LP&R Seminar| pag. 1 Are career break leaves a solution for the time squeeze? Time use comparisons of men and women with a different work load Jessie Vandeweyer.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Collecting data on Care-giving and Unpaid work Heather Dryburgh Statistics Canada.

Advertisements

LABOUR FORCE SURVEY The aim is to show that only an integrated approach to these data makes the contribution of Italian women to the economy more visible.

Division of Domestic Labour and Women s Human Capital ESRC Gender Equality Network Project 4: Gender, Time Allocation and the Wage Gap Jonathan Gershuny.

The Household Division of Labour Changes in Families Allocation of Paid and Unpaid Work ESRC Gender Equality Network 6 th December 2005 Susan Harkness.

The parenthood effect: what explains the increase in gender inequality when British couples become parents? Pia Schober London School of Economics.

Pia Schober London School of Economics

Researching the gender division of unpaid domestic work: practices, relationships, negotiations, and meanings. CCSR/ISC Seminar series at Manchester University.

THE RISE (AND RISE) OF THE WORK-LIFE ISSUE: WHAT WE KNOW AND WHY WE NEED A BROADER VIEW Paul Blyton.

Work-life balance as a condition of equal participation of women and men in the labour market November 11, 2013, Vilnius Ms Virginija LANGBAKK Director.

Living Single: The Effects of Domestic Capital Investments On Men’s Domestic Labor Participation Richard N Pitt, Jr. Vanderbilt University Department of.

22/04/ Logroño, La Rioja 24 March 2014 Promoting work-life balance across the EU Logroño, La Rioja 24 March 2014 Robert Anderson Eurofound.

Economic advantage and disadvantage: women in Australia Presentation to the National Council of Women of Australia Dr Marcia Keegan Research Fellow, National.

WORKSHOP AGIR HELSINKI JUNE 12-13, 2003 AGIR WP3: Determinants of retirement J. MESTDAGH – M. LAMBRECHT Federal Planning Bureau Economic Analysis & Forecasts.

UNECE Gender Statistics Session, October Dissemination and Use of Time Use Data The New Zealand Experience UNECE Gender Statistics Session Geneva,

The Issue of Work-Life Balance in Bulgaria Siyka Kovacheva University of Plovdiv Bulgaria.

PRESENTATION FOR THE 8 TH MEETING FOR THE SOCIOLOGICAL AND DEMOGRAPHIC STUDIES OF DIVORCE OCTOBER 2010 VALENCIA – SPAIN ELIEN COLMAN, SARA SYMOENS.

Integrating a Gender Perspective into Time Use Statistics.

Combining the strengths of UMIST and The Victoria University of Manchester An analysis of the relationship between time spent on active leisure and educational.

Harmonised European Time Use Studies (HETUS) Setting the Trend for Cross-National European Time Use Research a poster presentation by Dr. Kimberly Fisher.

31/10/ Benefits of being a Member Ambition without future? Ambition without future Obstacles and incentives in the scientific careers of men and.

Articulating Work and Family in Belgium : a Gendered Use of Institutional Measures Bernard Fusulier Université catholique de Louvain

Centre for Social Policy (University of Antwerp) 1 Parental time allocation: A European Overview Joris Ghysels (University of Antwerp)

The Characteristics of Employed Female Caregivers and their Work Experience History Sheri Sharareh Craig Alfred O. Gottschalck U.S. Census Bureau Housing.

Married Parents’ Time Use at Home, at Play, and with Children: Variations by Labor Force Status Ariel Kalil, Ph.D. and Kathleen M. Ziol-Guest, Ph.D. Harris.

WOMEN FACULTY AND THE SOCIAL–CULTURAL NEXUS IN HIGHER EDUCATION Karla A. Henderson, North Carolina State University To examine the social- cultural nexus.

Barriers to women’s labour force participation AUSTRALIA.

