Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing Instructional Expectations
Advertisements

Danielson Framework: Review and Card Sort Activity
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 4/14/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Conewago Valley School District Teacher Evaluation Tool Training Please sit at your “building” table. 2. Complete a nameplate – first name only.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
An Overview of TPGES: The Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray, Facilitator Kentucky Department of Education & NKCES July 26, 2013.
Introduction Framework for Teaching by Charlotte Danielson
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 1 Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation Charlotte Danielson
Matrix 101: The Oregon Matrix and Summative Evaluations Spring 2015 Technical Assistance Webinar.
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Differentiated Supervision
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
The Card Sort Does this help? Do you need to make a change?
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Teacher Evaluation Phase III February 27 – 28, 2013 Rosanne Javorsky and Dr. Patricia DiRienzo 1.
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Research-Based Cutting Edge Professional Development Communicate, Connect, Collaborate, Conceptualize, Create For Results Oriented Learning Experiences.
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
From Compliance to Quality TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS IN PA: PIL Institute 2012 Tracy Hinish, Sunny Minelli Weiland and Cristine Wagner-Deitch.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,
YEAR 1 INDUCTION Day One Workshop Pennsbury School District.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
Evidence in Evaluations. What is Evidence? ITED Document – Evidence refers to data, information, artifacts and performances that educators and evaluators.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
A brief introduction to
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
Qualities of Effective Teaching Wisdom of Practice Let’s begin by reflecting on our own thinking about effective teaching. “What are the qualities of teaching.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
 Pre-Observation Conference  Priority component: 1e (Designing Coherent Instruction)  Observation  Priority components: 3c, 3d (Engaging Students in.
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
KPBSD - Phase II Effective Instructional Model Fall 2010.
 Teacher completes Step #1: Lesson Plan in advance and sends to evaluator two days in advance of planning conference  Teacher and Evaluator meet to discuss.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
From Compliance to Quality TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS IN PA: SAS Institute 2011 Debra Dendas Eric Rosendale Cristine Wagner-Deitch,
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Enhancing R. Emmanuel-Cooke, Principal March 14, 2016 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE A Framework For Teaching.
Cohort Training, Phase II November 29 – 30, 2012.
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements
Educator Effectiveness Evaluation Overview
Introduction to Core Professionalism
The Unannounced observation
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Why Evaluate Teaching Quality Assurance Professional Learning 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Today’s Goals: Participants will learn.. The role of the Framework in teacher assessment Best practices in teacher evaluation How to conduct teacher evaluation to accommodate quality assurance and professional learning, too How to differentiate for novices, experienced teachers, and at-risk teachers How to create buy-in for all stakeholders. 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

The Widget Effect Identify the three most important facts from your section of the reading: “a”s: p – 14 “b”s: p – 18 “c”s: p – 23 “d”s: p – 30 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Share and Learn Within your group, have each individual person share their three big ideas from their reading. Mark your own document accordingly Discuss your thinking as a table group. 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

5 “Rules” for Teacher Evaluation 1. Defensible definition of teaching 2. Differentiation of evaluative processes 3. Evidence-driven process 4. The role of teacher learning 5. Transparency 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing? 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Rule # 1 Start with a defensible definition of good teaching that is studied, and understood, by all stakeholders. 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

A Framework for Teaching: Components of Professional Practice 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities Reflecting on Teaching Maintaining Accurate Records Communicating with Families Contributing to the School and District Growing and Developing Professionally Showing Professionalism Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Engaging Students in Learning Using Assessment in Instruction Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy Demonstrating Knowledge of Students Selecting Instruction Goals Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources Designing Coherent Instruction Assessing Student Learning Domain 2: The Classroom Environment Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport Establishing a Culture for Learning Managing Classroom Procedures Managing Student Behavior Organizing Physical Space 1.3-B

The Card Sort Use a sticky note Write ◦ Domain ◦ Component ◦ Element ◦ Share with table mates as instructed; get consensus 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Rewrite Select one scenario at your table Determine tentative LOP Rewrite at higher and lower levels using rubric characteristics 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

