The RE-LY Study: Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY Dabigatran Compared to Warfarin in 18,113 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Developments In New Oral Anticoagulants
Advertisements

1
ACTIVE Effects of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation who are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonists.
A New Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor, Dabigatran Etexilate, Compared With Enoxaparin for Prevention of Thromboembolic Events Following Total Hip or Knee.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage versus Warfarin Therapy for Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Educational Event 23rd & 24th January 2013
NOAC but NICE Conference 16th July 2013.
1 GRASP-AF Audit - Intro 8 th July 2010 Mark Gregory.
ROCKET-AF Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial.
AF and the New Oral Anti-Coagulants
PROCESS vs. WA State SCS Study A Comparison of Study Design, Patient Population, and Outcomes August 29,2007.
Atrial Fibrillation – TIMI 48
Insights of the RE-LY CHA2DS2-VASc subgroup analysis Hisao Ogawa Kumamoto University, Japan 1 1.
Clock will move after 1 minute
Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk.
Select a time to count down from the clock above
JOURNAL REVIEW Newer Antithrombotics in AF 1 Dr Ranjith MP Senior Resident Department of Cardiology Government Medical college Kozhikode.
Georges Ghanem MD, FESC, FACC Associate Professor, Chief of Cardiology UMC-RH/LAU-SOM Beirut, Lebanon.
New Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation Dr Dipti.
Standard Medical Therapy TRA 40 mg mg/d TRA 40 mg mg/d Placebo EP:CV Death/MI/stroke/hosp for RI/urgent coronary revasc. 1  EP:CV Death/MI/stroke/hosp.
Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran vs. Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation - Japanese population in the RE-LY ® - Shinya Goto, MD., PhD. Tokai.
ARISTOTLE TRIAL Dr R Nyabadza GPST1 Ward 32. Structure AF, stroke and CHA 2 -DS 2 VASC Anticoagulant choices ARISTOTLE trial Cost NICE guidance and the.
Study by: Granger et al. NEJM, September 2011,Vol No. 11 Presented by: Amelia Crawford PA-S2 Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
Atrial Fibrillation Stroke Prevention with Oral Anticoagulants Why is there discordance between guideline committees & specialists when the data is based.
Jim Hoehns, Pharm.D.. Edoxaban Oral factor Xa inhibitor Bioavailability: 62% Tmax: 1-2 hrs Elimination: 50% renal Half-life: 9-11 hours.
Randomized Evaluation of Long- term anticoagulant therapY Dabigatran Compared to Warfarin in 18,113 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at Risk of Stroke.
  Warfarin Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban Edoxaban Target
The Long Term Multi-Center Extension of Dabigatran Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) study To reviewers and moderators: These.
ACTIVE Clopidogrel plus Aspirin versus Aspirin in Patients Unsuitable for Warfarin.
Dodson Thompson, DO Northlakes Community Clinic Minong, WI.
Atrial Fibrillation Management Past, Present and Future
ARISTOTLE Objectives Primary: test for noninferiority of apixaban, a novel oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, versus warfarin Secondary: test for superiority.
A Randomized Trial of Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism Schulman S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 205.
Presented by Renato D. Lopes, MD, PhD, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, USA for the ARISTOTLE investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban.
WarfarinApixaban Primary outcome: major/clinically relevant bleeding (through 6 months) Secondary objective: Death, MI, stroke, stent thrombosis Randomize.
Manesh R. Patel, M.D., Kenneth W. Mahaffey, M.D., Jyotsna Garg, M.S., Guohua Pan, Ph.D., Daniel E. Singer, M.D., Werner Hacke, M.D., Ph.D., Gunter Breithardt,
Date of download: 7/10/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Choice of Antithrombotic Therapy for Stroke Prevention.
Review on NOACs Studies DR. KOUROSH SADEGHI TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES.
1 Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation R3 Dae Ho Kim / Prof. Jin Bae Kim N Engl J Med 2011; DOI: Manesh R. Patel, M.D.,
Comparison of Dabigatran and Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart DiseaseClinical Perspective by Michael D. Ezekowitz, Rangadham.
The Efficacy of Dabigatran versus Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review Karim Bouferrache Pacific University.
Direct Comparison of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban for Effectiveness and Safety in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation.
Harvard Medical School C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D.
You can never be too Thin…. An Update on NOACs
David R. Holmes, Jr., M.D. Mayo Clinic, Rochester
A Comparison of RE-LY and ROCKET AF Trial Designs and Outcomes
Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran vs
Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation
RE-CIRCUIT Trial design: Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation were randomized to uninterrupted dabigatran 150 mg twice daily.
Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY
Novel oral anticoagulants in comparison with warfarin
Oral Anticoagulation and Preventing Stent Thrombosis
US Guidelines US Guidelines Low-risk Patients.
ACTIVE A Effects of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation who are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonists.
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
Selecting NOACs for High-Risk Patients
Assessing Atrial Fibrillation: Real-World Data vs Clinical Trials
A Case Challenge.
Probability of major bleeding event and ischaemic stroke/SEE versus trough plasma concentration of dabigatran. Calculated for a 72-year-old male patient.
ACC 2003 Late Breaking Trials
5 Good Minutes on Atrial Fibrillation-related Stroke
Probability of major bleeding event and ischaemic stroke/SEE versus trough plasma concentration of dabigatran. Calculated for a 72-year-old male patient.
RE-ALIGN Randomized, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Oral Dabigatran Etexilate in Patients after Heart Valve Replacement.
Gianluigi Savarese et al. JCHF 2016;4:
Presenter Disclosure Information
Presentation transcript:

