Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) 2015 Call for Projects Workshop February 17, 2015 HCMPO Conference Room| Weslaco, TX.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ODOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Sheila Lyons, PE Local Area Government Conference 2011.
Advertisements

2013 TAP CONFERENCE MAP-21 FINAL GUIDANCE ODOT Office of Local Programs.
Downtown Revitalization Overview OBJECTIVES Provide for investments in Nebraska communities that will contribute to the revitalization or redevelopment.
2014 APPLICATION CYCLE TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM.
TRAILS AS TRANSPORTATION Design & Construction Michael J. Kubek, P.E. Ohio Department of Transportation, District 12 Production Administrator.
Local Programs Update July 24, 2014 Jennifer B. DeBruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.
Transportation Alternatives Program FY 2015 Proposed Projects for Funding in Northern Virginia Transportation Planning Board May 21, 2014 Sarah Crawford.
Transportation Enhancement Activities Expanding transportation choices, increasing recreation opportunity and access, revitalizing economies.
Environmental Justice (EJ) & Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Grant Programs California Department of Transportation District 3 January 25,
Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged 07 August 2013 Jennifer Hibbert Director FTA Office of Planning and Program Development.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Overview NYS Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Council August 2, 2010 Albany, New York.
York Region’s Pedestrian and Cycling Municipal Partnership Program Presentation to 2014 Sustainable Mobility and Healthy Communities Summit ACT Canada.
Chronic 2009 Conference - National Harbor, MD 2/23/2009.
Transportation Alternatives. MAP-21 & TAP MAP-21 requires the following with respect to the allocation & selection of projects: ◦TAP funds sub-allocated.
Navigating MAP-21 Workshop: Hidalgo County Profile Presented by Andrew A. Canon, Transportation Director Hidalgo County MPO 510 S Pleasantview Dr., Weslaco,
PennDOT’s Transportation Alternatives Program February 18, 2014.
Safe Routes to School: An update on programs, practice and how public health is playing a role Nancy Pullen, MPH, Program Manager September 14, 2006.
DATS Bicycle Planning 2009 Bicycle Advisory Committee Kickoff Danville Area Transportation Study July 13, 2009.
Funding Levels Similar funding levels to the Transportation Enhancement Activities under SAFETEA-LU: FY 2013: $808,760,000 FY 2014: $819,900,000 Total.
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) National Historic Trails Workshop, October
Webinar: August 28, Transportation Alternatives Program Webinar: August 28, 2013 Introduction: Shari Schaftlein, Director, FHWA Office of Human.
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) International Snowmobile Congress — June
Louisiana Safe Routes to School Program Department of Transportation and Development Louisiana Safe Routes to School Program The Application.
Kansas Department of Transportation Becky Pepper Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator Kansas Department of Transportation Contact:
State Financing Programs for Brownfield Redevelopment.
Trail Funding Sources & General Information
TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS. OVERVIEW  The CRTPA coordinates the annual submission of priority project lists (PPLs) to the FDOT for annual funding consideration.
Transportation Enhancement Funds Workshop April 19, 2004 MAG Saguaro Room.
1 Transportation Alternatives Program FY2015 Application Update February 19, 2014 Jennifer DeBruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.
From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH.
1 Item 11: Review of Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
MDOT Office of Economic Development Michael B. Kapp, Administrator Grant Programs Overview Transportation Solutions for Vibrant Communities.
1 Tribal Transit Program Federal Transit Administration May 2007 Bill Ramos Regional Tribal Transit Liaison.
Broward Complete Streets Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Meeting Monday August 10, 2015.
ADOT Multimodal Planning Division Planning Assistance for Rural Areas (PARA) Program Overview December 4, 2013.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.
TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS (TE) PROGRAM. Transportation Enhancements (TE) Program What is the Transportation Enhancements (TE) Program? What is the Transportation.
MDOT Office of Economic Development Michael B. Kapp, Administrator Grant Programs Overview Transportation Solutions for Vibrant Communities Upper Peninsula.
Texas Recreation and Parks Account, Boating Access & Recreational Trails Program Rules Review Public Hearings.
9 TH STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN Corvallis Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) Ali Bonakdar.
Transportation Programs. Habitat and Wildlife Habitat Connectivity Restoration Mitigation Wildlife Human Safety Crossings.
Caltrans Transportation Planning Grant Programs: Partnership Planning & 5304 Transit Planning Presented by Priscilla Martinez-Velez California Department.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grant Program California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning Office of Community.
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)
1 Tribal Transit Program Federal Transit Administration October 2006.
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT USING GIS TYLER MEYER, AICP 2015 AMPO Conference Clark County, NV October 2015.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
PennDOT’s Transportation Alternatives Program November 16, 2015.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
Caltrans Transportation Planning Grant Programs: Partnership Planning & 5304 (formerly 5305) Transit Planning Presented by Priscilla Martinez-Velez California.
Active Transportation Program California Transportation Commission Mitch Weiss 01/14/141.
Livingston County Transportation Connectivity Plan Final Report December 2013.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM (TAP) - FFY2018 & FFY2019 Funding & Application Processes Santa Fe MPO Technical Coordinating Committee Meeting; May.
FUNDING AVAILABILITY & SAFETY PROGRAMS 3//21/2013.
City of Belmont Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting 11/4/2015.
Community Crossings Matching Grant Fund Program Kathy Eaton-McKalip
Department of Transportation and the Corporation for National and Community Service: Engaging Corps.
TITLE PAGE: Project Title
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
Office of Greenways & Trails
Complete Streets Award Program
Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-aside
Chris Metka 2017 Statewide Conference on Heritage ???
Recreational Trails Program (RTP)
Navigating MAP-21 Workshop: Hidalgo County Profile
MPO Board Presentation
Federal-aid Highway Program
Safe Routes to School John Schaefer State Coordinator.
Presentation transcript:

