning and Evaluation Efforts in Tobacco Control Using Data on Smoking During Pregnancy Vanessa Newburn Patrick Remington Paul Peppard.
Recent Trends in Worker Quality: A Midwest Perspective Daniel Aaronson and Daniel Sullivan Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago November 2002.
Smoke-Free Homes & Smoking Cessation TUS-CPS overlap sample Karen Messer, Ph D Moores UCSD Cancer Center.
Tobacco Use In Kansas Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting May 12, 2005.
Do tax increases on tobacco hurt the poor? Some findings from South Africa Corné van Walbeek School of Economics University of Cape Town.
Changes in Patterns of Substance Use ─ Tobacco Lars Ramström Institute for Tobacco Studies Stockholm, Sweden 49th International ICAA Conference on Dependencies.
New Smokeless Tobacco Products and Taxes 5 th National Summit on Smokeless & Spit Tobacco September 22, 2009 Ann Boonn Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.
Urban and Rural Disparities in Tobacco Use Ming Shan, BS; Zach Jump, MA; Elizabeth Lancet, MPH National Conference on Health Statistics August 8, 2012.
A GUIDE FOR COACHES TOBACCO FREE SPORTS. KNOW THE FACTS! Each day in the US more than 3,200 people younger than 18 smoke their first cigarette, and an.
FCD CWI 1 The Foundation for Child Development Index of Child Well- Being (CWI) 1975 to 2004 with Projections for 2005 A Social Indicators Project Supported.
Lars M. Ramström PhD Director, Institute for Tobacco Studies Stockholm, Sweden The Swedish experience the role.
The Role of Harm Reduction in Tobacco control – An Update of Pros and Cons Lars M. Ramström Institute for Tobacco Studies Stockholm, Sweden 53rd International.
Mary Hrywna, MPH Cristine D. Delnevo, PhD, MPH Dorota Staniewska, MS University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ) School of Public Health (SPH)
Prevalence of Tobacco Use. Current user: A person who has smoked once in the last 30 days Prevalence of tobacco use: The proportion of current users in.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B ASSIST Evaluation.
Epidemiology of Tobacco Use and Cessation Gary A. Giovino, Ph.D., M.S. Roswell Park Cancer Institute Buffalo, New York Consumer Demand Round Table Washington,
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Occupational exposure to.
Menthol Cigarette Use Among African Americans Carrie Hinterthuer, MPH 1, Daphne Kuo, PhD 1, Randall Glysch, MS 2, Karen Palmersheim, PhD 1 Background The.
Teen Tobacco Use Valarie Starbuck. Nature of the Problem- Key Facts 90% of adults who smoke started by the age of 21, ½ of them became regular smokers.
Campus Tobacco Use & Prevalence Team Tobacco. Why this study? We wanted to asses the prevalence and perception of tobacco use among Rowan students.
John Cannings Camden and Islington Public Health Intelligence CAMDEN CARERS PROFILE
TM Substance Use Transitions from Initial Use to Regular Use to Discontinuance Ralph S. Caraballo, Ph.D., MPH Office on Smoking and Health, CDC, Atlanta.
Obesity and Socioeconomic Status in Adults: United States, 2005–2008 NCHS Data Brief ■ No. 50 ■ December 2010.
Shifting Social Climate of Tobacco Control in Mississippi, 2000 to 2004 Robert McMillen SSRC Social Science Research Center Mississippi State University.
The Story Behind the Data The Current Scene of Chewing Tobacco, Snuff, or Snus Among Wisconsin Adults Randall Glysch & Kyle Pfister Wisconsin Tobacco Prevention.
Montana High School Survey Percentage of students who ever tried cigarette smoking, even one or two puffs Q29 - Weighted Data *Non-Hispanic. Missing bars.
Trends in electronic cigarette use in England Robert West Emma Beard Jamie Brown University College London
Smoking in England Robert West Jamie Brown University College London 1.
1 Impact of the ‘smoking ban’ on smoking prevalence in England Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre Department of Epidemiology and Public.
1 Tobacco smoking: where are we now and what can be done to reduce prevalence? Robert West University College London Cardiff, April 2008.
CHAPTER ELEVEN LESSON ONE DANGEROUS TOBACCO. OBJECTIVES LIST THREE CHEMICALS THAT ARE PRODUCED WHEN A CIGARETTE IS LIT. LIST FIVE EFFECTS OF TOBACCO ON.
DEPENDENCE ON SMOKING Petra Rukavina 6.b. Smoking is a way of consuming tobacco in the form of cigars, cigarettes, cigarillos, and using pipes.
LESSON ONE DANGEROUS TOBACCO
Tobacco "Smoking Stinks! ." KidsHealth - the Web's most visited site about children's health. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Mar
2013 Wisconsin Health Trends: Progress Report
Trends in use of electronic cigarettes in England
Trends in electronic cigarette use in England
National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)
Trends in electronic cigarette use in England
Essential Facts About Clove Cigarette Usage Prepared by: Roth Associates, Inc. for Specialty Tobacco Council, Inc. 4/8/2019 Roth Associates, Inc.
Trends in electronic cigarette use in England
Teen vaping in Australia Does it increase smoking risk?
Tobacco and Taxation: Supplemental Slides
Presentation transcript:

Current Trends in Smokeless Tobacco Use Among Wisconsin Adults Daphne Kuo, Karen Palmersheim, Mark Wegner, and Patrick Remington UW Carbone Cancer Center University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Wisconsin Department of Health Services 5 th National Summit on Smokeless & Spit Tobacco Madison, Wisconsin September 22, 2009 Daphne Kuo, Karen Palmersheim, Mark Wegner, and Patrick Remington UW Carbone Cancer Center University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Wisconsin Department of Health Services 5 th National Summit on Smokeless & Spit Tobacco Madison, Wisconsin September 22, 2009

BackgroundBackground Trends in smokeless tobacco (SLT) use have varied over time, depending on type of product Most data have shown a slow, but steady decline of SLT use after the mid-1990’s and through early the 2000’s---particularly of chewing tobacco and dry snuff However, tobacco consumption and sale data have shown an increase in the sale of snus (a moist type of snuff, doesn’t require spitting) Trends in smokeless tobacco (SLT) use have varied over time, depending on type of product Most data have shown a slow, but steady decline of SLT use after the mid-1990’s and through early the 2000’s---particularly of chewing tobacco and dry snuff However, tobacco consumption and sale data have shown an increase in the sale of snus (a moist type of snuff, doesn’t require spitting)

ObjectivesObjectives To examine trends in the prevalence of SLT use among Wisconsin adults To compare trends in SLT use in Wisconsin to that observed across the US To investigate whether trends differ by type of smokeless product To investigate whether trends differ by adult smoking status To examine trends in the prevalence of SLT use among Wisconsin adults To compare trends in SLT use in Wisconsin to that observed across the US To investigate whether trends differ by type of smokeless product To investigate whether trends differ by adult smoking status

Data – Sample Wisconsin Data are somewhat limiting! Tobacco Use Supplement, Current Population Survey (US Census Bureau) , , , 2003 and Wisconsin and US adults (18+) Wisconsin Data are somewhat limiting! Tobacco Use Supplement, Current Population Survey (US Census Bureau) , , , 2003 and Wisconsin and US adults (18+)

Variables and Methods Ever use and current use of chewing tobacco, snuff (may include snus), and the combination of both Cigarette smoking status of the respondent Analyzed trends in the prevalence of ever use and current use---in the general population and by the smoking status of the respondents Ever use and current use of chewing tobacco, snuff (may include snus), and the combination of both Cigarette smoking status of the respondent Analyzed trends in the prevalence of ever use and current use---in the general population and by the smoking status of the respondents

QuestionsQuestions Ever Use (question has changed over time) 1. Have you ever used pipes, cigars, chewing tobacco, or snuff on a regular basis? (if “Yes”---which ones?) 2. … even one time? 3. … ever used chewing tobacco, such as … ? such as … ? … ever used snuff, such as … ? … ever used snuff, such as … ? Ever Use (question has changed over time) 1. Have you ever used pipes, cigars, chewing tobacco, or snuff on a regular basis? (if “Yes”---which ones?) 2. … even one time? 3. … ever used chewing tobacco, such as … ? such as … ? … ever used snuff, such as … ? … ever used snuff, such as … ?

Questions, continued… Current Use 1. Do you now use … ? 2. Do you now use … every day, some days or not at all? some days or not at all? Current Use 1. Do you now use … ? 2. Do you now use … every day, some days or not at all? some days or not at all?

