Introduction to the Common Electrical Interface (CEI)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Steve Joiner, Technical Committee Chair John McDonough, Member OIF Board of Directors Optical Internetworking Forum.
Advertisements

ROD R&D Status K. Johns, C. Armijo, J. Steinberg (U. Arizona) H. Chen, F. Lanni, J. Mead (BNL) L. Hervas (CERN) A. Meyer, A. Kielburg-Jeka, A. Straessner.
PeterJ Slide 1 Sep 4, B/10B Coding 64B/66B Coding 1.Transmission Systems 2.8B/10B Coding 3.64B/66B Coding 4.CIP Demonstrator Test Setup.
Optical Transceivers: Evaluation of Commercial Optical TRx Luis Amaral CERN – PH/ESE/BE – Opto 10/04/
11/27/2007ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop Mike Neubauer 1 RF Power and Cooling Requirements Overview from “Main Linac Power and Cooling Information”
[ 1 ] LVDS links Servizio Elettronico Laboratori Frascati INFN - Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati G. Felici LVDS links.
New ADSL2 Standards Which delivers improved rate and reach performance, advanced diagnostics capabilities, standby modes, and more to broadband designers.
Gigabit Ethernet Group 1 Harsh Sopory Kaushik Narayanan Nafeez Bin Taher.
September 20, 2002G2E 2002 GSA Technical Forum1 Best Of Breed (BOB) Standard.
E-link IP for FE ASICs VFAT3/GdSP ASIC design meeting 19/07/2011.
Versatile Link System Status Report Annie Xiang on behalf of WP1.1 Group SMU Physics March, 2010 ____________________________.
OIF SFI-5 40G Transponder Big Bear Networks OFC 2003.
Test equipment for physical layer conformance testing of parallel buses exemplified for SFI-4/5 Interoperability Working Group OFC Atlanta, March 23-28,
Group/Presentation Title Agilent Restricted Month ##, 200X Agilent N5431A XAUI Electrical Validation Application Fast and Accurate XAUI Validation with.
Communication Systems Simulation - I Harri Saarnisaari Part of Simulations and Tools for Telecommunication Course.
ROD R&D Status K. Johns, C. Armijo, J. Steinberg (U. Arizona) H. Chen, F. Lanni, J. Mead (BNL) L. Hervas (CERN) A. Meyer, A. Kielburg-Jeka, A. Straessner.
Introduction. 2 What Is SmartFlow? SmartFlow is the first application to test QoS and analyze the performance and behavior of the new breed of policy-based.
Interface circuits I/O interface consists of the circuitry required to connect an I/O device to a computer bus. Side of the interface which connects to.
Local Asynchronous Communications. Bit-wise data transmission Data transmission requires: Encoding bits as energy Transmitting energy through medium Decoding.
The Limits of Switch Bandwidth
March, 2013 Presenting: Avner Badihi TECHNOLOGY&MANUFACTURING XLoom Proprietary and Confidential 120GB-300Gb Optical Interconnect Solutions for Optical.
DesignCon 2004 Introducing the OIF Common Electrical I/O Project.
Peripheral Busses COMP Jamie Curtis. PC Busses ISA is the first generation bus 8 bit on IBM XT 16 bit on 286 or above (16MB/s) Extended through.
May 8, USB 2.0 Electrical Overview Jon Lueker Intel Corporation.
PeterJ Slide 1 Sep 4, B/10B Coding 64B/66B Coding 1.Transmission Systems 2.8B/10B Coding 3.64B/66B Coding 4.CIP Demonstrator Test Setup.
Modern Trends in Backplane Interconnection By Ken Uemura.
Gigabit Ethernet – IEEE 802.3z The Choice of a New Generation ECE 4006c G2- Gigabit Ethernet Intel/Agilent TX Javier Alvarez, gte006r Astou Thiongane,
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING1 Introduction. Software Software (IEEE): collection of programs, procedures, rules, and associated documentation and data SOFTWARE.
Doc.: IEEE /1153r2 Submission November 2009 Carlos Cordeiro, IntelSlide 1 Motivation and Requirements on 60 GHz Beamforming Date: Authors:
DEVICES AND COMMUNICATION BUSES FOR DEVICES NETWORK
Fen Hou and Pin-Han Ho Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario Wireless Communications and Mobile.
SRS DIGITAL C-CARD. TEST AND APPLICATIONS Mihai Cuciuc.