A helping hand: Analyzing time use and travel in three-generation households Kelcie M. Ralph Michael J. Smart Brian D. Taylor.

Balancing work and family responsibilities in New Zealand Associate Professor Annick Masselot Hornby Rotary Club - 26 November 2014.

STATISTICSSTATISTIQUECANADA Aboriginal Labour Force Survey Province of Alberta.

The experience of the parental leave system in Iceland Norsk kvinnesaksforening - fagseminar Oslo February 3, 2009 Svala Jónsdóttir Centre for Gender Equality.

Trends in Employment How many hours weekly do we work for pay?

Child Care and Children with Special Needs Challenges for Low-income Families.

Full Time Employment A full time employee generally works five days a week. Employment is often permanent. The amount of hours worked by the average full.

CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: TIME MANAGEMENT AND PERCEPTION OF STRESS Elsa Fontainha ISEG – Technical University of Lisbon – Portugal 3 rd International Conference.

1 Work-Life Balance at the ILO Survey Results February, 2010 STAFF UNION.

31/10/ Benefits of being a Member Ambition without future? Ambition without future Obstacles and incentives in the scientific careers of men and.

Predictors of Work-life Balance for Women Entrepreneurs in the North- East Region of Romania Dan Dumitru Ionescu, PhD Candidate Alina Măriuca Ionescu,

 Increasing age was associated with more time in sleep & leisure, & less in productive activity.  Females averaged less time in leisure & more time in.

Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Statistical Office FSO Balancing family and work in everyday life: a European comparison Dr. Katja Branger.

Lesson Starter. What does this picture say about the state of the media and politics in Britain?

1 STATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Time use survey in Serbia.

1 STATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Time Use Survey in Serbia Workshop on gender statistics.

TIME USE SURVEY Seminar on Time Use Surveys Brussels, 12 October 2006 SEMINAR ON TIME USE SURVEYS Brussels, 12 October 2006.

Comparative gender inequality Week 20 Comparative Sociology.

2010 GLA Women’s Economic Empowerment Empowering Women with Information Tuesday, October 5, :30 pm ET / 11:30 am CT JOIN THE CALL: (866)

Global Forum on Gender Statistics, Manila, Philippines, October, 2010 中华人民共和国国家统计局中华人民共和国国家统计局中华人民共和国国家统计局中华人民共和国国家统计局 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS.

Welfare Reform TANF Work Requirements and the Family.

How much should we work? Working hours, holidays and working life: the participation challenge Committee for Economic Development of Australia Hilton Hotel,

Balancing work and non-working life Alona Shemesh Labour Division, Central Bureau of Statistics, Jerusalem, Israel June 2008.

Time Use Statistics Workshop for Arabic Speaking Countries 25 – 28 April 2011, Amman, Jordan Time Use Statistics in the Context of Social Statistics.

Felicia Yang DeLeone, Institute for Children, Poverty and Homelessness Dona Anderson, Homes for the Homeless November 7, 2011 Child Care Use in Homeless.

Session III. Emerging issues in gender statistics “Time Use in Australia” Carolyn Ashley Australian Bureau of Statistics UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics.

Flexibility in a tough environment Department of Commerce Seminar Western Australia Alexander Library Theatre, State Library Building Perth Cultural Centre.

Pacific Region Workshop on Gender Statistics 4 – 6 August 2014, Nadi, Fiji United Nations Statistics Division Time Use and the International Classification.

Oxana Sinyavskaya, High School of Economics (Moscow) Use of Parental leave policies in the Russian Federation 11th.

WORKSHOP AGIR THE HAGUE FEBRUARY RESULTS FOR BELGIUM – WP2 J. MESTDAGH – M. LAMBRECHT Federal Planning Bureau Economic Analysis & Forecasts.

Department of Sociology University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742

Work-life balance as a condition of equal participation of women and men in the labour market November 11, 2013, Vilnius Ms Virginija LANGBAKK Director.

