Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Developing an environmental decision making tool Shelter Centre.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ICT Services Suppliers Briefing Thursday, 17 September 2009.
Advertisements

Embedding Public Engagement Sophie Duncan and Paul Manners National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
Part of the BRE Trust Protecting People, Property and the Planet BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 Key updates from 2011 version Key contact: Sarah McCarrick,
Construction and Demolition Waste Management at UVM
C. Matsungo - Green Star Accredited Professional Capital Projects Management.
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE (TDMI) – GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE ON MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PRESENT AND FUTURE European Conference on Mobility Management.
1 UNGC Module 3 – Session 3 THE UN GLOBAL COMPACT MODULE 3 THE ENVIRONMENTAL PRINCIPLES Session 3: Principle 9.
UNCLASSIFIED Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources Victorian Energy Efficiency Target Forum 16 April 2015 Village Roadshow.
Hill argues green design is essential, regardless of cost. 1.True 2.False.
Green Rating Systems : Intro Rachel MacIntyre, Arkitekt MAA, LEED AP Københavns Kommune Islands Brygge 37 Workshop 22 September, 2010.
The code for sustainable homes in practice. why housing? ● 200,000 new homes per year (CLG 2007) ● 30% of the UK’s CO² emissions ● 55% of timber used.
GREEN DRAGON ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STANDARD Recognising Environmental Management & Tackling Climate Change Across Wales.
BIOMASS FUTURES: Biomass role in achieving the Climate Change & Renewables EU policy targets. Demand and Supply dynamics under the perspective of stakeholders.
 Conservation & Efficiency in Commercial Buildings Is LEED the answer?
Todays Class: First 20 minutes: Introduction to Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Following 20 minutes: Exam.
Basic Building blocks for Developing a Sustainability Program Florida Healthcare Engineering Association September 22, 2010.
The Green Building Act of 2006: Transforming the Market DC Department of Housing and Community Development Prepared by the DC Department of Housing and.
Part of the BRE Trust Protecting People, Property and the Planet BREEAM In-Use: the international sustainability standard for existing buildings – quick,
Advancing environmental sustainability in WHO/PAHO and in the health sector.
INTD 51 human environments assessments. sustainability recap—time frame fashions come and go—designers must be careful to weigh fashion and longevity.
Resource Efficiency Opportunities in the Building Sector
Building Standards NON DOMESTIC SUSTAINABILITY LABELLING WITHIN BUILDING STANDARDS Fraser Walsh May 2012.
Severn Tidal Power Feasibility Study Background to the study Terms of reference announced in January 08 Aim of the study: To enable Government to decide.
SECRET Green Procurement Office of Greening Government Operations May 4, 2006.
PEIP National workshop in Montenegro: developing environmental infrastructure projects in the water sector Feasibility Study Preparation Venelina Varbova.
Shelter Training 08b – Belgium, 16 th –18 th November, 2008 based on content developed by p This session describes the benefits of developing a strategic.
Challenges AND Opportunities in Public and Private Sectors Maria Atkinson Green Building Council of Australia.
Confidencial © 2011 TECNALIA 1 TECNALIA. 2 Tecnalia R&I 1st. Research and Technology Organisation in Spain and 5th. in Europe.
Thriving Communities planning the places we need Adam Beck Manager Sustainable Communities Green Building Council of Australia.
SUSTAINABLE FLORIDA TECH Presented by the Green Campus Group.