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) 2015 Call for Projects Workshop February 17, 2015 HCMPO Conference Room| Weslaco, TX

Workshop Overview The workshop will focus on addressing the following questions:  What is TAP?  Who is eligible to apply?  What projects qualify for funding? Ineligible?  How much funding is available?  What is the TAP Process?  What is required before I apply?  How will my application be scored?  What attachments should I include?

What is TAP? MAP-21, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century signed In 2012, established the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)  Transportation Enhancements (TE), Safe Routes to School Program, and Recreational Trails Program (TRP) were combined into one funding source.  Provides funds for a variety of alternative transportation projects including bicycle and pedestrian facilities  States have sub-allocated 50% of funds to MPOs in urbanized areas with populations over 200,000. TAP TE SRTS RTP

What is TAP? MAP-21, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century signed In 2012, established the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)  The State and MPOs are responsible for creating their own competitive processes  HCMPO will have $4.6 million available in FY TAP Call for Projects  90% will fund Construction Projects 10% will fund Planning and Design  Future program calls will be held every other year for construction type projects only  Approx. $2 million available TAP TE SRTS RTP

Eligible Sponsors?  Under 23 U.S.C. 213(c)(4)(b), the eligible entities to receive TAP funds are:  Local governments  Regional transportation authorities  Transit agencies  Natural resource or public land agencies  School Districts, local education agencies, or schools  Tribal governments  Any other local or regional government entity with responsibility for oversight of transportation or recreational trails  Nonprofit organizations are not eligible as direct grant recipients for TAP funds unless they qualify through one of the eligible entity categories. Nonprofits are eligible to partner with any eligible entity on a TAP project.

Eligible Projects?  While several categories are eligible for TAP funds based on federal guidelines, the MPO has deemed only the following as eligible:  Construction, planning, and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non-motorized forms of transportation, including: Sidewalks

Eligible Projects?  While several categories are eligible for TAP funds based on federal guidelines, the MPO has deemed only the following as eligible:  Construction, planning, and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non-motorized forms of transportation, including: Bicycle Infrastructure

Eligible Projects?  While several categories are eligible for TAP funds based on federal guidelines, the MPO has deemed only the following as eligible:  Construction, planning, and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non-motorized forms of transportation, including: Pedestrian and Bicycle Signals

Eligible Projects?  While several categories are eligible for TAP funds based on federal guidelines, the MPO has deemed only the following as eligible:  Construction, planning, and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non-motorized forms of transportation, including: Traffic Calming Techniques Lighting & other safety related infrastructure

Eligible Projects?  While several categories are eligible for TAP funds based on federal guidelines, the MPO has deemed only the following as eligible:  Construction, planning, and design of infrastructure-related projects and systems that will provide safe routes for non-drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs. Bike Share, Shared Use Paths, Bus Stop Improvements

INELIGIBLE Projects The MPO has deemed the following as ineligible:  Conversion of abandoned railroad corridors (Rails to Trails)  Turnouts, overlooks, and viewing areas  Inventory, control or removal of outdoor advertising  Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities  Vegetation management practices in transportation R-O-Ws  Archaeological activities  Environmental mitigation activities  Recreational Trails Program  Safe Routes to School  Planning, Design, or construction of boulevards TAP funds can not be used for:  State or MPO administrative purposes  Promotional activities  General Parks & Rec facilities, playground equipment, sports fields, campgrounds, or picnic areas and pavilions  Routine maintenance and operations

Available Funds FY Call for Projects for Hidalgo County will have a total of $4.6 million available  There is a minimum local cash match of 20%. Entities must provide proof of local match funding availability for each submitted project.  Non-cash donations can be used on a project but will not count towards the required local match and should not be included in the budget.  No more than 4 projects may be submitted and must be prioritized. Activity Type% of TAP Funding AllocatedTotal TAP Funding Available Construction90%$4,176,000 Planning & Design10%$464,000

Questions? Any questions on the TAP Program? NEXT: Application Process and Scoring Criteria

Application Overview

 Applications must be received “in-hand” by May 8 th at 5PM, Central Standard Time  Project Proposals should be mailed or hand-delivered to: Hidalgo County Metropolitan Planning Organization Attn: Linda De La Fuente 510 S Pleasantview Drive Weslaco, TX 78596

Application Overview Completed Application packets shall include: Project Location Maps & Other Supporting Maps (no more than 15) Itemized Project Cost Estimate Resolution of Commitment of Local Match and Overmatch Evidence of Public Involvement and Letter of Support (no more than 10) Materials such as photos, diagrams, and so on to supplement the project description and explain conditions and proposed improvements Project proposals must consist of three (3) original hard copies (including attachments) and one (1) electronic copy of all files on a CD, or USB drive.