Physical Layer Update – EWG Presenting: Ian Colloff, EWG.
Multi Level, Multi Transition & Block Codes
Testing OIF Optical and Electrical Implementation Agreements Gary Goncher Tektronix, Inc.
Work at OIF on Interfaces for Optical Modules including Very Short Reach (VSR) and Electrical Interfaces Raj Savara Network Elements Inc.
High Speed Interconnect Solutions HIROSE ELECTRIC IT3-32mm SI Report Three-Piece Mezzanine Connector for 20+ Gbps Applications October 29, 2009.
Developing fast clock source with deterministic jitter Final review – Part A Yulia Okunev Supervisor -Yossi Hipsh HS-DSL Laboratory, Dept. of Electrical.
OIF Electrical Interfaces SXI-5 and TFI-5 Tom Palkert Applied Micro Circuits Corporation (AMCC)
Evaluation of Multi-Gbps Optical Transceivers for Use in Future HEP Experiments Luis Amaral CERN – PH/ESE/BE – Opto 16/09/2008.
BTeV Pixel Detector Optical link receiver chip Data In and Out project.
Vertical Optimization Of Data Transmission For Mobile Wireless Terminals MICHAEL METHFESSEL, KAI F. DOMBROWSKI, PETER LANGENDORFER, HORST FRANKENFELDT,
ECE 135 Final Presentation The Three … aka Pat Cleary with Kevin Parker & Bryan Chavez April 21 st, 2005 April 21 st, 2005.
12006 MAPLD International ConferenceSpaceWire 101 Seminar SpaceWire Physical Layer Issues 2006 MAPLD International Conference Washington, D.C. September.
Advancing Optics with Physical & Link Layer Interoperability Steve Joiner OIF Technical Committee Chair Ignis Optics
1 Programming of FPGA in LiCAS ADC for Continuous Data Readout Week 5 Report Tuesday 29 th July 2008 Jack Hickish.
Interoperability Testing. Work done so far WSDL subgroup Generated Web Service Description with aim for maximum interoperability between various SOAP.
J.Ye / SMU Sept.4, 2007 Joint ATLAS CMS Opto-electronics working group, subgroup C 1 Report from sub-group C, Optical Link Evaluation Criteria and Test.
A Survey on Interlaken Protocol for Network Applications Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan,
Tom Afferton Member of OIF Board of Directors Division Manager – AT&T Labs OIF Website:
Queuing Delay 1. Access Delay Some protocols require a sender to “gain access” to the channel –The channel is shared and some time is used trying to determine.
OIF 10Gbps Electrical Interfaces Tom Palkert AMCC Supercomm 2003.
J. Ye SMU Joint ATLAS-CMS Opto-electronics working group, April 10-11, 2008 CERN 1 Test Results on LOC1 and Design considerations for LOC2 LOC1 test results:
Update on Optical Fibre issues Rainer Schwemmer. Key figures Minimum required bandwidth: 32 Tbit/s –# of 100 Gigabit/s links > 320, # of 40 Gigabit/s.
LOCld – The fastest VCSEL driver in optical link for ATLAS Futian Liang USTC-IHEP, May. 3 rd, 2013.
FEC framing and delineation Frank Effenberger Huawei Technologies, US Dec. 5, 2006.
IEEE 1394b Real-Time Systems Lab. 박 준 호. Real Time Systems Lab. Contents IEEE 1394 Overview IEEE 1394 Specifications P1394a, P1394b, P1394.1, OHCI IEEE.
Jitter and BER measurements on the CuOF prototype G. Dellacasa, G. Mazza – INFN Torino CMS Muom Barrel Workshop CERN, February 25th, 2011.
Status and Plans for Xilinx Development
Trigger Gigabit Serial Data Transfer Walter Miller Professor David Doughty CNU October 4, 2007.
Gigabit Ethernet – IEEE 802.3z The Choice of a New Generation Design Presentation ECE 4006c G2- Gigabit Ethernet Intel/Agilent TX Javier Alvarez, gte006r.
Testing PCI Express Generation 1 & 2 with the RTO Oscilloscope
SpaceFibre Physical Layer Testing
Calorimeter Mu2e Development electronics Front-end Review
Gigabit Ethernet An Affordable Solution
Impact of Serializer/Deserializer Architecture on ETD High-Speed Links
SAS-3 Transmitter Training Review
SAS-3 Transmitter Training Review
RS-422 Interface.
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to the Common Electrical Interface (CEI) July 2006 Introduction to the Common Electrical Interface (CEI) Graeme Boyd PMC-Sierra why@pmc-sierra.com

Agenda What is CEI? Related OIF Interfaces or Protocols CEI Electrical Interfaces Some CEI Restrictions CEI Compliance Strategy CEI Futures

What is CEI? (1 of 5) CEI A faster electrical interface is required to provide higher density and/or lower cost interfaces for payloads of 10Gbps and higher, including SERDES to Framer Interface (SFI), System Packet Interface (SPI), TDM-Fabric to Framer Interface (TFI). Electrical and jitter specifications for future interfaces including SFI, SPI and TFI for OIF as well as for other interfaces unrelated to OIF (examples could include Serial Rapid IO, SAS, Ethernet, etc). It does not contain any protocol implementations (that is contained within the OIF’s CEI-P document or within other standards). Release 2.0 is available for free download at http://www.oiforum.com/public/impagreements.html

What is CEI? (2 of 5) Jitter and interoperability Methodology OIF-CEI-02.0 is the latest publicly available version which contains: Jitter and interoperability Methodology SxI-5, SFI-4.2, SFI-5.1, SPI-5.1 & TFI-5: Compliance information only (the real specifications can be found here) CEI-6G-SR: Data lane(s) that support bit rates from 4.976 to 6.375Gbps over a 20cm link on a PCB with up to one connector CEI-6G-LR: Data lane(s) that support bit rates from 4.976 to 6.375Gbps over a 1m link on a PCB with up to two connectors CEI-11G-SR: Data lane(s) that support bit rates from 9.95 to 11.1Gbps over a 20cm link on a PCB with up to one connector CEI-11G-MR: Data lane(s) that support bit rates from 9.95 to 11.1Gbps over a 60cm link on a PCB with up to two connectors CEI-11G-LR: Data lane(s) that support bit rates from 9.95 to 11.1Gbps over a 1m link on a PCB with up to two connectors

What is CEI? (3 of 5) CEI shall define the applicable data characteristics e.g. DC balance, transition density, maximum run length CEI shall define channel models and compliance points CEI shall not: Define the pin assignments or select a specific connector Define a management interface CEI shall allow both single and multi-lane applications CEI shall support AC coupling & hot plug CEI shall achieve a BER of better than 10-15 per lane (with the test requirement of 10-12 per lane)

What is CEI? (4 of 5) Short & long reach links should interoperate under 20cm CEI-11G-SR links shall be capable of supporting SONET/SDH compliance at the optical carrier (OC) interface Also compatible with XFI links within the XFP specification CEI-6G-LR links shall accommodate legacy IEEE 802.3 XAUI and TFI-5 compliant backplanes. The primary focus of the CEI-11G-LR links will be for non-legacy applications Optimized for overall cost-effective system performance including total power dissipation

