ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-1 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October 2011 -- SR case number 11-S-3744 applies Developing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DoD Logistics Human Capital Strategy (HCS) Executive Overview 1 October 2008.
Advertisements

WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
1 The Systems Engineering Research Center UARC Dr. Dinesh Verma Executive Director January 13,
The Commitment Initial training will centre around short, foundation training in the theory and practice of sustainability as related to the Water Corporation.
Instructional Decision Making
Succession and talent management
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
ERS Overview 5/15/12 | Page-1 Distribution Statement A – Cleared for public release by OSR, SR Case #s 12-S-0258, 0817, 1003, and 1854 apply. Affordable,
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Dr Jim Briggs Masterliness Not got an MSc myself; BA DPhil; been teaching masters students for 18 years.
Determining CLIMASP Competencies Jerash University Development of Interdisciplinary Program on Climate Change and Sustainability Policy- CLIMASP Development.
A Snapshot of TEQSA Dr Carol Nicoll Chief Commissioner Festival of Learning and Teaching University of Adelaide Tuesday 6 November 2012.
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
Career Path Framework.
SERC Achievements and Program Direction Art Pyster Deputy Executive Director November, Note by R Peak 12/7/2010: This presentation.
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
DoD Systems and Software Engineering A Strategy for Enhanced Systems Engineering Kristen Baldwin Acting Director, Systems and Software Engineering Office.
Leadership in the Baldrige Criteria
Recent Trends in DoD Systems and Software Engineering Processes Bruce Amato Acting Deputy Director, Software Engineering and Systems Assurance Office of.
0 Contract Specialist Army Contracting Command – Redstone CPCM, CFCM, CCCM, FELLOW Huntsville Chapter President Director, Mohawk Valley Small Business.
Leadership and Strategic Planning
JSC Systems Engineering Development Initiatives Jason Nelson JSC Human Resources Development.
Graduate Development Program (GDP) & Graduate Leadership Program (GLP) UNECE HRMT Conference Budapest 5 – 7 September 2012.
Approaches to talent management
Company LOGO Leading, Connecting, Transforming UNC… …Through Its People Human Capital Management.
ASCA 3.0 vs. ASCA 2.0 What are the changes between the 2nd and 3rd editions of the ASCA National Model? A Brief Synopsis Gregg Curtis, PhD School Counseling.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
INCOSE 1 st reactions. One other area that struck me has the sheer number of levels of proficiency—in ours we are going with 5 and the first one is limited.
Charting a course PROCESS.
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
Human Capital Management Assessment Joe Burt Director, HRM March 31, 2004.
08/2009 The Benefits of Mentoring. Mentoring Mentoring has evolved in the workplace to be less about bosses grooming their handpicked successors to being.
Unclassified. Program Management Empowerment and Accountability Mr. David Ahern Director, Portfolio Systems Acquisition AT&L(A&T) 14 April 2009 The Acquisition.
Field Engineer Development Program
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
© 2003 IBM Corporation July 2004 Technology planning for not-for-profit organizations IBM volunteer name Title, organization.
1 Towards a Framework for the Quality Assurance of Practical Skill Ability Akira Kurematsu* Takashi Sakamoto* Yoshito Shubiki** *Accreditation Council.
AN INVITATION TO LEAD: United Way Partnerships Discussion of a New Way to Work Together. October 2012.
OUSD (AT&L) Human Capital Initiatives Brief to Life-Cycle Logistics FIPT January 13, 2012 Keith Charles Director 2012 Vision: Creating a High Quality,
NASA FIRST 2011 Program Information. 2 Program Purpose To provide “individual contributors” and “influence leaders” the opportunity to develop foundational.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
PROMOTING HUMAN RESOURCES IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: CRITICAL ROLE OF HUMAN CAPITAL IN THE PERFORMANCE OF PUBLIC SERVICES IN AFRICA Africa’s Human Resources.
THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF QUALITY, 5e, © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning TM 1 Chapter 5 Leadership and Strategic Planning.
1.What does this talk have to do with SPM? 2.How can this help you with team building? 3.What was your favorite point or example? 4.What are the speaker's.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Succession Planning Ray Scott, CFPIM, CIRM President, APICS – St. Louis Chapter Ensuring Continued Success for Your Chapter.
NASA FIRST 2009 Program Information. 2 Program Purpose To provide “individual contributors” and “influence leaders” the opportunity to develop foundational.
The Comprehensive Literacy Plan Pennsylvania KeystonestoOpportunity Tom Corbett Governor Ron Tomalis Secretary.
Changing Skills for Changing Times Evolving with the Supply Chain Management (SCM) Profession Brian J. Gibson, PhD Wilson Family Professor of SCM Auburn.
CAREER PATHWAYS THE NEW WAY OF DOING BUSINESS. Agenda for our Discussion Today we’ll discuss: Career Pathways Systems and Programs Where we’ve been and.
Chapter 10 Learning and Development in a Knowledge Setting
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
Systems Engineering Initiatives 04/13/10 Page-1 CLASSIFICATION – UNCLASSIFIED Systems Engineering Initiatives and the SPRDE Career Field 13 April 2010.
© PeopleAdvantage 2013 All Rights Reserved We will Show You How to Easily Conduct Effective Performance Appraisals LCSA Conference 2013.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
UNCLASSIFIED The Open Group 01/07/10 Page-1 Kick-off Meeting for The Open Group Acquisition Cyber Security Initiative Ms. Kristen Baldwin Director, Systems.
June 23, 2016 Organizational Overview. 2 Automation Federation Background A fragmented community of automation professional associations and societies.
Project Office Effectiveness Educating the Organization on How to Use a PMO February 22 nd, 2006.
1 Chapter 9 Implementing Six Sigma. Top 8 Reasons for Six Sigma Project Failure 8. The training was not practical. 7. The project was too small for DMAIC.
Mgt Project Portfolio Management and the PMO Module 8 - Fundamentals of the Program Management Office Dr. Alan C. Maltz Howe School of Technology.
THE ADVANCED LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE
SAMPLE Develop a Comprehensive Competency Framework
NHN member organizations
THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Dolores Esposito, Executive Superintendent of Leadership Developing Social and Emotional Skills in our Schools.
By Jeff Burklo, Director
IEEE EAB Strategy 19 June 2011 New Brunswick, NJ.
February 21-22, 2018.
I4.0 in Action The importance of people and culture in the Industry 4.0 transformation journey Industry 4.0 Industry 3.0 Industry 2.0 Industry 1.0 Cyber.
Presentation transcript:

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-1 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies Developing a 21st Century Engineering Workforce Mr. Nicholas M. Torelli Director, Mission Assurance, ODASD(SE) 6 October 2011 Annual SERC Research Review – 2011

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-2 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies The Problem Many years of Systemic Root Cause Data show a correlation between DoD program technical failures and engineering staffing levels / technical skills. Factors Bearing on the Problem: Our current model: minimal certification versus full qualification On-the-job execution versus traditional academic programs. Critical skills learned via on-the-job experience and hands-on practice. There is an imminent demographic crisis in DoD engineering workforce

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-3 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies Engineering Workforce Demographics Mean Age = 43 Source: DAU DataMart Q Workforce Age

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-4 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies SPRDE-SE/PSE Assessment Demographics – 10,648 participants

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-5 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies Vision and Goals Vision: An engineering workforce with the capability, capacity and competence needed to address 21st Century acquisition technical and programmatic challenges. Goals: Establish a process that leverages workforce development and robust certification and qualification as the foundations for cultural and technical revitalization of the DoD Engineering Enterprise. Determine the essential technical knowledge, skills and abilities needed by practicing DoD Systems Engineers to contribute to the technical success of acquisition programs across all experience levels.

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-6 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies DoD Engineers Total = 93,907 ** Acquisition Engineers 47,813 * Non-Acquisition Engineers 46,094** Engineers 31,868 * Non-Engineers 7,631* *2 rd Qtr 2011 – DAU Data Mart db **2 nd Qtr 2011 – OPM Fedscope db Target Audience: DoD Engineers Systems Engineering (SPRDE-SE/PSE Career Field) Total = 39,499 *

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-7 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies Revitalize and reinvigorate “Engineering Culture” of the Department. Enable and ensure consistency in technical capabilities across the Department. Transition from a “minimally certified” to a “fully qualified” workforce. Maintain core principles of depth, breadth and leadership in engineering workforce career development. Objectives

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-8 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies Core Principles of a 21 st Century Engineering Workforce Depth –Extensive expertise and experience in one or more engineering disciplines and in one or more product domains Breadth –Awareness of and appreciation for other functional areas –Understanding of the system lifecycle and processes –Knowledge of other engineering disciplines, cross-disciplinary impacts and how they integrate into the system solution –Knowledge of product domains Leadership –Ability to motivate and inspire individuals and teams –Comfort in dealing with complexity –Focused on underpinning decisions with data –Capability to make tough technical decisions

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-9 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies SPRDE-SE/PSE Plot of DoD-Wide Proficiency and Mission Critical Ratings from Assessment

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-10 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies To achieve the goals and objectives, we are addressing the following questions: 1.What are the most impactful roles and the most common roles played by the engineering workforce? 2.What do these people actually do – what is the job description, goals, and tasks/practices for each of these roles? 3.What are the most critical competencies (i.e., behaviors, knowledge, skills, and abilities) – technical and other – and the required proficiency levels for each of these roles? Achieving the Goals and Objectives After we understand the answers to these questions, with validation from the engineering workforce at all levels, we plan to construct an engineering development model that refashions the DAU curriculum (position category descriptions, job descriptions, certification and qualification standards, on- the-job training and mentoring programs, etc.) to motivate and enable the workforce to effectively execute these roles.

