Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

MIS DATA CONFERENCE 2012 JULY 23, 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "MIS DATA CONFERENCE 2012 JULY 23, 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Federal Programs."— Presentation transcript:

1 MIS DATA CONFERENCE 2012 JULY 23, 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Federal Programs

2 Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR) Data elements collected from local districts Data collection and reporting process Future changes to the data collection process

3 The CSPR is an instrument administered annually be US Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education to collect data on a number of programs authorized by ESEA. The CSPR places the use of robust, timely performance data at the core of educational decision making and policymaking.

4 EDFacts Systems EDFacts Reporting System. EDFacts data analysis and reporting tools permit users to access, analyze and report on education data. Two kinds of reporting options are available – preformatted reports and ad hoc, or individually tailored, reports. States can access preformatted reports for the data they provide to ED, while Department staff can access both preformatted and ad hoc reports. EDEN Submission System (ESS). The ESS is an electronic system that facilitates the efficient and timely transmission of data from SEAs to the Department. SEAs provide the vast majority of their education data to ED using the ESS. EDEN Survey Tool (EST). The EST is a web-based interface that allows LEAs and other local level entities to submit data to ED. The EST is used to collect data for the Civil Rights Data Collection and the Electronic Application System for Indian Education. EDFacts Metadata and Process System (EMAPS). EMAPS provides an easy method for states to report and maintain metadata, which are information collected to explain and analyze data in ESS. Examples of metadata include state definitions, state policies, assessment information (such as performance levels and testing accommodations), graduation rate calculations, and accountability information.

5

6 Title I, Part A – Basic Program Title I, Part A – School Improvement Program Title I, Part C – Migrant Education Program Title I, Part D – Neglected and Delinquent Program Title II, Part A - Highly Qualified Teachers and Principals Title III, Part A – English Learners Title VI, Part B – Rural Education Achievement Title X, Part C – Homeless Education Program

7 Title I, Part A – Schoolwide and Targeted Assistance Programs – Student Participation – Services Offered (Instructional and Social Services) Title I, Part A - School Improvement (1003a) – AYP – Public School Choice and Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Eligibility Student Participation Cost of Services

8 English Learners, Immigrants, and Migrants

9 English Learners and Immigrants – Enrollment Counts – Languages Spoken – Proficiency Rates – Local Program Services Types of Language Instructional Programs Student Participation Professional Development Staff

10 Migrant Education Program – Identification and Enrollment Counts – Student Participation – Student Mobility Rates – Program Services (Instructional and Social Services) – Proficiency Rates – Staff

11 Neglected and Delinquent Program – Student and facility counts – Length of program participation – Student demographics – Academic and vocational outcomes – Academic achievement in reading and mathematics

12 Homeless Education – Identification and Enrollment Counts – Student Participation – Proficiency Rates – Services Offered – Barriers Removed

13 Title VI: Rural Education Achievement Programs – REAP-FLEX Authority – Spending Objectives Transferability Authority

14

15 District Accreditation Policy: 2.5 FACTORS AFFECTING CHANGE IN ACCREDITATION STATUS An assigned accreditation status may remain unchanged during that school year except in those cases where verified noncompliance with financial standards (See Appendix H), the testing standard (See Appendix F), standards for Safe and Healthy Schools (See standards 35, 36, & 37), continued noncompliance with federal regulations, or reporting false information MAY DOWNGRADE A STATUS IMMEDIATELY. When the district has verified correction of deficiencies in meeting all process standards previously cited as deficiencies on the district’s Accreditation Record Summary, the accreditation status will be upgraded.

16

17 MSIS Indicators – Title I – Title Student Indicators – Migrants – LEP/Immigrant – Homeless – Neglected/Delinquent

18

19

20 Frequency of the submission of data Personnel responsible for submitting data Reporting students that the district no longer has ownership of that are served in special programs Reporting students participating in 21 st Century Community Learning Programs Monitoring the completion of the data

21


Download ppt "MIS DATA CONFERENCE 2012 JULY 23, 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Federal Programs."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google