What is CEI? (5 of 5) SR: 0 – 20cm (6G & 11G) MR: 0 – 60cm (11G only) LR: 0 – 1m (6G & 11G) 6G: 4.976 – 6.375Gbps 11G: 9.95 – 11.10Gbps Does specify Channel Models Run Length Compliance points Jitter DC Balance BER Transition Density Coupling Interoperability Hot Plug Does not specify Lane Count Pinout Connector Types Protocol Management Interface Power Supplies Mechanical / Form Factor

Related OIF Interfaces or Protocols SxI-5 2.5-3.125Gbps electrical specification that uses the compliance part of CEI SFI-4.2 A multi-lane 2.5-3.125Gps link that uses the compliance part of CEI SFI-5.1 SPI-5.1 TFI-5 SFI-5.2 (In progress) A multi-lane link that uses CEI-11G-SR TDM-P (In progress) A protocol that can be used on top of CEI-6G-LR (next generation TFI-5 link) CEI-P A protocol that can be used on top of CEI-6G or CEI-11G SPI-S (In progress) A multi-lane link that can be used on top of CEI-6G or CEI-11G CEI-25G (In progress) A 25G electrical link (once done will go into OIF-CEI-03.0) SLA (Just starting)

Possible CEI Electrical Interfaces

Some CEI Restrictions (1 of 2) Average transition density and average DC balance needs to converge to over a 30,000 bit period with a probability of at least one minus the BER ratio Probability of run lengths over 10 to be proportional to 2-N for N-like bits in a row (N10). Hence, a run length of 40 bits would occur with a max probability of 2-40. If a fixed block coding scheme is used (e.g. 8B/10B), the input data must be either be scrambled before coding or the coded data must be scrambled prior to transmission This will prevent input data creating killer patterns (e.g. CJPAT patterns)

Some CEI Restrictions (2 of 2) The ground difference between the driver and the receiver shall be within ±50mV for SR links and ±100mV for MR & LR links Each connector is budgeted 50mV Both driver and receiver lane-to-lane skew are each allowed up to 500ps. Higher protocol layers must allow for this additional (1ns) skew. SR links have a standard open eye at the receiver, but for MR & LR links the eye maybe closed at the receiver hence requiring receiver equalization

CEI Compliance Strategy [1 of 3] Rather than specifying materials, channel components, or configurations, the CEI specification focuses on effective channel characteristics Hence a short length of poorer material should be equivalent to a longer length of premium material. A ‘length’ is effectively defined in terms of its attenuation rather than its physical length. CEI compliance method defines: Transmitter compliance in terms of eye masks, output jitter and certain emphasis abilities Channel compliance uses worst case transmitter design and a “ideal reference receiver” Receiver compliance must tolerate any compliant transmitter and channel

CEI Compliance Strategy [2 of 3] For SR links CEI has chosen to specify the transmitter and receiver. This then implies what are compliment channels. Similar to most other SERDES standards, except that CEI is using statistical eye’s (due to BER requirements). The Tx and channel compliance are done using a tool that OIF developed called StatEye. Open Eye at Rx pins Eye plot curtsy of Molex

CEI Compliance Strategy [3 of 3] As both MR and LR links can have a closed eye at the receiver, CEI has chosen to move the “receiver” spec point to after an “ideal receive equalizer”. Thus specifying the transmitter and compliment channels while implying the receiver spec. So however the real receiver is implemented it needs to be equivalent or better than the “ideal reference equalizer”. The Tx and channel compliance are done using a tool that OIF developed called StatEye. Eye completely closed at Rx pins Open Eye after EQ Eye plots curtsy of Molex

CEI Futures The OIF is currently working on updates for OIF-CEI-02.0 Editorial changes, clarifications, etc The OIF is also working on new clauses (for example CEI-20G) for future links.

It is the mission of the OIF to support the industry by sharing the results of its efforts with other organizations.

Thank You!