Trends in Engineering Licensure Blaine D. Leonard, P.E., D.GE, Pres.10.ASCE Montana JEC Meeting November 7, 2014 – Helena, MT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Advertisements

1 Comments on EC 2000: Why so much detail to tell us about EC 2000? Practices of Modern Engineering – Spring 2011 You learned where things (courses) fit.
Educating for a Sustainable Future – Environmental Engineering Body of Knowledge The EE BOK Working Group Debbie Reinhart, PhD, PE, BCEE University of.
1 First Saudi Engineering Forum Preparing THE Engineer of the Future Jeffrey S. Russell, Ph.D., P.E. (Chair, CAP^3)
National Academic Reference Standards
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
1 Graduates’ Attributes : EMF, EUR-ACE and Federal Educational Standards Alexander I. Chuchalin, Chair of the RAEE Accreditation Board Graduates’ Attributes.
ABET-ASAC Accreditation Workshop ABET Criteria and Outcomes Assessment
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Jeffrey S. Russell, P.E., Ph.D., F.ASCE Chair, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin - Madison Preparing the Professional.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
1. An ability to:  Understand the academic requirements you need to obtain your degree  Calculate your GPA  Prepare a draft schedule 2.
Mohammad Alshayeb 19 May Agenda Update on Computer Science Program Assessment/Accreditation Work Update on Software Engineering Program Assessment/Accreditation.
ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 To maintain ABET accreditation, Engineering Departments must demonstrate that all of their graduates have the following.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
Introduction The Mechanical Engineering Department at WPI was established in 1868 and the first undergraduate degrees were awarded in The Department.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - is a non governmental organization that accredits post secondary educational organizations in : 1)
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
In today’s society we find, an ever-increasing global population that continues to shift to urban areas will require widespread adoption of sustainability.
OBE Briefing.
A Sample Poster — Landscape Layout Name of Team Members Mechanical Engineering Department Introduction The Mechanical Engineering Department at WPI was.
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting May 21, 2013.
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
State of the Society Gregory E. DiLoreto, P.E., L.S., F. ASCE 2012 President-elect Presentation to the Orange County Branch November 15, 2011.
The Engineering Body of Knowledge Joint Engineers Conference 07 November 2014 Helena, MT Robert A. Green, P.E., F. NSPE President National Society.
GLOBAL ACCREDITATION TRENDS Russel C. Jones. Ph.D., P.E. World Expertise LLC USA and UAE.
/ASEEBOK Stuart G. Walesh, PhD, PE, Consultant NSPE’s Pan – Engineering Body of Knowledge ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Indianapolis,
EE Program Student Advising Prof. Michael Green These slides can be found at:
Graduates for the 21 st Century - Perspective from Research Ian Diamond RCUK.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
EENG 4910/4990 Engineering Design Murali Varanasi September 02, 2009.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Supporting ABET Assessment and Continuous Improvement for Engineering Programs William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University.
Cross Cutting Initiatives - Education William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University of America.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
CEN ABET Mini- Retreat March 4, CEN ABET Mini-Retreat Agenda: –State of the Assessments –Discussion on loop closings. –CSE Program Objectives/Outcomes.
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingOctober 6, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
HU113_Assignment31 HU113: Technical Report Writing Prof. Abdelsamie Moet Teaching Assistant: Mrs. Rana El-Gohary Fall 2012/13 Pharos University in Alexandria.
CEN Faculty MeetingMarch 31, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Background on ABET Overview of ABET EC 2000 Structure Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 – Part I.
CISE IAB MeetingOctober 15, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS. WHAT IS ENGINEERING ANALYSIS? ABET Required Program Outcomes: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering.
1 Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) January 22, 2016.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
Accreditation of study programs at the Faculty of information technologies Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Assessment and Accreditation
CE 220 Professionalism A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Presentation transcript:

Trends in Engineering Licensure Blaine D. Leonard, P.E., D.GE, Pres.10.ASCE Montana JEC Meeting November 7, 2014 – Helena, MT

2 Focus on the Future The Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge CE Program Accreditation Licensure Exam Changes Engineering builds the foundation for a better future

3 Changes

4 A Transformed Future Sustainable design Nanotechnology Fuel cell vehicles Point of use waste treatment systems Intelligent infrastructure and living databases New construction & financing models 3-D printing / manufacturing Decentralized work environments

Focus on the Future “Our greatest obligation to our [future engineering professionals] is to prepare them to understand and to deal effectively with the world in which they will live and not with the world we have known or the world we would prefer.” Grayson Kirk ( ), Educator

6 Entrusted by society to create a sustainable world and enhance the global quality of life, civil engineers serve competently, collaboratively, and ethically as:

7 Master Builders 1.Master planners, designers, constructors, and operators of society’s economic and social engine—the built environment

8 Stewards of the Environment 2.Stewards of the natural environment and its resources

9 Innovators 3.Innovators and integrators of ideas and technology across the public, private, and academic sectors

10 Managers of Risk 4.Managers of risk and uncertainty caused by natural events, accidents, and other threats

11 Leaders in Public Policy 5.Leaders in discussions and decisions shaping public environmental and infrastructure policy.

12 Paradigm Shift Sets an aspirational target for a new global state of affairs: ─ The role of engineers in the economy of the future ─ Where engineers are: Entrusted Leaders Ethical role models Stewards of the public good

13 The Need: The complex challenges of the future will require engineers with enhanced technical and professional knowledge and skills.

14 CE Body of Knowledge Engineering builds the foundation for a better future A detailed analysis of: ─ The knowledge, skills and attributes that future engineers will need to have for entry into professional civil engineering practice ─ Where and when the education should be obtained

Technical 5. Materials science 6. Mechanics 7. Experiments 8. Problem recognition & solving 9. Design 10. Sustainability 11. Contemporary issues & historical perspectives 12.Risk & uncertainty 13.Project management 14. Breadth in CE areas 15. Technical specialization Professional 16. Communication 17. Public policy 18. Business & public administration 19. Globalization 20. Leadership 21. Teamwork 22. Attitudes 23. Lifelong learning 24. Professional & ethical responsibility Foundational 1. Mathematics3. Humanities 2. Natural sciences4. Social sciences

16 Bloom’s Taxonomy: Levels of Achievement list, recite, define, … explain, describe, … apply, solve, … analyze, formulate, … design, create, … assess, evaluate, … 1. Knowledge 2. Comprehension 3. Application 4. Analysis 5. Synthesis 6. Evaluation

Outcome title 1 Knowledge 2 Comprehension 3 Application 4 Analysis 5 Synthesis 6 Evaluation Levels of achievement 12. Risk & uncertainty 11. Contemporary issues & historical perspectives 10. Sustainability 9. Design 8. Problem recogn. & solving 7. Experiments 6. Mechanics 5. Materials science Technical 4. Social sciences 3. Humanities 2. Natural sciences 1. Mathematics Foundational

Outcome title 24. Professional & ethical responsibility 23. Lifelong learning 22. Attitudes 21. Teamwork 20. Leadership 19. Globalization 18. Business & public admin. 17. Public policy 16. Communication Professional 15. Technical specialization 14. Breadth in CE areas 13. Project management Technical (cont) 6 Evaluation 5 Synthesis 4 Analysis 3 Application 2 Comprehension 1 Knowledge Levels of achievement

19 Looking at the Trend: Civil Engineering Transcripts Course CategoryCredits Basic Science 1615 Mathematics 1615 Communication Skills 68 Arts & Humanities 1715 Fitness 32 Engineering & Technical Courses 7165 Electives 70 Total

20 Looking at the Trend: Engineering Programs The credits required to earn a 4-year engineering degree have decreased significantly Engineering builds the foundation for a better future

21 Diverging Trends The complex challenges facing 21st- century society will require professional engineers (PEs) to advance their technical excellence and professional leadership. The engineering education of the present— a four-year undergraduate degree—will not be sufficient to prepare the licensed professional engineers of the future. Engineering builds the foundation for a better future

22 National Academy of Engineering “It is evident that the exploding body of science and engineering knowledge cannot be accommodated within the context of the traditional four-year baccalaureate degree.” Engineering builds the foundation for a better future

23 Trends in Other Professions PEs need greater breadth and depth of knowledge, leadership, and vision Every other learned profession has recognized the need to require advance education Engineering builds the foundation for a better future

“It seems to me, ironic, that engineers could build bridges and tunnels and dams that thousands of people’s lives depend on, whereas you can’t give my neighbor’s cat a vaccination, if you are a veterinarian, without an advanced degree. It doesn’t seem to add up.” ─ Norman Augustine, PE, Former Chair & CEO, Lockheed Martin

25 The Solution: A broader and deeper engineering education is essential for meeting future challenges.

26 “A continuation of the status quo in engineering education in the U.S. is not sufficient in light of the pressing demands for change.” “The increased breadth and complexity of modern engineering practice are straining the standard four-year curriculum for engineering education.” “Moving Forward to Improve Engineering Education,” National Science Board, “2028 Vision for Mechanical Engineering,” ASME, Other Voices for Change