Evaluation Process Evaluation and Selection Process  Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) will evaluate and score each project  The average scores will be presented to TAC for review.  TAC will present proposed project selections and awards to TPC  TPC has final approval of all projects and funding

Program Timeline  February 20 th – Call for Projects will open  May 8 th – Call for Projects will close  May 11 th – BPAC will evaluate the submitted projects  June 2 nd – TAC will review scores and recommend projects for selection  June 18 th – TPC will review TAC recommendations  June 3 rd – July 15 th – Public Involvement Period  July 7 th – TAC will finalize project selections and award amounts  July 16 th – TPC will approve finalized project selections and awards

Evaluation & Scoring Criteria Evaluation CriteriaScoring (Maximum points) Improving Safety29 Making Linkages and Connections24 Incorporates Ped/Bike Design Enhancements and Promotes Active Living 15 Connecting to Employment, Households, and Activity Centers 12 Implementing Active Transportation or Mobility Plan10 Serving Disadvantaged (Environmental Justice) Areas10 Total100 Above and Beyond CriteriaUp to 22 (bonus) pts

Evaluation & Scoring Criteria Improving Safety ( 29 Points Maximum)  Provides safer, less intimidating facilities for pedestrian, bicyclists, and other non-drivers by improving safety in areas with high numbers of crashes.  Improve crossings  Improve signalizations, lighting  Traffic calming  Other safety improvements  13 points – improves safety in areas with high # of crashes within a block (300 ft) of project  8 points – improves mobility for elderly, disabled, and/or youth  8 points – improves visibility of non-drivers to vehicular traffic

Evaluation & Scoring Criteria Making Linkages and Connections ( 24 Points Maximum)  Improves connections between neighborhoods, cities, transit services, bicycle facilities, and schools.  Gap closures  Extension of facilities  Linkages between multiple jurisdictions  Providing access to transit via trails, sidewalks, or bicycle facilities  6 points – connects other cities / neighborhoods  6 points – connects to schools/ public buildings or institutions  6 points – extends existing system (bike/ped/transit)  6 points – eliminates gaps in system (bike/ped/transit) ** Regional linkages

Evaluation & Scoring Criteria Incorporates Pedestrian/Bicycle Design Enhancements & Promotes Active Living ( 15 Points Maximum)  Provides pedestrians and bicyclists with landscaping, sidewalk design, crossing treatments, street furniture, bike racks, and lighting which encourage utilization and provides health and environmental benefits  5 points – provides design enhancements  5 points – provides bicycle parking/seating for pedestrians, rest areas  5 points – provides trailheads, staging area and parking *trails, pedestrian walkway enhancements, bicycle boulevard enhancements

Evaluation & Scoring Criteria Connecting to Employment, Households, and Activity Centers (12 Points Maximum)  Provides access to major destinations and large number of residents or employees  4 points – improves access to commercial areas  4 points – improves access to parks and recreational areas  4 points – improves access to educational areas (schools, libraries, learning centers) *small-scale linkages

Evaluation & Scoring Criteria Implementing Active Transportation or Mobility Plan (10 Points Maximum)  Improves mobility as described in:  the MPO’s Regional Bike Plan, Pedestrian Plan, Transit Plan  City Comprehensive or Master Plans  Other Regional Plan  10 points – Project conforms to any MPO, City (entity) or regional Plan *must provide evidence of conformity

Evaluation & Scoring Criteria Serving Disadvantaged (EJ) Areas (10 Points Maximum)  Provides access in underserved communities  10 points – Improves access to areas within or adjacent to 50% of households below poverty rate, as defined by Census

Evaluation & Scoring Criteria Above and Beyond Criteria (22 Bonus Points Maximum)  Local Match (10 points maximum)  21-30% (2), 31-40% (4), 41-50% (6), 51-60% (8), 61%+ (10)  Project Readiness (5 points maximum)  ROW has been acquired (3), PS&E is at least 90% Complete (2)  Funding Completes project (5 points)  Location of project has a Safe Passing Ordinance (2 points)

Contact Info  Linda de la Fuente, Assistant Director Office: Ext  Andrew Canon Office: Ext  Stephen P. Walker R.L.A, District Landscape Architect District TAP Coordinator Texas Department of Transportation - Pharr Office: