Trends in Urban Transit in the U.S. – Some Comparisons Edd Hauser, P.E., PhD Nicholas J. Swartz, MPA Center for Transportation Policy Studies UNC Charlotte.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Public Transit Alliance (NuPTA) RIPEC Study: Transportation at a Crossroads (2002) Growing Smart with Transit: A Report of the Transit 2020 Working.
Advertisements

Mass Transit OSullivan Chapter 11. Outline of the Chapter Analyze some empirical facts about public transit in the United States Analyze the commuters.
Southwest LRT Project Craig Lamothe, AICP Senior Project Manager 2011 MN State Planning Conference September 29, 2011.
Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.
The Cost of Status Quo Governor’s Task Force on Modernizing Transportation Funding in Idaho December 2, 2009 Presented by Idaho’s Metropolitan Planning.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner.
North Shore Connector Cost-Benefit Study of Extending Pittsburgh Light Rail Transit to the North Shore Parshwanath Adiraja Dan Concepcion Nicolas Zitelli.
Five-Year Mass Transit Fund Financial Forecast April 6,
The Rural NTD – What Have We Learned? Mary Martha Churchman Senior Policy Advisor Office of Program Management Mary Martha Churchman Senior Policy Advisor.
Steve Heminger Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission Transportation Research Board Executive Committee June 17, 2005 TOLL: The Four.
Public Transit in Sacramento
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
Calgary Regional Partnership Workshop BC Transit Governance and Funding Experience Bill Lambert, Manager, Transportation Solutions, April 16, 2013.
David Armijo, CEO Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Potential Transit Enhancements With Gas Tax Funding Hillsborough County Transportation Task Force.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Executive Director Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Washington, DC Reducing Congestion Tools of.
15 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Tuesday, May 19 th, 2015 – Atlantic City, NJ Integrating Travel Demand Models & SHRP2 C11 Tools:
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
Utah’s Collaborative Approach to Transportation and Community Michael A. Allegra, President/CEO Utah Transit Authority October 9, 2014.
QGET -- Scenarios Analysis Quality Growth Efficiency ToolsNovember 14, 1998 November 15, 1999 Strategy Analysis Prepared for: Envision Utah Prepared by:
1 Program of Projects Study The Impacts of Regional Transit Investment Forum March 21, 2013 Move LA - "LA's Got Lines"
A M O T I A A N N U A L M E E T I N G 2 3 S E P T E M B E R N A S H V I L L E, T N 1 A View from the State DOTs Joung H. Lee Associate Director.
Arizona Rural Transit Needs Study Arizona Department of Transportation Public Transportation Division November 2007.
Beyond the Crossroads National Conference on Transportation Infrastructure and Regulatory Policy May 27, Denver, CO Future Infrastructure Needs,
The FY 2006 New Starts Report Responding to the Demand for Transit.
Metro Cities Transportation Policy Committee August 10, 2015 Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance.
EFFECTS OF RISING GAS PRICES ON BUS RIDERSHIP FOR SMALL URBAN AND RURAL TRANSIT SYSTEMS Jeremy Mattson 18 th National Conference on Rural Public and Intercity.
: Research Question: Would ridership needs in the area of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project be better Served by the implementation of a Bus Rapid.
State of Transportation: Atlanta, GA Chris Clark University of New Orleans 10 February 2011.
Special Transit Advisory Commission “STAC” STAC commissioned by CAMPO and DCHC –“Capital Area MPO” & “Durham, Chapel Hill, Carrboro MPO” Regional cross.
Valley Transit Fixed Route and ADA Paratransit Transportation.
Innovations in Transit Planning and Financing Presentation to the 2003 MPO Conference, Muncie IN October 16, 2003.
1. New Starts Program Debate Preserving the American Dream Conference Washington, DC October 27, 2013 Art Guzzetti Vice President – Policy American Public.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 23: Transit System Performance Evaluation.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
Steve Heminger Executive Director, MTC American Public Transportation Association Washington DC March 12, 2007.
Walter Kulyk, P.E. Director, Office of Mobility Innovation Federal Transit Administration Session 11: ITS Research in the U.S. and Abroad 2007 ITSA Annual.
Implementing Quality and Efficiency in Transit Planning Mike Summerlin Former Chairperson Raleigh Transit Authority.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
Rail Division State & Federal Funding FY Operations & Facilities.
Greater Minnesota Transit. Greater MN Transit Service (2010) 59 transit agencies –6 Large Urban (more than 50,000 population) –13 Small Urban –40 Rural.
Central Kentucky Regional Policy Group Juva Barber Executive Director.
Health and Welfare Building Harrisburg, PA (717)
Integrated National Transit Database Analysis System – Rural/Tribal NTD Module June 24, 2015 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration.
1 Mountain Metropolitan Transit Sustainability Committee March 20, 2009 Presented By: Sherre Ritenour & Tim McKinney.
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
Investing in Transportation Infrastructure Government Research Association Annual Policy Conference Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009.
Getting & Using Transit Data John Semmens Laissez Faire Institute & Arizona Transportation Institute.
North Carolina Transportation Issues David T. Hartgen, Ph.D., P.E. Emeritus Professor of Transportation Studies UNC Charlotte Remarks at the Shaftesbury.
December 17, 2010 Developing Transit Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
Regional Transit Framework Regional Council March 31, 2010.
Transit is Smart Growth Matt Ryan Coconino County Supervisor Chair, NAIPTA April 24, 2012 Arizona Transit Association Annual Conference.
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
AMPO October 22, South Florida Region.
Indianapolis Public Public Hearing – Proposed 2014 Budget Thursday, August 15, 2013 Transportation Corporation.
Draft Action Plan for Public Transportation in Wake County June 22, 2009.
FY Annual Transit Performance Report Maricopa Association of Governments Transportation Review Committee February 26, 2004.
Metropolitan Council Transit Capital Improvement Program October 10, 2007.
Calculating the benefits of Transit in North Carolina
Social Planning and Research Council of Hamilton
Regional Roads Committee
Transportation Summit
RELATED TO AGENDA ITEM W1
Southwest LRT Project Craig Lamothe, AICP Senior Project Manager
How will Transit Fare in the Next Authorization
LRT, GRT, PRT Comparison Peter Muller, PE Ingmar Andreasson, Ph. D.
Office of Research and Analysis
NCRR is helping build a strong economy that benefits the people of North Carolina. We do this most visibly with steel and wood. Even more important, we.
Regional Transportation Authority
Presentation transcript:

Trends in Urban Transit in the U.S. – Some Comparisons Edd Hauser, P.E., PhD Nicholas J. Swartz, MPA Center for Transportation Policy Studies UNC Charlotte

“The role of a university has always been to provide a forum for the free and open discussion of ideas and precepts.” - Keyishian vs. Board of Regents, State University of New York, 385 U.S. 589 (1967) – a finding upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court

Presentation Outline Highway Funding Trends in the U.S. Transit Cost and Ridership Trends Comparative Analysis of Transit in Cities with Light Rail Systems Data on Charlotte Transit and Highways

Source: Status of the Nation's Highways, Bridges, and Transit: 2004 Conditions and Performance, US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration

Transit in the U. S. & Charlotte –Nationwide today, approx. 65,000 buses (140,000 route miles) –Charlotte – growth from 143 to 247 buses (from 47 to 76 routes) between 1998 and 2007 –15,000 rail vehicles(9,800 route miles) –Trip Types: Work54% School15% Shopping 9% Source: American Public Transportation Association Website (

Operating Expenses & Ridership ( ) Nationwide: –49.3 percent increase in Operating Expenses –8.9 percent increase in annual pass. miles – 16% increase in vehicle revenue miles Charlotte: –158 % increase in operating expenses –26% increase in annual passenger miles –81% increase in vehicle revenue miles Highest increases: –Light Rail –Demand Response –Van Pool Source: 2005 National Transit Summaries and Trends (

VRM, Bus Transit Source: 2005 National Transit Summaries and Trends (

VRM, Light Rail Transit Source: 2005 National Transit Summaries and Trends (

Comparative Analysis of Bus Transit in Cities with Light Rail Systems 1.Service Area and # of Bus and Light Rail Vehicles 2.Service Efficiency (Operating Expense Per Vehicle Revenue Mile) 3.Cost Effectiveness (Operating Expense Per Passenger Mile) 4.Proportion of Bus Operating Expenses Collected in Fares

( 2007 )

Bus Transit Service Area (sq. mi.) (2005) Source: Federal Transit Administration, National Transit Database for 2005

2005

(2005) Source: Federal Transit Administration, National Transit Database for 2005

Analysis of “Reasonableness” of South Corridor LRT Development 1.Capital Cost per mile – selected systems (2007 dollars) 2.Comparative Cost with other Transportation Projects in the Charlotte Area 3.Long-range Transportation Cost Projections 4.Private Sector Investments generated

Capital Cost per Mile, LRT - New Start Projects Cost in 2007 Dollars (Mil.) Charlotte$ 48.2 Dallas$ 60 Denver$ 32 Sacramento$ 13 St. Louis$ 56 Seattle$179 Sources: t/Home.htm

Cost Estimate Increase over time – Selected Charlotte Area Projects Pct. Change from Orig. Cost Estm. To Present LRT South Corridor109 % US Connector305 % I-485, NW Section292 % US 29 – NC 49 Connector327 % Monroe Bypass213 % Sources: CATS and NCDOT TIP

Long-Range Cost Projections to 2030, Mecklenburg County Current Estm. (2006 dollars)YOE Estm. Transit - CATS ½ cent$1.0 B.$ 1.9 B. NCDOT 0.6 B. 0.7 B. Federal 1.6 B. 1.9 B. Totals 3.2 B. 4.5 B. Highways - NCDOT $2.6 B. CDOT 0.5 B. Total$ 3.1 B. Sources: CATS, NCDOT, CDOT

Building Permits and Property Tax Values in South End Building Permits ($ M.)Prop. Tax Value ($ M.) FY 2000$ 232 FY 2003$ 281$ 441 FY 2004$ 301 FY 2005$ 322$515 FY 2006$ 403 Source: City of Charlotte Budget and Evaluation Office

Why is a modal choice important for the South Corridor?

Source: US Census

TRB Report (2000): -Charlotte experienced an average 26.1 minute work trip (an increase of 4.5 minutes, or 20.9% increase since 1990). -Atlanta: 31.2 minutes -Raleigh-Durham: 24.9 min. TTI (2005): Charlotte was 22 nd highest level of congestion in the country and 2 nd highest among cities between 500,000-1m people

Source: Produced by the Charlotte-Mecklenburg County Planning Commission, March 2002

2030 Corridor Plan Source: CATS

Summary / Observations CATS bus operations LRT development Overall quality of life and economic development in the region Long-range vision

Thank You! Edd Hauser, P.E., Ph.D. Professor and Director, Center for Transportation Policy Studies UNC Charlotte 9201 University City Blvd. Charlotte, NC (704)