The RE-LY Study: Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY Dabigatran Compared to Warfarin in 18,113 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at Risk of Stroke 1

Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke AF responsible for 1/6 of all strokes Warfarin reduces stroke in AF by 64% significant increase in intracranial and other hemorrhage Difficult to use Only 50% of eligible patients receive warfarin An alternative treatment is needed

Dabigatran Dabigatran Etexilate, a pro-drug, is rapidly converted to dabigatran 6.5% bioavailability, 80% excreted by kidney Half-life of 12-17 hours Phase 2 data identified 220 mg daily and 150 mg BID as viable doses

RE-LY: A Non-inferiority Trial Atrial fibrillation ≥1 Risk Factor Absence of contra-indications 951 centers in 44 countries PROBE=Prospective Randomized Open Trial with Blinded Adjudication of Events. R open Blinded Warfarin (INR 2.0-3.0) N=6000 Dabigatran Etexilate 110 mg b.i.d. N=6000 Dabigatran Etexilate 150 mg b.i.d. N=6000 10 efficacy outcome = stroke or systemic embolism 10 safety outcome = major bleeding Non-inferiority margin 1.46

Trial Execution Performed December 2005-March 2009 Median Follow up 2.0 years Follow up 99.9% complete Mean TTR = 64% (patients on warfarin)

Baseline Characteristics Dabigatran 110 mg Dabigatran 150 mg Warfarin Randomized 6015 6076 6022 Mean age (years) 71.4 71.5 71.6 Male (%) 64.3 63.2 63.3 CHADS2 score (mean) 0-1 (%) 2 (%) 3+ (%) 2.1 32.6 34.7 32.7 2.2 32.2 35.2 30.9 37.0 32.1 Prior stroke/TIA (%) 19.9 20.3 19.8 Prior MI (%) 16.8 16.9 16.1 CHF (%) 31.8 31.9 Baseline ASA (%) 40.0 38.7 40.6 Warfarin Naïve (%) 49.9 49.8 51.4

Permanent Discontinuation Years of Follow-up Stopping Rates 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Dabigatran110 Dabigatran150 Warfarin D110 D150 W # at Risk Year 0.5 6015 5336 5026 3950 2491 1176 6076 5329 5015 3955 2528 1172 6022 5563 5269 4158 2561 1187

Stroke or Systemic Embolism 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 Dabigatran 110 vs. Warfarin Dabigatran 150 vs. Warfarin Non-inferiority p-value <0.001 Superiority 0.34 Margin = 1.46 HR (95% CI)

Primary Outcome D 110mg D 150mg warfarin D 110mg vs. Warfarin D 150mg vs. Warfarin Number rate/yr RR 95% CI P* Stroke or systemic Embolism 182 1.5 %/yr 134 1.1 %/yr 199 1.7 %/yr 0.91 0.74-1.11 0.34 0.66 0.53-0.82 <0.001 Stroke 171 1.4 %/yr 122 1.0 %/yr 185 1.6 %/yr 0.92 0.74-1.13 0.41 0.64 0.51-0.81 Systemic Embolism 14 0.1 %/yr 13 19 0.2 %/yr 0.73 0.37-1.46 0.38 0.67 0.33-1.36 0.27 * These, and all subsequent, p values, are for superiority

Stroke Classification D 110mg D 150mg warfarin D 110 mg vs. Warfarin D 150 mg vs. Warfarin Number rate/yr RR 95% CI p Ischemic/ Unspecified 159 1.3 %/yr 111 0.9 %/yr 142 1.2 %/yr 1.11 0.89-1.40 0.35 0.76 0.60-0.98 0.03 Hemorrhagic 14 0.1 %/yr 12 45 0.4 %/yr 0.31 0.17-0.56 <0.001 0.26 0.14-0.49

Stroke or Systemic Embolism Cumulative Hazard Rates 0.0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Dabigatran110 Dabigatran 150 Warfarin 6022 5862 5718 4593 2890 1322 6015 5710 2945 1385 6076 5939 5779 4682 3044 1429 No. at Risk W D110 D150 Years

All Intracranial Bleeding Years Cumulative Hazard Rates 0.0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Dabigatran110 Dabigatran150 Warfarin # at Risk Year 0.5 D110 D150 W 6015 5900 5771 4666 3006 1420 6076 5958 5817 4735 3080 1451 6022 5887 5759 4632 2933 1343

Cumulative Hazard Rates Hemorrhagic Stroke Years Cumulative Hazard Rates 0.0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Dabigatran110 Dabigatran150 Warfarin # at Risk Year 0.5 D110 D150 W 6015 5901 5775 4669 3010 1423 6076 5963 5827 4743 3088 1457 6022 5899 5772 4652 2952 1351

MI, Hospitalization and Death D 110mg D 150mg warfarin D 110mg vs. Warfarin D 150mg vs. Warfarin Annual rate RR 95% CI p Myocardial Infarction 0.7% 0.7 % 0.5 % 1.35 0.98-1.87 0.07 1.38 1.00-1.91 0.048 Hospitalization 19.4 % 20.2% 20.8 % 0.92 0.87-0.97 0.003 0.97 0.92-1.03 0.34 Vascular Death 2.4 % 2.3 % 2.7 % 0.90 0.77-1.06 0.21 0.85 0.72-0.99 0.04 Death 3.8 % 3.6 % 4.1 % 0.91 0.80-1.03 0.13 0.88 0.77-1.00 0.05

Bleeding and Net Clinical Benefit 110mg 150mg warfarin D 110mg vs. Warfarin D 150mg vs. Warfarin Annual rate RR 95% CI p Major Bleeding 2.7 % 3.1 % 3.4 % 0.80 0.69-0.93 0.003 0.93 0.81-1.07 0.31 Life-Threatening major 1.2 % 1.5 % 1.8 % 0.68 0.55-0.83 <0.001 0.81 0.66-0.99 0.04 Minor Bleeding 13.2 % 14.8 % 16.4% 0.79 0.74-0.84 0.91 0.85-0.97 0.005 Total Bleeding (Major+Minor) 14.6 16.4 18.2 0.78 0.74-0.83 0.86-0.97 0.002 Net Clinical Benefit* 7.1 % 6.9 % 7.6 % 0.92 0.84-1.02 0.10 0.82-1.00 * stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, death and major bleed

Important Sites of Major Bleeding D 110mg D 150mg warfarin D 110mg vs. Warfarin D 150mg vs. Warfarin Annual rate RR 95% CI p Gastro-intestinal (GI) 1.1 % 1.5 % 1.0 % 1.10 0.86-1.41 0.43 1.50 1.19-1.89 <0.001 Intracranial (ICH) 0.2 % 0.3 % 0.7 % 0.31 0.20-0.47 0.40 0.27-0.60 Major Bleed (non-GI, non-ICH) 1.8 % 0.85 0.70-1.04 0.11 0.87 0.71-1.06 0.16

Cumulative Hazard Rates Major Bleeding Years Cumulative Hazard Rates 0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Dabigatran110 Dabigatran150 Warfarin # at Risk Year 0.5 D110 D150 W 6015 5835 5640 4510 2872 1349 6076 5839 5638 4557 2928 1366 6022 5801 5600 4474 2797 1269

Dabigatran 150 mg vs. 110 mg Dabigatran 110mg Dabigatran 150mg D 150mg vs. D 110 mg Number rate/yr Relative Risk 95% CI p Stroke and systemic embolism 1.5% 1.1 % 0.73 0.58-0.91 0.005 Ischemic/unspecified stroke 1.3 % 0.9 % 0.69 0.54-0.88 0.002 Hemorrhagic stroke 0.1% 0.1 % 0.85 0.39-1.83 0.67 Major Hemorrhage 2.7 % 3.1 % 1.16 1.00-1.34 0.05 GI Major Hemorrhage 1.5 % 1.36 1.09-1.70 0.007 Net Clinical Benefit 7.1 % 6.9 % 0.98 0.89-1.08 0.66

ALT or AST >3x ULN Years Warfarin Dabigatran150 Cumulative Risk 0.0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Dabigatran110 Dabigatran150 Warfarin # at Risk Year 0.5 D110 D150 W 6015 5860 5692 4601 2950 1394 6076 5925 5759 4675 3034 1427 6022 5858 5708 4592 2906 1331

Common Adverse Events Adverse events occurring in >5% of any group Dabigatran 110 mg % Dabigatran 150 mg Warfarin Dyspepsia * 11.8 11.3 5.8 Dyspnea 9.3 9.5 9.7 Dizziness 8.1 8.3 9.4 Peripheral edema 7.9 7.8 Fatigue 6.6 6.2 Cough 5.7 6.0 Chest pain 5.2 5.9 Arthralgia 4.5 5.5 Back pain 5.3 5.6 Nasopharyngitis 5.4 Diarrhea 6.3 6.5 Atrial fibrillation Urinary tract infection 4.8 Upper respiratory tract infection 4.7 *Occurred more commonly on dabigatran p<0.001

Conclusions Dabigatran 150 mg significantly reduced stoke compared to warfarin with similar risk of major bleeding Dabigatran 110 mg had a similar rate of stroke as warfarin with significantly reduced major bleeding Both doses markedly reduced intra-cranial and life-threatening hemorrhage Both doses are free of liver and other major toxicity, although they increase dyspepsia and GI bleeding

Conclusions Both Dabigatran doses offer advantages over warfarin Dabigatran 150 is more effective and dabigatran 110 has a better safety profile The availability of two effective doses, with different benefit risk profiles, creates the potential to tailor therapy to individual patient characteristics