School Improvement Specialist Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RtI Response to Intervention
Advertisements

PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Welcome Reflection Debrief –Fishbowl Group Data Work Action Planning Agenda.
1 Progress Monitoring Content developed by Wayne Callender and Jeanie Mercier Smith The Link Between Instruction and Reading Proficiency.
Read to Achieve North Carolina: Excellent Public Schools Act.
Today’s Objectives What is RtI and why it is here – Consensus-building Preparation for 2010 Implementation: – Three Tiers of Services – Data Analysis.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI) Overview
School Year September 2014 Amanda Grinager, Director of Teaching and Learning.
1 Data-Based Leadership Cohort B March 2, 2006 (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
1 Cohort B Q2: How are we doing?. 2 Reviewing Outcomes  What percent of students are reaching benchmark goals in each grade level?  What percent of.
Oregon Reading First: Statewide Mentor Coach Meeting February 18, 2005 © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Webinar Data-based Action Planning Winter 2009.
Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 13, 2010.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 2009.
Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Winter 2010 Data Based Planning for Instructional Focus Groups.
From Data to Dialogue: Facilitating meaningful change with reading data Ginny Axon misd.net) Terri Metcalf
EasyCBM: Benchmarking and Progress Monitoring System Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D. Director of Assessment & Student Information Shereen Henry Math Instructional.
Program Effectiveness in GARF: Where Have We Been and Where Do You Need to Go?
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
Grade-level Benchmark Data Meetings
Interpreting DIBELS reports LaVerne Snowden Terri Metcalf
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS The District Data Team Meeting Blending Behavioral and Academic Multi-tiered Systems of Support Oregon.
Implementing Structured Data Meetings Middle of Year (MOY) Meetings.
California Mini-CorpsOctober 10, Writing SMART Goals In order to become a team – a group of people working interdependently to achieve a common.
WBCSD District Strategic Goals Update August 10, 2015.
NECAP DATA ANALYSIS 2012 Presented by Greg Bartlett March, 2013.
Grade-level Data Team Meetings.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT SPECIALIST TRAINING SEPTEMBER 14, 2011.
School-wide Data Analysis Oregon RtI Spring Conference May 9 th 2012.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
School-wide Data Team Meeting Winter NSIF Extended Cohort February 10, 2012.
Training for Problem Solving Teams Susan Clay Jefferson County Board of Education Fall 2014.
Literacy Framework: What Does It Look Like at Shawnee Heights? Tamara Konrade ESSDACK Educational Services and Staff Development Association of Central.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
Implementing Structured Data Meetings End of Year (EOY) Meetings.
RTI: Response to Intervention An Invitation to Begin… Rutgers Conference January 2015 Janet Higgins Reading Specialist East Amwell Township School Rutgers.
Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.
HOW DO WE USE DIBELS WITH AN OUTCOMES-DRIVEN MODEL? Identify the Need for Support Validate the Need for Support Plan Support Evaluate Effectiveness of.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Benchmark Data Meetings Presented to Coaches September 6, 2013 Adapted from MiBLSi materials.
EOY DIBELS Benchmark Data for Intervention Programs Oregon Reading First Schools June, 2009 © 2009 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading -DIBELS.
USING DATA IN IOWA TIER Sarah Brown, PhD Iowa Department of Education.
What Do I Do With My DIBELS Data? Aligning Student Needs and Instruction source: Tracy Cormane:
Winston-Salem / Forsyth County Schools Revised Unit Maps Grades 3-5.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
SRBI SYMPOSIUM 2015 Tiered Instruction at JJIS Presented by: Jack Jackter Intermediate School Deb Sandberg, Principal Carissa Capozzi, Social Worker Lynne.
Elementary Middle School Expectation and Goal Setting Meeting June 26, 2009.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support 21.
White Pages Team Grey Pages Facilitator Team & Facilitator Guide for School-wide Reading Leadership Team Meetings Elementary.
Overview of DRA2 (Developmental Reading Assessment) Middle School Presentation Cathy Rosso Stephanie Williams May 2012.
MAP and Common Assessment Results January 22, 2015.
Data Review Team Time Spring Purpose 0 This day is meant to provide school leadership teams with time to review the current status of their.
Monitoring School Progress Towards Reading First Goals Pam Bell Morris, Ph.D. Theresa Clarke.
K-5: Progress Monitoring JANUARY, 2010 WAKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM INTERVENTION ALIGNMENT.
(MTSS) Multi-Tiered System of Supports Charles R. Eccleston, District MTSS Trainer.
Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.
Data-Based Leadership
Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.
WELCOME.
Meadowlake Elementary
Data-Based Instructional Decision Making
Kindergarten - Universal Screening Flow Chart (DIBELS or FAST)
Using Strategies, Protocols, and Tools to Analyze Data A Presentation of the National Reading Technical Assistance Center (NRTAC) Speaker’s notes Additional.
Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009.
MOY Data Analysis Increasing Achievement and Growth Grant NW BOCES
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

School Improvement Specialist Meeting January 18, 2012 Preparing for Grade Level Winter Data Analysis Meetings

AGENDA Welcome How are your School Systems Working? Reviewing Outcomes Summary of Effectiveness How are your Students Doing? Grade Level Lists Update Data Wall Build Teacher Action Plan

Using Data to Evaluate Progress At Multiple Levels We will answer… How are we doing? By grade level and racial subgroups Are students making adequate progress to close the achievement gap? How are individual students doing?