Instrument change Ever Use of SLT among Adults in Wisconsin and the US, TUS-CPS % 5% 10% 15% 20% US ever chewing WI ever chewing US ever snuff WI ever snuff US ever SLT WI ever SLT

Findings The ever use of SLT, chewing tobacco and snuff appears to have increased among the adult population in Wisconsin and in the US since Wisconsin adults were more likely to try chewing tobacco (and, thus, SLT) than the US adults. Wisconsin adults were as likely to try snuff as US adults. The ever use of SLT, chewing tobacco and snuff appears to have increased among the adult population in Wisconsin and in the US since Wisconsin adults were more likely to try chewing tobacco (and, thus, SLT) than the US adults. Wisconsin adults were as likely to try snuff as US adults.

Ever Use of SLT among Cigarette Smokers in Wisconsin and the US, TUS-CPS % 5% 10% 15% 20% US ever chewing WI ever chewing US ever snuff WI ever snuff US ever SLT WI ever SLT Instrument change

Findings Current cigarette smokers were more likely to try SLT than other adults; and increases were greater among current cigarette smokers than among the general population. WI smokers were more likely to try chewing tobacco than US smokers. WI smokers were equally as likely to try snuff as US smokers. Current cigarette smokers were more likely to try SLT than other adults; and increases were greater among current cigarette smokers than among the general population. WI smokers were more likely to try chewing tobacco than US smokers. WI smokers were equally as likely to try snuff as US smokers.

Current SLT Use among Adults in Wisconsin and the US, TUS-CPS % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% US current chewing WI current chewing US current snuff WI current snuff US current SLT WI current SLT

Findings National trends in current SLT use in our study of the general population, till 2003, were consistent with findings from previous studies. A slow but steady decline since 1998 was observed for chewing tobacco but not for snuff in the US. National trends in current SLT use in our study of the general population, till 2003, were consistent with findings from previous studies. A slow but steady decline since 1998 was observed for chewing tobacco but not for snuff in the US.

Findings Trends in current use of SLT and chewing tobacco among Wisconsin adults were different from the national average since An increase in SLT (chewing tobacco) use was observed in WI in , but not across the US. Trends in current use of SLT and chewing tobacco among Wisconsin adults were different from the national average since An increase in SLT (chewing tobacco) use was observed in WI in , but not across the US.

Findings Percentages of current use of SLT and chewing tobacco in Wisconsin declined slower than those in the US. From 1998 through 2007, the percentage of current chewing tobacco use (and SLT) was consistently higher in Wisconsin than in the US. Percentages of current use of SLT and chewing tobacco in Wisconsin declined slower than those in the US. From 1998 through 2007, the percentage of current chewing tobacco use (and SLT) was consistently higher in Wisconsin than in the US.

Findings The percentage of current snuff use in Wisconsin was consistently slightly lower than that observed across the US from 1995 to 2007.

Current SLT Use among Cigarette Smokers in Wisconsin and the US, TUS-CPS % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% US current chewing WI current chewing US current snuff WI current snuff US current SLT WI current SLT

Findings The percentages of current use of SLT, chewing tobacco and snuff steadily increased over time among current cigarette smokers in Wisconsin. In the US, similar increases were observed for snuff, but not for chewing tobacco. The percentages of current use of SLT, chewing tobacco and snuff steadily increased over time among current cigarette smokers in Wisconsin. In the US, similar increases were observed for snuff, but not for chewing tobacco.

Conclusions Ever use of (experimentation with) SLT increased between 1995 and but we are not sure how much of this change may be due to methodological issues (survey question) Current overall use of SLT has not change a lot in the general population  In the more recent years, use of chewing tobacco has decreased, use of snuff has increased (perhaps due to the marketing of snus) Ever use of (experimentation with) SLT increased between 1995 and but we are not sure how much of this change may be due to methodological issues (survey question) Current overall use of SLT has not change a lot in the general population  In the more recent years, use of chewing tobacco has decreased, use of snuff has increased (perhaps due to the marketing of snus)

Conclusions WI vs. the US average Overall SLT use is slightly higher in Wisconsin than across the US This is due to greater use of chewing tobacco in Wisconsin Whereas, Wisconsinites are slightly less likely to use snuff/snus, than US adults WI vs. the US average Overall SLT use is slightly higher in Wisconsin than across the US This is due to greater use of chewing tobacco in Wisconsin Whereas, Wisconsinites are slightly less likely to use snuff/snus, than US adults

Conclusions Cigarette smokers were more likely to ever use, and currently use SLT than the general population in WI and the US. Thus, smokers may be using smokeless products to compensate for the inability to smoke in public places due to smoke-free restrictions Cigarette smokers were more likely to ever use, and currently use SLT than the general population in WI and the US. Thus, smokers may be using smokeless products to compensate for the inability to smoke in public places due to smoke-free restrictions