DEVELOPING ALGEBRA-READY STUDENTS FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL: EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF EARLY ALGEBRA PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS:Maria L. Blanton, University of Massachusetts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

SCIENCE & TESTING. CMT-SCIENCE Given for the first time in Spring 2008 in grades 5 & 8 Consists of multiple choice and open ended questions Based on student.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence
The Research Consumer Evaluates Measurement Reliability and Validity
Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 7e © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 Reliability.
Action Plan Mr. Ahmed Zaki Uddin Mathematics O-Level.
A Presentation of the New Hampshire State Task Force on Mathematics Instruction Report to the State Board of Education, March 2012 Patty Ewen (603)
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Quality of New Assessments By Mark Teoh, Susan Volbrecht and Michael Savoy, Winter 2015 Funded by The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust.
Algebra in the Elementary Grades: Defining Research Priorities Maria L. Blanton Mathematics Dept University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Jere Confrey Frank.
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
New Hampshire Enhanced Assessment Initiative: Technical Documentation for Alternate Assessments Alignment Inclusive Assessment Seminar Brian Gong Claudia.
1 New York State Mathematics Core Curriculum 2005.
Calculators Not! Why Not? Jan Martin Assessment Director, SD DOE SDCTM Feb.8, 2014.
Michigan Career Education Conference February 6, 2012.
Principles of Assessment
Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics High School Session 2: Matching Clusters of Standards to Critical Areas in one.
1 MSP-Motivation Assessment Program (MSP-MAP) Tools for the Evaluation of Motivation-Related Outcomes of Math and Science Instruction Martin Maehr
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Understanding the Shifts in the Common Core State Standards A Focus on Mathematics Wednesday, October 19 th, :00 pm – 3:30 pm Doug Sovde, Senior.
Scientific Inquiry: Learning Science by Doing Science
New York State Education Department Understanding The Process: Science Assessments and the New York State Learning Standards.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Elementary Math: Principals Professional Development Fall 2011.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions District Learning Day Friday, September 18, 2015.
1 Issues in Assessment in Higher Education: Science Higher Education Forum on Scientific Competencies Medellin-Colombia Nov 2-4, 2005 Dr Hans Wagemaker.
A Framework of Mathematics Inductive Reasoning Reporter: Lee Chun-Yi Advisor: Chen Ming-Puu Christou, C., & Papageorgiou, E. (2007). A framework of mathematics.
Committee on the Assessment of K-12 Science Proficiency Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education National Academy of Sciences.
Ensuring that Professional Development Leads to Improved Mathematics Teaching & Learning Kristen Malzahn Horizon Research, Inc. TDG Leadership Seminar.
Assessment of an Arts-Based Education Program: Strategies and Considerations Noelle C. Griffin Loyola Marymount University and CRESST CRESST Annual Conference.
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions High School
Mt. Diablo Unified School District Elementary Mathematics Adoption Buy Back Day Thursday, August 27, 2009.
Elementary Math: Grade 5 Professional Development Fall 2011.
Maria Blanton - UMass Dartmouth Eric Knuth - UW Madison Project Associates Angela Gardiner Isil Isler Tim Marum Ana Stephens algebra.wceruw.orgkaputcenter.umassd.edu/projects/ea/alg_ready.
Inquiry Based Learning District Learning Day 1:45-2:45 August 5, 2015.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
Mathematics Teachers Grade 8 October 10, 2013 Joy Donlin and Tony Lobascher.
Using Common Core State Standards of Seventh Grade Mathematics in the Application of NXT LEGO® Robotics for CReSIS Middle School Students.
1 Mapping children’s understanding of mathematical equivalence Roger S. Taylor, Bethany Rittle-Johnson, Percival G. Matthews, Katherine L. McEldoon.
FALCON Meeting #3 Preparation for Harnett County Schools Thursday, March 8, 2012.
High School Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
The Research Process.  There are 8 stages to the research process.  Each stage is important, but some hold more significance than others.
Validity Validity is an overall evaluation that supports the intended interpretations, use, in consequences of the obtained scores. (McMillan 17)
SCS TNCore Rollout 2013 Study Group #4 Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Arrive At Essential Understandings: Part 2- Asking Advancing Questions.
January 26, 2011 Careers Conference, Madison, Wisconsin Robin Nickel, Ph.D. Associate Director, Worldwide Instructional Design System.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Summary of Assessments By the Big Island Team: (Sherry, Alan, John, Bess) CCSS SBAC PARCC AP CCSSO.
Mathematics and the Common Core Principals’ Conference November 18, 2011.
Enriching Assessment of the Core Albert Oosterhof, Faranak Rohani, & Penny J. Gilmer Florida State University Center for Advancement of Learning and Assessment.
Considering the Roles of Research and Evaluation in DR K-12 Projects December 3, 2010.
13.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION APR 2015 MARGINS: GREAT FOR ERRORS, NOT SO GOOD FOR.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Field Fridays: Immersing Preservice Teachers in Learning Inquiry Mathematics Instruction Eula E. Monroe & Damon L. Bahr Brigham Young University Joseph.