5 “Rules” for Teacher Evaluation 1. Defensible definition of teaching 2. Differentiation of evaluative processes 3. Evidence-driven process 4. Teacher learning integral 5. Transparency 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Rule # 2 Differentiate the processes of evaluation for novices, experienced teachers and teachers at risk. 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Differentiated Evaluation Novice/Untenured Very close observation and assessment Experienced/Tenured Presumption of professionalism At-Risk Not punitive Formal and informal observation of teaching is key + teacher interviews + artifacts Structured process 1/3yr. Other years: informals + teacher interviews+ professional goal- setting Intensive, extensive team-based support based on persistent unsatisfactory performance in one or more components 2 – 4 formal times per year; multiple informal observations Professional Goal- Setting: Choose from a list of rigorous, approved activities Clear goals, outcomes, evidence and timelines anchor No self-directed activities Activities produce evidence which is then evaluated Designed for the teacher who can, and wishes, to improve 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing? 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Process for IPGP 1. Begins with rubric self-assessment 2. Selected goal (1) is a measurable FFT component 3. Articulate activities/evidence that are tied to goal attainment and are job-embedded and measurable 4. Discuss with principal, receive feedback 5. Conduct plan, receive principal support 6. Goal attainment is documented by evidence 7. Evidence of impact upon student learning is included 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

5 “Rules” for Teacher Evaluation 1. Defensible definition of teaching 2. Differentiation of evaluative processes 3. Evidence-driven process 4. Teacher learning integral 5. Transparency 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Rule # 3 Let evidence, not opinion, anchor the process. 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Evidence or Opinion? 1. The teacher has a warm relationship with the students. 2. The teacher said that the South should have won the Civil War. 3. The table groups were arranged in 2 x 2 pods. 4. The materials and supplies were organized well. 5. Wait time was insufficient for student thinking. 6. The teacher stated that students have learned to add 2-digit numbers in preparation for today’s lesson students, questioned randomly, did not know the day’s learning goals. 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Evidence Evidence is a factual reporting of events. It may include teacher and student actions and behaviors. It may also include artifacts prepared by the teacher, students or others. It is not clouded with personal opinion or biases. It is selected using professional judgment by the observer and/or the teacher. 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED 1.5-A

Observation-based Assessment: Process and Evidence 1. Pre-Observation: D1, D4 2. Observation: D1, D2, D3 3.Post-Teaching: D1, D2, D3, D4 4.Collaborative Assessment: D1, D2, D3, D4 Standard Lesson Plan with components of D1 Standard Evidence Collection Doc, shared w/teacher Teacher Self-Assessment: Rubrics and addition/correction of evidence Evaluator Rubric and Teacher Self- Assessment Rubric: Teacher leads 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Practice Watch the pre-observation conference Collect evidence on your Lesson Plan form Write evidence only. 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Daily Lesson Plans 1c: What will students learn? 1e: How will I teach it to them? 1f: How will I measure which students learned it? 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Observation-based Assessment: Process and Evidence 1. Pre-Observation: D1, D4 2. Observation: D1, D2, D3 3.Post-Teaching: D1, D2, D3, D4 4.Collaborative Assessment: D1, D2, D3, D4 Standard Lesson Plan with components of D1 Standard Evidence Collection Doc, shared w/teacher Teacher Self-Assessment: Rubrics and addition/correction of evidence Evaluator Rubric and Teacher Self- Assessment Rubric: Teacher leads 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Types of Observation Evidence Verbatim scripting of teacher or student comments: “ Could one person from each table collect materials?” Descriptions of observed teacher or student behavior : The teacher stands by the door, greeting students as they enter. Numeric information about time, student participation, resource use, etc.: Three students of the eighteen offer nearly all of the comments during discussion. An observed aspect of the environment: The assignment is on the board for students to do while roll is taken. 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED 2.2-A

Collecting Evidence for D2, D3 Watch the lesson Collect evidence of what you see and hear. If you aren’t sure where to write the evidence, just write it. This is practice; relax 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Points about Evidence All questions are not about 3b Engagement is about the nature of the work and who does it Formative assessments should assess whether EACH student met the objectives. 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Observation-based Assessment: Process and Evidence 1. Pre-Observation: D1, D4 2. Observation: D1, D2, D3 3.Post-Teaching: D1, D2, D3, D4 4.Collaborative Assessment: D1, D2, D3, D4 Standard Lesson Plan with components of D1 Standard Evidence Collection Doc, shared w/teacher; addition/correction of evidence Teacher Self-Assessment: Rubrics and Evaluator Rubric and Teacher Self- Assessment Rubric: Teacher leads 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Mark Components of Agreement Do NOT mark components with which you are not in agreement DO mark the components of agreement 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

Concluding about the Lesson Where did your group mark the lesson at or above proficient? Where did your group mark below proficient? 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED

5 “Rules” for Teacher Evaluation 1. Defensible definition of teaching 2. Differentiation of evaluative processes 3. Evidence-driven process 4. Teacher learning integral 5. Transparency 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED