Counting Bikes in Madison, WI 2013 Fall Count Procedure Madison, WI Sept 4 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Update on Bicyclist & Pedestrian Data Collection and Modeling Efforts Transportation Research Board January 2010 Charlie Denney, Associate Michael Jones,
Advertisements

Conducting Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts: Volunteer Training MnDot Bicycle and Pedestrian Counting Initiative.
TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
3-1 Utility Conflict Identification and Management Lesson 3.
VOLUNTEER GUIDANCE UNSHELTERED COUNT Missouri Balance of State Point-in-Time Count.
Training Outline – Attendance Clerks
Juneau Downtown Tourism Transportation Study May 27, 2003.
1 Low Volume Road Traffic Counts Toggle Fullscreen mode with this button above For audio, call conference line: For.
Calibration of an Infrared-based Automatic Counting System for Pedestrian Traffic Flow Data Collection Step 3: Calibration Models Calibration models were.
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
Conducting Counts & Surveys. Why? Better understand needs Understand what influences biking and walking Secure grant funding Support Bicycle and Pedestrian.
80 th and Foster Intersection Analysis Kevin Hace Chris Hass Matt Palmer CE 410/510: Bicycle and Pedestrian Engineering Design.
Traffic Engineering Studies (Volume Studies)
Lean Operations for Water and Wasterwater Controlling Cost While Improving Efficiency… A Real World View.
TECH581 Improve/Control Presentation Fall 2008 Date: 12/09/08 Team Members: xxxxx xxxxx Sound Removed.
The London Congestion Charge. Facts Traffic speed in central London had fallen more that 20% since the 1960s (14.2 mph to 10mph) I n 1998 drivers in inner.
Bike/Walk Twin Cities Conducting bicycle & pedestrian counts.
BIG BIKE DATA: HOW GPS ROUTE DATA COLLECTED FROM SMARTPHONES CAN BENEFIT BICYCLE PLANNING MEYER, 2013 UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN 1.
Evaluating Robustness of Signal Timings for Conditions of Varying Traffic Flows 2013 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium – August 16, 2013.
Systems Development Life Cycle Dirt Sport Custom.
Regional Active Living Vision Statement The Arrowhead is a vibrant and healthy region where well-designed communities embrace and encourage physical activity.
2010 Wisconsin Safe Routes to School Funding SRTS Project Application Cycle Applications available January 2010 Applications due April 2, 2010 Approximately.
1 Road Crash and Victim Information System (RCVIS) Mr Sem Panhavuth Road Crash and victim information System Project Manager Handicap International Belgium.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
MPO/RPC Directors Meeting Asadur Rahman Lead Worker-Traffic Forecasting Section, BPED, July 28, 2015.
Broward Complete Streets Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Meeting Monday August 10, 2015.
10/10/2015 IENG 471 Facilities Planning 1 IENG Lecture END Project Report Requirements & Project Presentation Information.
Minnesota Guidestar Evaluation of Non-Intrusive Technologies for Traffic Detection Farideh Amiri Minnesota Department of.
Roosevelt Road: State to Columbus Public Meeting September 22, 2015.
2007 ITE District 6 Annual Meeting July 17, 2007 Sirisha Kothuri Kristin Tufte Robert L. Bertini PSU Hau Hagedorn OTREC Dean Deeter Athey Creek Consultants.
Interpreting Demand and Capacity for Street and Highway Design Lecture 6 CE 5720 Norman Garrick Norman W. Garrick.
Managing Travel for Planned Special Events: What, Why, & Benefits Walt Dunn, P.E. Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Talking Operations Seminar January.
1 Technical & Business Writing (ENG-315) Muhammad Bilal Bashir UIIT, Rawalpindi.
Rural Transportation Planning Eunice Fitzpatrick Transportation Planner Kentucky River ADD Hazard, KY.
Settlement Accuracy Analysis Prepared by ERCOT Load Profiling.
Collecting and Using Data ROMA Data for Management and Accountability.
Phase 2: Data Collection Findings and Future Steps.
Portland State University 11 By Maisha Mahmud Li Huan Evaluation Of SCATS Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System.
Rod Weis, Texas A&M University Lana Wolken, Texas A&M University Joe Richmond, University of North Texas Operating Your Own System Versus Contracting.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
Time Series Analysis and Forecasting. Introduction to Time Series Analysis A time-series is a set of observations on a quantitative variable collected.
LEADS/EMS DATA VALIDATION IPS MeteoStar December 11, 2006 WHAT IS VALIDATION? From The Dictionary: 1a. To Make Legally Valid 1b. To Grant Official.
March 24, 2010 Sunflower Project Monthly Conversion Meeting – March.
Rainier Avenue South Pilot Project Update Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board Project Manager Jim Curtin September 2, 2015.
Best Practices for Collecting Counts and Risk Evaluation for Bicyclists and Pedestrians Krista Nordback, P.E., Ph.D., PSU Taylor Phillips, PSU Mike Sellinger,
Transport.tamu.edu TAMING WILD BRONCOS Transit Management Changes, Financing, Training, Staffing Rod Weis, Texas A&M University Lana Wolken, Texas A&M.
The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.
Right of Way.
1 Toll Modeling Analysis for the SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project 19 th Annual International EMME/2 Users’ Conference October 19-21, 2005 Presented.
Counting that Counts: Bike and Pedestrian Documentation.
East-West Corridor Connectivity Study – Study Recommendations November 17, 2009.
Martin J. Walsh Mayor Michael Dennehy Commissioner Public Hearing January 20, 2015.
Attendance, Class Record Book and Enrollment Counts
Anytime, Anywhere Access Benefits Functionality Work Order Administration Dispatch Work Order Work Order Details New Work Order Additional Functionality.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
Statewide Pedestrian/Bicycle Data Collection Study Federal Certification of Statewide Planning Process Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION July 13, 2016.
Complete Streets Training Module 4b – Designing for All Users.
Mission Street Project Update Voyage 2070 Advance Operation Systems Using ASTRO Proactive Plan Selection Average and Split Variant operations Prepared.
Using Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts
Setting Up a Pedestrian Safety Enforcement Operation
Developing an Active Transportation Database for Southern California
Chapter 1 Traffic Flow What you will be learning from this chapter …
Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets Multimodal Cities: Addressing Issues in Transit Corridors March 24, 2016.
Text your Zip Code & Need to
Rail Program Management Services
Developing a Pedestrian -Bicycle Safety Action Plan
Order Processing and Requisition Accelerator
Forest Coordinator Training – Fieldwork and Backup Schedules
Presentation transcript:

Counting Bikes in Madison, WI 2013 Fall Count Procedure Madison, WI Sept

What is NBPD? An on-going effort by private consultants with support from ITE Annual national bicycle and pedestrian count and survey effort Fulfills need for in-depth analysis of why people bike and walk Objectives – Consistent data collection – Open access data – Shared research

3 Lack of consistent data Non-motorized modes lack funding Minimal national data sharing Analysis for other modes are based on marginal data yet receive substantive funding Need for NBPD

4 NBPD Accomplishments Over 75 organizations and agencies have sent data Over 600 count locations Extrapolation figures Related projects: Caltrans Seamless Travel Publicly available support documents including training presentations and count/survey forms

Why Count? Evaluate need for new trails and trail upgrades Evaluate community demand Explain trail value to community, elected officials, grant agencies Justify resource allocation Forecast demand Support grant applications

Quick Overview of Counting Process Preparation for Counts Select count days, times, locations Determine manual or automatic counters, or both Visit locations to understand unusual traffic patterns Determine how many counters you will need to hire Hire and train your counters

After Counting Period Review forms Re-count locations if necessary Data entry Send data to NBPD Data analysis Plan for your next count

NBPD Count Dates and Times January May July 3-5 September Recommended Times Weekday, 5-7 PM Saturday, 12 noon – 2PM Secondary Times Weekday, 7 AM to 7 PM Saturday, 7 AM to 7 PM Other days and times are ok, based on local situation Official National Count/Survey Days

Selecting Count Weeks Consider: – School schedules – Daylight savings – Special events – Weather

Selecting Days of the Week Select one weekday and one weekend day to gather different levels Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays are not statistically significantly different

Selecting Time of Day Consistency is key Peak periods include: – Weekday, 10AM-Noon – Weekday, 5-7 PM – Saturday, Noon-2pm Actual local peak periods may vary considerably

Selecting Locations Depends on reason for collecting data – Area-wide estimation of activity – Before-after analysis – Facility use – Exposure data – Transit access mode share – Etc….

Count Types Screenline Intersection Count everyone who passes Count anyone who enters your intersection and note movement

Screenline and Intersection Counts Screenline Counts Volume on a corridor Simpler, allows counters to collect other info easily Less training needed Automatic counters can be used Intersection Counts Volume Approximate exposure Turning movements More complicated Requires more training Automatic counters can’t be used

Quality Control It is important to include quality control measures – Spot field checks – Review and verification of data within a day or two of collection to identify discrepancies – Use of counters who care a lot about bicycle and pedestrian issues has been shown to improve the accuracy of counts.

Forms Intersection form Screenline form Forms available on website

Data Input  Name  Location  Date  Time Period  Weather

Data Input: Screenline Count Form  15 minute intervals  Count from each direction  Count by gender  Count number of people on bicycle  People in wheelchairs counted as pedestrians

Intersection Count Form Separate bicycle and pedestrian count forms Does not differentiate by gender Allows counters to collect turning movements 15-minute intervals 2-hour period can be collected on 1 sheet

Data Input: Intersection Count Form  15 minute intervals  Note movement through intersection  May use different symbols for bikes/peds  Or a symbol for sidewalk riding or road walking

Data Input: Intersection Crossing Enter after field work Total and summarize data for after the count and for input into the national database

Conducting Screenline Counts

Screenline Count Count everyone who passes

Count Form

Data Input  Name  Location  Date  Time Period  Weather

Data Input  By gender  15 minute intervals  People on Bicycles  Pedestrians - including wheelchairs  Others - skateboarders & rollerbladers  Anybody passing the screenline (from both directions)

Data Input

Returning Count Forms Count forms collected by the sponsoring agency Enter data in spreadsheet available at: – NBPD updated the spreadsheets for the 2009 count effort Send data sheets to

Subjects

How do you count this?

5!

How do you count this?

2!

How do you count this?

4!

How do you count this?

Other!

By the park.

How do you count this?

0!

How do you count this?

2! How do you count this?

2

Trail Counts with Automatic Counters The corner of Nørrebrogade and Søtorvet, in Copenhagen sees over 36,000 bicycles per day!

Count Technologies Passive InfraredDetects change in thermal contrast Active InfraredDetects obstruction in beam Video ImagingAnalyzes pixel changes or Data is played by and analyzed by a person In-Pavement Magnetic Loop Sense change in magnetic field as metal passes over Slab SensorDetects change in pressure to measure footsteps

Passive Infrared Little maintenance Easy to move Can detect travel in both directions 70-95% accuracy Can not distinguish between bicycles and pedestrians Grouping poses problem Cost estimate: $1,000-$3,000 each

Active Infrared Little maintenance Easy to move Can distinguish between bicycles and pedestrians 90-95% accurate Can not detect travel direction Requires equipment on both sides of path Grouping poses problem Cost estimate: $700-$1,000 each

Video Imaging Little maintenance Can record travel in both directions Can distinguish between bicycles and pedestrians Difficult to move Requires review Cost estimate: Varies on hours and number of locations

In-Pavement Loop Detection Little maintenance Grouping does not cause significant problem Can detect travel in both directions 95% accurate Difficult to move More expensive Cost estimate: $1,800-$3,000 each

Acoustic Slab Cost estimate: $1,000-$3,000 each Only detects pedestrians Difficult to move More expensive Little maintenance Grouping does not cause significant problem Can detect travel in both directions 95% accurate

Working with the equipment Installation & Mounting – Narrow area – Clear view of path – Avoid sun soaked trees Data downloads Issues Rains and Flooding Vandalism

Where to put your counter Historic (manual) count location Trail head approach › Major access point › Near transit › High use areas Areas of planned improvement High conflict areas Stakeholder recommendations

What the data will tell you Average Activity by Hour

What the data will tell you

Activity by Month

Why Use Automatic Counters? Consistent data rather than a snap shot › Weather › Seasonal variations in use › Events All influence manual counts More cost effective than coordinating volunteers More in-depth data than manual counts

Day of Count Be available to Abby via text, phone and social media Bring a hat Bring some water Bring extra pens or pencils Wear comfortable shoes Be ready to count!

Questions? Thank you! Ann Freiwald