3 CERTIFICATIONS AND RATINGS. Slide header copy In This Chapter >Sustainable building certifications and ratings >The decision to pursue a certification.
Developed by the U.S. Green Building Council in 2007U.S. Green Building Council Inspired the creation of the national Green Schools initiative Is the.
Sustainability in Non Domestic Construction By Professor Christopher Gorse – licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – Share Alike.
STRATEGIC DIRECTION UPDATE JANUARY THE VISION AND MISSION THE VISION: ENRICHING LIVES AND CREATING SUCCESSFUL FUTURES. THE MISSION: EDUCATION EXCELLENCE.
The Information Note —Produced by Climate UK in collaboration with the Environment Agency’s Climate Ready Service. —Input from Defra and LEPs. —Designed.
Including Sustainability in the Brief Kate Mills Senior Sustainability Consultant, BRE
Environmental auditing
Green Star – Campus Group Work. Rating tool framework Management Indoor Environment Quality Energy Transport Water Materials Land Use and Ecology Emissions.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Capacity Development for the CDM (CD4CDM) First National Workshop - SURINAM Sustainable Development Impact Evaluation Miriam Hinostroza.
UNDP Handbook for conducting technology needs assessments and Preliminary analysis of countries’ TNAs UNFCCC Seminar on the development and transfer on.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
The Greening of the Rooftop Module 4 Green Building Rating Systems What Are They? How Do They Work?
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
REVISED JUDGING CRITERION: UNDERSTANDING LIVELIHOODS.
1C1 Design of sustainable construction Petr Hájek.
COLBOURNE COLLEGE PRESENTED BY SADEKE SMITH SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
Environmental Association for Universities and Colleges 1 Environmental Association for Universities and Colleges 1 Supporting.
AIPC Annual Conference 2010 – Going Green: is it Worth it? Presented by Martin Jennings, Partner, Davis Langdon LLP Going Green – A UK Perspective.
Going Green Is it Worth it? Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre AIPC July 2010.
Universität Stuttgart | Institut für Bauökonomie | Dipl.-Ing. Maike Buttler Doctoral Session - ERES Conference - June 2009 CASBEE since 2001 DGNB since.
Finite Resources  L eadership in E nergy & E nvironmental D esign  LEED ® was developed by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC).  LEED ®
Chapter 8 - Integrative Process
Green Materials for building construction  Materials or products that Minimize resource use  Materials or products with Low environmental impact  Materials.
Sustainability in Non Domestic Construction By Professor Christopher Gorse – licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – Share Alike.
 Alan Barnard [Company Name] [Submission Title] LAA ENVIRO AWARDS 2010.
International Sustainability Alliance Paris Workshop 4 th December 2009.
BREEAM 2008 Update Ama Ndukwe BRE Global, Sustainability Group.
Planning for LEED ® © 2010 Project Lead The Way, Inc.Civil Engineering and Architecture Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design LEED ® and its related.
Green Building Certification Systems for Existing Buildings John Park, PE, CEM, CSDP Dept of Veterans Affairs June, 2009.
Projects, Events and Training
Objectives of a Green Building
Liz de Chastel National Policy Co-ordinator
8/22/2016 Dipl.Eng.M.Sc Architect LEED AP BD+C, PQP.
Pics from trips Alan Pears AM
Cañada College Sustainability Plan Past… Process/Structure…Goals..
INTD409 Interior Environmental Technology Fall 2016/17
LEED 2.2 for New Construction LEED 2.0 for Existing Buildings
C3 Design of sustainable construction
Cañada College Sustainability Plan Past… Process/Structure…Goals..
Presentation transcript:

Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Developing an environmental decision making tool Shelter Centre and the Norwegian Refugee Council

Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 3 Phase 1 & 2 Key findings Next steps Feedback Environmental Assessment Tools Development of an online tool What have we found? What others have to say Where now?

Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 1 & 2 Environmental Assessment Tools

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Phase 1 & 2 Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 1 & 2 Phase 1 Research BREEAM and LEED Draw comparisons Assess suitability for humanitarian shelter sector

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Phase 1 & 2 Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 1 & 2 Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) –First EAT –UK developed, 1990 –Allows comparison of buildings –Green Building Challenge, 1996 –Based on 10 criteria

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Phase 1 & 2 Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 1 & 2 6.Materials 7.Pollution 8.Transport 9.Waste 10.Water BREEAM Criteria 1.Energy 2.Indoor environment 3.Innovation 4.Land use and ecology 5.Management

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Phase 1 & 2 Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 1 & 2 Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) –US based, developed –Most widely recognised –Designed for hot climates with air conditioning –Used in all US states –Based on 10 categories

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Phase 1 & 2 Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 1 & 2 6.Materials 7.Regional priority 8.Resources 9.Site 10.Water LEED Criteria 1.Awareness and education 2.Energy 3.Indoor environment 4.Innovation 5.Locations and linkages

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Phase 1 & 2 Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 1 & 2 LEED 1.LEED assessor separate  USGBC 2.ASHRAE standards 3.Rewards on improvements BREEAM 1.Trained BREEAM assessor is architect  BRE 2.UK/EU regulations 3.Absolute benchmarks

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Phase 1 & 2 Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 1 & 2 Phase 2 –Research and compare EATs 18 found in total With 29 different categories –Assess suitability for humanitarian sector

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Phase 1 & 2 Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 1 & 2 10.EEWH – 7 11.Estidama – 7 12.GBCS – 7 13.BEAM – 6 14.DGNB – 6 15.GRIHA – 6 16.Green Mark – 5 17.HQE – 3 18.Minergie – 3 18 EATs sorted by number of criteria 1.Aspire – 12 2.BREEAM – 10 3.LEED – 10 4.CASBEE – 9 5.Green Star – 9 6.SI-5281 – 9 7.Green Globes – 8 8.LiderA – Star – 7

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Phase 1 & 2 Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 1 & 2 16.Awareness and education Culture Sustainable use Institutional enablers Off-site environment Pollution Preference items (strategic targets) Processes Quality of service Regional priority (extra weight given to existing criteria) Soil water content Sustainable construction Techniques Vulnerability different criteria sorted by frequency 1.Indoor environment quality Energy Water Materials Environmental management Land use and ecology Innovation Site CO 2 emission reduction Management Resources Transport Waste Locations and linkages Socioeconomic experience - 3

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Phase 1 & 2 Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 1 & 2 16.Awareness and education Culture Sustainable use Institutional enablers Off-site environment Pollution Preference items (strategic targets) Processes Quality of service Regional priority (extra weight given to existing criteria) Soil water content Sustainable construction Techniques Vulnerability different criteria sorted by frequency 1.Indoor environment quality Energy Water Materials Environmental management Land use and ecology Innovation Site CO 2 emission reduction Management Resources Transport Waste Locations and linkages Socioeconomic experience - 3

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Phase 1 & 2 Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 1 & 2 Indoor environment quality; Energy; Water; Materials; Environmental management; and Land use and ecology.

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Phase 1 & 2 Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 1 & 2 Findings of comparison –Regionally specific tools –Generally comprehensive thus complex –Centralised method of certification

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Phase 1 & 2 Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 1 & 2 Outcomes of Phase 1 & 2 –Is another tool feasible with limited time and money; and available skills and human resources? –Is a framework assessment tool the best direction for us?

Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 3 Development of an online tool

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 3 Compliance or education?

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 3 Compliance –Accrediting institute –Training of assessors –Support of sector –Regionally specific

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 3 Education –Tool to assist decisions – develop –Large body of vocational and academic knowledge – already available –Tool to assess results – available –Education and training material – available

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 3 Education –Tool to assist decisions – develop –Large body of vocational and academic knowledge – already available –Tool to assess results – available –Education and training material – available

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 3

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Phase 3 From EAT research Top criteria: Indoor environment quality; Energy; Water; Materials; Environmental management; and Land use and ecology.

Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Key findings What have we found?

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Key findings Direct reliance on local environment Understand decisions of affected people Good programming requires training Focus on continuous resource needs

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Key findings Questions we have –How best to market this concept? –How to include complexities of environment? –When to realistically involve this?

Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Feedback What others have to say

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Feedback Generally positive Needs to be more specific to: –be obvious it’s about shelter; and –define a decision making process.

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Feedback “an endless list of all things I could do if I had bottomless buckets of money”

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Feedback Focus on the local environment –Maintain or improve? –Increase resilience –Ensure humanitarian imperative –Support income generation

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Feedback Still collating feedback Feel free to use computers

Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Next steps Where now?

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Next steps Development of site –Where will this be hosted? –What system to use – Drupal, Wordpress, etc? –Refine usability and navigation

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Next steps Decision making tree(s) –Further research –Consultation –Method of presentation?

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Next steps Collaboration –Assessment tool creators –Training providers –Development sector

Phase 1 & 2 Phase 3 Key findings Feedback Next steps Thursday 24 th May 2012Shelter Meeting 12a Day 1 is hosted by the Norwegian Refugee Council Next steps Discussion –Challenges –Benefits –Opportunities