1 GENDER STATISTICS BY LIFE CYCLE STAGES IN ROMANIAN TIME USE SURVEY SEMINAR ON TIME USE SURVEYS (TUS) 12 OCTOBER 2006, BRUSSELS, BELGIUM DG Employment,

Busy Families in ‘Merica By: Catherine Wilbourne.

Modern Labour Economics Chapter 7 Labour Supply: Household Production, the Family, and the Life Cycle.

WomenMen Weekly hours worked by partnered men and women aged Australia 1982, and : by percentiles of men’s earnings Source: ABS income.

by The McGraw-Hill Group of Companies Inc. All rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin W ORK AND H OME CHAPTER 11.

Comparing a 2 and 7 day registration diary in time-use research Evaluating the EUROSTAT guidelines Contact:

DUAL CAREERS AND MAINTAINING RELATIONSHIPS DUAL CAREERS AND MAINTAINING RELATIONSHIPS.

Retention and Recruitment in the Hospital sector A Framework of Actions Concluded by EPSU and HOSPEEM here: the challenge of better work / life balance.

MODERN LABOR ECONOMICS THEORY AND PUBLIC POLICY CHAPTER Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy, Eleventh Edition Ronald G. Ehrenberg Robert S.

Work life balance in Norway: Present situation and future challenges Subject to changes Liss Schanke, KS

“Women’s Daily Life in San Isidro, Cuba: Time-Space Patterns in a Culture of Resistance.” By: Catherine Krull and Audrey Kobayashi Queen’s University This.

Balance Work and Family Life

Presentation transcript:

LP&R Seminar| pag. 1 Are career break leaves a solution for the time squeeze? Time use comparisons of men and women with a different work load Jessie Vandeweyer Department of Sociology Research Group TOR

LP&R Seminar | pag. 2 Presentation Data Who? Why? Time Use? Work/Life balance? Time Pressure?

LP&R Seminar | pag. 3 Presentation Total< 50-years Women9,0%7,3% Men2,9%1,1% Percentage of employed persons with career break (Flemish community – 2004)

LP&R Seminar | pag. 4 Data Working men/women Men/Women with career break Survey on career break Data collection: UA Flemish people with career break from years Full time ~ Part time / Men ~ Women Selection respondents with time use diary Time Use Survey TOR’04 Data collection: VUB Flemish people years Selection of full time working men and full/part time working women, years

LP&R Seminar | pag. 5 Time Use Data Fieldwork : 15 april - 30 october 2004 (six week interruption during summer) 7 day - diaries What? When? Where? With whom? Travel mode? Motivation? Questionnaires Representative data: weighted

LP&R Seminar | pag. 6 Research Groups Men with career break ↔ working men Women with career break ↔ working women

LP&R Seminar | pag. 7 Groups of men Full time working (n=434) Part time break (n=188) Full time break (n=108) - 20u41’ per week: paid work -54% participates in paid work -Full time break (paid work) (n=50) –Full time break (no paid work activities) (n=58)

LP&R Seminar | pag. 8 Groups of men Full time working (paid work: 39h24’) Part time break (paid work: 27h27’) Full time break (no paid work activities)

LP&R Seminar | pag. 9 Background Variables - Men Average age: 37 years PT break older (av.: 40 years) Educational level: no differences Family status: –PT break: 76% partner and children –Working: 55% –FT break: 40%

LP&R Seminar | pag. 10 Motivation? Men

LP&R Seminar | pag. 11 Time use – Total workload Men hours per week

LP&R Seminar | pag. 12 Time use - Total workload Men hours per week

LP&R Seminar | pag. 13 Time use – Personal care Men Hours per week

LP&R Seminar | pag. 14 Time use – Education Men Hours per week

LP&R Seminar | pag. 15 Time use – Leisure Men Hours per week

LP&R Seminar | pag. 16 Time use - Social participation Men Hours per week

LP&R Seminar | pag. 17 Free Time - Social Participation Men hours per week

LP&R Seminar | pag. 18 Time Use – Travel Men Hours per week

LP&R Seminar | pag. 19 Allocation reduced working time to other activities (compared to FT work) Men Part time break: 11h57’ Full time break: 39h01’ Full time break: fathers: 39h01’

