No Child Left Behind and School Improvement Ivana Beeman Southern Utah University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special Education Curriculum Anthony Scorsone. Each child's IEP should state that the placement is the least restrictive environment for that particular.
Advertisements

No Child Left Behind Sub-grant Application Project Planning & Evaluation John Cradler Ruthmary Cradler Educational Support Systems
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Enhancing our guiding philosophy of continuous improvement
IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Educational Research and Statistics EDRS 5305 Spring 2003.
The impact of NCLB on arts education UNT Speaks Out on No Child Left Behind D. Jack Davis, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus College of Visual Arts & Design University.
Family Involvement 1a.  a broadly defined concept that includes activities connecting children’s home and classroom learning experiences, as well as.
PRINCIPLES OF ASSESSMENT GENERAL PRINCIPLES, PURPOSE, TYPES, ALIGNING WITH OBJECTIVES DR. SHASHI PANDEY.
Response to Intervention: The new Road to Ensuring Student Success January, 2011 PISD.
Response to Intervention By: Angelique Gunderson.
CRESST / U C L A Slide 1, Implementing No Child Left Behind: Assessment Issues Joan L. Herman UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies.
Kaitlin White Mark Sanders Megan Davenport Nicole Faulkner.
Learning, Teaching, and Educational Psychology
What should be the basis of
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Now That My Marking’s Done, Now What??? Brent Galloway Lori Stuber.
Frameworks and Standards and Benchmarks…. Science Education Reform: A Brief History.
By: Roxanne Putro, Jessica Huff, and Kaylyn White National Curriculum.
Prepared and presented by Reda Saad El-Mahdy Ahmed Bin Hanbal Independent Secondary School for Boys And “SEC Curriculum Standards”
Ysleta Independent School District 2004 Accountability State and AYP.
Language and Content-Area Assessment Chapter 7 Kelly Mitchell PPS 6010 February 3, 2011.
Title I Parent Information Session Applegate School Laura Donovan School.
THE KEY TO CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP The key to predictable results in improving student achievement requires connecting curriculum, assessment and instruction.
Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice, 9/e Timothy J. Piciullo Ed.D. EDU 5301-Human Development and the Learning Process in.
To copy or adapt this material, see OpportunityCulture.org/terms-of-use Multi-Classroom Leadership Reviewing Instructional Practices.
Daniel H. Holloway Senior at Old Dominion University Coordinator of Database Services Gloucester County Public Schools.
Lecture 7. The Questions: What is the role of alternative assessment in language learning? What are the Reasons.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Presenters: Emily & Lily Professor: Dr. James C. Lawlor Date: July 23rd.
The Do’s and Don’ts of High-Stakes Student Achievement Testing Andrew Porter Vanderbilt University August 2006.
® [Insert your presentation title here]. ® ASCD: A Worldwide Community of Educators.
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Jill Daignault ED 613 Unit III Assignment.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
School Monitoring and OEPA Greg Miller MEL – 540 School Resource Management Spring 2015.
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6. Purpose of Understanding  If you don’t know where you are going, how will you know when you get there?  How.
Annual Family Partnership Planning Meeting October 26, 2015.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Standards-Based Education
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
NCLB. Introduction Increased federal mandates and requirements on states Increased federal funding to states by almost 25% from the previous year Movement.
The Assessment Dilemma August 31, 2010 Formative Summative Diagnostic Benchmark.
Foundations of American Education: Perspectives on Education in a Changing World, 15e © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 11 Standards,
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Neo-Conservative Ideas Berliner and Biddle ( ) Neo-conservative “centrist” thought won out in school reform. Main approaches to school reform: Get.
Continuous Improvement Priority Schools CIPS. Passage of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Passage All Students Meet Standards Adequate Yearly Progress.
Assessment without levels. Why remove levels?  levels were used as thresholds and teaching became focused on getting pupils across the next threshold.
Common Core Presentation Sharelius Holmes Week 2: Discussion 2 Dr. Sherry Leialoha-Waipa.
No Child Left Behind (Because where would we put them all?) (Because where would we put them all?)
By. Matthew M. Schaefer. What is the Common Core? The common core looks to give every child in America an equal education. Currently, students in Chicago.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Donna Lipscomb EDU 695 MAED Capstone Common Core Presentation INSTRUCTOR KYGER MAY 21, 2015.
No Teacher Left Behind D. Gerald. How would you suggest we, as a nation, provide consistent learning opportunities for teachers and ensure that they are.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Action Research Proposal Koraya Robinson EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Shelia G. Thomas.
 The professional growth and development of teachers is the fundamental purpose of teacher assessment.
THE BIG INTERVIEW KORRINA L. TAITANO EDU650 INSTRUCTOR RICCI NOVEMBER 02, 2015.
Standardized Testing By Tyler Ono English 100. Why is our society focused on standardized testing when it is biased and not helpful? Standardized tests.
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
“Back to the Basics” Kristy Reyes SEED 501
Start with the Science & Technology Standards (2002, 2008?)
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION
Analysis of No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

No Child Left Behind and School Improvement Ivana Beeman Southern Utah University

Why NCLB?  Polarizing topic for educators  Impact on everyday teaching and personal reflection No Child Left Behind

 No Child Left Behind was signed into law by President George W. Bush on January 8 th 2002 (Jorgenson & Hoffmann, 2003)  For states to receive federal funds they have to develop standardized tests and compare students results against high academic standards.  Focus is on students who are at risk for not passing and not graduating  To qualify for funds schools have to show Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). NCLB

 Teachers are forced to adjust their curriculum to accommodate the standards covered on the test.  A lot of the important aspects of school curriculum were lost and not taught because students weren’t tested on it.  Valuable instructional time was lost administering and preparing for these tests. Effect of NCLB on curriculum

Students’ focus is on passing the test and not on becoming more creative and being able to solve complex problems. Future of Our Workforce

 Instead of focusing on passing the standardized tests mandated by No Child Left Behind teachers should focus on helping teachers become more effective, improving instruction and using data driven instruction. Shifting Focus From NCLB

 Build relationships with students  Use clear learning targets  Make learning relevant  Use differentiated instruction  Continue education Effective teachers and Improving Instruction

 Effective teachers use assessment in classroom frequently to examine students’ strengths and weaknesses (Salazar, 2008).  Is student learning?  Frequent use of formative assessments  Formative and summative assessments should be created around the benchmarks and standards so they can be used to guide students to specific learning targets (Bambrick-Santoyo, 2010). Data Analysis

 Interviews with Rancho Teachers Field Activity

 Shift focus from anxiety driven high stakes tests to improving instruction Theory to practice

Final word

 Bambrick-Santoyo, P. (2010). Driven By Data: A Practical Guide to Improve Instruction. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. References

 Jorensen, A. M., & Hoffmann, J. (2003). History of the Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB)Pearson Assessment Report. Pearson Assessment Report. Retrieved from  Salazar, P. S. (2008). High Impact Leadership For High Impact Schools: The ActionsThat Matter Most. Larchmont: Eye On Education, Inc References cont