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-11 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies Skills and Teaching Venues Required for Selected AF SE Assessment Model (SEAM) Process Areas Gathering data: Engineers were requested to provide skills and education/training venues required to complete the tasks listed for the AF SEAM Process Areas provided below: Process Areas: Design Manufacturing Requirements Risk Management Transition, Fielding, & Sustainment Verification & Validation Education/Training Venue: Formal Education Training OJT Mentoring

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-12 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies A major thrust of the SERC is academic research that explores future workforce competencies and approaches to cultivate, educate, and prepare the future SE workforce – this research will provide essential learning content for 21 st Century engineers.  RT–1 Body of Knowledge and Curriculum to Advance Systems Engineering (BKCASE)  RT–4 Technical Leadership  RT–16 Experience Accelerator  RT-19& 19A SE Capstone Courses SERC Research Provides Learning Resources

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-13 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies Ultimate Goal: Work with members of the engineering workforce at all levels to develop a comprehensive and validated matrix of roles vs. competencies along with resultant learning outcomes that can guide the construction of a 21 st Century Engineering Development model. We will use this engineering development model to: Drive to achieve engineering core principles Enable technical consistency across the Department. “Raise the bar of excellence in engineering practice” to improve critical acquisition programs. Summary

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-14 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies Back-Up

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-15 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies  RT–1 Body of Knowledge and Curriculum to Advance Systems Engineering (BKCASE) Provides up-to-date reference material to enhance learning content Provides comprehensive guide for constructing the engineering development model  RT–4 Technical Leadership Provides major part of leadership content Covers Systems, Business, and Enterprise leadership skills Could be extended to cover entry- to expert-level leadership SERC Research Provides Learning Resources (1)

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-16 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies  RT–16 Experience Accelerator Creates new paradigm with potential to speed up (2X?) development of senior systems engineers Provides necessary skills to address emerging systems challenges in an economically attractive manner  RT-19& 19A SE Capstone Courses Provides early-on exposure to DoD problem areas Provides jumpstart to systems thinking for future engineering workforce Provides entry-level workforce candidates that can hit the ground running Provides lessons learned and promising practices on incorporating SE principles into the curriculum Provides enhancements to the engineering development model SERC Research Provides Learning Resources (2)

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-17 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies Workforce Development Implementing statutory responsibility under WSARA to provide guidance, oversight and advocacy for the SE Workforce –Department remains committed to growing SE human capital capacity and capability –Total SPRDE/Systems Engineering Workforce: 39,201 − Growth since 2009: 2,497 Established Key Leader Professional Development Program –Responds to Sec 820 of PL that requires “properly qualified” individuals in key positions on major defense acquisition programs and USD(AT&L) memo on Key Leader Positions –Program Lead Systems Engineer is a mandatory Key Leader Position –Currently developing core Key Leader qualifications in four major areas: Program Management, Technical Management, Business Management, and Executive Leadership “A capable, qualified, and appropriately sized acquisition workforce will be key to achieving efficiency.” -- Ashton B. Carter, USD(AT&L)

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-18 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies Systems Engineering Challenges Start programs right with strong early SE Expand the aperture of DoD engineering practice to address 21st century technical challenges Create the tools to support rapid capability delivery Reinvigorate Defense Standardization Address increased priority for program protection Perform robust reliability and maintainability engineering

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-19 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies To achieve the goals and objectives, we need to address the following questions: 1.What are the most impactful roles and the most common roles played by the SPRDE-SE/PSE workforce? Roles could include Chief Engineer, Architect, Requirements Manager, Software Engineer, Domain Engineer, etc. We want to affect people filling these roles first. 2.What do these people actually do – what is the job description, goals, and tasks/practices for each of these roles? This is where the needs for technical depth, breadth and leadership should emerge. Achieving the Goals and Objectives (1)

ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-20 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies 3.What are the most critical competencies (i.e., behaviors, knowledge, skills, and abilities) – technical and other – and the required proficiency levels for each of these roles? This is where the specific competencies that correspond to technical depth, breadth and leadership should emerge. We are talking about more than SE – we need to explore the full range of science, technology, engineering, and math competencies that are needed by the SPRDE-SE/PSE workforce. 4.Once we understand the answers to questions 1 – 3 with validation from the SPRDE-SE/PSE workforce at all levels, we plan to construct an engineering development model that refashions the Defense Acquisition University curriculum, position category descriptions, job descriptions, certification and qualification standards, on-the-job training and mentoring programs, etc., to motivate and enable the workforce to effectively execute these roles. Achieving the Goals and Objectives (2)