LP&R Seminar | pag. 20 Time pressure Men

LP&R Seminar | pag. 21 Groups of women Full time working (n=229) Part time working (n=173) Part time break (n=179) Full time break (n=133)

LP&R Seminar | pag. 22 Groups of women Full time working (paid work: 35h04’) Part time working (paid work: 24h05’) Part time break (paid work: 22h05’) Full time break (no paid work activities)

LP&R Seminar | pag. 23 Background Variables - Women Average age: 36 years FT work younger (av.: 34 years) Educational level: –PT break: 60% higher educated –FT work/ FT break: 49%/45% higher educated –PT work: 35% higher educated Family status: –FT work: 47% partner and children –PT work/ PT break/FT break: >80% partner and children

LP&R Seminar | pag. 24 Motivation? Women

LP&R Seminar | pag. 25 Time use – Total workload Women hours per week

LP&R Seminar | pag. 26 Time use - Total workload Women hours per week

LP&R Seminar | pag. 27 Time use – Personal care Women Hours per week

LP&R Seminar | pag. 28 Time use – Education Women Hours per week

LP&R Seminar | pag. 29 Time use – Leisure Women Hours per week

LP&R Seminar | pag. 30 Time use - Social participation Women Hours per week

LP&R Seminar | pag. 31 Free Time - Social Participation Women hours per week

LP&R Seminar | pag. 32 Time Use - Travel Hours per week

LP&R Seminar | pag. 33 Allocation reduced working time to other activities (compared to FT work) Women Part time break: 12h59’ Full time break: 34h57’

LP&R Seminar | pag. 34 Allocation reduced working time to other activities (compared to FT work) Mothers Part time break: 14h12’ Full time break: 36h

LP&R Seminar | pag. 35 Time pressure Women

LP&R Seminar | pag. 36 Summary Men Men with FT break (not working) 40% with partner and children Reason for break: - 29% ‘study’ - 28% ‘children’ - 24% ‘unsatisfied about job’ Most free time and lowest total workload Reduced working time allocated for 43% to household tasks & childcare –Fathers with full time break: 74% to household tasks & childcare  FT break can be catalysator for a better combination of work and family life/ reduces the feelings of time pressure

LP&R Seminar | pag. 37 Summary Men Men with part time break 76% with partner and children Reason for break: - 50% ‘children’ and 22% ‘domestic work’ - 32% ‘more leisure time’ and 23% ‘more time for myself’ Total workload = full time working men: less paid work = more domestic work and childcare Reduced working time allocated for 84% to household tasks & childcare  PT break effectively measure for better combination of work and family life/ reduces the feelings of time pressure

LP&R Seminar | pag. 38 Summary Women Women with FT break (not working) 90% with partner and children Reason for break: - 74% ‘children’ - 16% ‘domestic work’ lowest total workload, but huge amount spent on domestic work and childcare Reduced working time allocated for 80% to household tasks & childcare –Mothers with full time break: 64% to household tasks & childcare, more time for personal care and social contacts than working mothers  FT break is chosen to facilitate the care for home/children and reduces subjective time pressure

LP&R Seminar | pag. 39 Summary Women Women with part time break 84% with partner and children Reason for break: - 73% ‘children’ and 41% ‘domestic work’ - 38% ‘more time for myself’ Total workload = full time working women: less paid work = more domestic work and childcare Reduced working time allocated for 90% to household tasks & childcare –Mothers with full time break: 53% to household tasks & childcare, more time for personal care and social contacts than working mothers  PT break is chosen to facilitate the care for home/children and reduces subjective time pressure