27 5XME Workshop: Transforming Mechanical Engineering Education US engineers need to provide five times the value when compared to global competition. Graduates must possess: ─ Broad grounding in fundamentals ─ Flexibility and agility ─ Innovation and creativity to benefit society ─ Global focus ─ Teamwork and leadership ─ Communication skills

28 An NCEES task force recently concluded that our current licensure system has been in place for many years and has not adapted to the realities of the current engineering marketplace. The NCEES task force also expressed concern that our system is inadequate for engineers working in emerging fields. J. Richard Cottingham, PE, PLS, NCEES President 2000

Outcome title 6 Evaluation 5 Synthesis 4 Analysis 3 Application 2 Comprehension 1 Knowledge Levels of achievement 12. Risk & uncertainty 11. Contemporary issues & historical perspectives 10. Sustainability 9. Design 8. Problem recogn. & solving 7. Experiments 6. Mechanics 5. Materials science Technical 4. Social sciences 3. Humanities 2. Natural sciences 1. Mathematics Foundational

Outcome title 24. Professional & ethical responsibility 23. Lifelong learning 22. Attitudes 21. Teamwork 20. Leadership 19. Globalization 18. Business & public admin. 17. Public policy 16. Communication Professional 15. Technical specialization 14. Breadth in CE areas 13. Project management Technical (cont) 6 Evaluation 5 Synthesis 4 Analysis 3 Application 2 Comprehension 1 Knowledge Levels of achievement

31 “We can’t supplant or replace what they’re not getting in their Bachelor’s program in our fast paced world today.” —Brad Aldrich, P.E. Partner, Forcier, Aldrich & Associates, Inc., Past President, NSPE

32 The Future Path for Licensure An accredited bachelor’s of engineering degree A master’s degree ─ OR ─ an additional 30 semester credits of graduate or upper level undergraduate courses 3 to 4 Years of Experience Passing the PE & FE Exams Engineering builds the foundation for a better future

33 Translating the BOK to Education Accreditation Board for Engineering & Technology, Inc. (ABET) Current ABET Criteria (EC 2000): Outcomes based and less prescriptive ─ Outcomes in Engineering Education: Desired results of the educational process consistent with the program objectives. ─ ABET Accreditation Criteria General Criteria for Baccalaureate Level Programs General Criteria for Masters Level Programs Program Criteria (for many, but not all, disciplines)

34 ABET EAC Criterion 3 Outcomes Engineering programs must demonstrate that their students attain the following outcomes: (a)an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d)an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e)an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f)an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g)an ability to communicate effectively (h)the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i)a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j)a knowledge of contemporary issues (k)an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.

35 Apply principles of leadership ; Account for risk and uncertainty in the solution of engineering problems; Apply principles of project management ; Explain where and how public policy is developed & how it influences engineering practice; Explain business concepts applicable to engineering practice; Apply principles of sustainability to the evaluation and design of engineering systems. Additional Outcomes Recommended by NSPE

36 Proposed Civil Engineering Program Criteria The curriculum program must prepare graduates to apply knowledge of mathematics through differential equations, calculus- based physics, chemistry, and at least one additional area of basic science, consistent with the program educational objectives; apply probability and statistics to address uncertainty; apply knowledge of analyze and solve problems in at least four technical areas appropriate to civil engineering; conduct civil engineering experiments in at least two technical areas of civil engineering and analyze and interpret the resulting data; design a system, component, or process in at least two more than one civil engineering contexts; include principles of sustainability in design; explain basic concepts in project management, business, public policy, and leadership; analyze issues in professional ethics; and explain the importance of professional licensure.

37 Implementing the Solution: Achieve additional education through higher standards for professional licensure

38 Why Focus on Licensure? Visible, state-sanctioned standards of the profession. Standards explicitly tied to the engineer’s professional and ethical responsibility— protecting public health and safety. For engineers working under an industrial exemption, employers decide how much education is needed.

39 Raising the Bar in Education and Licensure Preparing engineers for the world they will live in: ─ Engineers who are better equipped to address the challenges of the future ─ Engineers with improved technical excellence and professional leadership Better protection of public health, safety, and welfare

40 NCEES National Council of Examiners for Engineering & Surveying (NCEES): ─ Organization representing state licensing boards ─ Federation that produces consensus-based standards to facilitate protection of public health, safety, and welfare by the states ─ Promotes uniformity across jurisdictions

41 Licensure Issues Decoupled Exam (Early Taking) ─ Experience still required ─ Attract more PEs Computer Based Testing ─ FE Exam currently offered by computer ─ PE Exam under development Wyoming PhD exclusion

42 Questions / Discussion