June 2011  Route  Operations & Riders  Benefits  Construction  Operations & Maintenance  Potential System Manager  Next Steps & Conclusion Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Local Funding Options for Streetcar Projects David M. Taylor, CNU Senior Vice President National Director Transit-oriented Design.
Advertisements

West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
Portland Streetcar CONNECTING PORTLAND’S NEIGHBORHOODS THE PORTLAND EXPERIENCE DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED STREETCARS THE PORTLAND EXPERIENCE DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED.
Smart Growth Makes Money: Transit Oriented Development.
What Makes Streetcars Work? Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Seattle Center City Streetcar Workshop July 20, 2007.
Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles APTA A quick overview August 2, 2011.
The TECOline Streetcar A Tampa Case Study The TECOline Streetcar A Tampa Case Study Placemaking. Development. Tourism.
Gilbert Road Light Rail Extension Transportation Project Advancement Agreement City Council Study Session December 4, 2014.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
Utility Extension Project
3 rd Annual California Passenger Rail Summit Innovative Transportation Financing Art Guzzetti Vice President – Policy American Public Transportation Association.
Located in downtown Boston by the Fort Point Channel.
Oceanside-Escondido Rail Line Final Project Presentation John R. VelascoMay 12 th, 2003.
Parking and Transportation Services Presentation December 2, 2008.
Dulles Metro Extension Phase I: Tyson’s Corner Martene Bryan Luis Serna Matt Zarit.
SUBWAY SYSTEM IN NEW YORK CITY The Magical Subway.
North Corridor Commuter Rail The Case For Tax Increment Financing Mecklenburg County May 2007.
1 AASHTO: SCOPT/MTAP Winter Meeting METRO Update: Light Rail Operations and the Status of Future Corridors Wulf Grote, P.E. Director, Project Development.
Beverly A. Scott, Ph.D. MBTA General Manager MassDOT Rail & Transit Administrator Richard A. Davey MassDOT Secretary and CEO Chairman of the MBTA Board.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
Midwest High Speed Rail Case StudySeptember 29th, 2004 Andy Inserra, Kristin Thompson, T.J. Thurlow, Natalie Villwock.
Part II: Case Studies 1.Arlington, VA: Transit-oriented Development Boosts Economy County-wide. 2.Portland, OR: Streetcar Increases Investment and Redevelopment.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
National Leaders in Real Estate Research Streetcar Economic Development Impact and Projected Ridership Ken Danter The Danter Company Streetcar Working.
April Salt Lake City Streetcars - History ABOUT STREETCARS.
Overland Park Public Works Committee – Transit Update June 24, 2015.
Portland Streetcar CONNECTING PORTLAND’S NEIGHBORHOODS THE PORTLAND EXPERIENCE DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED STREETCARS THE PORTLAND EXPERIENCE DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED.
Central London Congestion Charging David Hutchinson GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY International Union of Air Pollution Prevention and Environmental Protection.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
Bringing the streetcar back to St. Louis  Connecting two existing light-rail transit stops, Forest Park, the Missouri History Museum and the University.
Rapid Transit for Toronto February 8, Metrolinx “5 in 10 Plan” - October 2010 Light Rail Transit Projects New Rapid Transit for Etobicoke North.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
Forest Park Advisory Board March 15, 2012 Step 3 Presentation.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 15, 2009.
Morgan County Transit Discussion UTA Corporate Staff Presentation November 19, 2013.
Central Arkansas Transit Authority Enhancing the Downtown Economy.
The Purple Line Transit Connecting Bethesda, New Carrolton, and the Washington Metro Presented by- Nick Flanders Rose Ryan Anupam Srivastava.
Kern Regional Transit Workshop Kern Council of Governments Marilyn Beardslee Senior Planner.
JOSHUA CRAIN CE 458: PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS JUNE 4, 2009 Costs in Small Public Transit Systems in Oregon.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference The Results of Selected BRT Projects 2:00 – 3:20 p.m. Walt Kulyk Director, FTA Office of Mobility Innovation.
Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority: The Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority is a multimodal organization serving the Buffalo Niagara Region.
FlexBRT Project Briefing. Background Feasibility Study began in – $750,000 TEA-21 Grant to study an ITS Circulator in North Orange County/South.
Downtown Shuttle (D-Link) Interlocal Agreement Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee October 26, 2015.
Tide Light Rail Line By: Alec Rilee, Kimberly Gayle,& Steven Taylor School: Petsworth Elementary.
Overview Presentation Fall 2015 Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Study.
Briefing for Transportation Finance Panel Nov 23, 2015 Economic Analysis Reports: 1.I-84 Viaduct in Hartford 2.I-84/Rt8 Mixmaster in Waterbury 3.New Haven.
Making Headways Smart Card Fare Payment and Bus Dwell Time in Los Angeles Daniel Shockley Fehr & Peers Julia Salinas Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation.
Gastonia Transit Expansion Study City Council/Planning Commission Joint Transportation Workshop September 13, 2007.
MBTA Late-Night Service Proposed Service Changes Fiscal & Management Control Board February 29,
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Transportation Fee FY2016 January 16, Services Provided by Transportation Stinger Buses - Three routes with 10 buses operating weekdays and two.
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 7 OPERATING REVENUES: Fare revenue is above budget due to fare increases that became effective.
Financial Report through Q4 FY2014 Preliminary Year-end Results December 3, 2014.
WAYPOINTE Norwalk, CT Walker Parking Consultants Andy Hill Jody Todd June 26, 2008.
Portland’s Northwest District Parking Plan Development.
Transportation Fee MSFAC Meeting 12/06/ Transportation Summary Typical Service Day during Semester: Tech Trolley – 6,200 riders & 240 trips Red.
Multi Agency Exchange May 16, 2017.
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
Local Government Roundtable Session Arlington, Virginia
Regional Roads Committee
Transportation Summit
Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles APTA A quick overview August 2, 2011.
Tampa Historic Streetcar, Inc. May 16, 2018
Central Arkansas Transit Authority
LRT, GRT, PRT Comparison Peter Muller, PE Ingmar Andreasson, Ph. D.
Central Arkansas Transit Authority
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Streetcar Working Group November 13, 2006
Presentation transcript:

June 2011

 Route  Operations & Riders  Benefits  Construction  Operations & Maintenance  Potential System Manager  Next Steps & Conclusion Overview

Why are we considering a trolley?  Practical Benefits: Car-free travel  Economic Benefits: Increase in property values and tax revenue  Intangible Benefits: Enhanced experience for LNHP visitors and UMass Lowell

What was the goal of the trolley study?  Answer some key questions about how to make the trolley a reality:  Where will it go?  How much will it cost?  How will we pay for it?  Provide a framework for constructing, funding and operating the trolley

 Proposes a specific, defined route  Serves UMass Lowell’s extensive campus system  Includes a balanced O&M plan How is this study different?

Moving Forward Moving Forward Moving Forward

Moving Forward Moving Forward Moving Forward

 Trolleys arrive every 10 minutes  20 Station Stops  Hours of Service  Monday through Thursday: 6 am – 10 pm  Friday and Saturday: 6 am – Midnight  Sunday: 10 am – 8 pm Level of Service

Comparison of Weekday Service

 Newly-built streetcars designed to look historic  Feature A/C, Handicap Access, Electronic Fare Payment  Cost - $1 million per car  A total of nine trolley vehicles for the Lowell Trolley Photo Courtesy of Jim Schantz Streetcar Vehicles

Ridership SourceProjected Ridership National Park Service52,589 Local Residents (within 1/4-mile of rail line) 44,730 Folk Festival10,800 Entertainment Events67,176 UMass Lowell297,011 Lowell Regional Transit Authority185,130 Total Existing Trips657,436 New Residential6,848 New Office130,492 New Lowell Trial Court38,780 Total Future Trips176,119 TOTAL TRIPS833,555

Moving Forward Moving Forward Moving Forward

 Increase in Value of Existing Properties: $86 million or 5% over a 10-year period.  Higher rents  Increased sales prices  Proposition 2½ Limits  Trolley will support a higher volume of development and at a faster pace – than without it  Over $147 million in additional value  $2.6 million in annual tax revenue Economic Development Benefits

Moving Forward Moving Forward Moving Forward

Track$37.4 Power Stations$1.4 Streetcars$7.4 Maintenance Facility$4.4 Subtotal$50.6 Plus Contingency (15%)$7.6 Plus Design and Project Management$7.5 Total$65.7

Comparison of Construction Cost Estimate

Name of Program Funding Available Per Project Small StartsUp to $75 million Urban CirculatorUp to $25 million Transit in Parks ProgramUp to $6 million EarmarksVaries Public Works Economic Development Program Up to $1-2 million

Moving Forward Moving Forward Moving Forward

Vehicle Operations$1,749,408 Vehicle Maintenance$676,496 Non-Vehicle Maintenance$107,648 General Administration$444,754 Sub-Total$2,978,305 10% Cost Reserve$297,831 Total$3,276,136

Comparison of O&M Cost Estimate

Fares$307,826 Sponsorships$105,000 Advertising Revenue$50,000 Redirected Costs (UML, LRTA, LNHP) $1,337,450 Government Transportation Programs/Other $1,000,000 Special Assessment District$576,489 Total$3,376,775

Moving Forward Moving Forward Moving Forward O&M Revenue Breakdown

Moving Forward Moving Forward Moving Forward

 Trolley will most likely be privately operated  Manager could be one of two entities:  LRTA  Non-profit: typically formed by an agreement between the city and transit operator Potential System Manager

Moving Forward Moving Forward Moving Forward

Moving Forward Moving Forward

 40% of the operating dollars are already being spent  20% of the line is already in place Key Takeaways

Little Rock/St. Louis Trolley Trip

 Length of system: 7 Miles  Construction cost: $65.7 million  O&M cost (per year): $3.3 million  Number of riders (per year): 833,555  Gallagher to South Campus: 25 minutes  Maximum time between streetcars: 10 minutes  Earliest first year of operation: 2017

June 2011

 Trolleys every 10 minutes  20 Station stops  Hours of service Photo Courtesy of John Smatlak - RPR Consulting Heritage Streetcar

Little Rock Unit Costs Cost of Living Differential Lowell Unit Cost Revenue Hours (Cost Driver) Total Annual Operator Wages Operator Wages $ $ ,007$960,146

Lowell Comparable Streetcar Systems AverageLowHigh Per Revenue Mile$10.70$15.19$8.76$25.39 Per Hour$90.99$109.59$64.33$ Comparable Streetcar Systems:  Kenosha, Wisconsin  Little Rock  Memphis  Portland, Oregon  Tampa

Lowell Comparable Streetcar Systems AverageLowHigh Per Mile$8.81$9.78$2.60$22.08 Per Streetcar Vehicle$6.66$5.47$1.04$14.60 Comparable Streetcar Systems:  Kenosha, Wisconsin  Little Rock  Memphis  Portland, Oregon  Tampa

Photo Courtesy of Jim Schantz  2.5-mile system  Construction Cost: $28.5 million  New Development: $260 million

Photo Courtesy of John Smatlak - RPR Consulting  6.5-mile system  Construction Cost: $24 million  New Development: $137 million

Photo Courtesy of John Smatlak - RPR Consulting  6.8-mile system  Construction Cost: $60 million  New Development (HCD Only): $740 million