How are we doing by grade level and racial subgroups? Materials Needed: DIBELS Distribution Report by Class easyCBM Benchmark Risk Analysis by Grade Level Reviewing Outcomes Worksheet

Guided & Independent Practice Reviewing Outcomes Worksheet by Grade Level Guided & Independent Practice le 1 Grade Percent at Low Risk or Benchmark Fall 2011 (90/100 or 90%) Winter 2012 Percentage Point Increase/ Decrease (+ or -) Percent at High Risk or Well Below Benchmark Kindergarten   Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Guided & Independent Practice Reviewing Outcomes Worksheet by Race Guided & Independent Practice   Subgroup 1 Subgroup 2 Percent at Low Risk - Benchmark Fall 2011 (90/100 or 90%) Winter 2012 Percentage Point Increase/ Decrease (+ or -) Percent at High Risk – Intensive Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Discussion Questions Discussion Questions by Grade Level: What percent of students are performing at or above benchmark or low risk in each grade level? What percent of students are performing well below or high risk in each grade level? Is there a significant increase in the percentage of students performing at or above benchmark or low risk from Fall to Winter at each grade level? Is there a significant decrease in the percentage of students performing well below or high risk from Fall to Winter at each grade level? Discussion Questions by Race: Is there a significant increase in the percentage of students that are performing at or above benchmark from fall to winter? Is there a significant decrease in the percentage of students that are performing well below benchmark from fall to winter? Locate yourself on The Courageous Conversation Compass while discussing this data

Accessing DIBELS and easyCBM Reports DIBELS Distribution Reports by Grade Level and Race easyCBM Benchmark Risk Analysis By Grade Level Accessing easyCBM Demographic Data

Are students making adequate progress to close the achievement gap? Materials Needed: DIBELS Summary of Effectiveness Report, beginning to middle easyCBM Risk Analysis Summary of Effectiveness Worksheet

What is Adequate Progress? Adequate Progress is defined by Tier III students moving either to Tier II or Tier I Tier II students moving to Tier I Tier I students remaining in Tier I

Summary of Effective Worksheet   Use Composite Score or Risk Rating Percent of Total Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 90/100 or 90%. Percent of Well Below Benchmark or High Risk Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 1/5 or 20%. Percent of Below Benchmark or Some Risk Students that made Adequate Progress e.g., 25/50 or 50%. Percent of At or Above Benchmark or Low Risk Students that made Adequate Progress e.g., 95/100 or 95%. Fall 2011 to Winter 2012 Kindergarten First Grade Second Grade Third Grade Fourth Grade Fifth Grade Sixth Grade Seventh Grade Eighth Grade

Discussion Questions Summary Questions:   Did students who were “At or Above Benchmark or Low Risk” remain “At or Above Benchmark or Low Risk” ? Did students who were “Below Benchmark or Some Risk” move to “At or Above Benchmark or Low Risk” ? Did students who were “Well Below Benchmark or High Risk” move to “Below Benchmark or Some Risk” or “At or Above Benchmark or Low Risk”?  Discussion Questions: “Is our Tier I instructional plan working?” If yes…stay the course If no… Discuss Alterable Variables Are instructional materials being used with fidelity? Is appropriate instructional time allocated? Are effective instructional techniques and active engagement strategies being used? Are there behavior and/or attendance factors? “Is our Tier II instructional plan working?” If yes…..stay the course “Is our Tier III instructional plan working?”

Accessing DIBELS and easyCBM Reports DIBELS Summary of Effectiveness Beginning to Middle easyCBM Risk Analysis

How are individual students doing? Materials Needed: DIBELS Grade List Report Phonics Survey data Core in-program assessments Intervention mastery assessments easyCBM Benchmark Report Data cards and pocket charts Instructional Focus Group Descriptions

Update Data Wall Update data cards Move cards according to DIBELS Composite and easyCBM Risk Ratings Sort students receiving Tier I & II instructional supports into instructional focus groups ____________________________________ Guidelines for Exiting Students from Horizons and Language! Cautions regarding removing 30 additional minutes of instruction

Inquiry Protocol

Develop an Action Plan Refining the instructional focus Choose an instructional strategy Refer to Instructional Strategies Handout for additional ideas Make a plan to progress monitor

We are here to support you! Daniel Cogan – dcogan@pps.net Cathy Cowherd – ccowherd@pps.net Sheila Hallinan – shallinan@pps.net Maryanne Stalnaker – mstalnaker@pps.net