PRISMATIC PERCEPTION PROJECT THE LEARNER’S JOURNEY A Critical Thinking Retention Model 2007 TYCA Northeast Conference, Philadelphia, PA Susan E. Apshaga,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Harnessing Outcomes Assessment to Serve Student, Faculty and their Institutions Man and the Machine: Bridging Humanities and Technology – A Teaching/Learning.
Advertisements

Being explicit about learning Focusing feedback on improvement Gathering evidence of learning Handing on responsibility for learning Participation Dialogue.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Introduction to Service-Learning for Students
PORTFOLIO.
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms From Figure 1-2 in Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting.
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms From Figure 1-2 in Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Our Mission: Preparing Students for Postsecondary Success Mansoureh Tehrani R. L. Turner High School
DO NOT PLACE ANY TEXT OR GRAPHICS ABOVE THE GUIDELINE SHOWN DO NOT PLACE ANY TEXT OR GRAPHICS BELOW THE GUIDELINE SHOWN TO EDIT GRAPHICS IN THE MASTER.
Queen Anne’s County: New Teacher Portfolio Prepared by: Hired: August, 2006.
Consistency of Assessment
Key Communities and Objectives Outcomes- Based Assessment Telling the Story Results Closing the Loop.
WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT STUDENT LEARNING ACTIVE LEARNING Why it is Important Will Koolsbergen and Phyllis van Slyck.
ETT 229 Fall 2004 Introductions & Standards. Agenda 10:00-10:40 – Introductions 10:40-11:15 – Standards presentation.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms George Watson Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education
University of Delaware Comparison of Learning Paradigms: Learner-Centered vs. Instructor-Centered Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George.
ETT 429 Spring 2007 Technology Standards. NETS-T Background International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) created National Educational Technology.
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms
University of Delaware Plenary Presentation at September Institute Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning University of Cincinnati September.
University of Delaware Experience It Yourself: An Introduction to Problem-Based Learning Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George Watson.
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms From Figure 1-2 in Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Introduction to teaching and assessing so students will learn more using learner-centered teaching Phyllis Blumberg Warm-up activity How can instructor’s.
New Teacher Performance Evaluation Program
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Meaningful Social Studies & Meaningful Learning
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
MA course on language teaching and testing February 2015.
ENGAGING LEADERS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION ADEA CCI 2011 Summer Liaison Meeting San Diego, CA June 27-29, 2011 Janet M. Guthmiller, DDS, PhD University.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Now That My Marking’s Done, Now What??? Brent Galloway Lori Stuber.
Contributions of Contextual Teaching to Improved Student Learning Richard L. Lynch, PI University of Georgia (706)
A Supplemental Instruction Model for Precalculus Gabriela Schwab El Paso Community College Helmut Knaust Emil Schwab The University of Texas at El Paso.
Learning Objective III: Diverse Learners Teacher candidates and candidates for other professional school personnel roles exhibit knowledge, competence,
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Institutional Outcomes and their Implications for Student Learning by John C. Savagian History Department Alverno C O L L E G E.
CEP Templeton Project: Webinar & On-Line Learning VI – Providing a Meaningful Academic Curriculum & VII – Fostering Students’ Intrinsic Motivation Richard.
Problem-Based Learning. Process of PBL Students confront a problem. In groups, students organize prior knowledge and attempt to identify the nature of.
The DID Model of the Technology-Based Instructional Design EDU 529 Computer-Based Instructional Technology.
“Tell me and I forget, teach me and I remember, involve me and I learn-” Benjamin Franklin.
 Dramatic technological revolution  Increasingly diverse, globalized and complex media- saturated society.  Greater impact on society than from oral.
Professional Practice
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Professional Learning Communities Session 1 Rainier Elementary November 10, 2009.
Contemporary Issues September 12, NJEA Today.
Introduction to STEM Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
N. Katherine Standard’s Exit Portfolio
Effective Assessment: Do students learn what we are teaching? Tricia Munn.
Great Expectations Efficacy and Motivation Developing high expectations of what students, schools and school communities can achieve. Ideas developed in.
The Transformation of Undergraduate Education through Faculty Development and Course Design – Part 1 George Watson (with acknowledgement to.
CHAPTER 1: THOUGHTS & ACTIONS OF BEGINNING SCIENCE TEACHERS CHAPTER 2: THE PURPOSE OF SCIENCE TEACHING CHAPTER 6: THE SCIENCE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Class.
The DID Model of the Technology-Based Instructional Design EDU 529 Computer-Based Instructional Technology.
Christchurch New Zealand October 2009 Integrating new technologies to empower learning and transform leadership.
+ Student Centered Teaching Tools Teaching Certification and Mentorship for Adjunct STEM Faculty: Montgomery College Rockville Christine R. Rai Montgomery.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Strategies to Check Student Learning in the Classroom Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs)
Differentiation through 4MAT
21st Centruy Approaches to Teaching Physics
Pat Conole (315) My Showcase Portfolio Pat Conole (315) t687.
THE JOURNEY TO BECOMING
NJCU College of Education
Insert your name and a picture. Change the Design Template.
Looking Back to Look Ahead
Comparison of Learning Paradigms: Learner-Centered vs
Daisy Anajemba, Ed.D. Educator, Los Angeles, CA USA
Presentation transcript:

PRISMATIC PERCEPTION PROJECT THE LEARNER’S JOURNEY A Critical Thinking Retention Model 2007 TYCA Northeast Conference, Philadelphia, PA Susan E. Apshaga, Debra O. Lilli, Carol A. Panaccione October 20, 2007

An active, student-centered learning paradigm that has garnered national recognition.

The Paradigm at Work The Learner’s Journey is a multidisciplinary, active-learning paradigm that fosters self-directed learning and is based upon: Campbell’s The Hero’s Journey Grow’s 4 Stages of Self-Directed Learning Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development Bloom’s Taxonomy of Critical Thinking

“An environment which affords students opportunities to explore and construct knowledge based on their own observations and experiences.” - Smerdon, Burkam, Lee (1999) II. Defining Student-Centered Teaching __________________________

A student-centered approach is in contrast to the lecture-method of classroom instruction, …lectures were artifacts of the Middle Ages, before there were printing presses. Without printed materials, students merely transcribed the teachers’ or speakers’ comment. This was not learning but transcription. Yet today, the practice continues almost unabated, while learning suffers and students become transcribers, and inefficient ones at that (Broder, 2001).

Paradigm Shift

Community College of Rhode Island 16,042 students 26.9 average age 10,277 part-time 5,765 full-time 10.2% graduation rate 12.9% peer institution graduation rate

Students entering community colleges for the first time are ill-prepared for the rigors of the college experience in the following areas: The application of basic skills Understanding their learning styles Understanding their responsibilities as students Intrinsic motivation The application of critical thinking skills The application of effective communication skills to all courses Need to shift from “passive” to “active” learning mode Being autonomous, self-directed learners

Retention Survey Spring 2007 Total Surveyed: 175 students Focus question: Have you ever dropped a course? Results:  96 Yes  79 No

The 96 who admitted to dropping a course identified four major areas that influenced their decision: Personal issues The course itself Work issues Lack of support

Main Reasons for Dropping a Course

Of those same 96, 63 had also considered but ultimately did not drop a class for the following reasons: Reliance on themselves alone Reliance on themselves plus support from others Reliance on support from others alone

Retention Factor Ratio

Of the 79 who hadn’t dropped any courses, 43 did admit to thinking about it, but decided to finish the course because of the following: Reliance on themselves alone Reliance on themselves and the support of others Reliance on the support of others alone

“What do you think is key to a student’s success in college?” Determination A good student-teacher relationship built on communication, dedication, and respect Self-discipline Motivation and discipline–because at times it feels like everything is going wrong and outside causes just make it worse A good teacher Good time management Being passionate about what you are learning Keeping focused Personal feedback from professors Taking initiative

Goal of The Learner’s Journey ____________________________ To increase student retention, especially during the first year, by -Providing a bridge between high school and college by preparing students for the rigors of the college environment. -Providing strategies to enhance students’ self- concept as learners.

Further Goals ____________________________ For faculty, this course paradigm will provide Strategies which address the academic success of their students, particularly those at-risk. Strategies which address their students’ “college- readiness,” especially those who may not see themselves as college material.

Paradigm Outcomes Using a thematic subject-matter approach, students will: Apply critical thinking skills Apply critical reading skills Apply the writing process Demonstrate improved oral communication skills Apply analytical skills and strategies with regard to a subject matter Work effectively in a collaborative seminar setting Demonstrate improved research skills Connect subject matter to its cultural and historical contexts

Course Outline I. Introduction to The Learner’s Journey II. Learning Styles III. Learning Attitude IV. Responsibility of the Student V. Critical Thinking VI. Effective Communication Strategies VII. Research and Collaboration VIII. Presentation IX. Self-assessment

Student Reflection and Understanding Student Analysis Student Research and Synthesis Student Evaluation and Presentation Student Self- Assessment

“If you want to build a ship, don’t drum up the men to gather wood, divide the work and give orders. Instead, teach them to yearn for the vast and endless sea.” -Antoine de Saint-Exupéry The Wisdom of the Sands