2009-2010 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Enhancing Education through Technology Grant: Improving Instruction Through Regional Data Initiatives.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Advertisements

Instructional Leadership for the 21 st Century University of South Alabama in collaboration with Baldwin and Mobile County Public Schools.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Response to Instruction and Intervention Process Presentation.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Hillsdale County’s Data Director Initiative: ‘Growing Our Warehouse’ Implementation Plan August 4, 2010 Pat Dillon and William Yearling Hillsdale ISD Jennifer.
Comprehensive Literacy Program Louisiana Department of Education
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 9 Competitive.
School Improvement Plan Results & Next Steps December, 2009 Central Elementary School Home of the Eagles.
Braiding Initiatives Steve Goodman, Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Initiative (MiBLSi) April 16, :00PM – 3:30PM
© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Math and Science Education Overview, Fall 2004.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Part II: Strategic Planning for a Successful 1:1 Program
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Partners in Support of Student Achievement: California Department.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Collaboration I nstruction Assessment 1st AnalysisReflection Intervention Assessment 2nd COMING FULL CIRCLE Mallard Creek and UNCC PDS Work Plan Outcomes.
Understanding Stimulus Funding and Leveraging Philanthropy to Support Long-Term Education Goals A Webinar for the Foundation Community February 16, 2010.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Competitive Grants PBS TeacherLine.
Planning for Secondary Growth DIPBLE nvironments CCRCTEL earning 2014RISDF lexible September 22, 2014.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Data for Student Success Regional Data Initiative Presentation November 20, 2009.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Oregon Reading First Orientation Holiday Inn Portland Airport November 12, 2002 Oregon Department of Education.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Tom Corbett, Governor Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Ed.D., Acting Secretary.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Indistar Summit – Coaching with Indistar February 2012 Presenters: Yvonne Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director, Office of School Improvement Michael Hill.
Predicting Patterns: Lenawee County's Use of EXPLORE and PLAN DataDirector 2011 User Conference Dearborn, Michigan.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Supporting the Improvement of Washington Districts and Schools.
Title I Accountability Grant to Expand the SSOS for Schools in Phases 1 & 2 1.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
Presentation to the Board December 17,  Spring 2011 – Economically Disadvantaged subgroup – Reading  Warning List – Begin to Develop Plan  Spring.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Building Assessment Literacy in Michigan through Quality Common Assessment Development.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
STARTALK: Our mission, accomplishments and direction ILR November 12, 2010.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Leading at All Levels to Support MDC Implementation
EXPECTATIONS FOR MICHIGAN’S FOCUS SCHOOLS 11/12/20151 FOCUS SCHOOL WEBINAR Office of Education Improvement and Innovation School Support Unit August 27,
P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Update Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI)
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
EATON RESA- INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM MEETING Michelle Ribant Director of 21 st Century Learning – OEII
ACADEMIC REVIEW: GOAL IS TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC SUPPORT THAT CAN BE PROVIDED TO HELP THE SCHOOL IMPROVE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT.
Ionia, Kent, Muskegon, Montcalm, Newaygo and Ottawa.
Focus on Professional Learning Communities State Personnel Development Grant D. Ahrens 5/10/2013.
Solution-tree.com. How Effective PLCs Can Create Transformative Momentum Wylie ISD Kerry Gain, Director of Secondary Curriculum Joei Shermer, Director.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Regional Chief Instructional Leader Meetings. Today We will… List, categorize, and prioritize county professional development offerings Learn about the.
The Statewide System of Support & Regional Roundtables.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Consortium for Educational Research and Evaluation– North Carolina Building LEA and Regional Professional Development Capacity First Annual Evaluation.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Improving Instruction through Regional Data Initiatives FY2010 ARRA Title II, Part D Competitive Grant Program Applications due September 15, 2009.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Effective Professional Learning Communities (PLC) Where do we begin at Myers Middle School? (Adapted from Professional Learning Communities at Work Robert.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Presentation transcript:

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Enhancing Education through Technology Grant: Improving Instruction Through Regional Data Initiatives Title II, Part D program as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, CFDA Number

Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC) Regional Application Calhoun ISD as fiscal agent –Barry ISD –Berrien RESA –Branch ISD –Eaton ISD –Hillsdale ISD –Jackson County ISD –Lenawee ISD –Livingston –Macomb ISD –Gratiot-Isabella RESD –Washtenaw ISD

Key Attributes Existing data warehousing systems –DataDirector and Michigan’s Data for Student Success (Data4SS) Professional learning around –analyzing State data –analyzing school data –analyzing student work –monitoring classroom achievement

Enhancements for DataDirector Additional pre-built reports Expanded sharing of customized reports Stronger item bank content alignment Additional features for compliance reporting

Common Formative and Summative Assessments Curriculum alignment Efficacy of teacher practice Successful professional development Successful student intervention strategies

Principal Leadership Classroom observations supported by data Selection of professional development Shared leadership with PLCs Effective use of time

Project Design of Professional Development Training on data tools Two-day summer institutes A minimum of two days of local PLC professional development each year.

MAISA Role Overarching “professional learning community” to develop: –Interfacing Regional Data Initiatives with the Data for Student Success (D4SS) project –Interfacing Regional Data Initiatives with district student information systems –Developing common professional development programs –Recommending a common set of state and national course definitions to improve the transmission of secondary credit information across the K12 system and between K12 and higher education. –Facilitating research relationships with teacher preparation institutions. –Purchasing and sharing of tools and resources for differentiated instruction. –Developing a common set of reports to assist schools in identifying those students most at risk of dropping out that will help facilitate schools in addressing and lowering dropout rates based on the early warning sign research ( –Evaluating the impact of Regional Data Initiatives in terms of instructional impact. First meeting occurs November 19 and 20

Breakdown of Grant Monies The LISD expects to receive $122,400 by January 15, –$12,000 assigned to purchase item bank questions for interim course assessments (formative) aligned to secondary priority standards –$110,400 assigned to professional development for increasing the capacity of our data warehouse initiative Summer Damp Camp stipends, food, and resources Stipends, food, and resources for development of performance assessments (summative) aligned to secondary priority expectations

LEA Assurance 1. We will incorporate the Regional Data Initiative program into our educational practices at the classroom level. –Each building has a Data Team, capable of producing reports in DataDirector. –The LISD will continue to support increasing the capacity of data roles.

LEA Assurance 2. We will provide software interface capability between the Regional Data Initiatives and our student information system to facilitate the interchange of data. –eSchool Plus is our source for demographic data for our student-based data warehouse

LEA Assurance 3. We will dedicate at least four professional development days over two school years for all instructional staff and administrators for professional development related to the use of data to improve instruction. –We will work with your data team to implement a schedule that will impact all of your instructional staff and administrators.

LEA Assurance 4. We will participate in the Regional Data Initiative during the FY , FY , and FY school years. –We expect to continue the consortium agreements beyond our current three year agreement.

LEA Assurance 5. We will fully participate in the collective evaluation of the Regional Data Initiatives Title IID grant program, including completing surveys and providing additional information to assist in determining program effectiveness and impact on student achievement. –We have been collecting survey information and sharing results with you. –We will continue to monitor the effectiveness of our data warehouse initiative.

LEA Assurance 6. We give permission to the Regional Data Initiative to use district data for research purposes of improving education policy and practice and the preparation of teachers. –We will be working with our research partner, Central Michigan University.

LEA Assurance 7. We agree to using or aligning with a common set of standards to determine personnel technology skill level with all instructional staff observed and report these determinations in the Registry of Educational Professionals (REP) as required. – We will deliver online courses for teachers on “21things for the 21st Century Educator”.

LEA Assurance 8. We agree to using or aligning with a common set of standards to determine the technological literacy of all 8th grade students and report these assessment results in the Michigan Electronic Grants System (MEGS) as required. –At present, this addendum was not funded.

Next Steps by November 30 All districts who wish to participate must have their level 5 MEGS person complete the assurances process –Once in the Title II, Part D ARRA grant: Click on ‘Grant Consortium Acceptance Form’ Click ‘Accept the invitation and assurances above’ button –No response means you are not participating

Click on “Grant Consortium Acceptance Information” Do not click “Assurances”

[Either / Or]