Lewiston Porter PEC Standards- Based Report Card Grades K-3 Report Card Committee Members: Heidi Kazulak, Suzanne Hedemann, Lisa Winslow, Kelly Millville,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TheStandards-Based Report Card Adopted & Modified by The Office of Early NH DOE January 31, 2013 From: Lexington Public Schools K5, Lexington.
Advertisements

Parkland School Division
Informational Parent Meeting Cedar Hill School October 22, 2013.
Digging Deeper Into the K-5 ELA Standards College and Career Ready Standards Implementation Team Quarterly – Session 2.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Department of Assessment, Curriculum, and Instruction Kahle Charles, Director of Curriculum.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
© 2005 Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy 1 Illinois Learning Standards Information from
Standards-based Instruction and Assessment Ohio State ABLE Director’s Meeting October 29, 2002 Presenter: Mahna Schwager, PhD WestEd.
Fremont Unified School District An Informational Session for Families August 2015 Standards-Based Report Cards.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
English Language Learners and Standards-based Education in Massachusetts.
Keystone State Reading Conference October 29, 2012 Dr. Deb Carr, King’s College.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
Literacy in the Mathematics Classroom District Learning Day August 5, 2015.
Principles of Assessment
Adapted from Growing Success (Ontario Schools) by K. Gibson
June 19 th – PLC Day June 19 th – PLC Day Year In Review – Year In Preview District Road Map District Road Map TPEP Early Release Collaboration Early Release.
NCSC Project Description
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Overall Teacher Judgements and
Introducing The Work Sampling System. What is Work Sampling? Authentic Performance Assessment Curriculum Embedded Instructional Assessment Authentic Performance.
CCSS-Aligned K-6 Report Card Training for SCUSD Parents/Guardians
Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
Welcome to our 3 rd Grade Back to School Night Thanks for coming!
SLOs for Students on GAA February 20, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Common Core and Standards-based Report Cards
The Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum January 29, 2013 Karen M. Beerer, Ed.D.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
Assessment and Reporting in the Middle Years Div. LOGO Prairie Rose School Division 2009.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
So Much Data – Where Do I Start? Assessment & Accountability Conference 2008 Session #18.
Newfane Elementary Standards Based Report Card Grades 1-4.
Lesson Plan Project by Jill Keeve. Goal/Objective Goal : Students will use a reading excerpt to explore alternate background information on conic sections.
CCSS-Aligned K-6 Report Card Training for SCUSD Parents/Guardians EXCELLENT!
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
OKCPS K-5 th Grade Academic Progress Folder. OKCPS is working diligently toward Clear, Consistent Parent Communication. A significant part of that effort.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Assessment without Levels September Effective  Effective Assessment Systems should;  Give reliable information to parents about how their child,
Alternate Proficiency Assessment Erin Lichtenwalner.
Standards-Based Report Cards
K-5 Curriculum Night Curriculum Arizona Academic Standards Quarterly curriculum maps available online at Our comprehensive curriculum.
Student Led Conference By: First and Last Name.
Castle / Kahuku Complex Area Support Team (CK CAST) Phase I Professional Development
A Resource Guide for Parents. play&list=UUF0pa3nE3aZAfBMT8pqM5PA&playnext=1
Standard Based Report Card K-4 Naugatuck Public Schools November 16, 2010.
Standards-Based Report Cards. What is a Standards-Based Report Card? It reports student progress toward meeting state and district standards in areas.
Georgia Milestone Assessments Bryant Elementary School 1"Where Scholars Are Prepared to Be LEADERS"
Indian River Central School District Report Card for Grades 4-5 Aligned with the Common Core State Standards.
PUTTING THE COMMON CORE MATH STANDARDS INTO ACTION Sandy Christie Craig Bowman 2012.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
1 Common Core Standards. Shifts for Students Demanded by the Core Shifts in ELA/Literacy Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction and informational.
Meeting the LEAPS Act May 5, PEI: Building Rigorous and Robust PreK-3 Family Engagement 1.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
Tier III Preparing for First Meeting. Making the Decision  When making the decision to move to Tier III, all those involve with the implementation of.
ELPS-TELPAS Making the Connection HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Standards-based Grading and Reporting Information for Parents.
Standards Based Grading. Why Standards Based Grading? Standards-Based Grading (SBG) is based on current research of best practices in grading SBG is designed.
Understanding Your Child’s Report Card
Parent Forum – Elementary Report Card
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Presentation transcript:

