AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM Making your data accessible on the network using standards Bruce Simons.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
I had intended to announce the release of version 2 today.
Advertisements

Interoperability Work Group Brodaric, G, Interoperability, and GeoSciML Boyan Brodaric, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa Interoperability.
François ROBIDA, Jean-Jacques SERRANO BRGM, France One Geology: which catalogue ?
GML encoding of NADM C1 Connecting geosciences to international standards Eric Boisvert (GSC) Bruce R. Johnson (USGS) Boyan Brodaric (GSC) Simon Cox (CSIRO)
GeoSciML borehole data exchange and applications Christian Bellier (BRGM), John Laxton (BGS)
OneGeology-Europe - the first step to the European Geological SDI INSPIRE Conference 2010, Session Thematic Communities: Geology Krakow, June 24 th 2010.
Implementation of a Data Node in China's Spatial Information Grid Based on NWGISS Dengrong Zhang, Le Yu, Liping Di Institute of Spatial.
Copyright © 2006, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc., All Rights Reserved. The OGC and Emergency Services: GML for Location Transport & Formats & Mapping.
Web Feature Service and Web Map Service WATER FOR A HEALTHY COUNTRY FLAGSHIP SISS Workshop v2.3 Pavel Golodoniuc, Josh Vote 8 May 2013.
Geological Survey of Norway - concepts and contributions from Norway Sverre Iversen, Geological Survey of Norway (NGU) ICC Conference Santiago, Chile
AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM Information modelling – standards context Simon Cox.
© NERC All rights reserved BGS Linked Data Pilot – aims & objectives DNF Expert Group Meeting London, 18/11/10 John Laxton.
AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM EarthResourceML Model Bruce Simons GeoScience Victoria.
AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM Why build an Earth Science Information Network? Dr Robert Woodcock AuScope Grid - Director.
The role of registries within a spatial data infrastructure Simon CoxRob Atkinson Research ScientistSpatial Architect 16 April 2008.
AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM WFS IMPLEMENTATION DISCUSSION Alistair Ritchie Senior Information Geoscientist GeoScience.
1 EarthResourceML v.2.0 – History and Future of an International Mineral Resource Data Transfer Standard Jouni Vuollo - Йоуни Вуоло (GTK) and.
Testbed3 Use Cases Geoscience Australia IMF client implementation.
GeoSciML cool logo. GeoSciML v3.0 – the CGI-IUGS geoscience data model I nternational U nion of G eological S ciences C ommission for the Management and.
GeoSciML An international (IUGS) GML3 standard for sharing geologic map information, with examples from Canada and the U.S. Boyan BrodaricGeological Survey.
The Pragmatics of Geo-ontologies, and the Ontology of Geo-pragmatics Boyan Brodaric, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa.
GWML IGC August 10, 2008, Oslo 1 Groundwater Markup Language (GWML) Extending GeoSciML for Groundwater Eric Boisvert Boyan Brodaric Groundwater Program.
GeoSciML An XML markup language to enable geoinformatics CGI Interoperability Working Group Data Model Design Task Group.
1 EarthResourceML v.2.0 – an upgrade of the CGI-IUGS earth resource data model due to INSPIRE Data specification Jouni VUOLLO 1 and Bruce SIMONS 2, John.
Deploying OGC Web Services GeoScience Victoria’s Experience Alistair Ritchie, Senior Information Geologist GeoScience Victoria.
Mapping between SOS standard specifications and INSPIRE legislation. Relationship between SOS and D2.9 Matthes Rieke, Dr. Albert Remke (m.rieke,
Geology, mining, groundwater, landscape and soils The ‘Earth Science’ domains Bruce Simons Spatial Information Modelling Community of Practice workshop,
AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM The Spatial Information Services Stack – infrastructure for the AuScope Community Earth.
® GeoSciML The History and Future of an International Geoscience Data Transfer Standard Ollie Raymond GeoSciML Standards Working Group, Open Geospatial.
National Spatial Data Infrastructure The Spatial Information Services Stack Dr Robert Woodcock.
ET-ADRS-1, April ISO 191xx series of geographic information standards.
Serving North American Geologic Map Information using Open Geospatial Web Services Eric BoisvertGeological Survey of Canada Bruce JohnsonU.S. Geological.
AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM Ben Caradoc-Davies CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Free and Open Source.
GeoSciML: The logical data model of geological concepts Bruce Simons.
Oslo IGC - Workshop WSS August 2008 GeoSciML Version 2 - Release Candidate 3 The GeoSciML Model Design working group.
DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES Testbed 2: Demonstrating Geoscience Web Services Bruce Simons & Alistair Ritchie GeoScience Victoria, Minerals & Petroleum.
Workshop WSS-03: Delivery of Geoscience Information using Web Services IGC August 2008.
GML encoding of NADM C1 Connecting geosciences to international standards Eric Boisvert (GSC) Bruce R. Johnson (USGS) Boyan Brodaric (GSC) Simon Cox (CSIRO)
GeoSciML Interoperability Working Group. Formed in 2003 under the Commission for the Management and Application of Geoscience Information (CGI) of the.
Making Geological Map Data for the Earth Accessible OneGeology: assisting Geological Surveys worldwide to interoperate seamlessly on the Next Generation.
XIth International Congress for Mathematical Geology - September 3-8, 2006 – Liège, Belgium Contribution of GeoScienceML to the INSPIRE data harmonisation.
The CGI: Advancing International Geoscience Data Interoperability John Broome - CGI Council - Earth Sciences Sector, Natural Resources Canada.
Geoscience data standards Establishing geological map and mineral occurrence data exchange standards Bruce Simons GeoScience Victoria.
Web Services and Geologic Data Interchange Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration & Mining
Standards-based methodology for developing a geoscience markup language Simon Cox Research Scientist 9 August 2008.
® Sponsored by G eo S ci ML : v4 Modularization OGC TC Crystal City March 24, 2014.
Introduction to GeoSciML: standard encoding for transfer of geoscience information Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration and Mining 11 September 2006.
International Association for Mathematical Geology XIth International Congress Universite de Liege, Belgium Tuesday 5 th September 2006 The IUGS-CGI international.
EarthResourceML Background Bruce Simons GeoScience Victoria.
NADM-H2O and H2O-GML Enabling decision support by extending NADM for groundwater information interoperability Eric Boisvert (Geological Survey of Canada.
GeoSciML 4 The OGC/CGI Geoscience Data Transfer Standard Ollie Raymond
AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM The NCRIS AuScope Community Earth Model Bruce Simons.
Geography Markup Language (GML). GML What is GML? – Scope  The Geography Markup Language is  a modeling language for geographic information  an encoding.
Improving access to groundwater data using GroundWaterML2 Bruce Simons, CSIRO Land and Water Eloise Nation, Bureau of Meteorology Peter Dahlhaus, Federation.
DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES Demonstrating delivery of Geological Data using Web Feature and Web Mapping Services based on international standards.
Mark Rattenbury GNS Science, New Zealand Chair, GTWG Presentation for the Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy: 28 October 2015.
AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM “Building Clients for the AuScope Spatial Information Services Stack (SiSS)” AuScope.
GeoSciML: Enabling the exchange of geological map data DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES GeoSciML: a geoscience exchange language GeoSciML: enabling the.
Leverage and Delegation in Developing an Information Model for Geology Simon Cox Research Scientist 14 December 2007.
AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM AuScope Grid Architecture “Where does your architecture fit in with the big picture?”
CGI – GeoSciML Testbed 3 Status for BRGM Jean-Jacques Serrano.
Leverage and Delegation in Developing an Information Model for Geology Simon Cox Research Scientist 14 December 2007.
Status and Progress of OneGeology: Operational and Technical Ian Jackson and Francois Robida 23 April 2009 OneGeology Secretariat.
Implementing distributed geoscience information systems using Open GIS Web Services Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration & Mining
EarthresourceML version 2
Using standardised geoscience terminology via CGI-IUGS vocabularies
Simon Cox Research Scientist 16 April 2008
The Australian mineral occurrence data model
EarthResourceML – model – a summary
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
Presentation transcript:

AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM Making your data accessible on the network using standards Bruce Simons

2 Standards “Standards are like toothbrushes – everybody wants to use one but nobody wants to share it” Francois Robida, BRGM

3 GML Client WMS WFS WMS WFS WMS WFS WMS WFS GeoSciML WMS WFS GeoSciML GSV GA NTGS PIRSA MRT MRT mapping GeoSciML Benefits GeoSciML Format PIRSA mapping NTGS mapping GA mapping GSV mapping Data to GeoSciML Schema mapping OGC Services Datasources

4 Systems (Data Services) Syntax (Data Language) Schematic (Data Structure) Semantic (Data Content) interoperability Current ‘World’ Organisation specific Few standards Access, Excel, Proprietary GIS Files, DVD, CD GeoSciML Controlled Vocabularies GML, XML WFS, WMS, WCS GeoSciML ‘World’ Interoperability Requirements Geoscience community OpenGIS community (OGC)

5 Systems and Syntax standards WFS 1.0, WFS 1.1, WFS 2.0 GML 2.0, GML 3.1, GML 3.2 Compliance levels (SF-0, SF-1, SF-2) Community defined application schema WFS 1.0, WFS 1.1, WFS 2.0 GML 2.0, GML 3.1, GML 3.2 Compliance levels (SF-0, SF-1, SF-2) Community defined application schema –GeoSciML extends –GeoSciML conforms to SF-1 Make sure you are compliant with your community specified standard

6 ‘Simple features’ vs ‘Complex features’ Level SF-0Level SF-1 Restricted set of non-spatial property typesYY Restricted set of spatial property typesYY User-defined property typesNY Property cardinality * Property = temperature, Value = ’15-20 C’ Property = temperature, TValue[1] = 15 Unit = C Instrument = thermometer TValue[2] = 17 Unit = C Instrument = thermometer TValue[3] = 20 Unit = C Instrument = thermometer OR Property = temperature, TRange = MinValue = 15 Unit = C MaxValue = 20 Unit = C SF-0SF-1

7 Schematic Agreement Victoria South Australia lithology RockMaterial consolidationDegree compositionCategory geneticDescription lithology:ControlledConcept[1..*]

8 RockMaterial consolidationDegree compositionCategory geneticDescription Lithology: ControlledConcept [1..*] GeologicUnit +bodyMorphology: [0..*] +compositionCategory: [0..1] +exposureColor: [0..*] +outcropCharacter: [0..*] +rank: [0..1] CompositionPart +lithology: ControlledConcept [1..*] +material: RockMaterial [0..1] +proportion: +role: +composition 0..* Lithology Schematic Agreement

9 Cainozoic? Palaeozoic? Archaean? Bolindian? Eastonian? Gisbornian? Late? Early? Semantic Agreement Select geologic features where age = “xxx”

10 Geological data is largely text-based and interpretive. Simple numerical data is rare. Compliance to many controlled vocabularies is not a trivial exercise Compliance to vocabularies is crucial to be able to construct standardised requests on distributed data Establish language independent identifiers (URNs) that local terms and languages can be mapped to GGIC Controlled Vocabularies Working Group and CGI Geoscience Concepts Task Group Semantic Agreement

11 Uniform Resource Name (URN) Examples: urn:cgi:classifierScheme:ICS:StratChart:2008 –identifies the Stratigraphic Chart published by the International Commission for Stratigraphy urn:cgi:classifier:CGI:sandstone –identifies the concept designated "sandstone" by CGI urn:cgi:feature:GSV:GeologicalFeatureID: –Identifies a specific feature maintained by GSV A web-based service architecture requires the ability to identify resources The CGI has developed a scheme using URNs for use with GeoSciML: urn:cgi:{CGIResource}:{ResourceSpecificString}

12 Example … urn:ogc:def:nil:OGC::missing 50 Undifferentiated: sandstone, siltstone, black shale; sparsely fossiliferous Castlemaine Group Oc urn:cgi:feature:GA:Stratno:36202 ogc:def:nil:OGC::missing typicalNorm urn:cgi:classifier:ICS:StratChart:2004:Ordovician turbidity current … Most property values refer to registered concepts Common values  interoperability

13 Can define your own or use those provided by CGI or GGIC – which you do will depend on use case CGI vocabularies will generally have lower semantic resolution than data provider’s – but will be more interoperable Vocabularies

14 MappedFeature View: Provides Geometries (eg polygons) – GeologicFeature may be in-line or byReference –In response to a question like ‘find all GeologicUnits in this area’ GeologicFeature View: Provides GeologicFeatures (eg GeologicUnit) –geometry data (MappedFeature) in-line or byReference –In response to a question like ‘find all units of Devonian age’ MappedFeature vs GeologicFeature Views

15 Tony Cragg, Subcommittee, 1991 Governance IWG

16 MappedFeature – geologic map elements The map sheet Map polygons and lines Map legend

17 MappedFeature – use of standards ISO Feature Model ISO Geometry ISO Metadata OGC Sampling Model

18 Extensions Related communities building specializations on GeoSciML –GroundWaterML –GeochronML –Mineral Occurrences ML

AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM AuScope

20 RockMaterial consolidationDegree compositionCategory geneticDescription Lithology: ControlledConcept [1..*] GeologicUnit +bodyMorphology: [0..*] +compositionCategory: [0..1] +exposureColor: [0..*] +outcropCharacter: [0..*] +rank: [0..1] CompositionPart +lithology: ControlledConcept [1..*] +material: RockMaterial [0..1] +proportion: +role: +composition 0..* Lithology Schematic Agreement Cardinality

21 MineralSystem associationType geneticDescription InorganicFluid fluidDescription classification MineralDepositModel mineralDepositGroup mineralDepositType commodityDescription Commodity commodityGroup commodityName commodityImportance commodityRank MineralOccurrence type supergeneModification composition source SupergeneProcesses depth material type EarthResourceMaterial earthResourceMaterialRole material proportion EarthResource sourceReference dimension expression form linearOrientation planarOrientation shape parent child GeologicFeature observationMethod purpose MappedFeature observationMethod positionalAccuracy GeologicEvent eventAge eventEnvironment eventProcess geologicHistory preferredAge Description IGNORES HUMAN INTERACTION

22 commodityDescription Commodity commodityGroup commodityName commodityImportance commodityRank MineralOccurrence type source EarthResource sourceReference dimension expression form linearOrientation planarOrientation shape parent child Endowment includesReserves includesResources OreMeasure calculationMethod date dimension proposedExtractionMethod sourceReference estimatedProperty:ore CommodityMeasure commodityAmount cutOffGrade grade Resource category includesReserves Reserve category oreAmount measureDetails commodityOfInterest

23 commodityDescription Commodity commodityGroup commodityName commodityImportance commodityRank MineralOccurrence type source EarthResource sourceReference dimension expression form linearOrientation planarOrientation shape parent child Product productName sourceReference grade production recovery sourceCommodity deposit composition relatedMine associatedMine relatedActivity MiningActivity activityDuration activityType oreProcessed Mine endDate mineName sourceReference startDate status RawMaterial material proportion rawMaterialRole producedMaterial resourceExtraction MiningFeatureOccurrence observationMethod positionalAccuracy specification occurrence