NC Common Education Data Analysis and Reporting System (CEDARS) Accountability Conference February 19, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Data Management Accountability Conference February 17, 2010 Traci Blount, Section Chief, Web Services & Publications Kayla Mathis, Policy and Planning.
Advertisements

Maine Statewide Longitudinal Data System June 2010.
What is the RIGHT Data? …a Kansas Perspective Strategic Data Project Spring 2012 Convening April 2012 Kathy Gosa, Kansas State Dept of Ed.
1 K-12 Data Governance November 15, :30 – 2:30 Dave Ream, PA Bill Huennekens, WA Bill Hurwitch, ME.
CEDARS Data Warehouse (CDW) CDW at 30,000 ft. May 09 th, 2013 Terra Dominguez Data, Research & Federal Policy
Data Collection An overview of how data are collected and used in Washington state.
By: Mr Hashem Alaidaros MIS 211 Lecture 4 Title: Data Base Management System.
California Technology Agency Billing System (CalTABS) June 19, 2012.
LEVERAGING THE ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT Louise Edmonds Senior Manager Information Management ACT Health.
Maine Statewide Longitudinal Data System NEBHE October 2008.
Improving Data Migration Across Wyoming Schools Across Wyoming Schools October 2004 Presented By Data System Design Team Sponsored by the Wyoming Dept.
April 2, 2013 Longitudinal Data system Governance: Status Report Alan Phillips Deputy Director, Fiscal Affairs, Budgeting and IT Illinois Board of Higher.
Learning with a Purpose: Learning Management Systems Patti Holub, Director District Initiatives and Special Projects Miguel Guhlin, Director Instructional.
CASE STUDY: Implementing and Administering SAS® Enterprise Guide® Across the Enterprise As a Solution for Data Access Security Ulf Borjesson Evangeline.
Agenda 1. Definition and Purpose of Data Governance
A Free sample background from Slide 1 NYS PLAN FOR DATA DATA FOR ACCOUNTABILITY DATA FOR INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT.
5.1 © 2007 by Prentice Hall 5 Chapter Foundations of Business Intelligence: Databases and Information Management.
Data Warehouse New Data Administrator Training October 3, 2014 Data Coordinators: Larry Hunt & Angie Russell.
School and LEA Users
Update: Web Data Collection System (WDCS) Title I Administrative Meeting—September 30, 2010 Kristi Peters, Research and Evaluation Coordinator 1.
Organize to improve Data Quality Data Quality?. © 2012 GS1 To fully exploit and utilize the data available, a strategic approach to data governance at.
ISES UPDATES August 28, Topics for Session Review of the Fall 2007 CD/YE Collection Changes in WSLS ISES Data CD/YE Element Changes October 1 Supplement.
Client Assessments and the Reemployment of Low-Income Workers: Lessons from the Field OWRA: An Online Tool for Supporting Self-Sufficiency Chicago, Illinois.
Chapter 6: Foundations of Business Intelligence - Databases and Information Management Dr. Andrew P. Ciganek, Ph.D.
CDW LEA Trainer’s Webinar September 25 th, 2012 Terra Dominguez Data, Research & Federal Policy CEDARS Data Warehouse (CDW)
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
Documenting the Participation of Fishing Vessel Crew Members in Alaska’s Commercial Fisheries Documenting the Participation of Fishing Vessel Crew Members.
Magnet Lab User Portal August 2010.
GSC – Saginaw County Update P-20 Efforts: “Metrics, Dashboards and Accountability” March 17, 2011.
Msix.ed.gov. 9. How do I get access to MSIX? School and MEP personnel can request an MSIX account using the "How Do I Get an Account?" link at the bottom.
Migrant Student Information Exchange (MSIX) MSIX Lab: Using MSIX Reports 2011 OME Conference November 14-16, 2011 Nashville, Tennessee.
Oregon Department of Education Database Initiative Project 14th Annual Management Information Systems Conference Orlando, FL February , 2001.
Pennsylvania Information Management System (PIMS) Capital Area IU – PennData Group Meeting Sharon Clark, PIMS Project Director Dave Ream, PIMS Project.
Connecting Financial Data to EDFacts 25th Annual Management Information Systems Conference San Diego, CA February 15, 2012 Ross Santy and Matthew Case.
The Initiative For School Empowerment and Excellence (i.4.see) “Empowering teachers, administrators, policy makers, and parents to increase student achievement.”
Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Data Management, and Data Standardization Efforts at the U.S. Department of Education May 2006 Joe Rose, Chief Architect.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Core NC SBE/DPI Initiatives and RTTT Pillars Rebecca Garland Fall WRESA October 9, 2009.
MIS DATA CONFERENCE 2012 JULY 23, 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.
South Carolina Longitudinal Data System June 3, 2016 SC Longitudinal Data System.
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Data Collection and Reporting System.
BOCES Data Collection & Reporting October 10, 2013 Lisa Pullaro Mid-Hudson Regional Information Center.
Essential 3a - SSID Enrollment Capabilities and Key Concepts v3.0, August 07, 2012 SSID ENROLLMENT Capabilities and Key Concepts Essential 3a.
Kentucky Department of Education KIDS – Division of Enterprise Data KSIS/Infinite Campus UPDATE.
6.1 © 2010 by Prentice Hall 6 Chapter Foundations of Business Intelligence: Databases and Information Management.
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Update Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI)
1 Statewide Directions for Student Information Systems James A. Kadamus New York State Education Department March, 2004.
SLDS FY09 ARRA Grant Pilot Workgroup Kit Goodner Assistant Deputy Commissioner, Data Systems Florida Department of Education June 12, 2012.
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
K-12 Data Standards in Education  4 th Annual Conference on Technology and Standards 1 K-12 Data Standards and the U.S. Department of Education Accomplishments.
26 th Annual MIS Conference – February 13, Why CEDS?
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
Intro to CDW December 8, 2015 Terra Dominguez Data, Research & Federal Policy Kelley Blas Exceptional Children Division
Promoting Data Collection and Evaluation in Title I, Part D, Programs Stephanie Lampron, NDTAC; John McLaughlin, Program Officer; and Bobbi Stettner-Eaton,
EDFacts The Future of the Education Data Exchange Network (EDEN) CCSSO Data Summit November 17, 2005 U.S. Department of Education.
Common Education Data Standards (CEDS) and ED Facts …What’s Next Jack Buckley, Commissioner – NCES Ross Santy, Director – ED Fact s U.S. Department of.
The Statewide System of Support & Regional Roundtables.
Montana Office of Public Instruction Linda McCulloch Superintendent OPI Student Information System Madalyn QuinlanDonna O’Neill Charlie.
TSDS LEA APPLICATION SOFTWARE VENDOR WEBINAR – TSDS UNIQUE IDENTIFIER FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF Terri Hanson, Bryce Templeton – Texas Education Agency 11/13/2012.
 Data, Research & Federal Policy NCDPI.  CEDARS – Common Education  NC School Report Cards  Data Use in North Carolina.
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
Increase IDEA Data Use in an Integrated Statewide Longitudinal Data
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
K-12 State Reporting Overview for Administrators
SSID ENROLLMENT Capabilities and Key Concepts
Office Of Civil Rights Data Collection (OCR / CRDC)
Tennessee Longitudinal Data system (TLDS)
Tennessee Longitudinal Data system (TLDS)
Presentation transcript:

