Implementing A Quality Management System for Built Environment Programs Norhayati Mahyuddin, H. Abd Rahman, F.A. Mohd Rahim Centre for Project & Facilities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prof. V.J. Papazoglou on behalf of the Hellenic Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (HQAA) ENQA Seminar on Current Trends in the European Quality.
Advertisements

Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
The Five Working Groups Faculty Development Scaling-Up Post-Graduate programmes and 1.Research & Development 2.Innovation 3.Industry - Institute Interaction.
1-st stage DoQuP Report on countries. State standards in the area of assurance of education quality are developed with the aim of:  meeting permanent.
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
“Articulating the work on NQF, QA and recognition ” JULY 2008, Cetinje.
Quality management Vincent A Ssembatya.
The ISO 9002 Quality Assurance Management System
The quality assurance system in Sweden Håkan Hult Linköping University Gdansk March 13, 2009.
College Strategic Plan by
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Quality Management.
Quality Management Systems
ISO 9000:2000 Quality system standards adopted in 1987 by International Organization for Standardization; revised in 1994 and 2000 Technical specifications.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF MASTER’S DEGREES IN SPAIN 1.
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
Strategic, Annual Performance & Operational Planning Process
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.
The Perspectives from Universities Regarding Implementation of Indonesia Qualification Framework Gerardus Polla Rector of BINUS University 29 April 2009.
LOGO Internal Quality Assurance Model: Evidence from Vietnamese Higher Education Tang Thi Thuy, Department of International and Comparative Education,
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
The Structure and Role of QA Bodies at the University and faculty/department levels UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia.
Re-accreditation Workshop Private Higher Education Institutions 6 August 2008.
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
Quality Assurance Systems in Higher Education in Uzbekistan TerSU / TSAU Z.Djumaev, S.Islomov S.Adilov.
Vaal University of Technology (formerly Vaal Triangle Technikon ) Ms A.J. GOZO Senior Director: Library and Information Services.
AN OVERVIEW MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY. MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) pzv/09/09/08 2 Malaysian.
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION FOR THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OF SPs ■ Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava ■ Faculty of Civil Engineering.
Quality Assurance of Malaysian Higher Education COPIA – Code of Practice for Institutional Audit COPPA – Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ESTONIA ACCREDITATION OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMMES AND INSTITUTIONS TIIT LAASBERG.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 II.3 Self-Evaluation and Appendices.
Rome May 31st, 2006 University towards E-learning: a Focus on Finland, France and Italy1 CONFERENCE University towards E-learning: a Focus on Finland,
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Quality Assurance System in Higher Education Institutions(HEIs) Professor Dr Mesbahuddin Ahmed Head of Quality Assurance Unit UGC, Bangladesh.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
AIUA STRATEGI PLAN GUIDELINES : Quality Assurance Prepared by Kolej Universiti Islam Sultan Azlan Shah (KUISAS), Perak, Malaysia.
Quality Assurance Systems: QMS: The UEF’s experience Yohama Puentes HEI ICI project: End seminar
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 13-14, 2009 III.1 The accreditation report:
Accreditation of study programs at the Faculty of information technologies Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.
- ANALYSIS OF QUALITY DATA USING SPSS FOR THE EDUCATION PROCESS OF PUAS - MEASUREMENT OF STUDENTS SATISFACTION THROUGH SPPS AND MODIP IN PIRAEUS UNIVERSITY.
EXPERIENCE OF AL-FARABI KAZAKH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN CREDIT TRANSFER SYSTEM: WORKLOAD OF STUDENT AND TEACHER IN THE.
QA in HEIs: ZIMCHE’s Perspectives Workshop on trends in HE for BUSE Administrators 8-9 April 2016 Evelyn Garwe, Deputy CEO.
S TANDARDS, CERTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT C HAPTER 23 Dr. Ahmad F. Shubita.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.
ISO Certification For Laboratory Accreditation ISO Certification For Laboratory Accreditation.
UNDERSTANDING ISO 9001:2008.
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Excellent Healthcare Service: A structured approach through ISO Accredited Biomedical Laboratory 17 February 2016 Presented: Roziah Abdul Latiff.
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Othman Haji Simbran Brunei Darussalam National Accreditation Council
Quality Management Systems
Bulgaria Higher Education System
SCHEV Strategic Plan Priorities
Computer Science Section
PRESENTATION OF EXISTING EVALUATION
Finalization of the Action Plans and Development of Syllabus
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Josip Juraj Strossmayer University in Osijek
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Presentation transcript:

Implementing A Quality Management System for Built Environment Programs Norhayati Mahyuddin, H. Abd Rahman, F.A. Mohd Rahim Centre for Project & Facilities Management (PFM) Faculty of Built Environment University of Malaya Based on University of Malaya’s Experience

Globalization of markets and the fast improvements in information flow capabilities have increased competition worldwide. In order to compete in today’s turbulent competitive environment, organizations are focusing on the satisfaction of customers’ needs as a means of securing competitive advantage and even survival Hesham, 2003

Quality Management System (QMS) in the Education Industry! Quality assurance should be part and parcel of the structure, system and approaches related to teaching, research and administration as to enable the stated aims and objectives of the institution to be achieved. How successful will it be?

The increase in focus on quality assurance will closely relate to the increase in funds that needs to be invested in the higher education institution in Malaysia. HOWEVER….. Funding of higher education is seen as a means towards further economic growth and development. THEREFORE, a formal evaluation of public universities would ensure that there must be a minimum acceptable standard of quality education. Higher education institutions need to rethink and modify its function.

Higher education institutions need to rethink and modify its function. the scenario… Increase numbers of students’ intake to generate more revenue. Leading…. to a lowering of standards and quality. increase academic workloads due to the higher ratio of teaching staff to number of students lack of laboratory facilities and equipment Monitoring of students performance

University of Malaya A university-wide quality management system has been established in the University of Malaya, the first and premier university in Malaysia. “As an organization increases in size, quality control and quality assurance measures get increasingly tougher. Nevertheless, University Malaya (UM), the oldest and prestigious university in Malaysia, faced up to this challenge and achieved MS ISO 9001:2000 Certification for the whole university in all its processes in December 2002” Kamila

Why ISO ? ISO is a series of international guidelines and standards designed to be used for the evaluation and certification of organizations that have implemented a quality system. benefits of developing an ISO 9001 quality system for a university: Provides confidence to the students, industry, government and society, as well as the university and faculty management that the requirements for quality are continuously met. Adequate determination of the customer requirements for quality. Adequate documentation of program design activities and output. Teaching, learning and research process control. Effective marketing tools. Advantages in national and international accreditation. Hesham, 2003

ISO 9001 (2000): Model Adopted by UM The university has established its quality management unit known as the University of Malaya Quality Assurance Management Unit (QAMU). QAMU’s scope of responsibility involves about 1,400 academic staff, 2,700 support staff, 19,900 undergraduate students 7,900 postgraduate students, 17 academic centers, and 13 residential colleges. The main objectives in adopting the ISO 9001 (2000) are to: achieve a Universal quality approach, ensure acceptable quality standards, ensure customer satisfaction, and assure consistency in the quality of service delivery.

The model adopted by UM has the relevant characteristics identified by Johnson and Golomski (1999) such as: leadership, understanding stakeholders, factual approach to decision making, involvement of people, process approach and continual improvement. True enough, after its successful implementation, the ISO 9001 (2000) has been proved to be a standard for a quality system in education and NOT just a quality standard for products. THE MODEL

The two main categories of products produced by the university are the :- 1.educational experience towards the award of a degree, and 2.products of teaching and research and development (R&D) that includes publications and patents of products. Eleven core processes have been identified and used in the quality management system. They are as follow: PT00 : Quality Management Unit PT01 : Teaching and learning PT02 : Research and development PT03 : Human resource PT04 : Infrastructure and assets PT05 : Financial aspect PT06 : Commercialization PT07 : Students affairs PT08 : Library services PT09 : Residential colleges PT10 : Sports and cultural services THE MODEL

Work Instructions, Guidelines And Quality Specifications Accompany The Procedures Quality Audit Checks Compliance With Regards To The Core Processes Quality Objectives Have Been Met Measurement Continual Improvement The Process….

Faculty Of Built Environment Management System Principles and guidelines in curriculum design A program must produce broad based of graduates to achieve the standard requirement of the relevant professional bodies, to fulfill the requirement of the MS ISO 9001:2000 and the Ministry of Higher Learning, Malaysia. Course development Course(s) assessment methods Curriculum revision Semester examination

Course(s) assessment methods Assessment method for most courses consists of 30% - 40% of coursework and 60% - 70% of final examination. However there is also a continuous assessment method for certain subjects on the basis of assignments or project works. Students have to present their final product at the end of the semester in groups or in an individual basis. Faculty Of Built Environment Management System Curriculum revision Programme planning and curriculum quality reviews are carried out every five (5) years. The Faculty of Built Environment requires the students to obtain 113 credit hours within a minimum period of three (3) years which cover six (6) semesters. Curriculum is being reviewed by the External Examiners both from local and international experts. The external examiners have been assisted the Faculty in formulating the Faculty’s teaching, learning and research strategies to correspond to the private and public demands.