Lewiston Porter PEC Standards- Based Report Card Grades K-3 Report Card Committee Members: Heidi Kazulak, Suzanne Hedemann, Lisa Winslow, Kelly Millville, Rebecca Orsi, Alice Destino, Darcy Allender, Tina Rodriguez, Josh Suita, Michelle Riehler

History of the Committee’s Work A 10 member committee made up of grade levels K-3 teachers and a special area teacher convened in 2013 approximately 80 hours to: Study the research Collect & review documents from other districts Identify the PRIORITY standards in each academic area Prepare for implementation year scheduled for

WHY THE CHANGE? To respond to the Common Core State Standards and instructional shifts To more accurately and effectively communicate student progress to parents, students and to staff in other grades To be clear and specific about the academic and pro-social standards of public education: what all students need to know, shared responsibility of education, student driven learning To reduce paperwork and move to three reporting cycles during the school year so young children have time to master each standard To implement meaningful formative assessments and probes to align with student outcomes and learning expectations

What is a Standards-Based Report Card? Assesses student performance against a specific and observable set of skills; Measures each student against the identified grade level; “end of year” standard Does not measure how the student performs compared to the other students. Allows teachers to identify standards “not yet attempted” based on instructional pace.

How were the Academic Standards Selected? Essential Standards representing what ALL students should know and be able to do were identified using the Common Core State Standards and Developmental Continuums:  In each academic area  At a specific grade level

Comparison: English Language Arts & Literacy - Reading OLD NEW Uses comprehension strategies Spells correctly in daily work Listens for information and understands Stays on topic during class discussions Asks and answers questions using evidence from text Knows and applies grade level phonics and word analysis skills in decoding words Effectively participates in discussions within a group Presents information with appropriate facts and relevant descriptive details Student sustains attention and perseveres throughout tasks

Literacy - Writing OLD NEW Organizes ideas with beginning, middle, end Writes in complete sentences using details Stays on topic Produces writing in which the development and organization are appropriate for the task. Writes to communicate ideas and information effectively. Uses note taking when gathering information from print/digital resources. Student sustains attention and perseveres throughout tasks

Mathematical Content OLD New Recognizes place value Uses problem solving strategies Understands and uses math vocabulary and symbols Uses place value understanding to solve operations Applies strategies to solve problems Uses and communicates mathematical thinking clearly Student sustains attention and perseveres throughout tasks

Key for Performance Levels 4Exemplary Student consistently and independently demonstrates an advanced understanding and ability to apply grade level concepts, skills and processes. 3Proficient Student consistently and independently demonstrates an understanding and ability to apply concepts, skills and processes. 2Developing Student is not yet consistent in demonstrating an understanding and ability to apply concepts, skills, and processes. Review, reinforcement and support may be needed. 1Emerging Student demonstrates a limited understanding and ability to apply grade level concepts, skills and processes. Student is performing significantly below grade level expectations. NANot assessed Not assessed to date. New Grading Key: A Numeric System

What Other Changes Will I See? We recommended three reporting periods with report card distribution following a timeline of: Early December (with conference) Mid March (conference optional or by request) End of School

Q: Why a Standards-Based Report Card? A: Standards-based report cards provide: 1. In-depth student assessments 2. Consistent evaluations throughout the year 3. Individualized instruction information 4. Consistent evaluations between students

Q: How does this help parents? A: Standards-based report cards 1. Enable parents to receive accurate information based on cumulative student progress throughout the marking period. 2. They promote more detailed and meaningful conversations at parent/teacher conferences. 3. Allow for careful and precise monitoring of student achievement. 4. Reflect grade-level standards and expectations so parents gain a complete idea of student progress.

Q: Why are all standards not listed on the report card? A: A standards-based report card is not the same as a standard/learning outcome listing. Teams of teachers and administrators reviewed the New York State Common Core and District standards for each grade level and chose descriptors which were considered most significant for student learning at each grade level.

Q: Why are there no letter grades? A: A standards-based report card’s rubric approach (4, 3, 2, 1) provides information about student achievement without the need for letter grades. Letter grades: 1. Follow a teacher's individual assessments and expectations. 2. Do not show a student’s performance toward state and district expectations.

Q: Can a student perform at a level 3 and then move to a lower level in the next marking period? A: The expectations change from one marking period to the next as students move toward the end of grade-level expectations. This means: A student may meet the grade-level expectation during the first marking period, but as the expectations increase, the student may not demonstrate the same level of proficiency during the next marking period. 2. A student might receive a 3 in the first marking period and then receive a 2 in the second marking period.