CHEESECAKE DEPANNING Zach Alsheimer Garth Sinclair Matt Gundrum Casey Bauman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Laws of Thermodynamics
Advertisements

Develop an Information Strategy Plan
Lesson 1 Thermal Energy, Temperature, and Heat
No Teacher Left Behind Creating Professional Development for Transfer to Classroom Practice Overview.
Thermoforming Process
WP Inc: spray nozzle blues
Interim Design Amy Eckerle Andrew Whittington Philip Witherspoon Team 16.
Macroeconomics Unit 11 Fiscal Policy Decisions Top 5 Concepts.
A.S – Due Monday, Feb. 9.  Turn to your groups: What do you think this means?  Heat Capacity: ◦ The amount of thermal energy necessary.
AUTOMATIC PARTS WASHER: PROBLEM ANALYSIS BEN BROXTERMAN MBA STUDENT SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE MGMT 580, SUMMER 2012 WP Inc.
1 Job Element Sheet Process: Cheesecake Bake – Depanning Process Author: Andreana Crance, RIT MSD Date/Revision: 2/11/10, Rev 0 Post Tunnel Oven: 1.Dump.
Scale and Scope issues in Great Barrier Reef John Rolfe Jill Windle Jeff Bennett.
Nuclear Cookies Client: Idaho National Lab Project: Salt Removal.
EDGE™ Project Review P Automation/Improvement of Wegmans Cookie Line Packaging Project Team: Stephanie Rager (IE), Bruno Coelho (ME), Mark Voss (ME),
WP Inc. Case STUDY 3.1 Problem Solving Jonathan Stanley & Kari Eddings
Fins-2 If the pot from previous lecture is made of other materials other than the aluminum, what will be the temperature distribution? Try stainless steel.
Metallic phosphoric acid heaters in place of graphite block heaters Vincent PERROT1 SYMPHOS 2013 in AGADIR Morocco.
Leaders Manage Meetings
By Kasey Gillespie and Leonidas Leite You’re Ready, but is your pizza Hot?
Aim: Students will be able to measure the amount of heat released or absorbed in a chemical reaction. Do Now: What is the difference between potential.
Matthew Gundrum Zach Alsheimer Garth Sinclair Casey Bauman.
Food & Technology Unit 2 Cooking Methods. Area of Study 1 Outcome 1: Tools, equipment, preparation and processing On completion of this unit the student.
Zach Alsheimer, Casey Bauman, Matt Gundrum, Garth Sinclair.
District Workforce Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Workforce Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 62 slides.
Kinetic molecular theory. In order for molecules to react they must collide (bang into) each other. They must collide and collide in the exact right way.
CHEESECAKE DEPANNING Zach Alsheimer Garth Sinclair Matt Gundrum Casey Bauman.
Matthew Gundrum Zach Alsheimer Garth Sinclair Casey Bauman.
THERMAL Energy Chapter 5.
The Creative Problem Solving Pack. The following pages provide separate packs that you can use in the following situations. * Creative problem solving.
P10712 CHEESECAKE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT Andreana Crance, Kevin Rodas, Rob Santora, Jeremy Smith, Matt Syska.
Count Rumford supervised the drilling of brass cannons in a factory in Bavaria. From his observations, Rumford concluded that heat is not a form of matter.
Project Charters Module 3
Chapter 9 Thermal Energy. Thermal Energy “the total energy of all its atoms and molecules as they wiggle & jiggle, twist & turn, vibrate or race back.
Be ready to take notes!. Unit 6 Lesson 11 Thermal Energy Lesson 12 Temperature Lesson 13 (Optional)
Temperature and Heat CHAPTER the BIG idea CHAPTER OUTLINE Heat is a flow of energy due to temperature differences. Temperature depends on particle movement.
Alex Gee Jon Locke Joe Cooper Kylie Rhoades Clara Echavarria Ice Energy Extraction.
Matthew Gundrum Zach Alsheimer Garth Sinclair Casey Bauman.
Sizing Variable Flow Piping – An Opportunity for Reducing Energy
To return to the chapter summary click Escape or close this document. red.msscience.com Image Bank Foldables Video Clips and Animations Standardized Test.
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
Electrophotographic Cascade Development Apparatus Team 15503:Zach Foggetti (ME) Dalton Mead (ME) Bridget Kearney (EE) Ruishi Shen (ISE) Tom Wossner (ME)
Chemical Kinetics Diagrams of Energy Changes in Reactions.
Group 4 MGMT 580 Case Study 3.1 Shawndra Janne. Problem Statement The spray nozzles located in the parts washer are clogging, causing the parts washer.
EQ: How can we measure the amount of heat released or absorbed in a chemical reaction? Do Now: What is the difference between potential energy and kinetic.
HEAT TRANSFER. HEAT Heat is thermal energy that is in transit (movement). Energy can move from one place, object, or system to another.
I will know the difference between temperature and heat. I will know that thermal energy depends on different variables. I will be able to graph temperature.
Explain temperature and how it is measured. Understand that heat, temperature, and thermal energy are all different but related. Distinguish between and.
How Town of Cary used LEAN to Create a Better Contract Approval Process Michelle Brooks, CPA Financial Operations Analyst March 12, 2013.
Solar-Thermal (Concentrated Solar Heating) By Vivian Doan.
Matthew Gundrum Zach Alsheimer Garth Sinclair Casey Bauman.
Warm Up Explain 1) Why is an apple pies filling always hotter than the pastry even though they have been cooked at the same temperature? Your tongue.
Matthew Gundrum Zach Alsheimer Garth Sinclair Casey Bauman.
Chapter 7: Energy & Energy Transformations
INTEGRATED SCIENCE 11 CMH TEMPERATURE CONTROL AND VENTILATION
Thermoforming Process
Heat Preservation.
MGT 598 STUDY Education for Service-- mgt598study.com.
Chapter 3, Lesson 4, Conduction, Convection, and Radiation
Count Rumford supervised the drilling of brass cannons in a factory in Bavaria. From his observations, Rumford concluded that heat is not a form of matter.
1st Nine Weeks Test Study Guide Answers
Chapter 3, Lesson 4, Conduction, Convection, and Radiation
Wegmans Cheesecake Process Improvement (keep the customers happy)
Quality Management and Statistical Analysis (MGMT 580)
3rd Nine Weeks Exam Study Questions.
Siemens Education Topic 7: eZero Island.
Lesson 3.2 Product Planning
Chapter 3, Lesson 4, Conduction, Convection, and Radiation
Presentation transcript:

CHEESECAKE DEPANNING Zach Alsheimer Garth Sinclair Matt Gundrum Casey Bauman

OVERVIEW What we Have TriedWhat we KnowOptions Going ForwardTimeline

WHAT WE HAVE TRIED Thermocouples were borrowed from campus and affixed to the pizza oven The temperature on the oven was set to 600 F and planned to decrease form there Based on thermocouple and oven thermometer readings, the oven never reached over 300F Cheesecakes were run through and the depanning was timed – the cheesecake temperatures were tested Because of the missing coils, the temperature could not increase above 300F and was often less than that The cheesecakes did not show any decrease in depanning time as they could not get any warmer than normal PIZZA OVEN MANIPULATION

WHAT WE HAVE TRIED Stainless Steel Inserts created using RIT machine shop Inserts meshed well with cheesecake crumb and spinner head Grease formed under insert instead of laying on top Crust stuck to inserts and therefore could not be easily removed INSERT TEST

WHAT WE HAVE TRIED Tested idea using buckets filled with warm water, placing pans in water at times increasing by 10 seconds Difficult to get quantitative data about depanning times during initial testing Testing occurred separately from regular line; cheesecakes were not being depanned at that time Operators were helpful in giving their thoughts/opinions during initial testing Best times & temperatures seemed to be seconds and 100F based on number of bangs and operators reactions If this is pursued, the water bath would be an option to replace the pizza oven WATER BATH

WHAT WE KNOW Pizza Oven Heat transfer experiments aren’t an option due to pizza oven restrictions Inserts Stainless steel is unlikely to work as an insert due to low thermal conductivity SS has a lower coefficient of friction - grease might slide to outsides when crumb is spun

WHAT WE KNOW Water Bath Operators gave positive feedback about cheesecake quality and level of ease of the depanning Scheduling Running low on ‘no cost’ options, may need to consider greater cost- intensive ideas One week behind where we wanted to be starting MSDII, pushed presentation back one week to test inserts & water bath

OPTION A: WATER BATH 1. Run larger scale experiment 2. Gather data that can be used for compariso n to current process 3. Examine possible ergonomic effects 4. Make changes and improveme nts to the design 5. Develop an implement ation plan to be used by Wegmans 6. Train employees on new process

OPTION A: WATER BATH The early results were promising Would replace pizza oven Won’t be very cost-intensive to implement Advantages Variables are tougher to control Hard to compare to current process Disadvantages How to scale it up to meet production needs? Challenges

OPTION B: COST INTENSIVE Ideas to Test: Bakeable Insert - Cake Rings Handled Cake Remover System Table Conveyor Key Lime Pie Tin System

OPTION B: COST INTENSIVE 1. Brainstorm a list of possible solutions 2. Use Pugh evaluation to determine which ideas are viable 3. Design, order materials and build 4. Run experiment s to test the builds 5. Make changes and improveme nts to the design 6. Develop an implement ation plan to be used by Wegmans

OPTION B: COST INTENSIVE Higher potential to improve ergonomics All new ideas that haven’t be tested or implemented previously Advantages Limited time to complete full process in MSD 2 Will require some up front investment Disadvantages What is the budget for ROI for any cost intensive ideas? What designs will be manageable for integration? Challenges

OPTION C: METAL INSERTS 1. Identify the root causes of the problems that occurred during testing 2. Find solutions to those problems 3. Test to make sure problems have been eliminated 4. Run large metal insert experiment 5. Develop a plan to integrate inserts to current process

OPTION C: METAL INSERTS The early results were promising The team has a some idea of what caused problems Won’t be very cost-intensive to implement Advantages More time consuming route to take Uncertainties exist Disadvantages What material should be tested as an alternative? What were the actual root causes of the problems that occurred? Challenges

GOING FORWARD Current Date: Week 6 (March 3 rd ) Project Handoff Date: Week 14 (May 7 th ) The team has 9 Weeks remaining - Decide what direction(s) to go in - Set a defined end goal for end of MSDII - Develop a schedule to follow to guide us toward achieving our end goal Short-term Plan:

SUMMARY What we Have TriedWhat we KnowOptions Going ForwardTimeline

QUESTIONS