Air Pollution as a Feedback Control Loop Andrew McCarthy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Air Pollution as a Feedback Control Loop Andrew McCarthy.
Advertisements

New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
Energy and the Environment: Likely Winners & Losers in the Second Obama Administration ACG Breakfast - December 14, 2012 Copyright © by N.W. Bernstein.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Stationary-Source Local Air Pollution.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule & 40 CFR Parts 53 and 58 Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations;
Earth’s Changing Environment Lecture 3 Air Quality.
U.S. Market for SO2 Allowances
CONGESTION MITIGATION & AIR QUALITY(CMAQ) 1.  FY2013 = $9.8 million for NE  New CMAQ Guidance, November 12, 2013  Purpose of the CMAQ Program is to.
Air Protection Branch 1. 2 Air Quality Activities Support the Mission of the Air Protection Branch Monitor and Report Air Quality Data Analysis and Planning.
 Homework #3 Due Thursday  Quiz #2 Next Thursday Sept. 29th  Homework #4 Due Tuesday Oct. 11  Exam #2 Tuesday Oct. 11  Writing Assignment Due Oct.
Environmental Sustainability in the Extractive Industry: The Case for Climate Change Mitigation Dr Uwem E. Ite.
Trends of Mercury Flow over the US with Emphasis on Florida Progress Report by Janja Husar and Rudolf Husar Submitted to Thomas Atkeson, Florida DEP May.
Wenxin Zhang Department of Civic Design University of Liverpool
ADEQ Uses of ICF Modeling Analysis Tony Davis, Branch Manager – Air Planning Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Criteria Pollutant Modeling Analysis.
Clean Air Act and Permits
Janja D. Husar and Rudolf B. Husar
Wet Deposition of Mercury In The U.S. Results from the NADP Mercury Deposition Network, David Gay Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, IL,
Missouri Air Quality Issues Stephen Hall Air Quality Analysis Section Air Pollution Control Program Air Quality Applied Sciences Team (AQAST) 9 th Semi-Annual.
December 4, Utility MACT Air & Waste Management Association/EPA Information Exchange December 4, 2002 William H. Maxwell Combustion Group/ESD.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
Environmental Protection Division 1 AWMA Georgia Air Update August 10, 2007 Heather Abrams, Branch Chief.
Colorado: An Air Quality History WESTAR SPRING BUSINESS MEETING MAR CH 29 – 30, 2010.
Emissions Inventory and Air Quality Planning National Urban Air Quality Workshop Lahore, Pakistan December 13, 2004.
REGULATIONS. LIMITATIONS Availability of funds Lack of scientific data Property rights of individuals.
Indiana Environmental Health Summit Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) June 6, 2011 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP Commissioner,
Air Pollution Dr. R. B. Schultz. Introduction Air pollution Types Air pollution Types Sources of pollutants Sources of pollutants Pollution and weather.
 All the external conditions, circumstances, and influences surrounding and affecting the growth and development of an organism or a community of organisms.
Air Quality 101 Kansas Air Quality Program overview.
What Does a Tribal Air Program Look Like? James Payne Morongo Band of Mission Indians Environmental Department.
Air Quality Management China City Mobilization Workshop Joseph Paisie USEPA Beijing, China.
Air Pollution Solutions Ch. 18. How should we deal with air pollution? Legal, economic, and technical tools can help us to clean up air pollution, but.
Organization of Course INTRODUCTION 1.Course overview 2.Air Toxics overview 3.HYSPLIT overview HYSPLIT Theory and Practice 4.Meteorology 5.Back Trajectories.
Presentation for Air Quality Coalitions The 2015 Proposed Ozone Standard.
Anthony F. DiMarco, M.D. Professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilition Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth Medical Center Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process
Global Ozone Project Curriculum
Preparation of Control Strategies October 18, 2007 NAAQS RIA Workshop Darryl Weatherhead, Kevin Culligan, Serpil Kayin, David Misenheimer, Larry Sorrels.
1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and State Implementation Plans North Carolina Division of Air Quality National Ambient Air Quality Standards and.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
Air Quality & Traffic August 25, 2015.
Environmental Science: Toward a Sustainable Future Richard T. Wright Atmospheric Pollution PPT by Clark E. Adams Chapter 21.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
Current and Future Air Quality Issues Facing the States Bart Sponseller Air Management Bureau Director Joseph Hoch Regional Pollutants Section Chief NASA.
Indiana Environmental Management Conference October 16, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management 1.
Clean Air Act SAFE 210. Purpose Protect public health and regulate air emissions Addresses both stationary and mobile sources.
Feedback Loops Andrew McCarthy. Purpose of Feedback The primary reason for feedback control is to measure and compensate for the effect of disturbances.
Anthropogenic Mercury Flow in the US and Florida, Janja D. Husar and Rudolf B. Husar Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri Supported by.
Air Quality Management Comparison of Cap-and-Trade, Command-and Control and Rate-Based Programs Dr. Ruben Deza Senior Environmental Engineer Clean Air.
Nitrogen= 78% Oxygen=21% CO 2 =0.035% Total= %
Air Pollution as a Feedback Control Loop Andrew McCarthy.
2.14.  In 1970 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was established  Required to set and enforce air quality standards  Air quality standard –
The Air Pollution Control Act of 1955
EPA Air Policy Priorities
Air Pollution and Stratospheric Ozone Depletion
Reducing Air Pollution
Clean Air Act Glossary.
The Cost of Excessive Regulation in the Coal Industry
16.4 Control of Air Pollution
Cause Of Air And Water Pollution
Number of Hours Above 1-hour Ozone NAAQS
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
The Clean Air Act By Jessi Walker Per 2.
Major Air Pollutants: Part 1
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
Michigan Air Emissions
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
Travis Felthaus APES -4 Bodas
Clean Air Act of 1963 By: Brian Bae Period 4.
Sulfur Dioxide 1-Hour NAAQS Implementation
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Presentation transcript:

Air Pollution as a Feedback Control Loop Andrew McCarthy

Introduction  Air Pollution Feedback Control  Purpose and Components of Feedback  Components of Air Pollution Feedback Control, with Mercury as a specific example

Air Pollution Feedback Control A feedback control system is a metaphor for air pollution.

Air Pollution Feedback Control Economic growth has benefits, but with those benefits come risks, such as those caused by air pollution. As a result, the growth must be controlled.

Purpose of Feedback The primary reason for feedback control is to measure and compensate for the effect of disturbances.

4 Elements of Feedback  Sensor  Reference Input  Comparator  Control Mechanism

Sensor The sensor measures the variable that we seek to control, also known as the control variable.

How is pollution sensed?  Monitoring agencies use EPA approved equipment. PM and lead are measured over a 24 hour period, whereas gaseous pollutants are measured hourly. Collected data is then compared to the Clean Air Act standards (NAAQS) for each pollutant.  In the case of Mercury, U.S. Bureau of Mines data is examined for the following categories: electrical, paint, agricultural chemicals, measuring and control instruments, lab use, pharmaceutical, dental, chlorine, caustic soda manufacturing, and other. This data does not give a complete picture of the amount of mercury that goes into the air; it only tells what is mobilized. In order to determine how much mercury is emitted into the air, this is combined with emission data such as 50% for coal, 75% for paint, and 30% for electrical, control equipment, and lab use. This combined with mobilization data, gives an accurate picture of the amount of mercury emitted.

Reference Input This specifies the value the controlled variable should have.

Pollution Reference Value The EPA creates Clean Air Act standards (NAAQS) for each pollutant. This sets a standard for the ambient presence of pollutants. Additionally, the EPA sets emission standards for a wide range of pollutants. For the case of mercury, the EPA sets standards depending upon the use. (ie 50 ppm for paint, 50% reduction by chlor-alkali industry by 2005, 90% emission reduction by municipal waste combustors by 2000, and 95% emission reduction by medical waste incinerators)

Pollution Reference Value NAAQS represent the reference values: Carbon Monoxide (9 ppm, 8 hour) PM10 (150ug/cubic meter, 24 hour) PM2.5 (65ug/cubic meter, 24 hour) Ozone (.08 ppm, 8 hour) Sulfur Oxides (.14 ppm, 24 hour)

Comparator Compares the sensed value with the reference value. It also specifies the magnitude of the correction that needs to be made. (ie barely exceeding the standard vs. exceeding the standard by a large margin)

Air Pollution Comparator The EPA compares the data collected by monitoring sites to the Clean Air Act Standard. The EPA can, in the case of Mercury, monitor certain industries, such as the paint industry, and the products they produce to determine if mercury levels are within their guidelines.

Control Mechanism Takes the output of the comparator and makes corrective measures while progress toward the air quality standard is continuously tracked. Disturbance has been added to the system to illustrate that progress toward the standard is an iterative process and not a single step process.

Air Pollution Control Mechanism If pollution levels are above the NAAQS and present a risk, the monitoring agency in the state must develop and implement a plan to reduce the air pollution. If mercury levels are too high in a given industry, the EPA can levy stiff financial penalties, and the industry opens itself to litigation.

Conclusion  A feedback control system was presented as a metaphor for air pollution.  Four components of air pollution feedback control were presented: sensor, reference input, comparator, and control mechanism.  Mercury was examined as a specific example by looking at how mercury is sensed, how the EPA sets the reference input, how the sensed value is compared to the EPA’s standards, and the measures that the EPA takes to ensure that once an out of compliance value is sensed that it can be brought back into compliance.

References