C onceptual Framework A ssumption University May 8-9, 2003 09.45-10.30 hrs. Bancha Saenghiran, f.s.g., Ph.D. Student Affairs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A look at strengths and weaknesses of organizational structures and how they address critical issues in higher education.
Advertisements

CEFPI is a Registered Provider with The American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems (AIA/CES). Credit(s) earned on completion of this.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Information Systems (CIS) CIP Code: Program Code: 411.
Enrollment Management and Student Affairs at Portland State University Enrollment Management and Student Affairs is a student-centered organization, dedicated.
Experiential Learning
Strategic Planning and the NCA Special Emphasis A Focus on Community Engagement and Experiential Learning.
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Meeting the Student Learning Imperative: Building Powerful Partnerships Between Academic Libraries and Student Services Tami Albin, Lea Currie, Randy Burke.
1 Presentation Ivy Tech Community College Terre Haute, IN Jackie McCracken April 21, 2007.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Introduction to teaching and assessing so students will learn more using learner-centered teaching Phyllis Blumberg Warm-up activity How can instructor’s.
What Everyone Should Know About the Successful K–12 STEM Education Report.
ACHEA Conference July 2002 ‘The Challenge Of Quality for the Higher Education Administrative Professional.’ ACHEA Association of Caribbean Higher Education.
MA course on language teaching and testing February 2015.
Portland State University Division of Student Affairs.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Towards an Integrated Academy: A Teaching and Learning Framework for Carleton University
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration – Initiated in 2003 – Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in Student Development – Part I Student Development Division Meeting SUNY Oneonta May 9, 2008.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
September The Division of Student Affairs provides student learning and leadership opportunities that enhance overall academic, professional and.
Powerful Partnerships: How Student Life & Leadership Collaborates with Faculty to Engage Critical Thinking in Our Underrepresented Students Erin Senack-Daum.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
The Direction and Strategies for Student Affairs Development In main 3 issues:  Internationalization  Research  Quality Assurance System On May 1 st,
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration –Initiated in 2003 –Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
The Scholarship of Civic Engagement Adapted from a presentation by Robert G. Bringle Director, Center for Service and Learning Indiana University-Purdue.
Successful K–12 STEM Education Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Committee on Highly Successful Schools.
Research Findings: Good Practices in Student Retention and the First Year Experience Robert D. Reason Assistant Professor and Research Associate Foundations.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Institutional Effectiveness &. Institutional Effectiveness & Strategic Planning IE & SP Committees have developed a new system that integrates these two.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
College Planning Council 8 June Accreditation Standard 1 Standard 1: The institution demonstrates strong commitment to a mission that emphasizes.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
“PLANNING” CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Elizabeth Noel, PhD Associate Vice President, Research Office of Research and Development.
Onslow County Schools Division of Media and Instructional Technology This presentation was prepared under fair use exemption of the U.S. Copyright Law.
Student Affairs and Services Creating an environment for learning and service.
East Carolina University’s Conceptual Framework for Preparing Education Professionals.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY WEEK California Association of School Psychologists.
Chapters 2, 3, 15 Roles and Responsibilities of the RA RA Good Practices Community Development.
Counseling Critical Support for Student Success. Reflections Love Compassion Passion Student success Student-centered Proactive problem solving.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
TRIO CAREER EXPLORATION: HIGHLINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE Therese Credle Seattle University Student Development Administration Fall 2012.
The Comprehensive Literacy Plan Pennsylvania KeystonestoOpportunity Tom Corbett Governor Ron Tomalis Secretary.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Student Success: Learning & Engagement DIVISIONAL COUNCILS Fall 2010.
CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Student Affairs Assessment Council October 2013 Dr. Barbara Copenhaver-Bailey Assistant Vice President for Student Success.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Successful K–12 STEM Education Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Committee on Highly Successful Schools.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Service-Learning: A pedagogy and scholarship of civic engagement Marie Watkins, Ph. D. Faculty Assembly August 24, 2011.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY WEEK
Learning Without Borders: From Programs to Curricula
University Career Services Committee
2018 ACHA Annual Meeting Washington, DC
NJCU College of Education
Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009
February 21-22, 2018.
Academic Affairs Cluster 28 May 2015
Presentation transcript:

C onceptual Framework A ssumption University May 8-9, hrs. Bancha Saenghiran, f.s.g., Ph.D. Student Affairs

In the student-centered philosophy To assist students with the fulfillment and their full human potential Origin of Student Affairs The shift from viewing colleges as places where instruction takes places to places where learning is fostered. At Present :

International Student Center Information and Career Guidance and Counseling Center Learning Support Center Mental Hygiene and Personality Development Center Professional Ethics (Center for …) Student Activities (Center for …) Student Residence Center Center for Athletics Division for Rights and Discipline, and Student Welfare Activities in 2002

A changing student population, Electronic educational technologies, Accountability for outcomes, Affordability of higher education, and Changing faculty, staff, and student roles. Five Forces of Change

(i) Content-Centered Specialization and professionalization Focus on training Teaching to be delivered in any fashion (ii) Student-Centered Developing an educated citizen Able to earn a living know how to live Mastery of information and good citizenship, ethics, values, and an appreciation for the aesthetic qualities of life. Two Basic Approaches in Education

Student Services Model Student Development Model Student Learning Model Three Models

Student Services Model To support the academic mission To promote learning outside the classroom To provide numerous adjunctive services to maintain the student in the classroom

Student Development Model To represent the maturation process To focus on the development phases Many different theories are used

Student Learning Model To achieve a more integrated or seamless learning experience To establish learning goals or outcomes To assess the success that is achieved Outcomes are related to intentional learning, academic assistance, and enhanced academic climate.

1. Student services model prevails as the predominant functional purpose for student affairs today. 2. Student development model and the student learning model seem to be gaining a place as additions to student affairs campus purpose and practice. 3. As the two newer functions are added the old still needs to be maintained. Observations

1. Divisions of student affairs are accumulating campus responsibilities. 2. Student affairs must review organizational structure and functions to determine the need for reorganization, prioritization of responsibilities, and redirection of resources. 3. Certain student offices are more likely to be involved in learning programs than others. Implications

1. There is a need to find ways to have flexible staffing patterns that will link units and develop coherent programs that serve students in a systemwide, coordinated manner. Recommendations 2. Professionals should receive training in areas represented by the student learning model at levels of importance equal to training in student development and service functions. (to be cont’d)

3. Student affairs staff must establish outcome-based accountability for demonstrating program impact on student success. 4. Student affairs personnel can work to justify their legitimacy. Recommendations (cont.)

The role of student affairs is to create environments and experiences that bring students to discover and conduct knowledge for themselves, to make students members of communities of learners that make discoveries and solve problems. To increase campus opportunities for student learning and to demonstrate learning outcomes.

1. To engage students in active learning. 2. To help students develop coherent values and ethical standards. 3. To set and communicate high expectations for learning. 4. To use systematic inquiry to improve student and institutional performance. 5. To use resources effectively to achieve institutional, missions and goals. 6. To forge educational partnerships that advance student learning. 7. To build supportive and inclusive communities. Seven Principles of Good Practice

1. How student affairs professionals can intentionally create campus conditions that enhance student learning and personal development ? 2. What is the relative importance of student services, student development, and student learning as constructs for practice ? Questions to Pouder 3. How do divisions of student affairs improve student learning and academic success of students ? (to be cont’d)

4. Where do learning opportunities for students emerge within student affairs organization ? 5. What percentage of student affairs resources are devoted to student learning, student development, and student service ? 6. Do you evaluate your programs for effectiveness and measure the learning outcomes you purport to instill in students ?

We value the impact student affairs is making and will make in the future in regard to have student learn, what students learn, and the environment in which learning takes place. Conclusion

1. To understand conceptual framework of student affairs 2. To review the Vision/Mission of AU 3. To select operational model of student affairs 4. To prioritize the points of emphases and activities 5. To design structure... Student Affairs