Brown, Q., Mongan, W., Garbarine, E., Kusic, D., Fromm, E., & Fontecchio, A. (2008). Computer Aided Instruction as a Vehicle for Problem Solving: Scratch.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Advertisements

Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
William DeLuca North Carolina State University Pam Carpenter North Carolina State University ITEEA Charlotte.
1 Welcome to Module 6 Classroom Resources and Management.
A retrospective look : Action Research on the Fly:
Technology’s Edge: The Educational Benefits of Computer-Aided Instruction Lisa Barrow Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Lisa Markman Princeton University.
Title 4 Effects of a student designed multimedia project on 8th graders attitude and performance.
Collaborating for Student Success Teacher Collaboration: Strategies & Outcomes ARCHES Seminar UC Irvine ~ 3/15/10 Ivan Cheng
Standards-based Instruction and Assessment Ohio State ABLE Director’s Meeting October 29, 2002 Presenter: Mahna Schwager, PhD WestEd.
Intel® Education K-12 Resources Our aim is to promote excellence in Mathematics and how this can be used with technology in order.
Overcoming Obstacles: Reaching All Children Through Rich STEM.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
PISA Partnership to Improve Student Achievement through Real World Learning in Engineering, Science, Mathematics and Technology.
PECAT Physical Education Curriculum Analysis Tool Lessons for Physical Education Teacher Preparation Programs National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention.
Professional Learning Communities & My Learning Plan Laconia School District.
Kerry Murphy Paolo Busante
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
Teacher Professional Development Programs in Grades 3-8: Promoting Teachers’ and Students’ Content Knowledge in Science and Engineering Beth McGrath &
Every Student Prepared for the Future EXPLORE, PLAN, The ACT Test Specifications.
 A set of objectives or student learning outcomes for a course or a set of courses.  Specifies the set of concepts and skills that the student must.
Family, School, and Community Partnerships: A Model for Pre-service Teacher Education Presentation at Center for Research, Evaluation & Advancement of.
1 UTeach Professional Development Courses. 2 UTS Step 1 Early exposure to classroom environment (can be as early as a student’s first semester)
Evaluation of a Laptop Program Deborah L. Lowther Steven M. Ross Gary R. Morrison.
Does the use of math journals improve students retention and recall of math facts and formulas?
The Pershing/Rice University Math Partnership: PUMPing Up Math Achievement Caren Grant Pershing MS, Houston ISD
Teaching Through Problem Solving Part 2 – Bermuda Framework for Teaching Mathematics Gilbert Institute Ongoing PD commencing the week of March 3, 2014.
LinearRelationships Jonathan Naka Intro to Algebra Unit Portfolio Presentation.
By: Kayla Ford, Jessica Hogue, and Shelby Spalding TEACHING AND LEARNING WITH TECHNOLOGY IN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE.
Project Learning Tree Project Learning Tree is an award-winning environmental education program designed for teachers and other educators, parents, and.
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
Developing teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching Challenges in the implementation and sustainability of a new MSP Dr. Tara Stevens Department of.
Science Technology Engineering Mathematics.  STEM education is influential in driving national economic growth & innovation  Every person depends on.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW Ten Conditions that Result in Students Making Greater Effort to Succeed Gene Bottoms.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
The Impact of the Maine Learning Technology Initiative on Teachers, Students, and Learning Maine’s Middle School 1-to-1 Laptop Program Dr. David L. Silvernail.
Welcome to Guidelines for Preparing Students for Success! 1.
Welcome to Carroll Elementary STAAR Parent Meeting Tuesday, March 26, 2013.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
Setting High Academic Expectations that Ensure Academic Achievement TEAM PLANNING STANDARDS & OBJECTIVES TEACHER CONTENT KNOWLEDGE.
RAKESS PYP Mathematics Parents’ Evening February 1 st, 2010.
District Learning Day August 5, 2015
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
1 Multimedia-Supported Metaphors for Meaning Making in Mathematics Moreno & Mayer (1999)
Big6 Overview Big6™ Trainers Program McDowell County Schools.
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE Assessing the Mathematics Knowledge of Teachers William S. Bush University of Louisville North Carolina Association of Mathematics.
Mt. Diablo Unified School District Elementary Mathematics Adoption Buy Back Day Thursday, August 27, 2009.
The Evolution of ICT-Based Learning Environments: Which Perspectives for School of the Future? Reporter: Lee Chun-Yi Advisor: Chen Ming-Puu Bottino, R.
PRIMES Partnerships and Research Investigations with Mathematicians, Engineers, and Scientists Professional Development Model MSP Regional Meeting February.
Mid-Year Report Dibble Elementary Jackson Public Schools Pamela Perlos, Principal Math Focus.
Can first grade students’ interest levels and skills in mathematics increase when they are exposed to engaging real world mathematical tasks? By: Valerie.
Using Common Core State Standards of Seventh Grade Mathematics in the Application of NXT LEGO® Robotics for CReSIS Middle School Students.
Presented by: Shawna Howard Research Professor: Andres Garcia, Ed.D
Elementary Formative Assessment Re-engagement Lessons Using Student Work.
The Impact of Virtual Manipulatives on First Grade Geometry Instruction and Learning 指導教授: Chen, Ming-puu 報 告 者: Jheng, Cian-you 報告日期: 2006/10/03 Steen,
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 02, 2009 Papastergiou, M.(2009). Digital Game-Based Learning in high school Computer Science.
Section 1. Introduction Orientation to Virginia’s QRIS.
1 Educational Technology Electronic Teaching Portfolio Based on the ISTE/NCATE Foundation Standards for all educators. All candidates in teacher preparation.
Implementing Writing Technology in our Instruction By Judson Smith.
1 EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY Pertemuan Matakuliah: G0454/Class Management and Education Media Tahun: 2006.
A Pilot Study of a Multimedia Instructional Program for Teaching of ESL Grammar with Embedded Tracking.
Reasons Behind the Positive Effects of Using Dynamic Computer Software in High School Mathematics Classrooms Rajee Amarasinghe, California State University,
AYP Aigner Allen Shoemaker Elementary  Shoemaker did not make AYP because of the following subjects:  Math  Writing.
Engineering is Elementary Inservice PD Program Christine M. Cunningham Museum of Science, Boston.
General Education Assessment Report Assessment Cycle.
By: Brittany Cochran, Lindsey King, and Justin Blanton.
Coding Connections at the Interface of Algebra I and Physical World Concepts Improving Teacher Quality Grant Program Summer 2016.
Spatial STEM - C Evaluation of a Model Spatial Thinking Curriculum for Building Computational Skills in Elementary Grades K-5 A collaboratvive project.
Presentation transcript:

Brown, Q., Mongan, W., Garbarine, E., Kusic, D., Fromm, E., & Fontecchio, A. (2008). Computer Aided Instruction as a Vehicle for Problem Solving: Scratch Programming Environment in the Middle Years Classroom. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE K-12 Track 2008).

 To introduce computer-aided instruction using the Scratch programming environment for children as a context for problem-solving to engage and assess the problem-solving skills of the students who use them.  The hypothesis that an unfamiliar problem domain can be better approached by students who have been taught to deconstruct mathematical concepts and logical sequences into the simple steps to be understood by a computer.  To measures and evaluates the impact of CAI (Computer Assisted Instruction) on student performance by evaluating the students’ use of problem-solving skills and heuristics.

 Students in two fifth and two sixth grade classes as well as a control group receive a pre-test and post-test asking them to solve mathematical problems using any approach.  After receiving the pre-tests, the non-control students participate in a series of Scratch-based activities designed to improve their problem solving skills. During each lesson with Scratch, students are taught to use a variety of problem solving skills and strategies.  Students in the treatment group show improvement in their problem solving skills at a rate greater than those in the control group and this improvement constitutes a statistically significant impact of CAI in the classroom.

 The educational Fellows of the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) GK12 program have introduced a pilot program of computer-aided instruction (CAI) at two site-specific public schools having predominantly minority students.  The overall objectives of the Scratch-based CAI initiative at the schools are to ◦ develop CAI curricula that specifically address objectives in the state mandated educational standards. ◦ to strengthen the mathematical reasoning skills of the fifth and sixth grade students to utilize arithmetic operations efficiently and to make quantitative decisions in context. ◦ to improve students’ attitudes toward and interest in computing technology, particularly as respects the students’ vantage point as creators, rather than simply users, of technology.

◦ increase the students’ knowledge of computer hardware and software terminology. ◦ to improve the Fellows’ experience in developing CAI curricula that address state standards, implementing those lesson plans in a classroom setting, and assessing the quantitative impact of the program.  Research problem ◦ Can Scratch be used as an environment to strengthen students’ problem solving skills? ◦ Can allowing students to become technology creators improve their computing attitude? ◦ Can the teaching Fellows develop lesson plans using new technology that specifically address state-mandated educational standards?

 Making the connection between mathematics and daily life has been shown to correlate with high achievement.  The students can choose backdrops of real-world environments in their programs, or they may simply connect the activity to their own recreational game playing.  The use of Alice in treatment groups at several community colleges was found to show statistically significant improvements in algorithmic thinking, an ordering of logic that supports mathematical reasoning skills.  The Scratch environment has been promoted in schools and community centers for media-arts initiatives, technological fluency, and exposure to game programming, but in published work has never been explicitly used to develop proficiency with mathematical problem-solving and reasoning.

 Participants ◦ This study took place at two public schools in a financially under-resourced urban area of Philadelphia. ◦ The control group were not randomly assigned to their classrooms by the authors. They were assigned using the school’s normal methods.  Context ◦ To developed a four-lesson Scratch curriculum for fifth and sixth grade students. ◦ The students were instructed in math for an hour and a half each day. ◦ The Scratch curriculum consists of four 45 minute lessons over the duration of a month with two additional days for pre- and post-testing.

 Assess the students’ problem solving abilities (pre- and post- test. ◦ mathematics problems that could be solved using various techniques. ◦ To analyzed for problem solving strategies.  Assess the students’ computing attitudes ◦ measured by the Bath County Computing.  Fellows’ ability to develop lesson plans addressing state standards. ◦ as documented by the production of four lesson plans ready for publication in the Teach Engineering database. ◦ All of the Scratch-based plans indicate the state standards addressed in each lesson.

 Q: You are given $20 to buy supplies for your class. A set of supplies costs $2.15. How many students can you purchase supplies for? How much change would you receive? 16 points 8 points 4 points 0 points

 The Scratch-based lessons are designed to provide students with practice in applying and evaluating mathematical problem solving techniques in the context of computer programming.  The Scratch lessons introduce students to both efficient and inefficient mathematical problem solving methods used by computer scientists in real-life contexts, and provide the students with a visual means to evaluate their results after applying a particular method.

 Result ◦ F = 0.83, p > 0.01( Levene’s Test) ◦ F =24.54,p < 0.05

 Pearson correlation analysis indicted a significant correlation between survey questions that pertain to a student’s interest in studying technology.  All suggestive that Scratch as an instructional tool would be an effective way to practice the mathematical reasoning skills useful to problem solving.

 To support students’ required curricular goals  to develop with the state standards.  Successful in developing full lesson plans that addressed the following state standards: ◦ Science & Technology ◦ Mathematics

 Scratch-based lessons can be beneficial to the students learning problem-solving skills.  The gain scores on the mathematics test who the Scratch-based lessons, outperformed tho, the students se who did not use it.  Sudents’ willingness to participate in computer-based activities despite not using computers for large amounts of time.  The Fellows were successfully able develop a set of standards-based lesson plans that integrate technology without sacrificing the students mandated curricular goals.