Course development As part of the requirements of the University Malaya’s QMS, the faculty needs to conduct course evaluation towards the end of each semester. The outcomes of the evaluation will be used to improve the course as well as quality of teaching. Students are also encouraged to express their views using MS ISO9001:2000 format on any issues or problems pertaining to the running of the Faculty/Department. Figure illustrates : Evaluation Process for Course Delivery and Staff Teaching Method Flow Chart

Faculty Assessment forms are printed accordingly to course requirements by week 7 of lecture in each semester Faculty/Department Assessment forms are dispense to each lecturers by week 8 of lecture in each semester Department/Lecturer Each courses and teaching methods are assessed by students and the form will be submitted to the Faculty level within week 8 to week 13 of lecture in each semester Faculty Forms are scanned and detail statistics is analysed for the Department and the Academic Section for records, within 2 weeks after the semester end Faculty/Department Evaluate results of the assessed course Average means Faculty/Department Meeting with the lecturer assessed and necessary action is taken for continuous improvement (before the same course is offered in the new semester) Faculty/Department Assessed form is managed and filed into each course files and lecturer personal files before new semester begin Process end >3.0 < 3.0

This particular evaluation is based on three (3) main criteria which are;- Students evaluation on course conducted Students evaluation on teaching method applied Facilities evaluation on courses offered Based on our recent findings of 2005, 94% of the students consent that the teaching courses, the teaching method as well as the facilities available on thought courses offered is at satisfactory level. Faculty Of Built Environment Management System

Semester examination Overall, the University is precautious in assuring the development of examination papers for every semester. Each Faculty will be informed by the University Examination Section (ES) to produce examination questions through a systematic process administered by the University Quality Assurance Unit. Question papers, project briefs with schemas are prepared by the lecturers and this will go through a screening process. Characteristic of the question papers and project briefs is vetted through at the Departmental level and also at the Faculty’s level. This procedure is to ensure the confidentiality of the questions and the quality question papers are produced. Faculty Of Built Environment Management System

Start Faculty/Department Inform submission date to all lecturers Examination Section Request submission of question papers from the Faculty/Department Lecturer(s) Prepare question paper(s) Lecturer(s) Submit question paper(s) to Department Screening Committee Screening question papers Fit criterion No Faculty/Department Identify course level A Yes End Faculty/Department Submit question papers to External Examiners and received report Lecturer(s) Rectify question paper (s) and re-submit to Faculty/Department Final Year Level No A Any Rectification Faculty/Department Final submission of question papers to Examination Section for printing Yes No Question Papers Development Process for Examination

Undergraduate report The Faculty offers an array of specialisations in the field of built environment through the four departments: the Department of Architecture, Department of Building Surveying, Department of Quantity Surveying and Department of Estate Management. The total number of students enrolled in the five undergraduate degree programmes has increased gradually from 1995 to below Figure indicates the total number of students enrolled with the Faculty between 1995 and Faculty Of Built Environment Management System

The above Figure shows the percentage of graduates who obtained a CGPA of 3.0 and above and below 3.0 from 1998 until In the year 2005 the percentage of students who obtained CGPA above 3.0 was 63%, the highest percentage ever recorded by the Faculty. This indicates that the Faculty surpassed the target of 30% envisioned by the University’s quality objective. Faculty Of Built Environment Management System

The ISO standards are systems for evaluating the ability of organizations to consistently design, produce and deliver quality products and services. It provides confidence to customers that requirements for quality are met. In other words, it consists of methods and activities used to assure the customer of the quality of products and services provided to them meets the specifications promised by the institution of higher learning in Malaysia. The full-fledged ISO 9001 (2000) is one of its kind and at first seemed like an impossible task. Standardisation of processes and the audit processes have help the Faculty of Built Environment, to excel well in their quest to improve the quality of education for undergraduate and postgraduate students. The need to continually improve processes and quality of services has made the faculty prepare themselves for accreditation by the RICS, abe and many other local and international professional bodies. The ISO 9001 (2000) has definitely been a system worthwhile adopting in the education industry as shown from the case cited in this paper. Conclusion