Observations on the Jeremy Jaynes Criminal Spam Trial Jon Praed Internet Law Group jon.praed(at)i-lawgroup.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spammers, Phishers and Other Assorted Crooks: A Spam Litigators View From the Front Lines Jon Praed Internet Law Group jon.praed(at)i-lawgroup.com.
Advertisements

How Lawsuits Against Spammers Can Aid Spam-Filtering Technology: A Spam Litigators View From the Front Lines Jon Praed Internet Law Group
Latest Trends in the Legal Fight Against Spammers Spam Cambridge, MA January 16, 2004 Jon Praed Internet Law Group jon.praed(at)i-lawgroup.com.
McGraw-Hill © 2003, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Criminal Investigation Criminal Investigation Swanson Chamelin Territo eighth.
TRIAL EVIDENCE.
Internet Investigations. Internet Investigations Theres a charge on my credit card, but I didnt make that purchase. – Most common criminal investigation.
Law Enforcement Implications of House Bill 87 Bill is known as the Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act of Many different implications.
American Criminal Law Presented to: University of Belgrade Faculty of Law March 2011 Presented by: Judge Dale A. Crawford Columbus, Ohio
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial
By David Burrows © 2014 David Burrows, Attorney at Law.
Trial Procedures. Pleadings – papers filed with the beginning of a trial – establish the issues the court is being asked to decided Spell out allegations.
+ Courtroom Participants. + 2 Fundamental Principles An accused person is innocent until proven guilty. Guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Anatomy of a Criminal Case Government – Libertyville HS.
An Overview of the Law on Spam Anti-Spam Research Group San Francisco, CA March 20, 2003 Jon Praed Internet Law Group
Steps in Criminal Cases Criminal Court Proceedings.
How To Read A US Court Decision ….or not. U.S. v. Kilbride, (9th Cir. Oct. 28, 2009)
FRAUD EXAMINATION ALBRECHT, ALBRECHT, & ALBRECHT Legal Follow-Up Chapter 18.
CJ227 Criminal Procedure Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 4 (Chapter 9 – Pretrial Motions, Hearings and Pleas) (Chapter.
U.S. Government Chapter 15 Section 3
Our Criminal Justice System
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Elder Abuse Investigations Adapted from material presented June 30, 2004 by Sean Morgan.
Institute of Social Control
SUPA Forensic science September 20,  Both the Federal Government and New Jersey establish criminal laws  The United State Code U.S.C.A.  Title.
Criminal Law and Procedure February 25. The System Adversarial –People v. Defendant –Link to Criminal then to Self-help criminal-then.
Legal and Court Terminology. Indictment A formal criminal charge against a person who then becomes the defendant.
Objective 29L Analyze he rights of the accused as set forth in the 4 th,5 th,6 th,8 th, and 14 th Amendments, including but no limited to such cases as.
The Judicial Branch The Criminal Justice Process.
Trial advocacy workshop
Rights When Arrested Objective 2.01 Recognize types of courts. Business Law.
MIT Spam Conference 2006 How Spammers Deal with CAN-Spam: Costa Rica, “microbranding” & 18 USC §2257 Jon Praed Internet Law Group jon.praed(at)i-lawgroup.com.
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Elder Abuse Prosecutions Adapted from material presented June 30, 2004 by Sean Morgan.
The Trial Chapter 9 in Your Text John Massey Criminal Justice.
Chapter 20 Writing Reports, Preparing for and Presenting Cases in Court.
The Trial. I. Procedures A. Jury Selection 1. Impanel (select) a jury 2. Prosecutors and Defense lawyers pose questions to potential jurors (VOIR DIRE)
Bell Ringer Read the article “Searching for Details Online, Lawyers Facebook the Jury” and answer the questions. Be ready to discuss your answers with.
© 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Investigating High-Tech Crime By Michael Knetzger and Jeremy Muraski Tracing.
Trespass to Chattels: Spam Richard Warner. CompuServe v. Cyber Promotion  :“CompuServe has received many complaints from subscribers threatening to discontinue.
Arrests, Interrogations, and Confessions. Definitions Arrest: person is deprived of his or her freedom Interrogation: person accused or arrested is questioned.
The Criminal Trial Process Section 11 (d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that each person charged with an offence is to be ‘presumed innocent.
Legal Stumbling Blocks When Rescue and Law Enforcement Collide Gillian Deegan Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Botetourt County VA.
Which of the five types of crimes are shown in the pie chart? Bell Ringer.
Chapter 11.  Electronic commerce (e-commerce)  The sale of goods and services by computer over the Internet  Internet (Net)  A collection of millions.
C OMPANIES ACT,2013 Adv. Arun Saxena Saxena & Saxena Law Chambers Advocates & Attorneys , New Delhi House 27, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi –
Copyright 2000, Marchany Computer Law Threats and Issues VA Computer Crime Act Randy Marchany VA Tech Computing Center ©Marchany,2001.
s Protected by Fourth Amendment Right of Privacy By: Xavier Mulligan.
North Carolina Judicial Branch Chapter 13 Section 3.
Trespass in the Spam Cases. CompuServe v. Cyber Promotion User complaints  “CompuServe has received many complaints from subscribers threatening.
CRIMINAL LAW Objective: Know the rights a person has when arrested Recognize a person’s potential criminal liability for the actions of others Understand.
Basic Legal Rights Review Article I of the Constitution & the Bill of Rights, gives basic rights to all people.
Cooperating with Internet Service Providers OSCE, Vienna, 24 th October 2008.
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial – Chp 13 Booking – Formal process of making a police record of an arrest -Give private info such as:
CJ227: Criminal Procedure Unit 6 Seminar Mary K Cronin.
The Judicial System What Courts Do and Crime. Stages of Criminal Justice.
Forensic Science Legal Systems
Outline of the U.S. and Arizona Criminal Justice Systems
Evidence Preservation/Records Retention
Civics & Economics – Goals 5 & 6 Criminal Cases
Trespass in the Spam Cases
VII. IMPORTANT TRIAL CONSIDERATIONS
Steps of a Crime.
Lesson 5-2 Criminal Procedure.
Warm-Up (61L) TURN BACK SEVERAL PAGES…
The Court System A Trial.
The Court System A Trial.
Texas Search and Seizure
Yoyo: QUESTION: A man was found dead with a cassette recorder in one hand and a gun in the other. When the police came in, they immediately pressed the.
Law 12 Criminal Trial Process.
KENT vs United States 1966.
Differences and similarities
Presentation transcript:

Observations on the Jeremy Jaynes Criminal Spam Trial Jon Praed Internet Law Group jon.praed(at)i-lawgroup.com

Who Is Jeremy Jaynes? ROKSO listed spammer Alias Gaven Stubberfield 29, resident of Raleigh, North Carolina Investor in local restaurant and health club More insights available at: c.html Tried with sister Jessica DeGroot and Richard Rutkowski

The Spam Samples

Spam Sample -- Penny Stock Picker

Spam Sample -- Internet History Eraser

Spam Sample - Fed Ex Refund Processor

Spam Timeline, Volumes & Fingerprints

Spam Fingerprints from July 16

Virginia Criminal Spam Statute (Va. Code § :1) 1.Use of a computer or computer network 2.With intent to falsify or forge electronic mail transmission information or other routing information in any manner 3. in connection with the transmission of unsolicited bulk electronic mail through or into the computer network of an electronic mail service provider or its subscribers

Felony (Class 6) 10,000 attempted recipients over one day (24 hour period) 100,000…over 30 days 1 million…over one year Penalty (per offense) 1 year to 5 years in prison $2,500 fine

Criminal Investigation Proceeds July through December 2003

Jaynes Arrested, House Searched & Evidence Seized December 11, 2003

Spam Office in Spare Bedroom

Rack Mount in Spare Bedroom

Evidence Seized Computers, routers –Laptops, desktops, servers –Contents recovered CDs & DVDs – address lists –lists of user names & domain names –anti-spammer address lists Other Physical Evidence

Spam Interruptus

Text of Found on Seized Computer

Text from Seized Computer Sample from Report Spam

Notes Recovered from Trash Can

Notes Admitted into Evidence

Merchant Credit Card Account Sales per month

Merchant Credit Card Account x $40.00 per sale $440,000 per month Sales per month

Merchant Credit Card Account Refunds/charge backs

Merchant Credit Card Account Refunds/charge backs x $40.00 per sale ($332,000) per month

Merchant Credit Card Account Sales per month $440,000 sales - $332,000 returns $108,000 gross profit per month

Falsification of Transmission Information

ARIN Contract

Proof of Payment for Domain Name Registration Valid Visa credit card False names (Janet Marsh) Card successfully charged Charge was not disputed Signatory on card (Jessica Jaynes)

Testimony of UPS Store Owner Postal Form 1583 Required by Law Not One Customer Named John Rogers Nine Years of Records

UPS Store Application

Proof the s were Unsolicited Recipient testimony –Burdensome and unwieldy –Indirect admission is difficult (hearsay) Absence of evidence of request for solicitation in spammers possession (Absence of business record) Expert testimony

Expert Testimony: Drug Dealers and Spammers Police officers routinely qualify as experts on drug possession charges No ultimate fact (cant say in my opinion, defendant is a dealer) Quantity of drugs found on defendant is not consistent with personal consumption Prosecutor argues evidence shows defendant is a dealer

Dr. John Levine Expert for the Commonwealth Testified Defendants patterns were not consistent with solicited practices –Inconsistent from lines –Large number of IP addresses used –.bz domain names (Belize) Untouchable on cross examination See Dr. Levines article on CircleID.com (

Defendants Defenses No factual defense Constitutional Challenges –First Amendment –Commerce Clause Personal Jurisdiction in Virginia Venue in Loudoun County Lack of proof that volumes exceeded 10,000/day Meaning of Falsification and Unsolicited July 1, 2003 as flag day

Jury Verdict & Sentence Deliberated day and a half Jeremy Jaynes –Guilty of 3 felony spam counts –3 years per count Jessica Jaynes DeGroot –Guilty of 3 felony spam counts –$2,500 fine per count Richard Rutkowski –Not guilty

Lessons Learned Juries understand the technology Searches and seizures are important to preserving evidence While difficult, unsolicited can be proved without testimony from recipients, via an expert Offshore movement of bank accounts will complicate proof The Jessica Effect -- spam accomplices are now more likely to flip Despite public animosity against spam, jury system works well

Questions? Observations on the Jeremy Jaynes Criminal Spam Trial Jon Praed Internet Law Group jon.praed(at)i-lawgroup.com