Computing Higher Education: A Call for the Future

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Second Information Technology in Education Study (SITES) A Project of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)
Advertisements

Copyright © 2010 Verizon Foundation. All Rights Reserved. This document may be reproduced and distributed solely for uses that are both (a) educational.
Copyright © 2011 Verizon Foundation. All Rights Reserved. This document may be reproduced and distributed solely for uses that are both (a) educational.
1 The Promotion and Tenure Process Managing the Academic Career for Faculty Women at Undergraduate Computer Science and Engineering Institutions CRA-W.
Business Technology Education Gateway Institute of Technology Advisory Committee Meeting Fall 2010.
Supporting Team-Based Learning Dr. Kathryn R. Ross, Indiana University Kokomo Team-Based Learning Conference 2007, Vancouver, Canada Copyright 2007 Kathryn.
Teachers, administrators and staff continuously seek and share learning and then act on what they learn. The goal of their actions is to enhance their.
Supplemental Instruction in Precalculus
Course Syllabus Development Abdullateef Haidar. Contents Introduction Introduction Some considerations Some considerations Components of course syllabus.
Learning through Service Community Service-Learning at the University of Guelph Cheryl Rose, CSL Specialist, Student Life Executive Director, Canadian.
Introduction to Service-Learning for Students
ASSESSMENT 101 Preparing Future Faculty (PFF) Workshop Spring 2011 Facilitators: Dr. Kara Penfield, Director of Academic Assessment; Isis Artze-Vega, PFF.
Speakers: Denise Chilton, Sandra Smele, Christine Wong May 1, 2013
An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections
Orientation to the Planning 10 IRP  How does Planning 10 fit into the 2004 Graduation Program?  How was Planning 10 developed?  What’s the difference.
Mission Statement Benedictine Values The Business Division
Peer Assessment of Oral Presentations Kevin Yee Faculty Center for Teaching & Learning, University of Central Florida Research Question For oral presentations,
Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
Beyond EOF Presenters: Mecca K. Brown and Jasmine Lynch.
Engaging Business Students in Online Research and Critical Thinking through Customized Assignments Henri Mondschein Information Specialist Manager, Information.
CS1203 SCCC/ATS COURSE SYLLABUS Introduction to Computer Concepts and Applications Revised 8/16/2014 Online 7/14 revision Ed Hall Instructor.
Classroom Management in a Concept Based Curriculum Jill Peltzer, PhD, RN, APRN-CNS.
Suggested Strategies to Educate Generation Y Dialogue with Trustees, Presidents, Faculty and Administrative Professionals.
Kontos1 Principles of Quality Instruction in Web Classes George Kontos, Ed.D. Assistant Professor
Developing An Online Information Literacy Course Nancy O’Hanlon Ohio State University Libraries Wuhan University, China March 2007.
Introduction to teaching and assessing so students will learn more using learner-centered teaching Phyllis Blumberg Warm-up activity How can instructor’s.
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Co-op Development Training Program Starting September, 2011 Information Session July 8, 2011.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Focus On Learning June 5, 2012 Reflective Practice and The Professional Portfolio Mark Gallupe, Loyalist College 1.
“NUR 870 – Major Course Project” Winter 2013 Constance J. Creech, RN, Ed.D, ANP-BC – Department of Nursing & Andrea Becker, MA, Ed.S – Office of Extended.
1 UTeach Professional Development Courses. 2 UTS Step 1 Early exposure to classroom environment (can be as early as a student’s first semester)
Tusculum College School of Business. Tusculum College Program is: –Approved…Regionally by Southern Association of Colleges and Schools –Flexible & cost.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
MA course on language teaching and testing February 2015.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
Best Teaching Practices. Technology Important for success in education Kindergarten through high school Electronic tools to enhance learning Information.
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
Frameworks for South Dakota Schools.  Provide basic information on South Dakota’s Capstone Experiences.  Discuss how Capstone Experiences fit into South.
Student Affairs & Technology Sarah Glascock Taisha Mikell Xiaoran Xu Eastern Illinois University StudentAffairs.com –Virtual Case Study 2004.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Enhancing Teaching and Learning with Podcasts Mico e-Learning Workshop.
Understanding Student Expectations & Effective Teaching Presented by: Dr. Laura Marler Associate Professor of Management College of Business Mississippi.
* Research suggests that technology used in classrooms can be especially advantageous to at-risk, EL, and special ed students. (Means, Blando, Olson,
Technology Portfolio Kimberly Pierce May 08, 2008.
Teacher competencies. Professional competence with ICT Draw on appropriate ICT applications to enhance personal and professional effectiveness  Using.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Senior Capstone Experience Framework A Guide for South Dakota Schools.
Computers can raise student achievement and even improve school’s climate but they have to be placed in the right hands and used in the right way. Technology.
Yari M. Marrero, MHS UCC-Peer Mentoring Program Coordinator.
2004 StudentAffairs.com Virtual Case Study Presentation Created by: Tim Breitbach Megan Johnson Sarah Rockwell Matt Suwalski Western Illinois University.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
N ational Q ualifications F ramework N Q F Quality Center National Accreditation Committee.
ISTE Standards for Teachers Anja Whitehead IDT 3600 Fall 2015.
Faculty Development Models
Instructional Plan Template | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan Template Jami Anderson.
First week. Catalog Description This course explores basic cultural, social, legal, and ethical issues inherent in the discipline of computing. Students.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Developing a Work Based Portfolio
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
Instructional Plan Template | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan Cultural Diversity in Health Science Barry L. Rimpsey.
Strategies to Check Student Learning in the Classroom Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs)
Matchmaker, Matchmaker Make Me a Match
NJCU College of Education
Coalition for Career Development
Quality assurance and curriculum development
Information Literacy: What is it and Why Should I Care?
Presentation transcript:

Computing Higher Education: A Call for the Future Bowling Green State University Kristyn Bochniak Nicole Schwab Sarah Sunde Jessica Turos

Computing Higher Education This presentation will introduce, outline, and rationalize the necessity for the assimilation of the technology course Computing Higher Education into Higher Education curricula.

Course Components 14 week 2 credit hour required course in a computer lab Pass/Fail grading Meets once a week for two hours Format: discussion and implementation Faculty instructor Peer mentoring system

Peer Mentoring Because graduate students have differing levels of technology skills and knowledge, in order to challenge and support (Sanford, 1967) every student, a peer mentoring partnership will be formed “Working with others often increases involvement in learning. Sharing one’s own ideas and responding to others’ reactions sharpens thinking and deepens understanding” (Chickering & Gamson, 1991)

Peer Mentoring Selection After reviewing the course topics on the first class session, students will have the option to self identify as technologically savvy and become a peer mentor Peer mentor pairings will be determined by mentor to mentee ratio Peer mentors will reinforce their technology knowledge by teaching others and being a resource and mentees will gain new knowledge and skills

Course Objectives Upon completion of this course students will: Gain knowledge and experience with computer applications and Internet capabilities Comprehend consequences of technology use through an ethical and legal lens Promote student learning through technology Be exposed to campus information systems

Objectives Continued Upon completion of this course students will: Recognize that students have different skill and exposure levels with technology Apply technology to improve student services in various functional areas Appreciate current and future technological trends in higher education

Course Outline Week Number Topic Assignment 1 Building a Community of Learners 2 Microsoft Office- Word and Publisher Word and Publisher tutorials 3 Microsoft Office- Excel and Access Excel and Access tutorials 4 PowerPoint PowerPoint tutorial 5 Web Design Professional webpage 6 Web Design Continued 7 Internet Use and Implications 8 Implications for Student Learning with Technology

Course Outline Continued Week Number Topic Assignment 9 Current Technological Issues and Trends in Higher Education Create a group PowerPoint presentation on a current technological issue or trend 10 Student Affairs Functional Areas and Technology Action plan and justification for incorporation of technology with existing programs 11 How Does Technology Better Serve Our Students? 12 Student Technology Use: Legal and Ethical Issues 13 Class Presentations 14 So Now What?

Assignments Tutorials Professional Webpage PowerPoint Presentation Action Plan

Microsoft® Office 2000 8-in-1 Step by Step Tutorials Upon discussing each Microsoft Office application in class, students will complete Microsoft Office tutorial found in: Microsoft® Office 2000 8-in-1 Step by Step http://www.microsoft.com/products/info/product.aspx?view=22&pcid=f14a1074-cffd-8f57-b582-4eff21d9a0f4&type=ovr All tutorials are due the fifth week of class

Professional Webpage Each student will have to make a professional webpage highlighting their skills and accomplishments to help make them more marketable for future employment A copy of their resume and portfolio worthy materials will be included The webpage is due the twelfth week

PowerPoint Presentation Students will create a group PowerPoint presentation on a current technological issue or trend Students will utilize and synthesize knowledge gained through this course The PowerPoint presentation is due the thirteenth week

Action Plan Students will investigate a functional area and create an action plan outlining a technological implementation to improve an existing program or function to better serve students and to increase student learning The action plan is due the fourteenth week

Week 1: Building a Community of Learners Acquaint the class with one another through icebreakers. Syllabus description. Assess the technological capabilities of students (identify savvy students). Group generation of a class contract.

Weeks 2 - 4: Microsoft Office Discussion of Microsoft Word, Excel, Publisher, Access, and PowerPoint applications and usage. The effects on student affairs professionals and students. Opportunity to work in mentoring groups on tutorials and individual assignments.

Weeks 5 & 6: Web Design Discuss the history, creation, and purpose of a website Principles of HTML and Dreamweaver explained and explored through the beginning process of creating a website

Week 7: Internet Use and Implications Explore the common uses of the Internet and World Wide Web by students. Discuss both positive (i.e. research, communication, and knowledge) and negative (i.e. plagiarism, questionable materials, and addiction) aspects of Internet use by students for learning, growth, and development (Komives, Woodward, & Associates, 2001).

Week 8: Implications for Student Learning with Technology Discuss how student learning is enhanced through technology. Experiential learning through technology. Differing technological preferences and tools. - McKeachie, 2001 “. . . If knowledge is to be accessible to solve a new problem, it is best learned in a context where it is used as a problem-solving tool (Eyler & Giles, 1999).

Week 9: Current Technological Issues and Trends in Higher Education Examine the history and future of technology. Discuss benefits (i.e. convenience and accessibility) and drawbacks (i.e. impersonal and lack of control) of technology in higher education (Komives et. al, 2001; Kuh & Hu, 2001). Address current hot topic of distance learning and use of technology in classrooms (Komives et. al, 2001; McKeachie, 2002).

Week 10: Student Affairs Functional Areas and Technology Exploration of how functional areas use technology. Evaluation of appropriate technological uses in functional areas. Recommendations on improvement of functional areas setting the foundation for group PowerPoint presentation.

Week 11: How Does Technology Better Serve Our Students? Retrospective examination of how student affairs better serves our students as described in the Student Personnel Point View (1949). Assimilation of technology into the values espoused by the student affairs profession in development of the whole student.

Week 12: Student Technology Use: Legal and Ethical Issues Review legal and ethical issues surrounding student technology use: freedom of speech academic integrity copyright infringements student financial constraints - Engstrom, 1997

Week 13: Class Presentations Student created PowerPoint presentations on current technological issues in higher education. Evaluation and feedback will follow.

Week 14: So Now What? Speculation of future technological advances. Students will discuss their action plans. How can the profession be prepared for future advancements in technology? “A challenge for the future will be to balance “high tech” with “high touch” and to seek ways in which technology can complement the services the profession provides rather than replace them” (Komives et. al, 2001).

Justification for Course With technology becoming a staple in our society, we as educators owe it to our students to become well versed in technology (McKeachie, 2002; Kruger, 2003). Because technology is new and ever changing, it is necessary to keep professionals aware of advances that could benefit both college students and the field of student affairs.

Justification Continued The expanded learning opportunity of the peer mentoring system and the pass/fail grading framework lessens the workload of the instructor. “Nearly two-thirds of youth and parents agree that the children know more about the Internet than their parents do” (Kruger, 2003). The next generation of college students will be technologically advanced and expect their education to be as well. As educators, we need to meet that demand.

‘Just Do It’ Conclusion “. . . Much of this may seem daunting; however, understanding and using technology and information systems is a critical part of the daily work of to he student affairs practitioner, and it will become even more important in the future. Perhaps the best advice is echoed by the common expression . . .” ‘Just Do It’ -Komives et. al, 2001

References Chickering, A. W. & Gamson, Z. F. (1991). Applying the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Directions for Student Services, 47. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Engstrom, C. M. (1997). Integrating information technology into student affairs graduate programs. New Directions for Student Services, 78, 59-69. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Eyler, J., & Giles, Jr., D. E. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Komives, S. R., Woodard, Jr., D. B., & Associates. (2001). Student services: A handbook for the profession. (3rd edition). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Kruger, R. (2003). Discussing cyber ethics with students is critical. Social Studies, 94(4), 189-190. Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S. (2001). The relationships between computer and information technology use, selected learning and personal development outcomes, and other college experiences. Journal of College Student Development, 42(3), 217-232. McKeachie, W. J. (2002). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. New York: Houghton-Miflin.