Bennington County Head Start Child Outcomes Midpoint Data Report.
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Cheryl Blanco Smarter Balanced Colorado Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force August 24, 2012.
Research Opportunities in AMSP UK Mathematics Education Retreat October 15, 2005.
Supporting Regional AfL in K-12 Mathematics through Networked Professional Learning Panel: Eleanor Newman, Tammy Billen, Danielle LaPointe-McEwan, Sharon.
Research and Evaluation
Chapter 8: Performance-Based Strategies
Oleh: Beni Setiawan, Wahyu Budi Sabtiawan
Using the Michigan Focal Points to Guide Instruction and Assessment
Presented by: Angela J. Williams
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
Superintendent Goals Update MAY 7, 2013
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Presentation transcript:

DEVELOPING ALGEBRA-READY STUDENTS FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL: EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF EARLY ALGEBRA PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS:Maria L. Blanton, University of Massachusetts DartmouthEric Knuth, University of Wisconsin Madison This is a 3-year project designed to build the preliminary components for investigating the impacts of early algebra education on students’ algebra readiness in middle grades. The project goals are 1.To coordinate research, curricular, and mathematical perspectives to design a curricular learning progression [CLP] that identifies core algebraic concepts and their progression in children’s thinking across upper elementary and middle grades (grades 3-8). We expect the CLP to be based on core algebra areas involving variable, functions, equality, expressions and equations, proportional reasoning, and number and operation. 2.Using the CLP, to design grade-based assessments of students’ algebra understanding for upper elementary and middle grades (grades 3-7) and to validate these assessments through psychometric testing. 3.To conduct a preliminary study concerning the impact of an early algebra intervention based on the CLP and measured by the assessments developed in Project Goal 2. 4.To use the CLP and associated tasks to identify appropriate tasks for content-based teacher professional development [TPD] and to refine this through implementation of the TPD. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES RATIONALE FOR THE PROJECT Teaching and learning algebra has undergone a critical transformation in the US over the last two decades. Recognizing that historical paths to algebra have been largely unsuccessful in terms of students’ achievement in algebra, numerous conferences have convened to examine challenges in traditional algebra education and identify possible solutions. As a result, scholars have increasingly advocated that algebra be re- conceptualized in school mathematics as a longitudinal, grades K-12 strand of thinking so that students have long-term, sustained algebra experiences in school mathematics, beginning in the elementary grades, that build their natural, informal intuitions about structure and relationships into formalized ways of mathematical thinking. Along these lines, early algebra research has provided us with important evidence regarding children’s ability to think algebraically. However, a great deal of that evidence is still local in nature. As such, an open question in early algebra research involves understanding the impact a sustained, longitudinal early algebra experience has on students’ achievement in middle school and beyond. One of the essential reasons that impacts of early algebra education have not been explored extensively is that the curricular connections between early algebra and algebra in later grades have not been clearly articulated and appropriate assessments have not been developed and validated to examine student understanding of the skills within this domain. This project aims to address this work. RESEARCH METHODS & DESIGN Project Goal 2: Assessments for grades 3-7 will be developed using the CLP. Psychometric properties of the assessments will be evaluated in the following ways: (1)Internal consistency estimates of reliability will be calculated for each assessment. Individual items will be evaluated with respect to test reliability, item difficulty, variance, and item-total correlations. Each assessment will also be compared against state assessment scores to help establish construct validity. (2)We will evaluate item difficulties in relation to our (and the advisory board’s as expert panel) predictions of item difficulty and correlate our predicted item difficulties with those actually observed in our validation samples for evidence of test validity, construct validity and cognitive diagnostic assessment. (3)The project’s advisory board will provide expert evaluation of our individual items and overall assessments as a means to ensure content validity. Project Goal 3: We will conduct teaching experiments in grades 3-5 in one elementary school. Data will include students’ written work and student interviews. Assessments will be administered to students in experimental and control sites. Analysis will focus on students’ understanding of algebra concepts identified in the CLP. Results will be used to refine algebra assessments and the CLP. Student responses to the assessments will be analyzed for differences in student performance between control and experimental groups as a way to establish preliminary results of the teaching experiment and how it supports student progress within the CLP. Project Goal 4: Teachers in the experimental school will participate in TPD based on the CLP. We will use the TPD to explore how teachers understand the teaching experiment tasks, how they adapt these in their classroom practice, and how they interpret and use students’ thinking about the tasks in instruction. Data will include teacher reflections and responses to a questionnaire focusing on (1) teachers’ perceived appropriateness of the task for their students, (2) issues of implementing the tasks in their classroom, (3) whether the format for the TPD was reasonable and appropriate, and (4) what they learned about impacts of the tasks on children’s algebraic thinking. We will informally validate the questionnaires by interviewing selected teachers to ascertain why they responded as they did. Results will be used to refine the TPD for use in sustained, teacher-led early algebra interventions. Project Staff Angela Murphy Gardiner, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Ana Stephens, University of Wisconsin Madison Courtney Koestler, University of Wisconsin Madison Dan McGinn, University of Wisconsin Madison