NC Common Education Data Analysis and Reporting System (CEDARS) Accountability Conference February 19, 2009

Overview CEDARS objectives, components, plan Spotlight on UID UID Pilot Questions/Next Steps

Overview CEDARS objectives, components, plan Spotlight on UID UID Pilot Questions/Next Steps

CEDARS Objectives Enable State, local, and federal policy makers and service providers to make data-driven decisions based on analysis of trends and relationships – across different types of data – over time

CEDARS Objectives Increase the quality and accessibility of PreK-13 educational data – student, teacher demographic – course, assessment – program – financial

CEDARS Components State Longitudinal Data System (SLDS): A statewide unique ID (UID) system for students and staff that enables linking of different types of data across collections and over time A longitudinal data store (LDS), along with analytical tools and reports, that enables analysis of trends and relationships

CEDARS Components Source: DPI Enterprise Architecture, 2/2008, BCG Interviews Program information (CECAS, Title 1, etc.) Unique ID System (UID) Ensures that relevant source systems have properly matched students and staff with unique IDs Data Transfer Data Repositories Matches based on UID Checks to ensure quality Stores data over time Organized into domains based on type of data Data Access Financial systems Transportation Teacher licensure (LIC/SAL) School data managers ABC Teachers Students Testing Data (Assessment) Student information (NCWISE) Source Systems State, federal ABC Common location for data access (‘info library’) Different tools based on type of user “Data Dictionary” Standard reports Query tools Automated submission e.g. EDEN LEAs, schools Other access, e.g. online portal LDS Data marts

CEDARS: Meeting User Needs User Information needsCEDARS Approach DPI Ensure compliance Identify those who need support Inform policy and program initiatives Direct access to CEDARS – Established reports – Ad-hoc queries/data extracts Federal Receive mandated informationFederal submission via EDEN LEA central offices and principals Ensure data accuracy Review and compare performance and reports for their districts / schools Direct access to CEDARS, but filtered for specific LEA or school Researchers, higher ed, other State agencies* Analyze educational trends Mediated data extracts –Requests filtered through review process –Ensure appropriate user and usage Teachers Review performance of students Compare performance to standards Students and parents Understand performance of an individual student Current data on specific students will NOT be provided by CEDARS NC WISE will provide current year ad- hoc reporting capabilities for LEAs

CEDARS: Data Sources DPI Data System/Source SNA NCWISE LIC / SAL CECAS Accountability MIS2000 CTE Child Nutrition / FRL Homeless Immigrant LEP Neglected and Delinquent SES / Choice Title I / TAS USDDC Dropout DBS Internal and External AMTR More at Four PPAR PMR Data MFR/AFR “Data/metadata dictionary” will provide clear definitions of all data elements in the warehouse

Priority reports EDEN/EdFacts submission Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR) ABCs of Public Education and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) reports State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR) Migrant Student Information Exchange (MSIX) State Plan for Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT) School Report Cards (SRC) Report on Dropout Events and Rates Report on School Crime and Violence Study of Suspensions and Expulsions Legislative More at Four (MAF) report CEDARS will provide capability, training for re how to build/modify reports CEDARS Reporting

CEDARS: 6 Key Deliverables Reliably match student level records over time and across DPI applications Unique Student Identifier Deliverable Longitudinal Data Store (LDS) EDEN / EDFacts Reporting Analysis & Reporting Tools Transcript Service Unique Staff Identifier Reliably match staff level records over time and across DPI applications Automate required annual Federal reporting Provide robust, secure warehouse of high quality P-13 longitudinal data Provide user-friendly access and tools to enable longitudinal analysis and reporting Streamline and automate exchange of student transcripts among schools and with higher ed How addressed Deloitte / eScholar UID solution (on-track for completion 8/09) Data Warehouse and Reporting (DWR) RFP - 8 bidders being evaluated (target completion 7/2010) Oracle Service Oriented Architecture (“Enterprise Services”); installed 12/09 Proposal: Link to a national transcript exchange by 7/2010

Steering Committee JB Buxton P. Asmar J. Atkinson A. Quick R. Garland A. Levinson P. Price Project Leadership Adam Levinson, Project Sponsor Mike Veckenstedt, IT Lead Ben Comer, Project Manager Belinda Black, Non-technical Lead Non-tech Team Kayla Mathis Gwen Tucker Tom Field Denise Jackson Karl Pond Alexis Bouchard Joe Dietzel Vanessa Jeter Traci Blount Michele Burton Jessica Exline Kris Knower Daniel Boyette Technical Team John Wetsch Steve Bergene Gary Blumenthal Jerry Bunn Lily Ebron Betsy Baugess George Phelps Angela Pope-Lett Robin Lucarelli Suresh Pothireddy Frank Vierling Vicki Humphreys Higher education Researchers Representatives from other state agencies LEAs External Advisory LEA Advisory Various LEA contacts Existing User Advisory Boards from NCWISE, other existing applications Peter Asmar Mike Veckenstedt John Wetsch Annette Murphy Ken Thompson DPI IT Leadership DPI Directors Data Management Group Karl PondBetsy Baugess Traci BlountJoe Dietzel Lillie EbronKC Elander Tom FieldKenneth Gattis Ashley HerringKen Little Joanne MarinoKayla Mathis Alicia McGeeQuentin Parker George PhelpsSusan Ruiz Alexis Schauss Loreto Tessini Rhonda Welfare Gary Williamson CEDARS: Project Structure

Overview CEDARS objectives, components, plan Spotlight on UID UID Pilot Questions/Next Steps

Goals of UID System 1.All students will be assigned an NCWISE UID at the first point of contact with the public education system NCWISE CECAS MIS2000 LEP More at Four PreK PreK - 13

Goals of UID System 2. All staff will be assigned a unique statewide ID Note: new Staff file will serve as source

eScholar Uniq-ID 1.Basic demographic information sent to Uniq-ID server via web interface or batch upload 2.System uses multiple matching techniques to determine if NCWISE UID already exists 3.System provides an NCWISE UID via file or web If match, system will return existing UID If no match, system can assign a UID or leave blank If near match, system will initiate near-match resolution process Step:

Match Resolution

Overview CEDARS objectives, components, plan Spotlight on UID UID Pilot Questions/Next Steps

UID Pilot: Guidelines May 1 – June 1, 2009 Maximum of 20 LEAs and/or Charters Varying sizes, geographic regions, technology capabilities, and business processes Use all source systems

UID Pilot: Activities Assist DPI in developing policies and procedures for the new system Review and resolve near-matches for students and staff Provide feedback to the DPI project team Act as a resource for other LEAs during statewide rollout

Pilot Requirements Training –overview of the UID system and its key functions –demonstration of the UID Student and Staff Systems –opportunity to complete hands on exercises to practice reviewing and resolving near-matches Weekly conference call during the pilot period

Overview CEDARS objectives & components Spotlight on UID UID Pilot Questions/Next Steps

Interested in being a pilot LEA? Questions about UID or CEDARS in general? Please let us know by February 27th Contact us at: